The rules-based order as rhetorical entrapment: Comparing maritime dispute resolution in the Indo-Pacific

Reference list

• Al Jazeera. (2014, July 7). Bangladesh wins sea border dispute with India. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2014/7/9/bangladesh-wins-sea-border-dispute-with-india.
   Google Scholar
• Allard, T. (2016, February 15). East Timor to Malcolm Turnbull: Let’s start talks on maritime boundary. Sydney Morning Herald.https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/east-timor-to-malcolm-turnbull-lets-start-talks-on-maritime-boundary-20160215-gmugd1.html.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, S. (2014). The Chagos Islanders and international Law. Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Appleby, T. (2015). The Chagos marine protected arbitration—A battle of four losers? Journal of Environmental Law, 27(3), 529–540. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqv027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbitral Tribunal. (2014, July 7). In the matter of the Bay of Bengal Maritime Boundary Arbitration between the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and the Republic of India – Award.
   Google Scholar
• Arbitral Tribunal. (2015, March 18). In the Matter of the Chagos Marine Protected Area Arbitration (Mauritius v United Kingdom) (Award).
   Google Scholar
• Aryal, S. K. (2021). India’s ‘neighbourhood first’ policy and the Belt & Road Initiative (BRI). Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 7(4), 744–756. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.117720578911211014282. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911211014282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ásgeirsdóttir, A., & Steinwand, M. (2015). Dispute settlement mechanisms and maritime boundary settlements. The Review of International Organizations, 10(2), 119–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-015-9217-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Associated Press. (2020, March 25). Island claimed by India and Bangladesh sinks below waves, The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/world/cif-green/2010/mar/24/india-bangladesh-sea-levels#:~:text=India%20and%20Bangladesh%20both%20claimed,to%20hoist%20its%20national%20flag.
   Google Scholar
• Australia and Timor-Leste. (2018, March 6). Treaty Between Australia and the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste’ Establishing Their Maritime Boundaries in the Timor Sea.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Department of Defence. (2020). Defence strategic update. Commonwealth of Australia. https://www.defence.gov.au/about/strategic-planning/2020-defence-strategic-update.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Department of Defence. (2021, September 11). Joint statement on inaugural India-Australia 2+2 ministerial dialogue. https://www.minister.defence.gov.au/statements/2021-09-11/joint-statement-inaugural-india-australia-22-ministerial-dialogue.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. (2018). Australia and Timor-Leste Maritime Boundaries: Rules-based Order in Action. https://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/aus-timor-maritime-boundary-fact-sheet.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. (2002a, March 21). Australian declarations under Articles 287(1) and 298(1) of the United National Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. (2017). Australian foreign policy white paper. Commonwealth of Australia. https://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/2017-foreign-policy-white-paper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. (2022). Australian, UK and US Partnership. https://www.defence.gov.au/about/taskforces/nuclear-powered-submarine-task-force/australian-uk-and-us-partnership/.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L. (2018, October 22). Lords dash hopes of Indian Ocean islanders. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-chagos-idUKTRE49L2QK20081022.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. (2021). International progress, international order, and the liberal international order. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 14(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poaa019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthwal-Datta, M., & Chacko, P. (2020). The politics of strategic narratives of regional order in the Indo-Pacific: Free, open, prosperous, inclusive? Australian Journal of International Affairs, 74(3), 244–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2020.1744517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruah, D. M. (2020, June 30). India in the Indo-Pacific: New Delhi’s theater of opportunity. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/06/30/india-in-indo-pacific-new-delhi-s-theater-of-opportunity-pub-82205.
   Google Scholar
• Bashfield, S. (2020). Mauritian sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago? Strategic implications for Diego Garcia from a UK-US perspective. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, 16(2), 166–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/19480881.2020.1770949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman, S. (2016, March 10). Australia’s flawed position on the South China Sea. East Asia Forum. https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2016/03/10/australias-flawed-position-on-the-south-china-sea/.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. (2019, February 25). Chagos Islands dispute: UK obliged to end control – UN. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-47358602.
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, M. (2019, September 4). Australia waives the rules with Timor-Leste. ASPI. https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/australia-waives-the-rules-with-timor-leste/.
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, M., & Chubb, A. (2021). Australia, China and the maritime ‘rules-based international order’: Comparing the South China Sea and Timor Sea disputes. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 21(2), 233–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcz022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijl, M. (2019, April 10). The South China Sea, Australia, and a tiny half island-nation. Medium. https://medium.com/@matthijsbijl/https-medium-com-matthijsbijl-the-south-china-sea-australia-and-a-tiny-half-island-nation-52bc1249ae94.
   Google Scholar
• Bisley, N., & Schreer, B. (2018). Australia and the rules-based order in Asia: Of principles and pragmatism. Asian Survey, 58(2), 302–319. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2018.58.2.302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brautigam, D. (2020). A critical look at Chinese ‘debt-trap diplomacy’: The rise of a meme. Area Development and Policy, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2019.1689828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueger, C., & Edmunds, T. (2021). Pragmatic ordering: Informality, experimentation, and the maritime security agenda. Review of International Security, 47(2), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210520000479
   Google Scholar
• Bugat, I. (2012). Territorial sovereignty issues in maritime disputes: A jurisdictional dilemma for Law of the Sea tribunals. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 27(1), 59–95. https://doi.org/10.1163/157180812X615113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, C. (2020). Securing the ‘rules-based order’ in the Indo-Pacific: The significance of strategic narrative. Security Challenges, 16(3), 10–15. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26924333.
   Google Scholar
• Cannane, S., Koloff, S., & Andersen, B. (2015, November 26). ‘Matter of death and life’: Espionage in East Timor and Australia’s diplomatic bungle. ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-11-25/east-timor-greater-sunrise-spy-scandal/6969830.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, A. (2019). No longer a middle power: Australia’s strategy in the 21st century. Focus stratégique, 92, 1–50. https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/carr_australia_middle_power_2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chellany, B. (2019, December 23). The illusion of a rules-based global order. ASPI.December. https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/the-illusion-of-a-rules-based-global-order/.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2018, March 26). Parliamentary debates. House of Representatives.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2020, July 23). Submission to the United Nations N° 20/026. https://www.un.org/depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/mys_12_12_2019/2020_07_23_AUS_NV_UN_001_OLA-2020-00373.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, A., Nexon, D., & Ward, S. (2019). Revising order or challenging the balance of military power? An alternative typology of revisionist and status-quo states. Review of International Studies, 45(4), 689–708. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210519000019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, A. (2016a, July 21). DFAT on China and Timor-Leste: No ‘two-step’ but one considered approach. Lowy Interpreter. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/dfat-china-and-timor-leste-no-two-step-one-considered-approach.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, A. (2016b, March 4). Timor Sea treaties show Australia’s commitment to rules-based order. Lowy Interpreter. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/timor-sea-treaties-show-australias-commitment-rules-based-order.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, H. (2019, April 16). Australia accused of ‘siphoning’ millions in Timor-Leste oil revenue. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/apr/16/australia-accused-of-siphoning-millions-in-timor-leste-oil-revenue.
   Google Scholar
• De Luce, D. (2016, June 28). Timor-Leste: Australia Is Behaving Like China in Disputed Waters, Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/06/28/timor-leste-australia-is-behaving-like-china-in-disputed-waters/.
   Google Scholar
• De Santo, E. M., Jones, P. J. S., & Miller, A. M. M. (2011). Fortress conservation at sea: A commentary on the Chagos marine protected area. Marine Policy, 35(2), 258–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2010.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doran, M., & Lloyd, P. (2016, April 11). East Timor-Australia maritime border to be negotiated before United Nations after protests. ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-04-11/east-timor-to-negotiate-maritime-border-with-australia-at-un/7316674.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, T., & Rumley, D. (2019). The rise and return of the Indo-Pacific. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duncombe, C., & Dunne, T. (2018). After liberal world order. International Affairs, 94(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupont, P.-E. (2018). Contested sovereignty over land territory and maritime zones. In S. Minas, & H. J. Diamond (Eds.), Stress testing the Law of the Sea (pp. 31–54). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. (2021, November 1). Trio of exploration wells planned for historic East Timor campaign. Energy Voice. https://www.energyvoice.com/oilandgas/asia/360660/trio-of-exploration-wells-planned-for-historic-east-timor-campaign/.
   Google Scholar
• Flockhart, T. (2016). The coming multi-order world. Contemporary Security Policy, 37(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2016.1150053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, J. (2004). Australian practice in international Law 2002. Australian Yearbook of International Law, 23(1), 289–395. http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AUYrBkIntLaw/2004/12.html.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, S. (2018). When right makes might: Rising powers and world order. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guilfoyle, D. (2021). The Chagos archipelago before international tribunals: Strategic litigation and the production of historical knowledge. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 21(3), 749–771. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316informit.20220118060440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, P. (2015). America’s other Guantánamo: British foreign policy and the US base on Diego Garcia. Political Quarterly, 86(6), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12186
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, M., & Jian, H. (2019). Protracted maritime boundary dispute resolutions in the Bay of Bengal: Issues and impacts. Thalassa: An International Journal of Marine Affairs, 35(1), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-019-0126-1
   Google Scholar
• Hurrell, A. (2008). On global order: Power, values, and the constitution of international society. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Indian Ministry of External Affairs. (2015a, August 6). Remarks by Minister of State for External Affairs at the 5th East Asia Summit Foreign Ministers’ Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Indian Ministry of External Affairs. (2015b, November 22). Remarks by Prime Minister at the 10th East Asia Summit.
   Google Scholar
• Indian Ministry of External Affairs. (2020a). Annual Report 2019–2020. http://www.mea.gov.in/Uploads/PublicationDocs/32489_AR_Spread_2020_new.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Indian Ministry of External Affairs. (2020b, June 4). Government of India, Joint Statement on a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership between Republic of India and Australia. https://www.mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/32729/Joint_Statement_on_a_Comprehensive_Strategic_Partnership_between_Republic_of_India_and_Australia.
   Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group. (2021, November 29). Competing Visions of International Order in the South China Sea, 315. https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/north-east-asia/china/315-competing-visions-international-order-south-china-sea.
   Google Scholar
• ITLOS. (2021, January 28). Dispute concerning delimitation of the maritime boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean. Press Release 313. https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/press_releases_english/PR_313_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, M. (2016, February 15). East Timor: Concession is the price for a rules-based order, Lowy Interpreter. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/east-timor-concession-price-rules-based-order.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, M. (2018). Equilibrium & Fragmentation in the International Rule of Law: The Rising Chinese Geolegal Order (KFG Working Paper Series No. 21). Berlin Potsdam Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, M. (2021). The jurisprudence of the rules-based order: The power of rules consistent with but not binding under international law. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 22(2), 221–258. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/jurisprudence-rules-based-order-power-consistent/docview/2671718562/se-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katselli, E. (2019, June 11). Chagos Islands: UK refusal to hand back archipelago disregards international law and echoes era of colonialism. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/chagos-islands-uk-refusal-to-hand-back-archipelago-disregards-international-law-and-echoes-era-of-colonialism-118290.
   Google Scholar
• Krisch, N. (2005). International law in times of hegemony: Unequal power and the shaping of the international legal order. European Journal of International Law, 16(3), 369–408. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C. (2019). Rhetorical traps and China’s peaceful rise: Malaysia and the Philippines in the South China Sea territorial disputes. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 19(1), 117–146. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcx008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, M. (2016, July 20). The PCA ruling, Australia and Timor-Leste, Lowy Interpreter. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/pca-ruling-australia-timor-leste.
   Google Scholar
• Levinger, M., & Roselle, L. (2017). Narrating global order and disorder. Politics and Governance, 5(3), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i3.1174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, T. (2017). It’s not the size, it’s the relationship: From ‘small states’ to asymmetry. International Politics, 54(2), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0028-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauritius Parliament. (2016, August 11). Sixth national assembly parliamentary debates. First Session.
   Google Scholar
• Mauritius Parliament. (2019, August 6). Sixth national assembly parliamentary debates. First Session.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, K. (2017). Crossing the line: Australia’s secret history in the Timor Sea. Black Inc.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, K. (2020). Drawing the line: Witness K and the ethics of spying. Australian Foreign Affairs, 9, 112–124. https://www.australianforeignaffairs.com/articles/extract/2020/08/drawing-the-line.
   Google Scholar
• Medcalf, R. (2020). Contest for the Indo-Pacific: Why China won’t map the future. La Trobe University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (Eds.). (2017). Forging the world: Strategic narratives and international relations. University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Page, M. (2015, November 25). India’s approach to maritime disputes: lessons for Beijing in the South China Sea?, ASPI. https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/indias-approach-to-maritime-disputes-lessons-for-beijing-in-the-south-china-sea/.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, C. (2014). The ‘indo-pacific’ and geopolitical anxieties about China’s rise in the Asian regional order. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 68(4), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2014.884054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattison, B. (2015, September 3). Peaceful resolution of Bangladesh-India maritime boundary dispute sets global example. Future Directions International.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R. (2014, July 8). U.N. tribunal rules for Bangladesh in sea border dispute with India. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-bangladesh-india-seaborder-idUKKBN0FD15N20140708.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, F. (2010, February 18). The Chagos archipelago – where conservation meets colonialism. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/feb/18/chagos-nature-reserve-greenwash.
   Google Scholar
• Petrova, M. H. (2016). Rhetorical entrapment and normative enticement: How the United Kingdom turned from spoiler into champion of the Cluster Munition Ban. International Studies Quarterly, 60(3), 388–399. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqv013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M. (2021). Norm erosion and Australia’s challenge to the rules-based order. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 75(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2021.1875983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu, W. (2016). The issue of jurisdiction over mixed disputes in the Chagos marine protection area arbitration and beyond. Ocean Development and International Law, 47(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2016.1124484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan, R. (2020). Evasive balancing: India's unviable Indo-Pacific strategy. International Affairs, 96(1), 75–93. http://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajput, A. (2018). Bay of Bengal maritime delimitation cases: Upholding the rule of law in international relations. Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India, 14(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09733159.2018.1478432
   Google Scholar
• Rambaree, K. (2020). Environmental justice in the case of the Chagos marine protected area: Implications for international social work. Sustainability, 12(20), 8349. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehman, I. (2017). India, China, and differing conceptions of the maritime order. Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, G. (2012, September 1). Human rights colloquium: Who Owns Diego Garcia? Decolonization and Indigenous rights in the Indian Ocean. University of Western Australia Law Review. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316INFORMIT.427936208922542.
   Google Scholar
• Rolland, N. (2020). China’s vision for a new world order. National Bureau of Asian Research.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, M., & Jackson, D. (2017). Bangladesh v. India: A positive step forward in public order of the seas. Center for Naval Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, M. B., & Mutlu, C. E. (2013). Securitisation and Diego Garcia. Review of International Studies, 39(4), 815–834. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210512000587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2001). The community trap: Liberal norms, rhetorical action, and the Eastern enlargement of the European Union. International Organization, 55(1), 47–80. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3078597. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081801551414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2021). Rhetorical entrapment in EU–Turkey relations. In W. Reiners, & E. Turhan (Eds.), EU-Turkey Relations: Theories, institutions and policies (pp. 139–156). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, C. (2007). Minding the Gap: The Australia–East Timor treaty on certain maritime arrangements in the Timor Sea (CMATS). The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 22(2), 189–234. https://doi.org/10.1163/157180807781361520
   Google Scholar
• Scott, S. V. (2018). The decline of international law as a normative ideal. Victoria University Wellington Law Review, 49(4), 627–644. https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v49i4.5344
   Google Scholar
• Singh, A. (2018, January 10). Why good order at sea matters. Maritime Issues. http://www.maritimeissues.com/most-prominent-news/why-good-order-at-sea-matters.html.
   Google Scholar
• Song, Y.-H. (n.d.). The Bay of Bengal Maritime Boundary Arbitration (Bangladesh v. India). Maritime Dispute Resolution Project, New York University School of Law. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/55d21ffee4b0d22e803fdca1/t/5ff4a9090c86035cd35810a7/1609869578607/Bangladesh_v_India.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sonwalker, P. (2017, January 19). Britain and US seek India’s assistance on Diego Garcia. Hindustan Times. https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/britain-and-us-seek-india-s-assistance-on-diego-garcia/story-thHY7JObIZETj2zIQ73DwL.html.
   Google Scholar
• Splidsboel Hansen, F. (2006). The EU and Ukraine: Rhetorical entrapment? European Security, 15(2), 115–135. http://doi.org/10.1080/09662830600903561
   Google Scholar
• Steinsson, S. (2018). Do liberal ties pacify? A study of the Cod Wars. Cooperation and Conflict, 53(3), 339–355. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48512980. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836717712293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strating, R. (2017). Timor-Leste’s foreign policy approach to the Timor Sea: Pipeline or Pipedream? Australian Journal of International Affairs, 71(3), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2016.1258689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strating, R. (2019). A ‘new chapter’ in Australia-Timor bilateral relations? Assessing the politics of the Timor Sea maritime boundary treaty. Australian Yearbook of International Law, 36, 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1163/26660229_03601005
   Google Scholar
• Strating, R. (2020). Regional responses to the South China Sea. East West Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, K. (2011). Indo-Bangladesh maritime border dispute conflicts over a disappeared island. Mandala Projects ICE Case Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. (2020). Is Australia’s Indo-Pacific strategy an illusion? International Affairs, 96(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakkar, C. (2021, July 12). Overcoming the Diego Garcia Stalemate. War on the Rocks. https://warontherocks.com/2021/07/overcoming-the-diego-garcia-stalemate/.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, O., & Nymalm, N. (2019). Morality and progress: IR narratives on international revisionism and the status quo. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32(4), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1623173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Government. (2020). UK Government’s position on legal issues arising in the South China Sea, http://data.parliament.uk/DepositedPapers/Files/DEP2020-0516/UK_govt_analysis_of_legal_issues_in_the_South_China_Sea.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UK Government. (2021). Global Britain in a competitive age: The Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/975077/Global_Britain_in_a_Competitive_Age-_the_Integrated_Review_of_Security__Defence__Development_and_Foreign_Policy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UK Parliament. (2014, May 8). Overseas territories (Sustainability), 580. House of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• UK Parliament. (2016, October 25). British Indian Ocean territory and the Chagos Islands. House of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• UK Parliament. (2017, June 26). British Indian Ocean Territory, 626. House of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• UK Parliament. (2019, July 3). Chagos Islands: UN general assembly resolution, 662. House of Lords.
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom. (2009). HMG Floats Proposal for Marine Reserve Covering the Chagos Archipelago (British Indian Ocean Territory). Wikileaks. https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09LONDON1156_a.html.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Compulsory Conciliation. (2016, September 19). Decision on Australia’s Objections to Competence. PCA Case N° 2016-10. https://pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/10062.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of State. (2019). A Free and Open Indo-Pacific: Advancing a Shared Vision. https://www.state.gov/a-free-and-open-indo-pacific-advancing-a-shared-vision/.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. White House. (2021a, September 9). Joint Leaders Statement on AUKUS. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/09/15/joint-leaders-statement-on-aukus/.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. White House. (2021b, March 12). Quad Leaders’ Joint Statement: “The Spirit of the Quad”.https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/12/quad-leaders-joint-statement-the-spirit-of-the-quad/.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. White House. (2022, February). Indo-Pacific Strategy of the United States. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/U.S.-Indo-Pacific-Strategy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, C., & Jenne, N. (2022). Filling the void: The Asia-Pacific problem of order and emerging Indo-Pacific regional multilateralism. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(2), 213–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2036506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, N. (2020, September 8). The UK and the international rules-based system. The Foreign Policy Centre. https://fpc.org.uk/the-uk-and-the-international-rules-based-system/.
   Google Scholar
• Wroe, D. (2018, March 6). Australia’s New Maritime Deal Fuelled by Fears of Regional Disorder Amid China’s Rise. Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/australia-s-new-maritime-deal-fuelled-by-fears-of-regional-disorder-amid-china-s-rise-20180306-p4z342.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ying, F. (2016, July 10). Why China Says No to the Arbitration on the South China Sea. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/07/10/why-china-says-no-to-the-arbitration-on-the-south-china-sea/?gclid=CjwKCAjwrdmhBhBBEiwA4Hx5g4UskUjGlx_BtZtThe6XeihW1Ybl39PLUoCYVlOoriPMltEdHA4W8xoCVIUQAvD_BwE.
   Google Scholar