Between punishment and denial: Uncertainty, flexibility, and U.S. military strategy toward China

Reference list

• Allison, G. (2017). Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides’s trap? Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcort.
   Google Scholar
• Beckley, M. (2017). The emerging military balance in East Asia: How China’s neighbours can check Chinese Naval expansion. International Security, 42(2), 78–119. doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, R. (2000). Is Strategy an Illusion? International Security, 25(2), 5–50. doi: 10.1162/016228800560444
   Google Scholar
• Bialos, J. P., & Koehl, S. L. (2016, June 1). What America’s Big Defense Plan Gets Wrong. The National Interest.
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, S., & Oelrich, I. (2016). Future warfare in the Western Pacific: Chinese Antiaccess/area denial, U.S. Air Sea battle, and command of the commons in East Asia. International Security, 41(1), 7–48. doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenthal, D. (2012). The power projection balance in Asia. In T. G. Mahnken (Ed.), Competitive strategies for the 21st Century: Theory, History and Practice (pp. 168–183). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, S. G., & Wohlforth, W. C. (2015/2016). The rise and fall of the great powers in the twenty-first century: China’s rise and the fate of America’s global position. International Security, 40(3), 7–53. doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, K., & Ratner, E. (2018). The China reckoning: How Beijing defied American expectations. Foreign Affairs, 97(2), 60–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha, V. D. (2000). Abandonment, entrapment, and neoclassical realism in East Asia: The United States, Japan and Korea. International Studies Quarterly, 44(2), 261–291. doi: 10.1111/0020-8833.00158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, I., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Cultural psychology of surprise: holistic theories and recognition of contradiction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 890–905. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.6.890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. J. (2001). Posing problems without catching up: China’s rise and challenges for U.S. security policy. International Security, 25(4), 5–40. doi: 10.1162/01622880151091880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. J. (2006). Fostering stability or creating a Monster? The rise of China and U.S. Policy toward East Asia. International Security, 31(1), 81–126. doi: 10.1162/isec.2006.31.1.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. J. (2015). The China challenge: Shaping the choices of a rising power. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, J., Walton, T. A., Lemon, A., & Yoshihara, T. (2019). Leveling the playing field: Reintroducing U.S. theater-range missiles in a Post-INF World. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Coté Jr., O. R. (2011). Assessing the Undersea Balance Between the U.S. and China. MIT Security Studies Working Paper, February.
   Google Scholar
• Danzig, R. (2011). Driving in the Dark: Ten propositions about prediction and national security. Washington, D.C.: Center for a New American Security.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbins, J. (2012). War with China. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 54(4), 7–24. doi: 10.1080/00396338.2012.709384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelstein, D. M. (2002). Managing Uncertainty: Beliefs about intentions and the rise of great powers. Security Studies 12 (1), 1–40. doi: 10.1080/09636410212120002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzsimmons, M. (2006). The problem of uncertainty in strategic planning. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 48(4), 131–146. doi: 10.1080/00396330601062808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedberg, A. L. (2005). The future of U.S.-China relations: Is conflict inevitable? International Security, 30(2), 7–45. doi: 10.1162/016228805775124589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedberg, A. L. (2011). A contest for supremacy: China, America and the struggle for Mastery in Asia. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Friedberg, A. L. (2014). Beyond air-sea battle: The debate over US military strategy in Asia. London: International Institute for Strategic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Gholz, E., Friedman, B., & Gjoza, E. (2019). Defensive defense: A better way to protect US allies in Asia. The Washington Quarterly, 42(4), 171–189. doi: 10.1080/0163660X.2019.1693103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoshal, S. (1987). Global strategy: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 8, 425–440. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250080503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilli, A., & Gilli, M. (2019). Why China has not caught up yet: Military-technological superiority and the limits of imitation, reverse engineering, and cyber espionage. International Security, 43(3), 141–189. doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, C. L. (1992). Political consequences of military strategy: Expanding and refining the deterrence and spiral models. World Politics, 44(4), 497–538. doi: 10.2307/2010486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, C. S. (1992). House of cards: Why arms control must fail. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C. (2010). Strategic thoughts for defense planners. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 52(3), 159–178. doi: 10.1080/00396338.2010.494883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunzinger, M., & Clarke, B. (2016). Winning the salvo competition: Rebalancing America’s air and missile defenses. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Hammes, T. X. (2012). Offshore control: A proposed strategy for an unlikely conflict. Strategic Forum, 278, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hammes, T. X. (2013). Sorry, air sea battle is no strategy. The National Interest, 7 August.
   Google Scholar
• Harold, S. W., Nakagawa, Y., Fukuda, J., Davis, J. A., Kono, K., Cheng, D., & Suzuki, K. (2017). The U.S.-Japan alliance and deterring gray zone coercion in the maritime, cyber, and space domains. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Harris Jr., H. (U.S. Navy Commander, U.S. Pacific Command). (2017). Statement before the House Armed Services Committee on U.S. Pacific Command Posture. Washington, DC, 26 April.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, A. G. (1937). Anticipations, business Planning and the Cycle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51(2), 273–297. doi: 10.2307/1882089
   Google Scholar
• Heginbotham, E., & Heim, J. (2015). Deterring without dominance: Discouraging Chinese adventurism under Austerity. The Washington Quarterly, 38(1), 185–199. doi: 10.1080/0163660X.2015.1038189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, F. (2015). Black Swans and Pink Flamingos: Five Principles for Force Design. War on the Rocks, 19 August.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. R. (2012). “The state of U.S.-China competition.”. In T. G. Mahnken (Ed.), Competitive strategies for the 21st Century: Theory, History and Practice (pp. 131–146). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunzeker, M. A., & Lanoszka, A. (eds.). (2018). A question of time: Enhacing Taiwan’s conventional deterrence posture. Washington, DC: Center for Security Policy Studies (George Mason University).
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, R. (1978). Cooperation under the security dilemma. World Politics, 30(2), 167–214. doi: 10.2307/2009958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, A. I. (2003). Is China a status quo power? International Security, 27(4), 5–56. doi: 10.1162/016228803321951081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joint Chiefs of Staff (2015). The national military strategy of the United States. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Chiefs of Staff. (2019). DoD dictionary of military and associated terms. Washington , DC.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, Y., & Mukherjee, A. (2019). From denial to punishment: The security dilemma and changes in India’s military strategy towards China. Asian Security, 15(1), 25–43. doi: 10.1080/14799855.2019.1539817
   Google Scholar
• Khong, Y. F. (2013/2014). Primacy or World order? The United States and China’s rise—A review essay. International Security, 38(3), 155–157. doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1957). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Krepinevich Jr., A. (2010). Why AirSea Battle? Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Krepinevich Jr., A. (2017). Preserving the balance: A U.S. Eurasia defense strategy. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Lieber, K. A., & Press, D. G. (2006). The end of MAD? The nuclear dimension of U.S. primacy. International Security, 30(4), 7–44. doi: 10.1162/isec.2006.30.4.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, D. J., & Cooper, Z. (2015). Reassessing hedging: The logic of alignment in East Asia. Security Studies, 24(4), 696–727. doi: 10.1080/09636412.2015.1103130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnken, T. G. (2011a). China’s anti-access strategy in historical and theoretical perspective. Journal of Strategic Studies, 34(3), 299–323. doi: 10.1080/01402390.2011.574971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnken, T. G. (2011b). Secrecy & stratagem: Understanding Chinese strategic culture. Double Bay: Lowy Institute for International Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Mahnken, T. G., & Blumenthal, D. (eds.). (2014). Strategy in Asia: The past, present and future of regional security. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martinage, R. (2014). Towards a new offset strategy: Exploiting U.S. long-term advantages to restore U.S. global power projection capability. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Mazarr, M. J. (2018). Understanding deterrence. Perspective. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. (1983). Conventional deterrence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. S. (2005). Strategic hedging and the future of Asia-Pacific stability. Washington Quarterly, 29(1), 145–167. doi: 10.1162/016366005774859724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, K. D. (1992). A framework for integrated risk management in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(2), 311–331. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirski, S. (2013). Stranglehold: The context, conduct, and consequences of an American naval blockage of China. Journal of Strategic Studies, 36(3), 385–421. doi: 10.1080/01402390.2012.743885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, E. B. (2014). Contested primacy in the Western Pacific: China’s rise and the future of U.S. power projection. International Security, 38(4), 115–149. doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, E. B. (2017). Reinforcing the front line: U.S. defense strategy and the rise of china. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Pape, R. A. (1992). Coercion and military strategy: Why denial works and punishment doesn’t. Journal of Strategic Studies, 15(4), 423–475. doi: 10.1080/01402399208437495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posen, B. P. (1984). The sources of military doctrine: France, Britain and Germany between the world wars. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Posen, B. (2014). Restraint: A new foundation for U.S. grand strategy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp-Hooper, M., Chism, J., Kresja, H., Scharre, P., & Jackson, V. (2016). Networked transparency. Washington, DC: Center for a New American Security.
   Google Scholar
• Rehman, I., Stillion, J., & Thomas, J. (2014). Hard ROC 2.0: Taiwan and deterrence through protraction. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, E. (2000). Conventional deterrence. Comparative Strategy, 19(3), 221–253. doi: 10.1080/01495930008403210
   Google Scholar
• Ross, R. S. (1999). The geography of the peace: East Asia in the twenty-first century. International Security, 23(4), 81–118. doi: 10.1162/isec.23.4.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, R. S. (2002). Navigating the Taiwan strait: Deterrence, escalation dominance, and U.S.-China relations. International Security, 27(2), 48–85. doi: 10.1162/016228802760987824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, R. S. (2013). US grand strategy, the rise of China, and US national security for East Asia. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 7(2), 20–40.
   Google Scholar
• Rosydin, M. (2019). The Dao of foreign policy: Understanding China's dual strategy in the South China Sea. Contemporary Security Policy, 40(2), 214–238. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2019.1565374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. (1980). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, N. A., & Greenert, J. W. (2012, February 20). Air-Sea Battle: Promoting Stability in a Period of Uncertainty. The American Interest.
   Google Scholar
• Schweller, R. L., & Pu, X. (2011). After unipolarity: China’s visions of international order in an era of U.S. Decline. International Security, 36(1), 41–72. doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, P. (1991). The art of the long view. New York, NY: Currency Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Silove, N. (2016). The Pivot before the Pivot: U.S. strategy to preserve the power balance in Asia. International Security, 40(4), 45–88. doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, G. H. (1959). Deterrence by Denial and Punishment. Research Monograph No. 1, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, 2 January.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, G. H. (1961). Deterrence and defense: Towards a theory of National security. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talmadge, C. (2017). Would China go nuclear? Assessing the risk of Chinese nuclear escalation in a conventional War with the United States. International Security, 41(4), 50–92. doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. (2013). Why the U.S. Army needs missiles: A new mission to save the service. Foreign Affairs, 92(3), 137–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornberry, M., & Krepinevich Jr. A. F. (2016). Preserving primacy: A defense strategy for the new administration. Foreign Affairs, 95(5), 26–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Defense. (2018). Summary of the national defense strategy of the United States of America: Sharpening the American military’s competitive edge. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. International Journal of Management Science, 3(6), 639–656. doi: 10.1016/0305-0483(75)90068-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tol, J., Gunzinger, M., Krepinevich Jr., A., & Thomas, J. (2010). Air sea battle: A point-of-departure operational concept. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Watai, Y. (2018). Is Japan’s ballistic missile defense too integrated with the US? The Diplomat, 28 November.
   Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt, B., & Karnani, A. (1987). Competitive strategy under uncertainty. Strategic Management Journal, 8, 187–194. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250080209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf, A. F. (2014). Conventional prompt global strike and long-range ballistic missiles: background and issues. Congressional Research Service, 26 August.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshihara, T., & Holmes, J. (2005). Command of the sea with Chinese characteristics. Orbis, 49(4), 677–694. doi: 10.1016/j.orbis.2005.07.008
   Google Scholar