Reclaiming the local in EU peacebuilding: Effectiveness, ownership, and resistance

Reference list

• African Union. (2013). Policy framework on security sector reform. Addis Ababa: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Autesserre, S. (2014). Peaceland: Conflict resolution and the everyday politics of international intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Autesserre, S. (2017). International peacebuilding and local success: Assumptions and effectiveness. International Studies Review. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1093/isr/viw054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargués-Pedreny, P. (2015). Conceptualising local ownership as “reflexive cooperation: the deferral of self-government to protect “unequal” humans? In Global cooperation research papers (Vol. 11). Duisburg: Centre for Global Cooperation Research.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., Kim, H., O’Donnell, M., & Sitea, L. (2007). Peacebuilding: What is in the name. Global Governance, 13, 35–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendix, D., & Stanley, R. (2008). Deconstructing local ownership of security sector reform: A review of the literature. African Security Review, 17, 93–104. doi: 10.1080/10246029.2008.9627475
   Google Scholar
• Bickerton, C. (2011). European Union foreign policy: From effectiveness to functionality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Call, C., & Cousens, E. (2008). Ending wars and building peace: International responses to war-torn societies. International Studies Perspectives, 9, 1–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-3585.2007.00313.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Call, C., & Wyeth, V. (2008). Building states to build peace. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D. (2010). International statebuilding. The rise of post-liberal governance. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D. (2011). The liberal peace: Statebuilding, democracy and local ownership. In S. Tadjbakhs (Ed.), Rethinking the liberal peace: External models and local alternatives (pp. 77–88). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D., & Richmond, O. P. (2015). Contesting postliberalism: Governmentality or emancipation. Journal of International Relations and Development, 18, 1–24. doi: 10.1057/jird.2014.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesterman, S. (2007). Ownership in theory and in practice: Transfer of authority in UN statebuilding operations. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 1, 3–26. doi: 10.1080/17502970601075873
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C., & J. H. Mittelman. (1997). Conceptualising resistance to globalisation. New Political Economy, 2, 25–37. doi: 10.1080/13563469708406282
   Google Scholar
• Collantes-Celador, G., & Juncos, A. E. (2011). Security sector reform in the Western Balkans: The challenge of coherence and effectiveness. In M. Ekengren & G. Simons (Eds.), The politics of security sector reform: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 127–154). London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. W. (1981). Social forces, states and world orders: beyond international relations theory. Millennium, 10, 126–155.
   Google Scholar
• De Carvalho, G., De Coning, C., & Connolly, L. (2014). Creating an enabling peacebuilding environment: How can external actors contribute to resilience. Policy & practice brief. Umhlanga Rocks: Accord.
   Google Scholar
• De Waele, H., & Kuipers, J. J. (Eds.). (2013). The European Union’s emerging international identity: Views from the global arena. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• DFID. (2010). The politics of poverty: Elites, citizens and states: Findings from ten years of DFID-funded research on governance and fragile states 2001–2010 a synthesis paper. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/67679/plcy-pltcs-dfid-rsch-synth-ppr.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, H. (2013). Policy-making in EU security and defence: An institutional perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Donais, T. (2012). Peacebuilding and local ownership: Post-conflict consensus-building. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, M., & Sambanis, N. (2006). Making war and building peace: United nations peace operations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, M. W., & Sambanis, N. (2000). International peacebuilding: A theoretical and quantitative analysis. The American Political Science Review, 94, 779–801. doi: 10.2307/2586208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dursun-Ozkanca, O., & Vandemoortele, A. (2012). The European Union and security sector reform: Current practices and challenges of implementation. European Security, 21, 139–160. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2012.665881
   Google Scholar
• Ejdus, F. (2017). “Here is your mission, now own it!” The rhetoric and practice of local ownership in EU interventions. European Security, 26, 461–484. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2017.1333495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejdus, F. (2018). Local ownership as international governmentality: Evidence from EU mission in the Horn of Africa. Contemporary Security Policy, 39, 28–50. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2017.1384231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union. (1998). Working document of the commission of May 1998 on support for indigenous peoples in the development co-operation of the community and the member states. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2001). Communication of the commission on conflict prevention. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2005). EU concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR). Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2005). EU concept for ESDP support to Security Sector Reform (SSR). Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2006). The European consensus on development. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2015). Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy, the council joint communication to the European Parliament, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2016a). Shared vision, common action: A stronger Europe, a global strategy for the European Union’s foreign and security policy. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2016b). Joint communication to the European Parliament and the council, elements for an EU-wide strategic framework to support security sector reform. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2016c). Joint staff working document: Lessons drawn from past interventions and stakeholders’ views. Strasbourg: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Fortna, V. P. (2008). Does peacekeeping work? Shaping belligerents’ choices after civil war. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, M. R., & Simão, L. (2013). The EU’s security actorness: The case of EUMM in Georgia. European Security, 22, 464–477. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2013.808191
   Google Scholar
• Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6, 167–191. doi: 10.1177/002234336900600301
   Google Scholar
• Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF). (2016). Country case studies to inform the EU-wide strategic framework for supporting SSR: Findings from Mali, DRC and Ukraine. Geneva: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Gippert, B. (2018). The interaction between local and international power in EU police reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Contemporary Security Policy, 39, 51–71 doi: 10.1080/13523260.2017.1398529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grevi, G., Helly, D., & Keohane, D. (2009). European security and defence policy: The first ten years (1999–2009). Paris: The European Union Institute for Security Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Heathershaw, J. (2008). Unpacking the liberal peace: The dividing and merging of peacebuilding discourses. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 36, 597–621. doi: 10.1177/03058298080360031101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellmüller, S. (2014). Owners or partners? A critical analysis of the concept of local ownership. In S. Hellmüller & S. Santschi (Eds.), Is local beautiful? Peacebuilding between international interventions and locally led initiatives (pp. 3–14). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, J. A., & Einwohner, R. L. (2004). Conceptualizing resistance. Sociological Forum, 19, 533–554. doi: 10.1007/s11206-004-0694-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howorth, J. (2014). Security and defence policy in the European Union (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jabri, V. (2013). Peacebuilding, the local and the international: A colonial or a postcolonial rationality? Peacebuilding, 1, 3–16. doi: 10.1080/21647259.2013.756253
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. (2011). Security sector reform and state building. Third World Quarterly, 32, 1803–1822. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2011.610577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, E. (2007). Ownership is over-rated. Sais Review, 27, 109–123.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, J. (2012). The social in the global: Social theory, governmentality and global politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juncos, A. E. (2013). EU foreign and security policy in Bosnia. The politics of coherence and effectiveness. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juncos, A. E. (2017). Resilience as the new EU foreign policy paradigm: A pragmatist turn? European Security, 26, 1–18. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2016.1247809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juncos, A. E. (2018). EU security sector reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Reform or resist? Contemporary Security Policy, 39, 95–118. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2017.1391625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappler, S. (2014). Local agency and peacebuilding: EU and international engagement in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Cyprus and South Africa. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kappler, S. (2015). The dynamic local: Delocalisation and (re-)localisation in the search for peacebuilding identity. Third World Quarterly, 36, 875–889. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1025740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappler, S., & Lemay-Hébert, N. (2015). Hybrid local ownership in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo. In S. Y. Lee & A. Özerdem (Eds.), Local ownership in international peacebuilding: Key theoretical and practical issues (pp. 74–93). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kappler, S., & Richmond, O. P. (2011). Peacebuilding in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Resistance or emancipation? Security Dialogue, 42, 261–278. doi: 10.1177/0967010611405377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapid, Y. (1989). The third debate: On the prospects of international theory in a post-positivist era. International Studies Quarterly, 33, 235–254. doi: 10.2307/2600457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larivé, M. H. (2012). From speeches to actions: EU involvement in the war in Afghanistan through the EUPOL Afghanistan mission. European Security, 21, 185–201. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2012.665883
   Google Scholar
• Lederach, J. P. (1995). Preparing for peace: Conflict transformation across cultures. New York, NY: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardsson, H., & Rudd, G. (2015). The “local turn” in peacebuilding: A literature review of effective and emancipatory local peacebuilding. Third World Quarterly, 36, 825–839. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1029905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucarelli, S., & Fioramonti, L. (Eds.). (2010). External perceptions of the European Union as a global actor. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, R. (2008). Indigenous peace-making versus the liberal peace. Cooperation and Conflict, 43, 139–163. doi: 10.1177/0010836708089080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, R. (2011). International peacebuilding and local resistance: Hybrid forms of peace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, R. (2014). Everyday peace: Bottom-up and local agency in conflict-affected societies. Security Dialogue, 45, 548–564. doi: 10.1177/0967010614550899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, R. (2018). The limits of technocracy and local encounters: The European Union and peacebuilding. Contemporary Security Policy, 39, 166–179. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2017.1407191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, R., & Richmond, O. (2013). The local turn in peace building: A critical agenda for peace. Third World Quarterly, 34, 763–783. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.800750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahr, E. (2018). Local contestation against the European Union rule of law mission in Kosovo. Contemporary Security Policy. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2017.1407060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merlingen, M. (2012). Applying Foucault’s toolkit to CSDP. In X. Kurowska & F. Breuer (Eds.), Explaining the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy: Theory in action (pp. 188–211). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, G. (2016). For whom do local peace processes function? Maintaining control through conflict management. Cooperation and Conflict. Advanced online publication. doi: 0010836716671757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, A. (2014). CSDP police missions: Comparing bottom-up and top-down approaches. European Foreign Affairs Review, 19, 283–305.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, P., & Zahda, Y. (2018). Local perceptions of the EU’s role in peacebuilding: The case of Palestinian security sector reform. Contemporary Security Policy, 39, 119–141. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2017.1399624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narten, J. (2008). Post-conflict peacebuilding and local ownership: Dynamics of external–local interaction in Kosovo under United Nations administration. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 2, 369–390. doi: 10.1080/17502970802436361
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, L. (2007). No ownership, no commitment: A guide to local ownership of security sector reform. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Niemann, A., & Bretherton, C. (2013). EU external policy at the crossroads: The challenge of actorness and effectiveness. International Relations, 27, 261–275. doi: 10.1177/0047117813497306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noutcheva, G. (2009). Fake, partial and imposed compliance: The limits of the EU’s normative power in the Western Balkans. Journal of European Public Policy, 16, 1065–1084. doi: 10.1080/13501760903226872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, T., Zorbas, E., & Koros, M. (2012). A new deal for engagement in fragile states. Conflict, Security & Development, 12, 559–587. doi: 10.1080/14678802.2012.744187
   Google Scholar
• Oksamytna, K. (2011). The European Union training mission in Somalia: Lessons learnt for EU security sector reform. Rome: Istituto Affari Internazionali.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1996). Shaping the 21st century: The contribution of development co-operation. Paris: Development Assistance Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2008). Handbook on security sector reform: Supporting security and justice. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Overhaus, M., & Peter, M. (2012). The EU and peacebuilding South Sudan and the Sahel indicate that the union is rethinking its concepts but not yet changing its policies. In SWP Comments (Vol. 41). Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.
   Google Scholar
• Paffenholz, T. (2015). Unpacking the local turn in peacebuilding: A critical assessment towards an agenda for future research. Third World Quarterly, 36, 857–874. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1029908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, R. (2010). Saving liberal peacebuilding. Review of International Studies, 36, 337–365. doi: 10.1017/S0260210510000057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qehaja, F. (2017). International or local ownership: Security sector development in post-independent Kosovo. Washington, DC: Westphalia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse, T., & Miall, H. (2005). Contemporary conflict resolution (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Rayroux, A., & Wilén, N. (2014). Resisting ownership: The paralysis of EU peacebuilding in the Congo. African Security, 7, 24–44. doi: 10.1080/19392206.2014.880030
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, O. P. (2009). A post-liberal peace: Eirenism and the everyday. Review of International Studies, 35, 557–580. doi: 10.1017/S0260210509008651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, O. P. (2010). Resistance and the post-liberal peace. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 38, 665–692. doi: 10.1177/0305829810365017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, O. P. (2011). Critical agency, resistance and a post-colonial civil society. Cooperation and Conflict, 46, 419–440. doi: 10.1177/0010836711422416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, O. P. (2012). A pedagogy of peacebuilding: Infrapolitics, resistance, and liberation. International Political Sociology, 6, 115–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2012.00154.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodt, A. P. (2014). The European Union and military conflict management: Defining, evaluating and achieving success. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rupesinghe, K. (1995). Conflict transformation. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York, NY: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Saurugger, S., & Terpan, F. (2015). Studying resistance to EU norms in foreign and security policy. European Foreign Affairs Review, 2, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. (1989). Everyday forms of resistance. Copenhagen Papers, 4, 33–62.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. E. (2017). Europe’s Common Security and Defence Policy: Capacity-building, experiential learning, and institutional change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tartir, A., & Ejdus, F. (2018). Effective? Locally owned? Beyond the technocratic perspective on the European Union police mission for the Palestinian territories. Contemporary Security Policy, 39, 142–165. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2017.1407486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolksdorf, D. (2014). Incoherent peacebuilding: The European Union’s support for the police sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2002–8. International Peacekeeping, 21, 56–73. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2014.885710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1992). An agenda for peace. Preventive diplomacy, peacemaking and peace-keeping. A/47/277. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2000). Report of the panel on United Nations peace operations. A/55/305–S/2000/80. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• USAID. (2009). Security Sector Reform. Retrieved from https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/115810.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vandemoortele, A. (2012). Adaptation, resistance and a (re) turn to functionalism: The case of the Bosnian police restructuring process (2003–2008). European Security, 21, 202–218. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2012.665884
   Google Scholar
• Von Billerbeck, S. (2016). Whose peace? Local ownership & United Nations peacekeeping. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, W., & Anholt, R. (2016). Resilience as the EU global Strategy’s new leitmotif: Pragmatic, problematic or promising? Contemporary Security Policy, 37, 414–430. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2016.1228034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilén, N. (2009). Capacity-building or capacity-taking? Legitimizing concepts in peace and development operations. International Peacekeeping, 16, 337–351. doi: 10.1080/13533310903036392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarembo, K. (2017). Perceptions of CSDP effectiveness in Ukraine: A host state perspective. European Security, 26, 190–206. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2017.1291502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar