The transformation of targeted killing and international order

Reference list

• Abrahams, M., & Mierau, J. (2015). Leadership matters: The effects of targeted killings on militant group tactics. Terrorism and Political Violence. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/09546553.2015.1069671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerman, S. (2015, September 9). Drone strikes by UK and Pakistan point to Obama’s counter-terror legacy. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2dtNmFq
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, D. I. (2013). Defending weak states against the “unwilling or unable” doctrine of self-defense. Journal of International Law and International Relations, 9, 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ainley, K. (2008). Individual agency and responsibility for atrocity. In R. Jeffery (Ed.), Confronting evil in international relations (pp. 37–60). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Albright, M. (1998, February 19). Remarks at University of South Carolina Columbia, South Carolina. US Department of State. Retrieved from http://1.usa.gov/1OvOnvL
   Google Scholar
• Aloyo, E. (2013). Just assassinations. International Theory, 5, 347–381. doi: 10.1017/S1752971913000237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alston, P. (2010). Report of the special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions: Addendum: Study on targeted killings (Report to the Human Rights Council, UN, Doc. A/HRC/14/24/Add.6). Retrieved from http://bit.ly/1lQMxqK
   Google Scholar
• Alston, P. (2011). The CIA and targeted killings beyond borders. Harvard National Security Journal, 2, 284–446.
   Google Scholar
• Altman, A. (2012). Introduction. In C. Finkelstein, J. D. Ohlin, & A. Altman (Eds.), Targeted killings: Law and morality in an asymmetrical world (pp. 1–27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Altman, A., & Wellman, C. H. (2008). From humanitarian intervention to assassination: Human rights and political violence. Ethics, 118, 228–257. doi: 10.1086/526543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. (2012). Efficiency in bello and ad bellum: Making the use of force too easy? In C. Finkelstein, J. D. Ohlin, & A. Altman (Eds.), Targeted killings: Law and morality in an asymmetrical world (pp. 374–399). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anter, A. (2007). Die Macht der Ordnung: Aspekte einer Grundkategorie des Politischen (2nd ed.). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
   Google Scholar
• Arend, A. C. (2003). International law and the preemptive use of military force. The Washington Quarterly, 26, 89–103. doi: 10.1162/01636600360569711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, J. B. (1972). Assassination in international politics. Lord Moyne, Count Bernadotte, and the Lehi. International Studies Quarterly, 16(1), 59–82. doi: 10.2307/3013473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Yehuda, N. (1990). Political assassinations as rhetorical devices: Events and interpretations. Terrorism and Political Violence, 2, 324–350. doi: 10.1080/09546559008427069
   Google Scholar
• Beres, L. R. (1990). Assassinating Saddam Hussein. The view from international law. Indiana International & Comparative Law Review, 13, 847–869.
   Google Scholar
• Bially-Mattern, J. (2005). Ordering international politics: Identity, crisis, and representational force. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, T. (1999, April 24). Prime Minister’s speech: Doctrine of the international community at the Economic Club. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/1OvPg7M
   Google Scholar
• Blum, G., & Heymann, P. (2010). Law and policy of targeted killing. Harvard National Security Journal, 1, 145–179.
   Google Scholar
• Bob, C., & Erikson Nepstad, S. (2007). Kill a leader, murder a movement? Leadership and assassination in social movements. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1370–1394. doi: 10.1177/0002764207300162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrie, J. (2014). Humanitarian reframing of nuclear weapons and the logic of a ban. International Affairs, 90, 625–646. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.12130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. J. (2013). The costs and consequences of drone warfare. International Affairs, 89, 1–29. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.12002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. J. (2015). The legal and ethical implications of drone warfare. The International Journal of Human Rights, 19, 105–126. doi: 10.1080/13642987.2014.991210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, M., & Brunstetter, D. R. (2013). Rethinking the criterion for assessing CIA-targeted killings: Drones, proportionality and jus ad vim. Journal of Military Ethics, 12, 304–324. doi: 10.1080/15027570.2013.869390
   Google Scholar
• Brincat, S. K. (2008a). Death to tyrants: The political philosophy of tyrannicide-part I. Journal of International Political Theory, 4, 212–240. doi: 10.3366/E1755088208000220
   Google Scholar
• Brincat, S. K. (2008b). Death to tyrants: The political philosophy of tyrannicide-part II. Journal of International Political Theory, 5, 75–93. doi: 10.3366/E1755088209000330
   Google Scholar
• Brincat, S. K. (2009). The legal philosophy of internationally assisted tyrannicide. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 34, 151–192.
   Google Scholar
• Brunstetter, D. R., & Braun, M. (2011). The implications of drones on the just war tradition. Ethics & International Affairs, 25, 337–358. doi: 10.1017/S0892679411000281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunstetter, D. R., & Jiminez-Bacardi, A. (2015). Clashing over drones: The legal and normative gap between the United States and the human rights community. The International Journal of Human Rights, 19, 176–198. doi: 10.1080/13642987.2014.991214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A., & Keohane, R. O. (2015). Toward a drone accountability regime. Ethics & International Affairs, 29, 15–37. doi: 10.1017/S0892679414000732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, H. (1995). The anarchical society: A study of order in world politics. London: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burgers, T., & Romaniuk, S. N. (2016, August 12). Is China establishing a norm prohibiting lethal drone strikes in Asia? The Diplomat. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2cNpYV2
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B. (2004). From international to world society? English school theory and the social construction of globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B. (2014). An introduction to the English school of international relations: The societal approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Búzás, Z. I. (2016). Evading international law: How agents comply with the letter of the law but violate its purpose. European Journal of International Relations. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1354066116679242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byman, D. (2006). Do targeted killings work? Foreign Affairs, 85(2), 95–111. doi: 10.2307/20031914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, I. (2015). Value-freeness and value-neutrality in the analysis of political concepts. In D. Sobel, P. Vallentyne, & S. Wall (Eds.), Oxford studies in political philosophy. (Vol. 1, pp. 278–306). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669530.003.0012
   Google Scholar
• Carvin, S. (2012). The trouble with targeted killing. Security Studies, 21, 529–555. doi: 10.1080/09636412.2012.706513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvin, S. (2015). Getting drones wrong. The International Journal of Human Rights, 19, 127–141. doi: 10.1080/13642987.2014.991212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coady, C.A.J. (2013). Collateral damage. In H. LaFollette (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of ethics. Wiley. doi: 10.1002/9781444367072
   Google Scholar
• Corn, G. S. (2012). Self-defense targeting: Blurring the line between the jus ad bellum and the jus ad bello. In K. Watkin & A. J. Norris (Eds.), Non-international armed conflict in the twenty-first century (pp. 57–92). Newport, RI: Naval War College.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, E., & Pert, A. (2015). International humanitarian law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, N. C. (2013). Accountability for killing: Moral responsibility for collateral damage in America’s post-9/11 wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• David, S. R. (2003). Israel’s policy of targeted killing. Ethics & International Affairs, 17, 111–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-7093.2003.tb00422.x
   Google Scholar
• Deeks, A. S. (2012). “Unwilling or unable”: Toward a new normative framework for extraterritorial self-defense. Virginia Journal of International Law, 52, 483–550.
   Google Scholar
• de Wijze, S. (2009). Targeted killing: A “dirty hand’ analysis. Contemporary Politics, 15, 305–320. doi: 10.1080/13569770903118762
   Google Scholar
• Dill, J. (2015). The 21st-century belligerent’s trilemma. The European Journal of International Law, 26, 83–108. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chv005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinstein, Y. (2011). War, aggression, self-defence (5th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dinstein, Y. (2016). The conduct of hostilities under the law of armed conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K. (2016). The philosophy and methods of political science. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, M. (2011). Killing kings: Patterns of regicide in Europe, AD 600–1800. British Journal of Criminology, 51, 556–577. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azr004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elster, J. (1989). The cement of society: A study of social order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enemark, C., & Michelsen, C. (2005). Just War doctrine and the invasion of Iraq. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 51, 545–563. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8497.2005.00393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esquivel, J. (1979). Assassination and tyrannicide. Crítica: Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía, 11(33), 3–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (2013). The great drone debate. Military Review, 93(2), 2–13.
   Google Scholar
• Fair, C. C., Kaltenthaler, K., & Miller, W. J. (2014). Pakistani opposition to American drone strikes. Political Science Quarterly, 129, 1–33. doi: 10.1002/polq.12145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, O. (2014). Permissibility of targeted killing. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 37, 295–321. doi: 10.1080/1057610X.2014.879380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farer, R., & Bernard, F. (2016). Killing by drone: Towards the uneasy reconciliation with the values of a liberal state. Human Rights Quarterly, 38, 108–133. doi: 10.1353/hrq.2016.0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhat, T. (2010). The year of the drone misinformation. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 21, 529–535. doi: 10.1080/09592318.2010.505486
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, C., Ohlin, J. D., & Altman, A. (2012). Targeted killings: Law and morality in an asymmetrical world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, J. W. (2006). Targeted killing, norms, and international law. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 45, 711–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisk, K., & Ramos, J. M. (2014). Actions speak louder than words: Preventive self-defense as a cascading norm. International Studies Perspectives, 15, 163–185. doi: 10.1111/insp.12013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisk, K., & Ramos, J. M. (2016). Preventive force: Drones, targeted killing, and the transformation of contemporary warfare. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flockhart, T. (2016). The coming multi-order world. Contemporary Security Policy, 37, 3–30. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2016.1150053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, F. L. (1985). Political murder: From tyrannicide to terrorism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, S. B. (2013). Jus ad vim and the just use of lethal force-short-of-war. In F. Allhoff, N. G. Evans, & A. Henschke (Eds.), Routledge handbook of ethics and war (pp. 63–75). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foust, J. (2011, December 30). Unaccountable killing machines: The true costs of U.S. drones. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://theatln.tc/2aYRVtJ
   Google Scholar
• Frowe, H. (2016). On the redundancy of jus ad vim: A response to Daniel Brunstetter and Megan Braun. Ethics & International Affairs, 30, 117–129. doi: 10.1017/S0892679415000659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political order and political decay: From the industrial revolution to the globalisation of democracy. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gazit, N., & Brym, R. J. (2011). State-directed political assassination in Israel: A political hypothesis. International Sociology, 26, 862–877. doi: 10.1177/0268580910394006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, D. (1988). Distinguishing classical tyrannicide from modern terrorism. The Review of Politics, 50, 390–419. doi: 10.1017/S0034670500036317
   Google Scholar
• Gill, P., Piazza, J. A., & Horgan, J. (2016). Counterterrorism killings and provisional IRA bombings, 1970–1998. Terrorism and Political Violence, 28, 473–496. doi: 10.1080/09546553.2016.1155932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilli, A., & Gilli, M. (2016). The diffusion of drone warfare? Industrial, organizational, and infrastructural constraints. Security Studies, 25, 50–84. doi: 10.1080/09636412.2016.1134189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilpin, R. (1981). War and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goertz, G. (2006). Social science concepts: A user’s guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grayson, K. (2012). Six theses on targeted killing. Politics, 32, 120–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2012.01434.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, T. (2017). Targeted killings: Drones, noncombatant immunity, and the politics of killing. Contemporary Security Policy, 38, 212–236. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2017.1336296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Großklaus, M. (2017). Friction, not erosion: Assassination norms at the fault line between sovereignity and liberal values. Contemporary Security Policy, 38, 260–280. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2017.1335135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, M. L. (2006). Assassination and targeted killing: Law enforcement, execution or self-defence? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 23, 323–335. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00347.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, M. L. (2010). Moral dilemmas of modern war: Torture, assassination, and blackmail in an age of asymmetric conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guiora, A. (2004). Targeted killing as active self-defense. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 36, 319–334.
   Google Scholar
• Guiora, A. (2012). Determining a legitimate target: The dilemma of the decision-maker. Texas International Law Journal, 47, 315–336.
   Google Scholar
• Guiora, A. (2013). Legitimate target: A criteria-based approach to targeted killing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunneflo, M. (2016). Targeted killing: A legal and political history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, M. C., & Fischer, S.-C. (2017). The evolution of targeted killing practices: Autonomous weapons, future conflict, and the international order. Contemporary Security Policy, 38, 281–306. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2017.1336407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafez, M. M., & Hatfield, J. M. (2006). Do targeted assassinations work? A multivariate analysis of Israel’s controversial tactic during Al-Aqsa uprising. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 29, 359–382. doi: 10.1080/10576100600641972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakimi, M. (2012). A functional approach to targeting and detention. Michigan Law Review, 110, 1365–1420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haque, A. A. (2017). Law and morality at war. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hauner, M. (2007). Terrorism and heroism: The assassination of Reinhard Heydrich. World Policy Journal, 24(2), 85–89. doi: 10.1162/wopj.2007.24.2.85
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. (1968). The confusion of language in political thought. Tondbridge: The Institute of Economic Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. (1973). Law, legislation, and liberty: A new statement on the liberal principles of justice and political economy (Vol. 1, Rules and Order). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, I. (2009). The contemporary law of targeting: Military objectives, proportionality and precautions in attack under additional protocol I. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hennigan, W. J. (2016, February 22). A fast growing club: Countries that use drones for killing by remote control. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://lat.ms/1TzuDZc
   Google Scholar
• Himes, K. R. (2016). Drones and the ethics of targeted killing. Lanhamn, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, S. (1987). Janus and Minerva: Essays in the theory and practice of international politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holsti, K. J. (2004). Taming the sovereigns: Institutional change in international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holzscheiter, A. (2014). Between communicative interaction and structures of signification: Discourse theory and analysis in international relations. International Studies Perspectives, 15, 142–162. doi: 10.1111/insp.12005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopgood, S. (2013). The endtimes of human rights. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M. C., & Fuhrman, M. (2015). Droning on: Explaining the proliferation of unmanned aerial vehicles. SSRN. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2514339
   Google Scholar
• Hosmer, S. T. (2001). Operations against enemy leaders, MR-1385-AF. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, L., Owen, C. S., & Flannes, M. (2011). Drone warfare: Blowback from the new American way of war. Middle East Policy, 18(3), 122–132. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4967.2011.00502.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurd, I. (2017a). The permissive power of the ban on war. European Journal of International Security, 2, 1–18. doi: 10.1017/eis.2016.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurd, I. (2017b). Targeted killing in international relations theory: Recursive politics of technology, law, and practice. Contemporary Security Policy, 38, 307–319. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2017.1336605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurrell, A. (2007). On global order: Power, values and the constitution of international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal, Z., & Zorn, C. (2008). The political consequences of assassination. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52, 385–400. doi: 10.1177/0022002707310855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. (2000). The global covenant: Human conduct in a world of states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, D., & Kaplan, E. H. (2007). Suicide bombings and targeted killings in (counter-) terror games. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51, 772–792. doi: 10.1177/0022002707304814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jervis, R. (2012). System effects revisited. Critical Review, 24, 393–415. doi: 10.1080/08913811.2012.767048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. (2007). Mortus discriminatus: Procedures in targeted killing (Master’s thesis). Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA. Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a469936.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. T. (2014). Sovereignty: Moral and historical perspectives. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, P. B. (2012). Does decapitation work? Assessing the effectiveness of leadership targeting in counterinsurgency campaigns. International Security, 36(4), 47–79. doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, P. B., & Sarbahi, A. K. (2016). The impact of US drone strikes on terrorism in Pakistan. International Studies Quarterly, 60, 203–219. doi:10.1093/isq/sqv1004 doi: 10.1093/isq/sqv004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. F., & Olken, B. (2009). Hit or miss? The effects of assassinations on institutions and war. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 1(2), 55–87. doi: 10.1257/mac.1.2.55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, J. (2009). When heads roll: Assessing the effectiveness of leadership decapitation. Security Studies, 18, 719–755. doi: 10.1080/09636410903369068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, J. (2014). Attacking the leader, missing the mark: Why terrorists groups survive decapitation strikes. International Security, 38(4), 7–38. doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jose, B. (2016). Bin Laden’s targeted killing and emerging norms. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 10(1), 44–66. doi: 10.1080/17539153.2016.1221662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jose, B. (2017). Not completely the new normal: How Human Rights Watch tried to suppress the targeted killing norm. Contemporary Security Policy, 38, 237–259. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2017.1334856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldor, M. (2007). Human security: Reflections on globalization and intervention. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S. N., Shapiro, I., & Masoud, T. (2008). Introduction: Integrating the study of order, conflict, and violence. In S. N. Kalyvas, I. Shapiro, & T. Masoud (Eds.), Order, conflict, and violence (pp. 1–14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E. H., Mintz, A., Mishal, S., & Samban, C. (2005). What happened to suicide bombings in Israel? Insights from a terror stock model. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 28, 225–235. doi: 10.1080/10576100590928115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoepfler, S. (2010). Dead or alive: The future of U.S. assassination policy under a just war tradition. New York University Journal of Law & Liberty, 5, 457–499.
   Google Scholar
• Krasner, S. D. (2001). Rethinking the sovereign state model. Review of International Studies, 27(5), 17–42. doi: 10.1017/S0260210501008014
   Google Scholar
• Krasner, S. D. (2013). Recognition: Organized hypocrisy once again. International Theory, 5, 170–176. doi: 10.1017/S1752971913000092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreps, S., & Kaag, J. (2012). The use of unmanned aerial vehicles in contemporary conflicts: A legal and ethical analysis. Polity, 44, 260–285. doi: 10.1057/pol.2012.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretzmer, D. (2005). Targeted killing of suspected terrorists: Extra-judicial executions or legitimate means of defence? European Journal of International Law, 16, 171–212. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chi114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantis, J. S. (2016). Arms and influence: U.S. technology innovations and the evolution of international security norms. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lascurettes, K. M. (2011). The disorderly state of ‘international order’: In search of an elusive concept. Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series. Retrieved from http://www.concepts-methods.org/Files/WorkingPaper/PC_52_Lascurettes.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrke, J. P., & Schomaker, R. (2016). Kill, capture, or defend? The effectiveness of specific and general counterterrorism tactics against the global threats of the post-9/11 era. Security Studies, 25, 729–762. doi: 10.1080/09636412.2016.1220199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesaffer, R. (2015). Too much history: From war as sanction to the sanctioning of war. In M. Weller (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the use of force in international Law (pp. 35–55). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lorand, R. (1994). The concept of order. Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly, 43, 305–327.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, J. (2016). Ethics, law and justifying targeted killings: The Obama administration at war. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, C. (2012). Going medieval: Targeted killing, self-defense and the jus ad bellum regime. In C. Finkelstein, J. D. Ohlin, & A. Altman (Eds.), Targeted killings: Law and morality in an asymmetrical world (pp. 223–252). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, M. (2012). Rebutting the civilian presumption: Playing whack-a-mole without a mallet? In C. Finkelstein, J. D. Ohlin, & A. Altman (Eds.), Targeted killings: Law and morality in an asymmetrical world (pp. 31–59). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazarr, M. J., Priebe, M., Radin, A., & Stuth Cevallos, A. (2016). Understanding the current international order. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• McGovern, G. (2010). Targeted violence: A statistical and tactical analysis of assassinations, contract killings, and kidnappings. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• McMahan, J. (2009). Killing in war. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeal, G. (2012). Are targeted killings unlawful? A case study in empirical claims without empirical evidence. In C. Finkelstein, J. D. Ohlin, & A. Altman (Eds.), Targeted killings: Law and morality in an asymmetrical world (pp. 326–346). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, G. (2014). Targeted killing and accountability. Georgetown Law Journal, 102, 681–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melzer, N. (2008). Targeted killing in international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. V. (2012). The privilege of belligerency and formal declarations of war. In C. Finkelstein, J. D. Ohlin, & A. Altman (Eds.), Targeted killings: Law and morality in an asymmetrical world (pp. 183–219). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morehouse, M. A. (2014). It’s easier to decapitate a snake than it is a hydra: An analysis of Colombia’s targeted killing program. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 37, 541–566. doi: 10.1080/1057610X.2014.913118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morehouse, M. A. (2015). The claws of the bear: Russia’s targeted killing program. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 28, 269–298. doi: 10.1080/13518046.2015.1030231
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, J. D. (2014). Order within anarchy: The laws of war as international institution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, R., & Radsan, A. J. (2009). Due process and targeting killing of terrorists. Cardozo Law Review, 31, 405–450.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, T. M. (2016). Sovereignty and preventive war in the twenty-first century. A retrospective on—eve of destruction: The coming age of preventive war. In K. Fisk & J. M. Ramos (Eds.), Preventive force: Drones, targeted killing, and the transformation of contemporary warfare (pp. 88–112). New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell, M. E. (2010). Unlawful killing with combat drones: A case study of Pakistan, 2004–2009 (Norte Dame Law School, Legal Studies Research Paper (09-34)). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1501144.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlin, J. D. (2012). Targeting co-belligerents. In C. Finkelstein, J. D. Ohlin, & A. Altman (Eds.), Targeted killings: Law and morality in an asymmetrical world (pp. 60–89). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlin, J. D. (forthcoming). Remoteness and reciprocal risk. In J. D. Ohlin (Ed.), Research handbook on remote warfare. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Press. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2811271
   Google Scholar
• Otto, R. (2012). Targeted killings and international law. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pape, R. A. (1996). Bombing to win: Air power and coercion in war. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, E., & Casale, T. (2005). Targeting terror: The ethical and practical implications of targeted killing. International Journal of Intelligence and Counter Intelligence, 18, 638–652. doi: 10.1080/08850600590945407
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, A. (2011). War, religion and empire. The transformation of international orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plaw, A. (2008). Targeting terrorists: A license to kill? Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Plaw, A. (2013). Counting the dead: The proportionality of predation in Pakistan. In B. J. Strawser (Ed.), Killing by remote control: The ethics of an unmanned military (pp. 126–153). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price, B. C. (2012). Targeting top terrorists: How leadership decapitation contributes to counterterrorism. International Security, 36(4), 9–46. doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protevi, J. (2008). Affect, agency and responsibility: The act of killing in the age of cyborgs. Phenomenology and Cognitive Sciences, 7, 405–413. doi: 10.1007/s11097-008-9097-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ralph, J. (2007). Defending the society of states. Why America opposes the international criminal court and its vision of world society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reinold, T. (2011a). The sovereignty dodge and the responsibility to control: Should the US do what Pakistan won’t do? Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 5, 395–417. doi: 10.1080/17502977.2011.625792
   Google Scholar
• Reinold, T. (2011b). State weakness, irregular warfare, and the right of self-defense. The American Journal of International Law, 105, 244–286. doi: 10.5305/amerjintelaw.105.2.0244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinold, T. (2014). Sovereignty and the responsibility to protect: The power of norms and the norms of the powerful. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ringmar, E. (2012). Performing international systems: Two east-Asian alternatives to the Westphalian order. International Organization, 66, 1–25. doi: 10.1017/S0020818312000033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, W. (2008). Dynamics of international norm change: Rules against wartime plunder. European Journal of International Relations, 14, 101–131. doi: 10.1177/1354066107087766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasson, J. (2012). Saddam Hussein’s Ba’th Party: Inside an authoritarian regime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, C., & Shane, S. (2016, 1 July). U.S. reveals death toll from airstrikes outside war zones. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://nyti.ms/29988rX.
   Google Scholar
• Sayler, K. (2015). A world of proliferated drones: A technology primer. Washington, DC: Center for New American Security.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M. N. (1992). State-sponsored assassination in international and domestic Law. Yale Journal of International Law, 17, 618–651.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M. N. (2006). Targeting and humanitarian law: Current issues. International Law Studies, 80, 151–194.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M. N. (2010). Drone attacks under the jus ad bellum and jus in bello: Clearing the ‘fog of law’. In H. Krieger (Ed.), Yearbook of international humanitarian law (pp. 311–326). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M. N. (2011). Essays on law and war at the fault lines. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sikkink, K. (2011). The justice cascade: How human rights prosecutions are changing world politics. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, G. (2004). Great powers and outlaw states: Unequal sovereigns in the international legal order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. W. (2012, January 21). Do drones undermine democracy? The New York Times. Retrieved from http://nyti.ms/2bCt0dp
   Google Scholar
• Solis, G. D. (2016). The law of armed conflict: International humanitarian law in war (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Statman, D. (2004). Targeted killing. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 5, 179–198. doi: 10.2202/1565-3404.1090
   Google Scholar
• Statman, D. (2012). Can just war theory justify targeted killing? Three possible models. In C. Finkelstein, J. D. Ohlin, & A. Altman (Eds.), Targeted killings: Law and morality in an asymmetrical world (pp. 90–11). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strawser, B. J. (2010). Moral predators: The duty to employ uninhabited aerial vehicles. Journal of Military Ethics, 9, 342–368. doi: 10.1080/15027570.2010.536403
   Google Scholar
• Strawser, B. J. (Ed.) (2014). Opposing perspectives on the drone debate. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, S., Quirk, J., & Zhang, Y. (2014). International orders in the early modern world: Before the rise of the west. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, S. (2016). Order: A conceptual analysis. Chinese Political Science Review, 1, 30–46. doi: 10.1007/s41111-016-0001-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teergarden, D. A. (2014). Death to tyrants! Ancient Greek democracy and the struggle against tyranny. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teitel, R. G. (2011). Humanity’s law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tesón, F. (2012). Targeted killings in war and peace: A philosophical analysis. In C. Finkelstein, J. D. Ohlin, & A. Altman (Eds.), Targeted killings: Law and morality in an asymmetrical world (pp. 403–433). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. (2011). Why don't we talk about ‘violence’ in international relations? Review of International Studies, 37, 1815–1836. doi: 10.1017/S0260210510001154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. A. (2014). The uses and abuses of legitimacy in international Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 34, 729–758. doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqu008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, W. (2001). The ethics of destruction: Norms and force in international relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, W. (2005). The new age of assassination. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 25(1), 27–39. doi: 10.1353/sais.2005.0021
   Google Scholar
• Tiernay, M. (2015). Killing Kony: Leadership change and civil war termination. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59, 175–206. doi: 10.1177/0022002713499720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1973). Convention on the prevention and punishment of crimes against internationally protected persons, including diplomatic agents (Vol. 1035, pp. 186–239). New York: United Nations, Treaty Series.
   Google Scholar
• Wachtel, H. A. (2005). Targeting Osama bin Laden: Examining the legality of assassination as a tool of U.S. foreign policy. Duke Law Journal, 55, 677–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (2016). Death squads and death lists: Targeted killing and the character of the state. Constellations, 23, 292–307. doi: 10.1111/1467-8675.12231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, W. (2011). A perpetual menace: Nuclear weapons and international order. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. (2006). Just and unjust wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations (4th ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. (2013). Targeted killing and drone warfare. Dissent. Retrieved from https://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/targeted-killing-and-drone-warfare
   Google Scholar
• Watson, A. (2017). Targeted killing: A new departure for British defence and security policy? Briefing. Remote Control Project. Retrieved from http://remotecontrolproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Targeted-Killing-PDF-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1992). Politik als Beruf. Stuttgart: Reclam.
   Google Scholar
• Wey, A. L. K. (2015). Killing the enemy: Assassination operations during World War II. London; New York, NY: I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. (2014). A theory of contestation. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G. D. (2013). Piercing the shield of sovereignty: An assessment of the legal status of the ‘unwilling or unable’ test. UNSW Law Journal, 36, 619–641.
   Google Scholar
• Wrong, D. H. (1994). The problem of order: What unites and divides society. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zellner, H. (Ed.). (1974). Assassination. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar