Liquidity and information asymmetry considerations in corporate takeovers

References

• Abadie, Alberto, and Guido W. Imbens. 2006. “Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects.” Econometrica 74 (1): 235–267. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00655.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adra, Samer, and Leonidas G. Barbopoulos. 2018. “The Valuation Effects of Investor Attention in Stock-Financed Acquisitions.” Journal of Empirical Finance 45: 108–125. doi: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2017.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandridis, George, Nikolaos Antypas, and Nickolaos Travlos. 2017. “Value Creation From M&As: New Evidence.” Journal of Corporate Finance 45: 632–650. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandridis, George, Kathleen P. Fuller, Lars Terhaar, and Nickolaos G. Travlos. 2013. “Deal Size, Acquisition Premia and Shareholder Gains.” Journal of Corporate Finance 20 (April): 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2012.10.006.
   Google Scholar
• Amihud, Yakov, and Haim Mendelson. 1988. “Liquidity and Asset Prices: Financial Management Implications.” Financial Management 17 (1): 5–15. doi: 10.2307/3665910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoniou, Antonios, Philippe Arbour, and Huainan Zhao. 2008. “How Much Is Too Much: Are Merger Premiums Too High?” European Financial Management 14 (2): 268–287. doi:10.1111/j.1468-036X.2007.00404.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avramov, Doron, and Tarun Chordia. 2006. “Asset Pricing Models and Financial Market Anomalies.” Review of Financial Studies 19 (3): 1001–1040. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhj025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbopoulos, L., and S. Adra. 2016. “The Earnout Structure Matters: Takeover Premia and Acquirer Gains in Earnout Financed M&As.” International Review of Financial Analysis 45: 283–294. doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2016.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker-Blease, John R., and Donna L. Paul. 2006. “Stock Liquidity and Investment Opportunities: Evidence From Index Additions.” Financial Management 35 (3): 35–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-053X.2006.tb00146.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betton, Sandra, B. Espen Eckbo, and Karin S. Thorburn. 2009. “Merger Negotiations and the Toehold Puzzle.” Journal of Financial Economics 91 (2): 158–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, Audra L, and J. Harold Mulherin. 2007. “How Are Firms Sold?” The Journal of Finance 62 (2): 847–875. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01225.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boot, Arnoud WA, Radhakrishnan Gopalan, and Anjan V. Thakor. 2008. “Market Liquidity, Investor Participation, and Managerial Autonomy: Why Do Firms Go Private?” The Journal of Finance 63 (4): 2013–2059. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01380.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capron, Laurence, and Jung-Chin Shen. 2007. “Acquisitions of Private vs. Public Firms: Private Information, Target Selection, and Acquirer Returns.” Strategic Management Journal 28 (9): 891–911. doi:10.1002/smj.612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Saeyoung. 1998. “Takeovers of Privately Held Targets, Methods of Payment, and Bidder Returns.” The Journal of Finance 53 (2): 773–784. doi:10.1111/0022-1082.315138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chordia, Tarun, Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, and Qing Tong. 2014. “Have Capital Market Anomalies Attenuated in the Recent Era of High Liquidity and Trading Activity?” Journal of Accounting and Economics 58: 41–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz, Kaon Belén Díaz, Sergio Sanfilippo Azofra, and Carlos López Gutiérrez. 2009. “Are M&A Premiums Too High? Analysis of a Quadratic Relationship Between Premiums and Returns.” Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting 48 (3): 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Draper, Paul, and Krishna Paudyal. 2006. “Acquisitions: Private Versus Public.” European Financial Management 12 (1): 57–80. doi:10.1111/j.1354-7798.2006.00310.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekkayokkaya, Manapol, Phil Holmes, and Krishna Paudyal. 2009. “Limited Information and the Sustainability of Unlisted-Target Acquirers’ Returns.” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 36 (9–10). Wiley Blackwell: 1201–1227. http://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v36y2009-11i9-10p1201-1227.html. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02166.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faccio, Mara, and R. W. Masulis. 2005. “The Choice of Payment Method in European Mergers and Acquisitions.” The Journal of Finance 60 (3): 1345–1388. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00764.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, Kathleen, Jeffry Netter, and Mike Stegemoller. 2002. “What Do Returns to Acquiring Firms Tell Us? Evidence From Firms That Make Many Acquisitions.” The Journal of Finance 57 (4): 1763–1793. doi:10.1111/1540-6261.00477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hujer, Reinhard, Marco Caliendo, and Stephan L. Thomsen. 2004. “New Evidence on the Effects of Job Creation Schemes in Germany—A Matching Approach with Threefold Heterogeneity.” Research in Economics 58 (4): 257–302. doi:10.1016/j.rie.2004.07.001.
   Google Scholar
• Koeplin, John, Atulya Sarin, and Alan C. Shapiro. 2000. “The Private Company Discount.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 12 (4): 94–101. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6622.2000.tb00022.x.
   Google Scholar
• Kohers, Ninon. 2004. “Acquisitions of Private Targets: The Unique Shareholder Wealth Implications.” Applied Financial Economics 14 (16). Routledge: 1151–1165. doi:10.1080/09603100412331297676.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Hai, Junbo Wang, and Chunchi Wu. 2011. “Liquidity Risk and Expected Corporate Bond Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics 99: 628–650. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massa, Massimo, and Moqi Xu. 2013. “The Value of (Stock) Liquidity in the M&A Market.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 48 (5): 1463–1497. doi: 10.1017/S0022109013000604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, Dennis C., and Mark L. Sirower. 2003. “The Causes of Mergers: Tests Based on the Gains to Acquiring Firms’ Shareholders and the Size of Premia.” Managerial and Decision Economics 24 (5): 373–391. doi:10.1002/mde.1103.
   Google Scholar
• Muthoo, Abhinay. 1999. Bargaining Theory with Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Officer, Micah S. 2007. “The Price of Corporate Liquidity: Acquisition Discounts for Unlisted Targets.” Journal of Financial Economics 83 (3): 571–598. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Officer, Micah S., Annette B. Poulsen, and Mike Stegemoller. 2009. “Target-Firm Information Asymmetry and Acquirer Returns.” Review of Finance 13 (3): 467–493. doi:10.1093/rof/rfn017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, Martin J., and Ariel Rubinstein. 1990. Bargaining and Markets. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pastor, Lubos, and Robert F. Stambaugh. 2003. “Liquidity Risk and Expected Stock Returns.” Journal of Political Economy 111 (3): 642–685. doi: 10.1086/374184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peel, Michael J., and Gerald H. Makepeace. 2012. “Differential Audit Quality, Propensity Score Matching and Rosenbaum Bounds for Confounding Variables.” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 39 (February): 606–648. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5957.2012.02287.x.
   Google Scholar
• Roll, Richard. 1986. “The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers.” The Journal of Business 59: 197–216. doi: 10.1086/296325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roosenboom, Peter, Frederik P. Schlingemann, and Manuel Vasconcelos. 2014. “Does Stock Liquidity Affect Incentives to Monitor? Evidence From Corporate Takeovers.” The Review of Financial Studies 27 (8): 2392–2433. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hht076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, Paul. 2002. Observational Studies. Springer Series in Statistics. New York, NY: Springer New York. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3692-2.
   Google Scholar
• Shleifer, Andrei, and Robert W. Vishny. 2003. “Stock Market Driven Acquisitions.” Journal of Financial Economics 70: 295–311. doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00211-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sianesi, Barbara. 2004. “An Evaluation of the Swedish System of Active Labor Market Programs in the 1990s.” Review of Economics and Statistics 86 (1): 133–155. doi: 10.1162/003465304323023723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Jeffrey, and Petra Todd. 2005. “Does Matching Overcome LaLonde’s Critique of Nonexperimental Estimators?” Journal of Econometrics 125 (1–2): 305–353. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travlos, Nickolaos G. 1987. “Corporate Takeover Bids, Methods of Payment, and Bidding Firms’ Stock Returns.” The Journal of Finance 42 (4): 943–963. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb03921.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar