Reference list
- Ansorg, N. (2017). Security sector reform in Africa: Donor approaches versus local needs. Contemporary Security Policy, 38, 129–144. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2016.1278343
- Autesserre, S. (2014). Peaceland. Conflict resolution and the everyday politics of international intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Autesserre, S. (2016). The responsibility to protect in Congo: The failure of grassroots prevention. International Peacekeeping, 23, 29–51. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2015.1080595
- Bargués-Pedreny, P., & Mathieu, X. (2018). Beyond silence, obstacle and stigma: Revisiting the ‘problem’ of difference in peacebuilding. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 12, 283–299. doi: 10.1080/17502977.2018.1513622
- Bargués-Pedreny, P., & Randazzo, E. (2018). Hybrid peace revisited: An opportunity for considering self-governance? Third World Quarterly, 39, 1543–1560. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2018.1447849
- Björkdahl, A., & Höglund, K. (2013). Precarious peacebuilding: Friction in global–local encounters. Peacebuilding, 1, 289–299. doi: 10.1080/21647259.2013.813170
- Bojicic-Dzelilovic, V., & Martin, M. (2018). Wholly local? Ownership as philosophy and practice in peacebuilding interventions. Peacebuilding, 6, 218–232. doi: 10.1080/21647259.2018.1491682
- Bott, M., Gigler, B.-S., & Young, G. (2014). The role of crowdsourcing for better governance in fragile state contexts. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
- Bourbeau, P., & Ryan, C. (2018). Resilience, resistance, Infrapolitics and Enmeshment. European Journal of International Relations, 24, 221–239. doi: 10.1177/1354066117692031
- Boutros-Ghali, B. (1992). An agenda for peace. International Relations, 11, 201–218. doi: 10.1177/004711789201100302
- Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2018). Conceptual framework: Fostering resilience in areas of limited statehood and contested orders (EU-LISTCO Working Paper No.1). Berlin. Retrieved from https://www.eu-listco.net/publications/conceptual-framework-fostering-resilience-in-areas-of-limited-statehood-and-contested-orders
- Burns, R. (2014). Moments of closure in the knowledge politics of digital humanitarianism. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 53, 51–62. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.02.002
- Campbell, D. (1998). National deconstruction: Violence, identity, and justice in Bosnia. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.
- Campbell, S., Chandler, D., & Sabaratnam, M. (2011). A liberal peace? The problems and practices of peacebuilding. London: Zed Books.
- Cavelty, M. D., Kaufmann, M., & Søby Kristensen, K. (2015). Resilience and (in)security: Practices, subjects, temporalities. Security Dialogue, 46, 3–14. doi: 10.1177/0967010614559637
- Chandler, D. (2014). Resilience: The governance of complexity. London: Routledge.
- Chandler, D. (2015). A world without causation: Big data and the coming of age of posthumanism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43, 833–851. doi: 10.1177/0305829815576817
- Chandler, D. (2020). Security through societal resilience: Contemporary challenges in the anthropocene. Contemporary Security Policy, 42(2), 195–214. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2019.1659574
- Chandler, D., & Reid, J. (2016). The neoliberal subject: Resilience, adaptation and vulnerability. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Clooney, G. (2008, September 4). Peace is a full time job … [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7u2gJeDHap0
- Cochrane, L., & Cafer, A. (2018). Does diversification enhance community resilience? A critical perspective. Resilience, 6, 129–143. doi: 10.1080/21693293.2017.1406849
- Council of the European Union. (2018). Council conclusions on the integrated approach to external conflicts and crises (No. 5266/18). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/january-2018-council-conclusions-integrated-approach-external-conflicts-and-crises_en
- Cretney, R., & Bond, S. (2014). ‘Bouncing back’ to capitalism? Grass-roots autonomous activism in shaping discourses of resilience and transformation following disaster. Resilience, 2, 18–31. doi: 10.1080/21693293.2013.872449
- De Carvalho, G., De Coning, C., & Connolly, L. (2014). Creating an enabling peacebuilding environment: How can external actors contribute to resilience? Accord. Policy and Practice Brief. Retrieved from http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/ACCORD-policy-practice-brief-28.pdf
- De Coning, C. (2016). From peacebuilding to sustaining peace: Implications of complexity for resilience and Sustainability. Resilience, 4, 166–181. doi: 10.1080/21693293.2016.1153773
- De Coning, C. (2018). Adaptive peacebuilding. International Affairs, 94, 301–317. doi: 10.1093/ia/iix251
- De Heredia, M. I. (2012). Escaping statebuilding: Resistance and civil society in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 6, 75–89. doi: 10.1080/17502977.2012.655567
- De Weijer, F. (2013). Resilience: A trojan horse for a new way of thinking? (Discussion paper No. 139). Maastricht: European Centre for Development Policy Management.
- Department for International Development. (2009). Country programme evaluation Afghanistan [Evaluation Report EV696]. Jon Bennett (Team Leader). London. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/countries/afghanistan/47107291.pdf
- Dietrich, W. (2013). Elicitive conflict transformation and the transrational shift in peace politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Duffield, M. (2019). Post-humanitarianism: Governing precarity in the digital world. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Duursma, A., & Read, R. (2017). Modelling violence as disease? Exploring the possibilities of epidemiological analysis for peacekeeping data in Darfur. International Peacekeeping, 24(5), 733–755. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2017.1383563
- Edney, M. (2015). Cartography and its discontents. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 50, 9–13. doi:muse.jhu.edu/article/577428 doi: 10.3138/carto.50.1.02
- Ejdus, F. (2018). Local ownership as international governmentality: Evidence from the EU mission in the horn of Africa. Contemporary Security Policy, 39, 28–50. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2017.1384231
- Ejdus, F., & Juncos, A. E. (2018). Reclaiming the local in EU peacebuilding: Effectiveness, ownership, and resistance. Contemporary Security Policy, 39, 4–27. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2017.1407176
- EU-CIVCAP. (2017). Improving the EU’s local capacity building efforts in post-conflict environments [Policy Briefing 01]. Retrieved from https://eucivcap.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/eu-civcap_policy_briefing-2017-01.pdf
- European Commission. (2016). Lessons drawn from past interventions and stakeholders’ views (Joint Staff Working Document No. SWD(2016) 221 final). Strasbourg: European Commission. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52016SC0221&from=en
- European Commission. (2017). 2017 Joint communication—A strategic approach to resilience in the EU’s external action [JOIN(2017) 21 final]. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/2017-joint-communication-strategic-approach-resilience-eus-external-action_en
- European External Action Service. (2016). Shared vision, common action: A stronger Europe: A global strategy for the European Union’s foreign and security policy. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/globalstrategy/en
- Evans, B., & Reid, J. (2014). Resilient life. The art of living dangerously. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Fast, L. (2017). Diverging data: Exploring the epistemologies of data collection and use among those working on and in conflict. International Peacekeeping, 24, 706–732. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2017.1383562
- Ganson, B., & Wennmann, A. (2012). Operationalising conflict prevention as strong resilient systems: Approaches, evidence, action points. Retrieved from http://www.gpplatform.ch/sites/default/files/PP%2003%20-%20Operationalising%20Conflict%20Prevention%20as%20Strong%20Resilient%20Systems%20-%20January%202012_0.pdf
- Gippert, B. J. (2018). The interaction between local and international power in EU Police reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Contemporary Security Policy, 39, 51–71. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2017.1398529
- Grimm, S., & Leininger, J. (2012). Not all good things Go together: Conflicting objectives in democracy promotion. Democratization, 19, 391–414. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2012.674355
- Interpeace. (2015). Fostering resilience for peace [Annual Report]. Geneva: Interpeace. Retrieved from https://www.interpeace.org/resource/fostering-resilience-for-peace/
- Jacobsen, K. L., & Engell, T. G. (2018). Conflict prevention as pragmatic response to a twofold crisis: Liberal interventionism and Burundi. International Affairs, 94, 363–380. doi: 10.1093/ia/iix236
- Joseph, J. (2013). Resilience as embedded neoliberalism: A governmentality approach. Resilience, 1, 38–52. doi: 10.1080/21693293.2013.765741
- Joseph, J. (2016). Governing through failure and denial: The new resilience agenda. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44, 370–390. doi: 10.1177/0305829816638166
- Joseph, J. (2018). Varieties of resilience: Studies in governmentality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Juncos, A. E. (2018). EU security sector reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Reform or resist? Contemporary Security Policy, 39, 95–118. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2017.1391625
- Kappler, S. (2014). Local agency and peacebuilding: EU and international engagement in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Cyprus and South Africa. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2007). Rethinking maps. Progress in Human Geography, 31, 331–344. doi: 10.1177/0309132507077082
- Korosteleva, E. A. (2018). Paradigmatic or critical? Resilience as a new turn in EU governance for the neighbourhood. Journal of International Relations and Development, Advance online publication. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41268-018-0155-z
- Korosteleva, E., & Flockhart, T. (2020). Resilience in EU and international institutions: Redefining local ownership in a new global governance agenda. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(2), 153–175. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2020.1723973
- Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
- Lederach, J. P. (2016). Foreword. Journal of Peace Education, 13, 197–199. doi: 10.1080/17400201.2016.1268343
- Lemay-Hébert, N., & Kappler, S. (2016). What attachment to peace? Exploring the normative and material dimensions of local ownership in peacebuilding. Review of International Studies, 42(5), 895–914. doi: 10.1017/S0260210516000061
- Lobo-Guerrero, L. (2019). On the epistemology of maps and mapping: De la Cosa, Mercator and the making of spatial imaginaries. In P. Bargués-Pedreny, D. Chandler, & E. Simon (Eds.), Mapping and politics in the digital age (pp. 20–38). Abingdon: Routledge.
- Mac Ginty, R., & Richmond, O. P. (2016). The fallacy of constructing hybrid political orders: A reappraisal of the hybrid turn in peacebuilding. International Peacekeeping, 23, 219–239. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2015.1099440
- Mac Ginty, R. (2011). International peacebuilding and local resistance: Hybrid forms of peace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Mac Ginty, R. (2017). Peacekeeping and data. International Peacekeeping, 24(5), 695–705. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2017.1383561
- Mac Ginty, R. (2018). The limits of technocracy and local encounters: The European Union and peacebuilding. Contemporary Security Policy, 39, 166–179. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2017.1407191
- Macaspac, N. V. (2018). Suspicion and ethnographic peace research (notes from a local researcher). International Peacekeeping, 25, 677–694. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2017.1358622
- Mahr, E. (2018). Local contestation against the European Union rule of law mission in Kosovo. Contemporary Security Policy, 39, 72–94. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2017.1407060
- Martin de Almagro, M., & Ryan, C. (2019). Subverting economic Empowerment: towards a postcolonial-feminist framework on gender (in)securities in post-war settings. European Journal of International Relations. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1354066119836474
- Mathieu, X. (2019). Critical peacebuilding and the dilemma of difference: The stigma of the ‘local’ and the quest for equality. Third World Quarterly, 40, 36–52. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2018.1538732
- Mattern, S. (2018). Mapping’s intelligent agents. In P. Bargués-Pedreny, D. Chandler, & E. Simon (Eds.), Mapping and politics in the digital Age (pp. 208–224). Abingdon: Routledge.
- Mavelli, L. (2019). Resilience beyond neoliberalism? Mystique of complexity, financial crises, and the reproduction of neoliberal life. Resilience, 7, 224–239. doi: 10.1080/21693293.2019.1605661
- Mckeown, A., & Glenn, J. (2018). The rise of resilience after the financial crises: A case of neoliberalism rebooted? Review of International Studies, 44, 193–214. doi: 10.1017/S0260210517000493
- McLeod, L. (2015). A feminist approach to hybridity: Understanding local and international Interactions in producing post-conflict gender security. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 9, 48–69. doi: 10.1080/17502977.2014.980112
- McLeod, L., & O’Reilly, M. (2019). Critical peace and conflict studies: Feminist interventions. Peacebuilding, 7, 127–145. doi: 10.1080/21647259.2019.1588457
- Meier, P. (2012). Crisis mapping in action: How open source software and global volunteer networks are changing the world, one map at a time. Journal of Map & Geography Libraries, 8, 89–100. doi: 10.1080/15420353.2012.663739
- Meier, P. (2015). Digital humanitarians. How big data is changing the face of humanitarian response. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
- Millar, G. (2018). Ethnographic peace research: The underappreciated benefits of long-term Fieldwork. International Peacekeeping, 25, 653–676. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2017.1421860
- Nadarajah, S., & Rampton, D. (2015). The limits of hybridity and the crisis of liberal peace. Review of International Studies, 41, 49–72. doi: 10.1017/S0260210514000060
- November, V., Camacho-Hübner, E., & Latour, B. (2010). Entering a risky territory: Space in the age of digital navigation. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28, 581–599. doi: 10.1068/d10409
- Obrecht, A., & Warner, A. T. (2016). More than just luck: Innovation in humanitarian action. London: HIF/ALNAP.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Concepts and dilemmas of state building in fragile situations: From fragility to resilience. OECD Journal on Development, 9, 61–148. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/development/concepts-and-dilemmas-of-state-building-in-fragile-situations_journal_dev-v9-art27-en
- O’toole, M. (2014). UN ambassador warns against intervention fatigue. Defense One. Retrieved from https://www.defenseone.com/threats/2014/11/un-ambassador-warns-against-intervention-fatigue/99485/
- Paffenholz, T. (2014). International peacebuilding goes local: Analysing Lederach’s conflict transformation theory and its ambivalent encounter with 20 years of practice. Peacebuilding, 2, 11–27. doi: 10.1080/21647259.2013.783257
- Paris, R. (2010). Saving liberal peacebuilding. Review of International Studies, 36, 337–365. doi: 10.1017/S0260210510000057
- Parker, B. (2019, March 20). Humanitarian innovation faces rethink as innovators take stock. The New Humanitarian. Retrieved from https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/analysis/2019/03/20/humanitarian-innovation-faces-rethink-innovators-take-stock
- Perera, S. (2017). To boldly know: Knowledge, peacekeeping and remote data gathering in conflict-affected states. International Peacekeeping, 24, 803–822. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2017.1383566
- Pospisil, J. (2019). Peace in political unsettlement: Beyond solving conflict. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Ramalingam, B., Scriven, K., & Foley, C. (2009). Innovations in international humanitarian action: ALNAP’s 8th review of humanitarian action. London: ALNAP. Retrieved from https://www.alnap.org/help-library/innovations-in-international-humanitarian-action-alnaps-8th-review-of-humanitarian
- Rampton, D., & Nadarajah, S. (2017). A long View of liberal peace and its crisis. European Journal of International Relations, 23, 441–465. doi: 10.1177/1354066116649029
- Randazzo, E. (2016). The paradoxes of the ‘everyday’: Scrutinising the local turn in peace building. Third World Quarterly, 37, 1351–1370. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1120154
- Read, R., Taithe, B., & Mac Ginty, R. (2016). Data hubris? Humanitarian information systems and the mirage of technology. Third World Quarterly, 37, 1314–1331. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1136208
- Richmond, O. P. (2011). A post-liberal peace. London: Routledge.
- Rosenow, D. (2019). Decolonising the decolonisers? Of ontological encounters in the GMO controversy and beyond. Global Society, 33, 82–99. doi: 10.1080/13600826.2018.1558181
- Rotmann, P. (2016). What explains criminal violence in Mexico City? A test of two theories of crime. Stability: International Journal of Security and Development, 5, 1–19. doi:10.5334/sta.414 doi: 10.5334/sta.433
- Rouvroy, A., & Berns, T. (2013). Algorythmic governmentality and prospects of emancipation: Disparateness as a precondition for individuation through relationships? La Découverte, 1, 163–196. doi: 10.3917/res.177.0163
- Salovaara, I. (2016). Participatory maps. Digital Journalism, 4, 827–837. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2016.1173519
- Schmidt, J. (2015). Intuitively neoliberal? Towards a critical understanding of resilience governance. European Journal of International Relations, 21, 402–426. doi: 10.1177/1354066114537533
- Scott-Smith, T. (2016). Humanitarian Neophilia: The ‘innovation turn’ and its Implications. Third World Quarterly, 37, 2229–2251. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2016.1176856
- Specht, D., & Feigenbaum, A. (2019). From the cartographic gaze to contestatory cartographies. In P. Bargués-Pedreny, D. Chandler, & E. Simon (Eds.), Mapping and politics in the digital age (pp. 39–55). Abingdon: Routledge.
- Stockholm Resilience Centre. (2015). Applying resilience thinking: Seven principles for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Stockholm: Stockholm Resilience Centre and Stockholm University.
- Tansel, C. B. (2017). States of discipline: Authoritarian neoliberalism and the contested reproduction of capitalist order. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Tocci, N. (2020). Resilience and the role of the European Union in the world. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(2), 176–194. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2019.1640342
- U.S. DoS. (2010). Leading through civilian power: The first quadrennial diplomacy and development review. Retrieved from https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/153108.pdf
- Ucko, D. H. (2013). Beyond clear-hold-build: Rethinking local-level counterinsurgency after Afghanistan. Contemporary Security Policy, 34, 526–551. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2013.839258
- UNDP. (2016). Local governance in fragile and conflict affected settings: Building a resilient foundation for peace and development [A UNDP How-to Guide]. New York, NY: Author. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/Democratic%20Governance/Local%20Governance/Guide_Local_Governance_in_Fragile_and_Conflict_Settings.pdf
- UNESCO. (2017). Local knowledge, global goals. Paris: Author. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000259599
- United Kingdom. (2011). Building stability overseas strategy. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/27370/bsos_july2011.pdf
- United Kingdom. (2019). The UK goverment’s approach to stabilisation: A guide for policymakers and practitioners. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/784001/The_UK_Government_s_Approach_to_Stabilisation_A_guide_for_policy_makers_and_practitioners.pdf
- United Nations. (2014). Performance peacekeeping: Final report of the expert panel on technology and innovation [Expert Panel on Technology and Innovation]. New York, NY: United Nations Peacekeeping. Retrieved from https://peacekeeping.un.org/sites/default/files/performance-peacekeeping_expert-panel-on-technology-and-innovation_report_2015.pdf
- United Nations. (2015). The challenge of sustaining peace: Report of the advisory group of experts for the 2015 review of the United Nations peacebuilding architecture. New York, NY: Author. Retrieved from https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/150630%20Report%20of%20the%20AGE%20on%20the%202015%20Peacebuilding%20Review%20FINAL.pdf
- United Nations. (2018a). Peacebuilding and sustaining peace: Report of the secretary-general [A/72/707-S/2018/43]. New York, NY: United Nations General Assembly and Security Council. Retrieved from https://reliefweb.int/report/world/peacebuilding-and-sustaining-peace-report-secretary-general-a72707-s201843
- United Nations. (2018b). United Nations conflict prevention and preventive diplomacy in action: An overview of the role, approach and tools of the United Nations and its partners in preventing violent conflict. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/undpa/sites/www.un.org.undpa/files/Booklet_200618_fin_scrn.pdf
- United Nations Secretary General. (2014). Peacebuilding in the immediate aftermath of conflict. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/69/399
- von Billerbeck, S. (2016). Whose peace? Local ownership and United Nations peacekeeping. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Wagner, W., & Anholt, R. (2016). Resilience as the EU global strategy’s new leitmotif: Pragmatic, problematic or promising? Contemporary Security Policy, 37, 414–430. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2016.1228034
- Walker, J., & Cooper, M. (2011). Genealogies of resilience. Security Dialogue, 42, 143–160. doi: 10.1177/0967010611399616
- World Bank. (2018). Pathways for peace: Inclusive approaches to preventing violent conflict. Washington, DC: Author.
- Zebrowski, C. (2013). The nature of resilience. Resilience, 1, 159–173. doi: 10.1080/21693293.2013.804672