Reference list
- Adler-Nissen, R. (2014). Stigma management in international relations: Transgressive identities, norms, and order in international society. International Organization, 68(01), 143–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818313000337
- Albright, D., & Hibbs, M. (1991). Iraq’s nuclear hide-and-seek. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 47(7), 14–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.1991.11460006
- Albright, D., & Hibbs, M. (1992). Iraq’s quest for the nuclear grail: What can we learn? Arms Control Today, 22(July/August).
- Allison, G. T. (2010). Nuclear disorder: Surveying atomic threats. Foreign Affairs, 89(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/20699784
- Anstey, I. (2018). Negotiating nuclear control: The Zangger committee and the nuclear suppliers’ group in the 1970s. International History Review, 40(5), 975–995. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2018.1449764
- Aradau, C. (2014). The promise of security: Resilience, surprise and epistemic politics. Resilience, 2(2), 73–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2014.914765
- Asculai, E. (2004). The nuclear nonproliferation regime: A rethink? In E. B. Landau & A. Bermant (Eds.), The nuclear nonproliferation regime at a crossroads (pp. 75–84). Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, Tel Aviv University.
- Aven, T. (2015). The concept of antifragility and its implications for the practice of risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 35(3), 476–483. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12279
- Barnum, M., & Lo, J. (2020). Is the NPT unraveling? Evidence from text analysis of review conference statements. Journal of Peace Research, 57(6), 740–751. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343320960523
- Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. Free Press Glencoe.
- Ben-Yehuda, N. (1990). The politics and morality of deviance: Moral panics, drug abuse, deviant science, and reversed stigmatization. State University of New York Press.
- Biswas, S. (2014). Nuclear desire: Power and the postcolonial nuclear order. University of Minnesota Press.
- Blix, H. (2004). Disarming Iraq: The search for weapons of mass destruction. Bloosmbury.
- Burr, W. (2014). A scheme of ‘control’: The United States and the origins of the nuclear suppliers’ group, 1974–1976*. International History Review, 36(2), 252–276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2013.864690
- Carranza, M. E. (2007). Can the NPT survive? The theory and practice of US nuclear non-proliferation policy after September 11. Contemporary Security Policy, 27(3), 489–525. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260601060537
- Central Intelligence Agency. (1975, March 18). CIA staff notes: Western Europe, Canada, International Organizations, CREST CIA-RDP79T00865A000600040001-2.
- Chandler, D. (2020). Security through societal resilience: Contemporary challenges in the anthropocene. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2019.1659574
- Deitelhoff, N., & Zimmermann, L. (2020). Things we lost in the fire: How different types of contestation affect the robustness of international norms. International Studies Review, 22(1), 51–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viy080
- Dentler, R. A., & Erikson, K. T. (1959). The functions of deviance in groups. Social Problems, 7(2), 98–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/799160
- Donohue, D. (1998). Strengthening IAEA safeguards through environmental sampling and analysis. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 271–273, 11–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388(98)00015-2
- Dotter, D. L., & Roebuck, J. B. (1988). The labeling approach re-examined: Interactionism and the components of deviance. Deviant Behavior, 9(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.1988.9967765
- Doyle, T. (2017). A moral argument for the mass defection of non-nuclear-weapon states from the nuclear nonproliferation treaty regime. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 23(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02301002
- Durkheim, E. (1895). The rules of sociological method. The Free Press.
- Epstein, W. (1976). The last chance: Nuclear proliferation and arms control. The Free Press.
- Erikson, K. (1966). Wayward Puritans: A study in the sociology of deviance. John Wiley & Sons.
- Fischer, D. (1992). Innovations in IAEA safeguards to meet the challenges of the 1990s. In D. Fischer et al. (Eds.), A new nuclear triad: The non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, International Verification and the International Atomic energy agency (pp. 31–38). Mountbatten Centre for International Studies.
- Fuhrmann, M. (2009). Spreading temptation: Proliferation and peaceful nuclear cooperation agreements. International Security, 34(1), 7–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2009.34.1.7
- Fuhrmann, M., & Tkach, B. (2015). Almost nuclear: Introducing the nuclear latency dataset. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 32(4), 443–461. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894214559672
- Gavin, F. J. (2012). Nuclear statecraft: History and strategy in America’s atomic age. Cornell University Press.
- Gibbons, R. D., & Herzog, S. (2022). Durable institution under fire? The NPT confronts emerging multipolarity Contemporary Security Policy, 43(1), 50–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1998294
- Goldschmidt, P. (2009). Exposing nuclear non-compliance. Survival, 51(1), 143–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00396330902749764
- Hanson, M. (2022). Power to the have-nots? The NPT and the limits of a treaty hijacked by a “power-over” model. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(1), 80–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2037968.
- Harrington, A. (2009). Nuclear weapons as the currency of power. The Nonproliferation Review, 16(3), 325–345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700903255029
- Horovitz, L. (2015). Beyond Pessimism: Why the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons will not collapse. Journal of Strategic Studies, 38(1–2), 126–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2014.917971
- Hunt, C. D. (1977). Canadian policy and the export of nuclear energy. The University of Toronto Law Journal, 27(1), 69–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/825559
- Huntley, W. L. (2006). Rebels without a cause: North Korea, Iran and the NPT. International Affairs, 82(4), 723–742. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00565.x
- Jaipal, R. (1977). The Indian nuclear explosion. International Security, 1(4), 44–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2538621
- Johnson, J., & Gheorghe, A. V. (2013). Antifragility analysis and measurement framework for systems of systems. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 4(4), 159–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-013-0017-7
- Joshi, Y. (2018). Between principles and pragmatism: India and the nuclear non-proliferation regime in the post-PNE era. The International History Review, 40(5), 1073–1093. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2017.1417322
- Keeley, J. F. (1994). Weapons of mass destruction as mature technologies. In D. Mutimer (Ed.), Control but verify: Verification and the new non-proliferation agenda (pp. 171–179). York University.
- Kittrie, O. F. (2007). Averting catastrophe: Why the nuclear nonproliferation treaty is losing its deterrence capacity and how to restore it. University of Michigan Journal of International Law, 28, 337–430.
- Knopf, J. W. (2022). Not by NPT alone: The future of the global nuclear order. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(1), 186–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1983243
- Krasner, S. D. (1982). Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. International Organization, 36(2), 185–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018920
- Krige, J. (2012). The proliferation risks of gas centrifuge enrichment at the dawn of the NPT. The Nonproliferation Review, 19(2), 219–227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2012.690961
- Krook, M. L., & True, J. (2012). Rethinking the life cycles of international norms: The United Nations and the global promotion of gender equality. European Journal of International Relations, 18(1), 103–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066110380963
- Lake, A. (1994). Confronting Backlash states. Foreign Affairs, 73(2), 45–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/20045918
- Macionis, J. J. (2012). Sociology (14th ed.). Pearson.
- Martínková, H., & Smetana, M. (2020). Dynamics of norm contestation in the chemical weapons convention: The case of ‘non-lethal agents’. Politics, 40(4), 428–443. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395720904605
- Meyer, P. (2009). Saving the NPT. The Nonproliferation Review, 16(3), 463–472. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700903255128
- Miller, N. L. (2014). Nuclear dominoes: A self-defeating prophecy? Security Studies, 23(1), 33–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2014.874189
- Miller, N. L. (2018). Stopping the bomb: The sources and effectiveness of US nonproliferation policy. Cornell University Press.
- Miller, S. E. (2012). Nuclear collisions: Discord, reform & the nuclear nonproliferation regime. American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
- Morrison, R. W. (1978). Canada’s nuclear export policy. Carleton University.
- Müller, H. (2017). The nuclear non-proliferation treaty in jeopardy? Internal divisions and the impact of world politics. The International Spectator, 52(1), 12–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2017.1270088
- Müller, H., Fey, M., & Rauch, C. (2013). Winds of change: Exogenous events and trends as norm triggers (or norm killers). In H. Müller & C. Wunderlich (Eds.), Norm dynamics in multilateral arms control: Interests, conflicts, and justice (pp. 141–162). University of Georgia Press.
- Müller, H., & Wunderlich, C. (Eds.). (2013). Norm dynamics in multilateral arms control: Interests, conflicts, and justice. University of Georgia Press.
- National Intelligence Council. (1985). The dynamics of nuclear proliferation: Balance of incentives and constraints. NIC M 85-10001. U.S. Intelligence assessments of potential nuclear powers, 1977–2001. George Washington University.
- Noda, O. (2022). A wolf in sheep’s clothing? The NPT and symbolic proliferation. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(1), 134–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1983699
- NSG. (1993). Press statement on the 1993 meeting of the “Nuclear Suppliers Group” (NSG) in Lucerne (Switzerland) from 30 March to 1 April 1993. http://www.bits.de/ac-archive/6pr/on/nsg/1993-Press.pdf.
- Nye, J. S. (1981). Maintaining a nonproliferation regime. International Organization, 35(1), 15–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300004069
- O’Mahoney, J. (2014). Rule tensions and the dynamics of institutional change: From’to the victor go the spoils’ to the Stimson doctrine. European Journal of International Relations, 20(3), 834–857. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113483781
- O’Mahoney, J. (2018). Denying the Spoils of War. Edinburgh University Press.
- O’Mahoney, J. (2020). The smiling Buddha effect: Canadian and US policy after India’s 1974 nuclear test. Nonproliferation Review, 27(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2020.1803561
- Panke, D., & Petersohn, U. (2012). Why international norms disappear sometimes. European Journal of International Relations, 18(4), 719–742. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111407690
- Patti, C., & Mallea, R. (2018). American seeds of ABACC? Findley’s proposal to create a mutual nuclear inspections system between Brazil and Argentina. International History Review, 40(5), 996–1013. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2018.1441891
- Pelopidas, B. (2011). The oracles of proliferation: How experts maintain a biased historical reading that limits policy innovation. The Nonproliferation Review, 18(1), 297–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2011.549185
- Pilat, J. F. (2007). The end of the NPT regime? International Affairs, 83(3), 469–482. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2007.00632.x
- Pretorius, J., & Sauer, T. (2022). When is it legitimate to abandon the NPT? Withdrawal as a political tool to move nuclear disarmament forward. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(1), 161–185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.2009695
- Rabinowitz, O. (2014). Bargaining on nuclear tests: Washington and its Cold War deals. Oxford University Press.
- Rabinowitz, O., & Miller, N. L. (2015). Keeping the bombs in the basement: US nonproliferation policy toward Israel, South Africa, and Pakistan. International Security, 40(1), 47–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00207
- Rabinowitz, O., & Sarkar, J. (2018). ‘It isn’t over until the fuel cell sings’: A reassessment of the US and French pledges of nuclear assistance in the 1970s. Journal of Strategic Studies, 41(1–2), 275–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2017.1328355
- Ritchie, N. (2019). A hegemonic nuclear order: Understanding the Ban Treaty and the power politics of nuclear weapons. Contemporary Security Policy, 40(4), 409–434. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2019.1571852
- Romberg, D. (2018). How to further develop the nonproliferation regime? West German nuclear exports to Brazil and Iran in context of US criticism. International History Review, 40(5), 1094–1114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2018.1444665
- Rublee, M. R. (2014). Construction of threat and nuclear nonproliferation measures: Considerations on theory and policy. In J. R. Fields (Ed.), State behavior and the nuclear nonproliferation regime (pp. 84–105). University of Georgia Press.
- Sandholtz, W. (2008). Dynamics of international norm change: Rules against wartime plunder. European Journal of International Relations, 14(1), 101–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107087766
- Sarkar, J. (2021). From the dependable to the demanding partner: The renegotiation of French nuclear cooperation with India, 1974–80. Cold War History, 21(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14682745.2019.1694908
- Sauer, T. (2006). The nuclear nonproliferation regime in crisis. Peace Review, 18(3), 333–340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10402650600848274
- Scheinman, L. (1993). Lessons from post-war Iraq for the international full-scope safeguards regime. Arms Control Today, 23, 3–3.
- Simons, L. M. (1974, May 19). India explodes a-device, cites ‘peaceful use’. Washington Post.
- Sloss, D. (1995). It’s not broken, so don’t fix it: The international atomic energy agency safeguards system and the nuclear nonproliferation treaty. Virginia Journal of International Law, 35, 841–894.
- Smetana, M. (2020a). (De-)stigmatising the outsider: Nuclear-armed India, United States, and the global nonproliferation order. Journal of International Relations and Development, 23(3), 535–558. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-018-0165-x
- Smetana, M. (2020b). Nuclear deviance: Stigma politics and the rules of the nonproliferation game. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Smetana, M., & Onderco, M. (2018). Bringing the outsiders in: An interactionist perspective on deviance and normative change in international politics. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 31(6), 516–536. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2018.1549021
- Taleb, N. N. (2012). Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder. Random House.
- Tannenwald, N. (2007). The nuclear taboo: The United States and the non-use of nuclear weapons since 1945. Cambridge University Press.
- Thakur, R. (2011). Nuclear nonproliferation and disarmament: Can the power of ideas tame the power of the state? International Studies Review, 13(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.00996.x
- Tocci, N. (2020). Resilience and the role of the European Union in the world. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(2), 176–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2019.1640342
- Tolchin, M. (1980, September 19). House votes to block shipment of Uranium for India. The New York Times.
- Tzeng, P. (2013). Nuclear leverage: US intervention in sensitive technology transfers in the 1970s. Nonproliferation Review, 20(3), 473–492. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2013.852783
- UNSC. (1991, August 15). United Nations Security Council Resolution 707. https://www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/documents/707.pdf
- U.S. Department of State. (1974, February 18). Telegram TOSEC 794/104621 from the department of state to the mission to the international atomic energy agency. 2238Z, Nixon-Ford Administrations, FRUS, 1969-1976, Vol. E-8, Doc. 162.
- U.S. Department of State. (1977, May 28). 75. Memorandum of conversation. Foreign relations of the United States, 1977–1980, Volume XIX, South Asia. Retrieved from https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1977-80v19/d75
- U.S. National Security Council. (1974, May 23). National Security Study Memorandum [NSSM] 202, Nixon–Ford Administrations, FRUS, 1969–76, Vol. E-14, doc. 50.
- Van Wyk, M. S. (2007). Ally or critic? The United States’ response to South African nuclear development, 1949–1980. Cold War History, 7(2), 195–225. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14682740701284124
- Wagner, W., Werner, W., & Onderco, M. (2014). Rogues, pariahs, outlaws: Theorizing deviance in international relations. In W. Wagner, W. Werner, & M. Onderco (Eds.), Deviance in international relations: “Rogue states” and international security (pp. 1–14). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Walker, J. S. (2001). Nuclear power and nonproliferation: The controversy over nuclear exports, 1974–1980. Diplomatic History, 25(2), 215–249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0145-2096.00260
- Walker, W. (2007). Nuclear enlightenment and counter-enlightenment. International Affairs, 83(3), 431–453. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2007.00630.x
- Wan, W. (2014). Firewalling nuclear diffusion. International Studies Review, 16(2), 217–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/misr.12133
- Wiener, A. (2004). Contested compliance: Interventions on the normative structure of world politics. European Journal of International Relations, 10(2), 189–234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066104042934
- Wiener, A. (2009). Enacting meaning-in-use: Qualitative research on norms and international relations. Review of International Studies, 35(1), 175–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509008377
- Wiener, A. (2014). A theory of contestation. Springer.
- Wunderlich, C. (2020). Rogue states as norm entrepreneurs: Black sheep or sheep in wolves’ clothing? Springer.