The last atomic Waltz: China’s nuclear expansion and the persisting relevance of the theory of the nuclear revolution

References

• Arceneaux, G. D. (2023). Whether to worry: Nuclear weapons in the Russia-Ukraine war. Contemporary Security Policy, 44(4), 561–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2023.2260175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braut-Hegghammer, M. (2019). Proliferating bias? American political science, nuclear weapons, and global security. Journal of Global Security Studies, 4(3), 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogz025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, B. (1959). Strategy in the missile age. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bundy, M. (1983). The bishops and the bomb. New York Review of Books, June 16.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Global Security Research. (2023). China’s emergence as a second nuclear peer: Implications for US nuclear deterrence strategy. A report of a study group convened by the Center for global security research at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. https://cgsr.llnl.gov/content/assets/docs/CGSR_Two_Peer_230314.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., & Ge, T. (2022). Meiguo dui Hua juzhixing weixie zhanlüe lunxi [An analysis of the US strategy of deterrence by denial against China]. Guoji Anquan Yanjiu, 5, 81–106.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. J. (2012). The meaning of the nuclear evolution: China’s strategic modernization and US-China security relations. Journal of Strategic Studies, 35(4), 447–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2012.714710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creedon, M. R., Kyl, J. L., Billingslea, M. S., Duffy, G. C., Gottemoeller, R. E., Gordon-Hagerty, L. E., Heinrichs, R. L., Hyten, J. E., Kroenig, M. H., Miller, F. C., Scher, R. M., & Tomero, L. A. (2023). Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States. https://armedservices.house.gov/sites/republicans.armedservices.house.gov/files/Strategic-Posture-Committee-Report-Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cui, M. (2018). Meiguo xin ban ‘He taishi pinggu’ baogao chutai—Zhongguo ying ruhe huiying [The latest US Nuclear Posture Review is out—How should China respond?]. Zhongguo Qingnianbao, February, 14, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, F. S. (2023). The unknowns about China’s nuclear modernization program. Arms Control Today, 53(5), 6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, F. S., & Fravel, M. T. (2015). Assuring assured retaliation: China’s nuclear posture and US-China strategic stability. International Security, 40(2), 7–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, F. S., & Fravel, M. T. (2019). Dangerous confidence? Chinese views on nuclear escalation. International Security, 44(2), 61–109. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, H., Bi, Y., Zhang, O., & Huang, Y. (2018). Mei E luji heliliang duoyuan xingtai fazhan tanxi [Analysis on the development of diversified forms of US and Russian land-based nuclear forces]. Feihang Daodan, 55(10), 45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, B., Liu, Y., Tang, S., Guo, Y., & Chen, J. (2018). Eluosi fashe jinggai de fazhan licheng [The development history of Russian silo covers]. Feihang Daodan, 2, 69–73.
   Google Scholar
• Denmark, A., & Talmadge, C. (2021). Why China wants more and better nukes. Foreign Affairs, November 19. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/china/why-china-wants-more-and-better-nukes.
   Google Scholar
• Eveleth, D. (2023). People’s Liberation Army Rocket Force order of battle 2023. CNS.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, J. (2018). Zhongguo hezhengce de jiben luoji yu qianjing [Logic and evolution of China’s nuclear policy]. Waijiao Pinglun, 5, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Fravel, M. T., Hiim, H. S., & Trøan, M. L. (2023). China’s misunderstood nuclear expansion. Foreign Affairs, November 10. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/china/chinas-misunderstood-nuclear-expansion.
   Google Scholar
• Fravel, M. T., & Medeiros, E. S. (2010). China’s search for assured retaliation: The evolution of Chinese nuclear strategy and force structure. International Security, 35(2), 48–87. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fravel, M. T., & Twomey, C. P. (2014). Projecting strategy: The myth of Chinese counter-intervention. The Washington Quarterly, 37(4), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2014.1002164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, C. L. (1990). Analyzing strategic nuclear policy. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, C. L., & Fetter, S. (2005). Counterforce revisited: Assessing the nuclear posture review’s new missions. International Security, 30(2), 84–126. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228805775124552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, C. L., & Fetter, S. (2016). Should the United States reject MAD? Damage limitation and US nuclear strategy toward China. International Security, 41(1), 49–98. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, C. L., & Fetter, S. (2017). The authors reply. In Green, B. R., Long, A., Kroenig, M., Glaser, C. L., & Fetter, S. Correspondence: The limits of damage limitation. International Security, 42(1), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_c_00279
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, A. (2000). Deterrence and security in the 21st century: China, Britain, France, and the enduring legacy of the nuclear revolution. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, B. R. (2020). The revolution that failed: Nuclear competition, arms control, and the Cold War. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108779593
   Google Scholar
• Green, B. R. (2021). Author response: The meaning of the nuclear counterrevolution. In T. Mahnken (Ed.), Book review roundtable: The revolution that failed (pp. 29–40). June 14, 2021, Texas National Security Review.
   Google Scholar
• Green, B. R., & Long, A. (2017a). In Green, B. R., Long, A., Kroenig, M., Glaser, C. L., & Fetter, S. Correspondence: The limits of damage limitation. International Security, 42(1), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_c_00279
   Google Scholar
• Green, B. R., & Long, A. (2017b). The MAD who wasn’t there: Soviet reactions to the late Cold War nuclear balance. Security Studies, 26(4), 606–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2017.1331639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, X. (2019). Meiguo tuichu “Zhongdao tiaoyue” de dongyin yu yingxiang qianxi [Analysis of drivers and implications of the US withdrawal from the INF Treaty]. Zhongguo Guoji Zhanlüe Pinglun, 1, 191–203.
   Google Scholar
• Hagerty, D. T. (1995). Nuclear deterrence in South Asia: The 1990 Indo-Pakistani crisis. International Security, 20(3), 79–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiim, H. S., Fravel, M. T., & Trøan, M. L. (2023). The dynamics of an entangled security dilemma: China’s changing nuclear posture. International Security, 47(4), 147–187. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsburgh, N. (2015). China and global nuclear order: From estrangement to active engagement. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198706113.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Hu, G. (2021). Zhong Mei bu duichen he wending yu meiguo zhanlüe jihui zhuyi lunxi [An analysis on China-US asymmetric nuclear stability and US strategic opportunism]. Guoji Anquan Yanjiu, 2, 61–85.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, X. (2020). China needs to increase its nuclear warheads to 1,000. Global Times, May 8. https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1187766.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, R. (1984). The illogic of American nuclear strategy. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, R. (1989). The meaning of the nuclear revolution: Statecraft and the prospect of Armageddon. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. S. (2019). Chinese evolving approaches to nuclear “war-fighting”: An emerging intense US–China security dilemma and threats to crisis stability in the Asia Pacific. Asian Security, 15(3), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2018.1443915
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, A I. (1995). China's new “old thinking”: The concept of limited deterrence. International Security, 20(3), 5–42. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.20.3.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartchner, K. M., & Gerson, M. S. (2014). Escalation to limited nuclear war in the 21st century. In J. Larsen & K. M. Kartchner (Eds.), On limited nuclear war in the 21st century. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knopf, J. W. (2022). Not by NPT alone: The future of the global nuclear order. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(1), 186–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1983243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korda, M., & Kristensen, H. (2021). China is building a second nuclear missile silo field. Strategic Security (blog), Federation of American Scientists, July 26. https://fas.org/blogs/security/2021/07/china-is-building-a-second-nuclear-missile-silo-field/.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, H. M., Korda, M., & Reynolds, E. (2023). Chinese nuclear weapons, 2023. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 79(2), 108–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2023.2178713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen, H. M., Norris, R. S., & McKinzie, M. (2006). Chinese nuclear forces and US nuclear war planning. Federation of American Scientists.
   Google Scholar
• Kroenig, M. (2017). In Green, B. R., Long, A., Kroenig, M., Glaser, C. L., & Fetter, S. Correspondence: The limits of damage limitation. International Security, 42(1), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_c_00279
   Google Scholar
• Kroenig, M. (2018). The logic of American nuclear strategy: Why strategic superiority matters. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190849184.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R. (2021). PLA likely begins construction of an intercontinental ballistic missile silo site near Hanggin Banner, China Aerospace Studies Institute, August 12. https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/CASI/Display/Article/2729781/pla-likely-begins-construction-of-an-intercontinental-ballistic-missile-silo-si/.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. (2007). The minimum means of reprisal: China’s search for security in the nuclear age. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4645.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. (2008). Minimum deterrence. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 64(3), 38–41. https://doi.org/10.2968/064003008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., & Eveleth, D. (2021). Chinese ICBM silos. Arms Control Wonk, July 2. https://www.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/1212340/chinese-icbm-silos/.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. W., & Hua, D. (1992). China’s ballistic missile programs: technologies, strategies, goals. International Security, 17(2), 5–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, B., & Hu, G. (2018). Meiguo shi yu zhong de Zhongguo he weishe youxiaoxing [The effectiveness of China’s nuclear deterrence from the US perspective]. Waijiao Pinglun, 5, 21–41.
   Google Scholar
• Lieber, K. A., & Press, D. (2020). The myth of the nuclear revolution: Power politics in the atomic age. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501749315
   Google Scholar
• Lieber, K. A., & Press, D. G. (2009). The nukes we need: Preserving the American deterrent. Foreign Affairs, 88(6), 39–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieber, K. A., & Press, D. G. (2017). The new era of counterforce: Technological change and the future of nuclear deterrence. International Security, 41(4), 9–49. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, D. C. (2020). Are they Reading Schelling in Beijing? The dimensions, drivers, and risks of nuclear-conventional entanglement in China. Journal of Strategic Studies, 46(1), 5–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2020.1844671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, D. C., & Saunders, P. C. (2023). Discerning the drivers of China’s nuclear force development: Models, indicators, and data. National Defense University.
   Google Scholar
• Long, A. (2020). The impermanent revolution: MAD is a variable, not a constant. Chap. 4 in book review roundtable: The meaning of the nuclear revolution 30 years later edited by F. Gavin, Texas National Security Review, April, 30, 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Long, A., & Green, B. R. (2015). Stalking the secure second strike: Intelligence, counterforce, and nuclear strategy. Journal of Strategic Studies, 38(1–2), 38–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2014.958150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, X. (2017). Meiguo zhanlüe weishe tixi de tiaozheng yu Zhong-Mei zhanlüe wendingxing [Shifts in US strategic deterrence and US-China strategic stability]. Guoji Guanxi Yanjiu, 6, 32–49.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, E. B., & Yoshihara, T. (2022). The real challenge of China’s nuclear modernization. The Washington Quarterly, 45(4), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2022.2148508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, R. S., Burrows, A. S., & Fieldhouse, R. W. (1994). Nuclear weapons databook. Volume V: British, French, and Chinese nuclear weapons. Westview press.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, Z. (2018). A study of China’s no-first-use policy on nuclear weapons. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 1(1), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2018.1458415
   Google Scholar
• Podvig, P. (. (2023). US China’s military developments report (CMPR) says the 300 missile silos are real. well, what about fissile material production? China doesn’t have that much plutonium. USG people tell me that “it’s all real, it’s all in the report.” But there is not much there (thread)’, Twitter, 15 Jan. 2023. https://twitter.com/russianforces/status/1618193070939574272.
   Google Scholar
• PRC Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2020). Director-General FU Cong’s interview with Kommersant. October 16. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/wjb_663304/zzjg_663340/jks_665232/jkxw_665234/202010/t20201016_599378.html.
   Google Scholar
• PRC State Council. (2019). Xin shidai de Zhongguo guofang [China’s national defense in a new era]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-07/24/content_5414325.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Qiliang, X. (2022). Ru qishi xianjian jun yi bai nian fendou mubiao [How to realize the 100 year goals of the military]. Renmin Ribao, November 7. http://politics.people.com.cn/n1/2022/1107/c1001-32559984.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, J. (2015). Red China’s “capitalist Bomb”: Inside the Chinese neutron bomb program. National Defense University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rovner, J. (2018). Was there a nuclear revolution? Strategy, grand strategy, and the ultimate weapon. War on the Rocks, March 6. https://warontherocks.com/2018/03/was-there-a-nuclear-revolution-strategy-grand-strategy-and-the-ultimate-weapon/.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. C. (1966). Arms and influence. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, G. H. (1961). Deterrence and defense. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, G. H. (1965). The balance of power and the balance of terror. In P. Seabury (Ed.), The balance of power (pp. 184–201). Chandler.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, M. A. (2010). China’s nuclear warhead storage and handling system. Project 2049 Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Talmadge, C., & Rovner, J. (2023). The meaning of China’s nuclear modernization. Journal of Strategic Studies, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2023.2212871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannenwald, N. (2020). The meaning of the nuclear revolution: 75 years of Non-Use. Chap. 2 in “book review roundtable: The meaning of the nuclear revolution 30 years later,” Texas National Security Review, April 30, 9–19. https://tnsr.org/roundtable/book-review-roundtable-the-meaning-of-the-nuclear-revolution-30-years-later/.
   Google Scholar
• Tecott, R., & Halterman, A. (2021). The case for campaign analysis: A method for studying military operations. International Security, 45(4), 44–83. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunsjø, Ø. (2018). The return of bipolarity in world politics: China, the United States, and geostructural realism. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/tuns17654
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Defense. (2018). Nuclear Posture Review.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Defense. (2022a). Annual report to congress: Military and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China 2022. https://media.defense.gov/2022/Nov/29/2003122279/-1/-1/1/2022-MILITARY-AND-SECURITY-DEVELOPMENTS-INVOLVING-THE-PEOPLES-REPUBLIC-OF-CHINA.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Defense. (2022b). Nuclear Posture Review.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Defense. (2023). Annual report to congress: Military and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China 2023. https://media.defense.gov/2023/Oct/19/2003323409/-1/-1/1/2023-MILITARY-AND-SECURITY-DEVELOPMENTS-INVOLVING-THE-PEOPLES-REPUBLIC-OF-CHINA.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• US Strategic Command. (2021). Speech by Commander Charles Richard, 2021 space and missile defense symposium, August 12. https://www.stratcom.mil/Media/Speeches/Article/2742875/2021-space-and-missile-defense-symposium/.
   Google Scholar
• Van Evera, S. (1999). Causes of war: Power and the roots of conflict. Cornell university press.
   Google Scholar
• Walt, S. M. (2010). Rethinking the “nuclear revolution”. Foreign Policy, August 3. https://foreignpolicy.com/2010/08/03/rethinking-the-nuclear-revolution/.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. N. (1981). The spread of nuclear weapons: More may be better. The Adelphi Papers, 21(171), https://doi.org/10.1080/05679328108457394
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. N. (1988). The origins of war in neorealist theory. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18(4), 615–628. https://doi.org/10.2307/204817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. N. (1990). Nuclear myths and political realities. American Political Science Review, 84(3), 730–745. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. N. (2013). More may be better. In S. Sagan & K. N. Waltz (Eds.), The spread of nuclear weapons: An enduring debate (pp. 3–40). W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Weisgerber, M. (2021). Air Force Secretary warns of China’s burgeoning nuclear arsenal, reveals B-21 detail. Defense One, September 20. https://www.defenseone.com/threats/2021/09/air-force-secretary-warns-chinas-burgeoning-nuclear-arsenal-reveals-b-21-detail/185486/.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlstetter, A. (1958). The delicate balance of terror. RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, R. (2013). Certainty of uncertainty: Nuclear strategy with Chinese characteristics. Journal of Strategic Studies, 36(4), 579–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2013.772510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, R. (2017). Zhong-Mei ruhe bimian he junbei jingsai [How to avoid a China-US nuclear arms race]. Dangdai Meiguo Pinglun, 122–123(2), 39–60.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, R. (2020). Living with uncertainty: Modeling China’s nuclear survivability. International Security, 44(4), 84–118. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, T.2020). Zhanlüe xue [The science of military strategy]. Guofang daxue chubanshe.
   Google Scholar
• Xinhua. (2022). Xi Jinping: Gaoju Zhongguo tese shehui zhuyi weida qizhi wei quanmian jianshe shehui zhuyi xiandaihua guojia er tuanjie fendou – zai Zhongguo gongchangdang di ershi ci quanguo daibiao dahui shang de baogao [Xi Jinping: Hold high the great banner of socialism with Chinese characteristics and strive in unity to build a modern socialist country in all respects – report to the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China], 16 October. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-10/25/content_5721685.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., Bi, Y., & Qi, C. (2019). Mei E jingji he liliang shencun fanghu jianshe tanjiu ji qishi [Explorations and implications of US and Russian development of survivability and protection of silo-based forces]. Feihang Daodan, 73(7), 59–62.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, T. (2021). China’s silence on nuclear arms buildup fuels speculation on motives. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, November 12. https://thebulletin.org/2021/11/chinas-silence-on-nuclear-arms-buildup-fuels-speculation-on-motives/.
   Google Scholar