Not by NPT alone: The future of the global nuclear order

Reference list

• Adler, E. (1992). The emergence of cooperation: National epistemic communities and the international evolution of the idea of nuclear arms control. International Organization, 46(1), 101–145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, M. (2016, June 30). Pakistan’s tactical nuclear weapons and their impact on stability. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. http://carnegieendowment.org/2016/06/30/pakistan-s-tactical-nuclear-weapons-and-their-impact-on-stability-pub-63911
   Google Scholar
• Arms Control Association. (2017a, updated July). Nuclear Weapon Free Zones (NWFZ) at a glance. Fact Sheet. https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/nwfz
   Google Scholar
• Arms Control Association. (2017b, updated August). Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) at a glance. Fact Sheet. https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/NSG
   Google Scholar
• Baker, P., & Tackett, M. (2018, January 2). Trump says his ‘nuclear button’ is ‘much bigger’ than North Korea’s. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/02/us/politics/trump-tweet-north-korea.html
   Google Scholar
• Baklitskiy, A., Bidgood, S., & Meier, O. (2020). Russian-U.S. strategic stability talks: Where they are and where they should go. Deep Cuts Issue Brief #13. https://deepcuts.org/files/pdf/Deep_Cuts_Issue_Brief_13-Russian_US_Strategic_Stability_Talks.pdf
   Google Scholar
• BBC News. (2018, March 1). Russia’s Putin unveils ‘invincible’ nuclear weapons. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-43239331
   Google Scholar
• Berger, A. (2015, May 27). Gangs of New York: The 2015 NPT RevCon. European Leadership Network. https://www.europeanleadershipnetwork.org/commentary/gangs-of-new-york-the-2015-npt-revcon/
   Google Scholar
• Bino, T. (2020). A Middle Eastern WMD-free zone: Are we any closer now? Arms Control Today, 50(7), 11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, B., & Wolfsthal, J. (2019, August 1). We still can’t ‘win’ a nuclear war. Pretending we could is a dangerous fantasy. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/08/01/we-still-cant-win-nuclear-war-pretending-we-could-is-dangerous-fantasy/
   Google Scholar
• Bleek, P. C. (2002). Nuclear Posture Review leaks; outlines targets, contingencies. Arms Control Today, 32(3), 20–21.
   Google Scholar
• Broad, W. J. (2021, January 15). Hypersonic weapons are a mirage, new analysis says. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/15/science/hypersonic-missile-weapons.html
   Google Scholar
• Broad, W. J., & Sanger, D. E. (2021, July 26). A 2nd new nuclear missile base for China, and many questions about strategy. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/26/us/politics/china-nuclear-weapons.html
   Google Scholar
• Broom, F. (2019, April 10). Making a murderer: the assassination of Kim Jong-nam. Lowy Institute. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/making-murderer-assassination-kim-jong-nam
   Google Scholar
• Brown, H., & Deutch, J. (2007, November 19). The nuclear disarmament fantasy. Wall Street Journal, A19.
   Google Scholar
• Bunn, M., Malin, M. B., Roth, N., & Tobey, W. H. (2016). Preventing nuclear terrorism: Continuous improvement or dangerous decline? Project on Managing the Atom, Belfer Center for International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, R. (2020, February 3). US adds new ‘low-yield’ nuclear weapon to its submarine arsenal. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/john-rood-ap-top-news-wa-state-wire-nuclear-weapons-politics-b910d5f4f2076d558416ae021b511517
   Google Scholar
• Bush, G., & Scowcroft, B. (1998). A world transformed. Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Colby, E. A., & Gerson, M. S. (2013). Strategic stability: Contending interpretations. U.S. Army War College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cranes For Our Future. (n.d.). A joint project of the Hiroshima Prefecture, Nagasaki Prefecture, Nuclear Threat Initiative, and Hiroshima Organization for Global Peace. https://www.cranesforourfuture.org/
   Google Scholar
• Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA). (n.d.). The history of cooperative threat reduction. https://www.dtra.mil/Portals/61/Documents/History%20of%20CTR.pdf?ver=2019-04-25-140558-733
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L., & Potter, W. (2020). Time to renew the Reagan-Gorbachev principle. Arms Control Today, 50(2), 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Dvorkin, V. (2019, February 8). Preserving strategic stability amid U.S.-Russian confrontation. Carnegie Moscow Center. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/2-8_Dvorkin_Strategic_Stability.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Egeland, K. (2021). The ideology of nuclear order. New Political Science, 43(2), 208–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2021.1886772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeland, K. (2022). A theory of nuclear disarmament: Cases, analogies, and the role of the non-proliferation regime. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(1), 106–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1978159
   Google Scholar
• European Leadership Network. (2019, December 13). Policy recommendations: Options for P5 cooperation. https://www.europeanleadershipnetwork.org/policy-intervention/policy-recommendations-options-for-p5-cooperation/
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, L. (2003). The evolution of nuclear strategy (3rd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, L. (2013). Disarmament and other nuclear norms. Washington Quarterly, 36(2), 93–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2013.791085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futter, A., & Zala, B. (2021). Strategic non-nuclear weapons and the onset of a third nuclear age. European Journal of International Security, 6(3), 257–277. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2021.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaddis, J. L. (1986). The long peace: Elements of stability in the postwar international system. International Security, 10(4), 99–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2538951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gault, M. (2015, February 19). This TV movie about nuclear war depressed Ronald Reagan. War Is Boring. https://medium.com/war-is-boring/this-tv-movie-about-nuclear-war-depressed-ronald-reagan-fb4c25a50044
   Google Scholar
• Gellman, B. (1998, June 21). U.S. and China nearly came to blows in ‘96. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1998/06/21/us-and-china-nearly-came-to-blows-in-96/926d105f-1fd8-404c-9995-90984f86a613/
   Google Scholar
• Gheorghe, E. (2019, July 12). Iran’s nuclear program seems to be accelerating. Will Saudi Arabia take a similar path? Washington Post Monkey Cage blog. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/07/12/irans-nuclear-weapons-program-seems-be-accelerating-will-saudi-arabia-take-similar-path/
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, R. D. (2018). The humanitarian turn in nuclear disarmament and the treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear weapons. Nonproliferation Review, 25(1-2), 11–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2018.1486960
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, R. D., & Herzog, S. (2022). Durable institution under fire? The NPT confronts emerging multipolarity. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(1), 50–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1998294.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, M. (2022). Power to the have-nots? The NPT and the limits of a treaty hijacked by a “power-over” model. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(1), 80–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2037968.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington de Santana, A. (2011). The strategy of non-proliferation: Maintaining the credibility of an incredible pledge to disarm. Millennium, 40(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811413312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsburgh, N. (2015). China and global nuclear order: From estrangement to active engagement. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, R. (1989). The meaning of the nuclear revolution: Statecraft and the prospect of armageddon. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, H. (1965). On escalation: Metaphors and scenarios. Frederick A. Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Kheel, R. (2021, June 16). Overnight defense. The Hill. https://thehill.com/policy/defense/overnights/558850-overnight-defense-biden-putin-agree-to-launch-arms-control-talks-at
   Google Scholar
• Kimball, D. G., & Thielmann, G. (2010). Obama’s NPR: Transitional, not transformational. Arms Control Today, 40(4), 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Klimas, J. (2018, February 2). Trump plan calls for new nuclear weapons. Politico. https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/02/trump-plan-nuclear-weapons-386087
   Google Scholar
• Knopf, J. W. (2012/13). Nuclear disarmament and nonproliferation: Examining the linkage argument. International Security, 37(3), 92–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knopf, J. W. (2012). The concept of nuclear learning. Nonproliferation Review, 19(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2012.655088
   Google Scholar
• Knopf, J. W. (ed.). (2016). International cooperation on WMD nonproliferation. University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, H. M., & Korda, M. (2020). Russian nuclear forces, 2020. Nuclear notebook. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 76(2), 102–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2020.1728985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroenig, M. (2016). US nuclear weapons and nonproliferation: Is there a link? Journal of Peace Research, 53(2), 166–179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343315626770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutchesfahani, S. Z. (2019). Global nuclear order. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kutchesfahani, S. Z., Davenport, K., & Connolly, E. (2018). The Nuclear Security Summits: An overview of state actions to curb nuclear terrorism, 2010–2016. Report, Arms Control Association and Fissile Materials Working Group.
   Google Scholar
• Landler, M., & Cooper, H. (2018, February 1). White House wants Pentagon to offer more options on North Korea. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/01/us/politics/white-house-pentagon-north-korea.html
   Google Scholar
• Lavoy, P. R. (ed.). (2009). Asymmetric warfare in South Asia: The causes and consequences of the Kargil conflict. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. (2018). The 2020 commission report on the North Korean nuclear attacks against the United States: A speculative novel. Mariner Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum, M. (1979). The nuclear question: The United States and nuclear weapons, 1946–1976. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, P. (2011). The NPT Review Conference: an assessment of outcome and outlook. Simons papers in Security and development, No. 11/2011, School for International studies, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Narang, V. (2009/10). Posturing for peace? Pakistan’s nuclear postures and South asian stability. International Security, 34(3), 38–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2010.34.3.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nebehay, S., & Landay, J. (2021, July 28). U.S., Russia hold nuclear talks in Geneva after summit push. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/us-russia-hold-nuclear-talks-geneva-after-summit-push-2021-07-28/
   Google Scholar
• Noda, O. (2022). A wolf in sheep’s clothing? The NPT and symbolic proliferation. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(1), 134–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1983699.
   Google Scholar
• N Square. (n.d.). https://nsquare.org/
   Google Scholar
• NTI. (n.d.). The hair trigger game. https://hairtriggergame.org/
   Google Scholar
• Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI). (2018, updated May 1). Global Partnership Against the Spread of Weapons and Materials of Mass Destruction (“10 plus 10 over 10 program”). https://www.nti.org/learn/treaties-and-regimes/global-partnership-against-spread-weapons-and-materials-mass-destruction-10-plus-10-over-10-program/
   Google Scholar
• Onderco, M., & Zutt, M. (2021). Emerging technology and nuclear security: What does the wisdom of the crowd tell us? Contemporary Security Policy, 42(3), 286–311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1928963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panda, A., & Narang, V. (2021, February 22). Sole purpose is not no first use: Nuclear weapons and declaratory policy. War on the Rocks. https://warontherocks.com/2021/02/sole-purpose-is-not-no-first-use-nuclear-weapons-and-declaratory-policy/
   Google Scholar
• Pant, H. V., & Joshi, Y. (2020, October 23). Is India overturning decades of nuclear doctrine? Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/10/23/india-nuclear-no-first-use-strike-china-pakistan/
   Google Scholar
• Paul, T. V. (2009). The tradition of non-use of nuclear weapons. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, W. C. (2017). Disarmament diplomacy and the nuclear ban treaty. Survival, 59(4), 75–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2017.1349786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Press, D. G., Sagan, S. D., & Valentino, B. A. (2013). Atomic aversion: Experimental evidence on taboos, traditions, and the non-use of nuclear weapons. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 188–206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretorius, J., & Sauer, T. (2022). When is it legitimate to abandon the NPT? Withdrawal as a political tool to move nuclear disarmament forward. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(1), 161–185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.2009695.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, N. (2019). A hegemonic nuclear order: Understanding the Ban treaty and the power politics of nuclear weapons. Contemporary Security Policy, 40(4), 409–434. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2019.1571852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydell, R. (2005). Looking back: The 1995 nuclear nonproliferation treaty review and extension conference. Arms Control Today, 35(3), 47–48.
   Google Scholar
• Sagan, S. D. (2000). The commitment trap: Why the United States should not use nuclear threats to deter biological and chemical weapon attacks. International Security, 24(4), 85–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/016228800560318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagan, S. D. (2004). Realism, ethics, and weapons of mass destruction. In S. Hashmi, & S. Lee (Eds.), Ethics and weapons of mass destruction (pp. 73–95). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sagan, S. D., & Valentino, B. A. (2017). Revisiting Hiroshima in Iran: What Americans really think about using nuclear weapons and killing noncombatants. International Security, 42(1), 41–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanger, D. E., Jakes, L., & Fassihi, F. (2021, July 31). Biden promised to restore the Iran nuclear deal. now it risks derailment. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/31/us/politics/biden-iran-nuclear-deal.html
   Google Scholar
• Sanger, D. E., & Sang-Hun, C. (2020, June 12). Two years after Trump-Kim meeting, little to show for personal diplomacy. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/12/world/asia/korea-nuclear-trump-kim.html
   Google Scholar
• Sasikumar, K. (2019). India-Pakistan crises under the nuclear shadow: The role of reassurance. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 2(1), 151–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2019.1619229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmemann, S. (1993, November 4). Russia drops pledge of no first use of atom arms. New York Times, A8.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, L., Bender, B., & O’Brien, C. (2021, June 2). Biden goes ‘full steam ahead’ on Trump’s nuclear expansion despite campaign rhetoric. Politico. https://www.politico.com/news/2021/06/02/biden-trump-nuclear-weapons-491631
   Google Scholar
• Shankar, M., & Paul, T. V. (2016). Nuclear doctrines and stable strategic relationships: The case of South Asia. International Affairs, 92(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smetana, M., & O’Mahoney, J. (2022). NPT as an antifragile system: How contestation improves the nonproliferation regime. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(1), 24–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1978761.
   Google Scholar
• Smetana, M., & Wunderlich, C. eds. (2021). Forum: Nonuse of nuclear weapons in world politics: Toward the third generation of ‘nuclear taboo’ research. International Studies Review. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viab002
   Google Scholar
• Sonne, P. (2021, February 3). United States extends nuclear treaty with Russia for five years. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/us-russia-new-start-nuclear-treaty/2021/02/03/4293d0fa-6638-11eb-bf81-c618c88ed605_story.html
   Google Scholar
• Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). (2015). World nuclear forces. In SIPRI yearbook 2015 (pp. 459–520). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tannenwald, N. (2007). The nuclear taboo: The United States and the non-use of nuclear weapons since 1945. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tannenwald, N. (2018a). The great unraveling: The future of the nuclear normative order. In N. Tannenwald & J. M. Acton (Eds.), Meeting the challenges of the new nuclear age: Emerging risks and declining norms in the age of technological innovation and changing nuclear doctrines (pp. 6–31). American Academy of Arts & Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Tannenwald, N. (2018b). The vanishing nuclear taboo? Foreign Affairs, 97(6), 16–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinkunas, H. A., Lin, H., & Loehrke, B. (eds.). (2020). Three tweets to midnight: Effects of the global information ecosystem on the risk of nuclear conflict. Hoover Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• UN Office for Disarmament Affairs. (n.d.). Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. https://www.un.org/disarmament/wmd/nuclear/npt/text/
   Google Scholar
• Ven Bruusgaard, K. (2017, September 22). The myth of Russia’s lowered nuclear threshold. War on the Rocks. https://warontherocks.com/2017/09/the-myth-of-russias-lowered-nuclear-threshold/
   Google Scholar
• Walker, W. (2000). Nuclear order and disorder. International Affairs, 76(4), 703–724. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, W. (2012). A perpetual menace: Nuclear weapons and international order. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, A., & Wilner, A. (eds.). (2012). Deterring terrorism: Theory and practice. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, T. (2016, May 18). China’s MIRVs: Separating fact from fiction. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2016/05/chinas-mirvs-separating-fact-from-fiction/
   Google Scholar
• Wilkening, D. (2019). Hypersonic weapons and strategic stability. Survival, 61(5), 129–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2019.1662125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, H., & Drew, A. (2020). Escalation by tweet: Managing the new nuclear diplomacy. Centre for Science & Security Studies, King’s College London.
   Google Scholar
• Woolf, A. F. (2017, December 6). Russian compliance with the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty. Congressional Research Service Report R43832.
   Google Scholar
• Yusuf, M. W. (2019). The pulwama crisis: Flirting with war in a nuclear environment. Arms Control Today, 49(4), 6–11.
   Google Scholar