Conceptualizing caveats for political research: Defining and measuring national reservations on the use of force during multinational military operations

Reference list

• Anrig, C. F. (2015). The Belgian, Danish, Norwegian, and Dutch experiences. In Karl P. Mueller (Ed.), Precision and purpose: Airpower in the Libyan Civil War (pp. 267–307). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Auerswald, D. P., & Saideman, S. M. (2014). NATO in Afghanistan: Fighting together, fighting alone. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchard, C. (2012). Lessons learned from operation unified protector—a commander’s perspective. Papers of the Royal Norwegian Air Force Academy, 27, 127–137.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J., & Fisera, M. (2010). National caveats and its impact on the army of the Czech Republic. Retrieved from https://www.unob.cz/eam/Documents/Archiv/EaM_1_2007/Brophy_Fisera.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clark, W. K. (2001). Waging war: Bosnia, Kosovo, and the future of combat. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Concise Oxford English Dictionary. (2006). Concise Oxford English dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Borchgrave, A. (2009). Commentary: NATO caveats. UPI. Retrieved from http://www.upi.com/Top_News/Analysis/de-Borchgrave/2009/07/10/CommentaryNATO-caveats/47311247244125/
   Google Scholar
• Deni, J. R. (2004). The NATO rapid deployment corps: Alliance doctrine and force structure. Contemporary Security Policy, 25(3), 498–523. doi: 10.1080/1352326042000330628
   Google Scholar
• Fermann, G. (2019). Coping with caveats in coalition warfare: An empirical research program. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Findlay, T. (2002). The use of force in UN peace operations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frost-Nielsen, P. M. (2016). Betingede forpliktelser. Nasjonale reservasjoner i militære koalisjonsoperasjoner (PhD dissertation in political science). Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim.
   Google Scholar
• Frost-Nielsen, P. M. (2017). Conditional commitments: Why states use caveats to reserve their efforts in military coalition operations. Contemporary Security Policy, 38, 371–397. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2017.1300364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost-Nielsen, P. M. (2018). Bringing military conduct out of the shadow of law: Towards a holistic understanding of rules of engagement (ROE). Journal of Military Ethics, 17(1), 21–35.
   Google Scholar
• Høiback, H. (2009). The noble art of constructive ambiguity. Oslo Files on Defence and Security, 3, 19–39.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. L. (2004, May 7–10). Prague ti Istanbul: Ambition versus reality. In Global security: A broader concept for the 21st century (Berlin Workshop proceedings), pp. 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, S. (2013). No more free-riding: The political economy of military power and the transatlantic relationship. In J. H. Matlary & M. Petersson (Eds.), NATO’s European allies—military capability and political will (pp. 97–120). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Koschut, S. (2014). Transatlantic conflict management inside-out: The impact of domestic norms on regional security practices. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 27, 339–361. doi: 10.1080/09557571.2013.840561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marten, K. (2007). State-building and force: The proper role of foreign militaries. Journal of Intervention and State-building, 1, 231–247. doi: 10.1080/17502970701302862
   Google Scholar
• Mello, P. A. (2014). Democratic participation in armed conflict. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mello, P. A. (2019). National restrictions in multinational military operations: A conceptual framework. Contemporary Security Policy, 40, 38–55. doi:10.1080/13523260.2018.1503438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello, P. A., & Saideman, S. M. (2019). The politics of multinational military operations. Contemporary Security Policy, 40, 30–37. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2018.1522737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noetzel, T., & Rid, T. (2009). Germany’s options in Afghanistan. Survival, 51, 71–90. doi: 10.1080/00396330903309865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noetzel, T., & Schreer, B. (2009). Does a multi-tier NATO matter? The Atlantic alliance and the process of strategic change. International Affairs, 85, 211–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2009.00790.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, M. V. (2013). Punching above its weight: Denmark’s legitimate peripheral participation in NATO’s wars. In J. H. Matlary and M. Petersson (Eds.), NATO’s European allies—military capability and political will (pp. 262–278). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, J. P. (2007). Napoleon and the world war of 1813—lessons in coalition war-fighting. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ringsmose, J. (2010). NATO burden-sharing redux: Continuity and change after the Cold War. Contemporary Security Policy, 31, 319–338. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2010.491391
   Google Scholar
• Ringsmose, J., & Thruelsen, P. D. (2010). NATO’s counter-insurgency campaign in Afghanistan: Are classical doctrine suitable for alliances? UNISCI Discussion Papers, 22, 56–77.
   Google Scholar
• Saideman, S. M., & Auerswald, D. P. (2012). Comparing caveats: Understanding the sources of national restrictions upon NATO’s mission in Afghanistan. International Studies Quarterly, 56, 67–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00700.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sky, E. (2007). Increasing ISAF’s impact on stability in Afghanistan. Defense and Security Analysis, 23, 7–25. doi: 10.1080/14751790701254425
   Google Scholar
• Trønnes, O. (2012). Mapping and explaining Norwegian caveats in Afghanistan from 2001 to 2008 (Master thesis in political science). Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Meulen, J., & Kawano, H. (2008). Accidental neighbours: Japanese and Dutch troops in Iraq. In J. Soeters and P. Manigart (Eds.), Military cooperation in multinational peace operations: Managing cultural diversity and crisis response (pp. 166–179). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Young, T. D. (2003). The revolution in military affairs and coalition operations: Problem areas and solutions. Defense and Security Analysis, 19, 111–130.
   Google Scholar