Reimagining NATO after Crimea: Defender of the rule-based order and truth?

References

• Alden, C. (2023). The global south and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. LSE Public Policy Review, 3(1), 16. pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31389/lseppr.88
   Google Scholar
• Barth, F. (Ed.). (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries. Norwegian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwill, R. D., & Gordon, P. H. (2018). Containing Russia. Council on Foreign Relations Press.
   Google Scholar
• Böller, F. (2018). “Guardian of the international order”? NATO’s contested identity, the discourses of Secretaries General, and the Ukraine crisis. East European Politics, 34(2), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2018.1458616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukkvoll, T. (2016). Why Putin went to war: Ideology, interests and decision-making in the Russian use of force in Crimea and Donbas. Contemporary Politics, 22(3), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2016.1201310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzan, B. (1998)). Ole Wæver and Jaap de Wilde, security: A New framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Calha, J. M. (2015). Hybrid warfare: NATO’s new strategic challenge? Report to NATO Parliamentary Assembly, 7.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. (1992). Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. U of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casier, T. (2016). From logic of competition to conflict: Understanding the dynamics of EU–Russia relations. Contemporary Politics, 22(3), 376–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2016.1201311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooley, A., & Nexon, D. (2020). Exit from hegemony: The unraveling of the American global order. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, F., & Steele, B. (2019). Critical security history: (De)securitisation, ontological security, and insecure memories. European Journal of International Security, 4(2), 209–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2019.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne, T., & Mulaj, K. (2010). America after Iraq. International Affairs, 86(6), 1287–1298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2010.00943.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabian, S. (2019). The Russian hybrid warfare strategy – Neither Russian nor strategy. Defense & Security Analysis, 35(3), 308–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2019.1640424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M. (2009). Legitimacy, hypocrisy, and the social structure of unipolarity. World Politics, 61(1), 58–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887109000082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flockhart, T. (2024). NATO in the multi-order world. International Affairs, 100(2), 471-489.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, R. (2019). Evidence of securitisation in the economic sector of security in Europe? Russia’s economic blackmail of Ukraine and the EU’s conditional bailout of Cyprus. European Security, 28(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2019.1604509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, K. (2016). Russia’s ‘new’ tools for confronting the West: Continuity and innovation in Moscow’s exercise of power. Research Paper. Russia and Eurasia Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, K. (2017). Assessing Russia's reorganized and rearmed military (Vol. 3). Carnegie Endowment for International Peace..
   Google Scholar
• Gjerde, K. L. (2019). Corporaexplorer: An R package for dynamic exploration of text collections. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(38), 1342. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01342
   Google Scholar
• Götz, E. (2016a). Russia, the West, and the Ukraine crisis: Three contending perspectives. Contemporary Politics, 22(3), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2016.1201313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götz, E. (2016b). Neorealism and Russia’s Ukraine policy, 1991-present. Contemporary Politics, 22(3), 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2016.1201312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagmann, J. (2015). (In-) security and the production of international relations: The politics of securitization in Europe. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, L. (2006). Security as practice: Discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hedling, E., Edenborg, E., & Strand, S. (2022). Embodying military muscles and a remasculinized west: Influencer marketing, fantasy, and “the face of NATO”. Global Studies Quarterly, 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksac010
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. J. (2003). Is American multilateralism in decline? Perspectives on Politics, 1(3), 533–550. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592703000380
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. J. (2008). The rise of China and the future of the West-Can the liberal system survive. Foreign Affairs, 87(1), 23-37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, A. J. (2015). Obama's Libya debacle: How a well-meaning intervention ended in failure. Foreign Affairs, 94(2), 66–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanoszka, A. (2016). Russian hybrid warfare and extended deterrence in eastern Europe. International Affairs, 92(1), 175–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupovici, A. (2023). Deterrence by delivery of arms: NATO and the war in Ukraine. Contemporary Security Policy, 44(4), 624–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2023.2256572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mälksoo, M. (2018). Countering hybrid warfare as ontological security management: The emerging practices of the EU and NATO. European Security, 27(3), 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2018.1497984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mälksoo, M. (2021). A ritual approach to deterrence: I am, therefore I deter. European Journal of International Relations, 27(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066120966039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mälksoo, M. (2024). NATO's new front: Deterrence moves eastward. International Affairs, 100(2), 531–547. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiae008
   Google Scholar
• Matovski, A. (2023). How Putin’s Regime Survivalism Drives Russian aggression. The Washington Quarterly, 46(2), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2023.2223839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFaul, M. (2020). Putin, putinism and the domestic determinants of Russian foreign policy. International Security, 45(2), 95–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFaul, M., Sestanovich, S., & Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). Faulty powers: Who started the Ukraine crisis? Foreign Affairs, 93(6), 167–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. (2014). Why the Ukraine crisis is the West's fault: The liberal delusions that provoked Putin. Foreign Affairs, 93, 77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. (2022). John Mearsheimer on why the West is principally responsible for the Ukrainian crisis. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/by-invitation/2022/03/11/john-mearsheimer-on-why-the-west-is-principally-responsible-for-the-ukrainian-crisis
   Google Scholar
• Milliken, J. (1999). The study of discourse in international relations: A critique of research and methods. European Journal of International Relations, 5(2), 225–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minzarari, D. (2020). The interstate conflict potential of the information domain. NATO Defense College. NDC Policy Brief. https://www.ndc.nato.int/news/news.php?icode=1485
   Google Scholar
• Mitzen, J. (2006). Ontological security in world politics: State identity and the security dilemma. European Journal of International Relations, 12(3), 341–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106067346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan, A. (2019). Dealing with the Russians. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, T. (1989). The view from nowhere. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, F. (2003). Beyond good and evil. 1st World Library – Literary Society.
   Google Scholar
• Noetzel, T., & Schreer, B. (2009). Does a multi-tier NATO matter? The Atlantic alliance and the process of strategic change. International Affairs, 85(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2009.00790.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, P. (2020). The false promise of liberal order: Nostalgia, delusion and the rise of Trump. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rak, J., & Bäcker, R. (Eds.). (2022). Neo-militant democracies in post-communist member states of the European Union. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, N. (2023). The upside of rivalry: India’s great-power opportunity. Foreign Affairs, April 18.
   Google Scholar
• Renz, B. (2016). Russia and ‘hybrid warfare’. Contemporary Politics, 22(3), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2016.1201316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakwa, R. (2017). The Ukraine syndrome and Europe: Between norms and space. The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review, 44(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1163/18763324-04401003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, J. (2019). Hybrid warfare on the Ukrainian battlefield: Developing theory based on empirical evidence. Journal on Baltic Security, 5(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.2478/jobs-2019-0001
   Google Scholar
• Schoen, D. (2016). Putin's master plan: To destroy Europe, divide NATO, and restore Russian power and global influence. Encounter Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schuette, L. A. (2021). Why NATO survived Trump: The neglected role of Secretary-General Stoltenberg. International Affairs, 97(6), 1863–1881. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjøli, J. N. (2023). The BRICS: An alliance for peace? A study of discourses in Brazil, India, China and South Africa around the Russian War in Ukraine (2014–2023) [Master's thesis]. University of Agder.
   Google Scholar
• Sperling, J., & Webber, M. (2017). NATO and the Ukraine crisis: Collective securitisation. European Journal of International Security, 2(1), 19–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2016.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoner, K. E. (2021). Russia resurrected: Its power and purpose in a New global order. 2021 online edn, Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190860714.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Terry, P. C. (2015). The Libya intervention (2011): Neither lawful, nor successful. Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa, 48(2), 162–182.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rythoven, E. (2020). The securitization dilemma. Journal of Global Security Studies, 5(3), 478–493. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogz028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vershbow, A. (2014, April 4). A new strategic reality in Europe: Speech by NATO Deputy Secretary General Ambassador Alexander Vershbow to the 21st International Conference on Euro-Atlantic Security. nato.int/cps/en/natolive/opinions_108889.htm
   Google Scholar
• Wæver, O. (1995). Securitization and desecuritization. In R. D. Lipschutz (Ed.), On security (pp. 46–86). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelmsen, J. (2017). How does war become a legitimate undertaking? Re-engaging the post-structuralist foundation of securitization theory. Cooperation and Conflict, 52(2), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836716648725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelmsen, J. (2021). Spiraling toward a new cold War in the north? The effect of mutual and multifaceted securitization. Journal of Global Security Studies, 6(3), ogaa044. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogaa044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. C., & Neumann, I. B. (2000). From alliance to security community: NATO, Russia, and the power of identity. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 29(2), 357–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298000290020801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar