Regional socialization and disarmament preferences: Explaining state positions on the nuclear ban treaty

Reference list

• Acharya, A. (1997). Ideas, identity, and institution-building: From the ‘ASEAN way’ to the ‘Asia-Pacific way'? The Pacific Review, 10(3), 319–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512749708719226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. (2011, Jun). Asian regional institutions and the possibilities for socializing the behavior of states. Working Papers on Regional Economic Integration 82, Asian Development Bank. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ris/adbrei/0082.html.
   Google Scholar
• Acharya, A., & Johnston, A. I. (2007). Comparing regional institutions: An introduction. In A. Acharya, & A. I. Johnston (Eds.), Crafting cooperation: Regional international institutions in comparative perspective (pp. 1–31). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491436
   Google Scholar
• Acheson, R. (2021). Banning the bomb, smashing the patriarchy. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Acheson, R., & Fihn, B. (2013). Preventing collapse: The NPT and a ban on nuclear weapons. Reaching Critical Will. http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Publications/npt-ban.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bandarra, L., & Martuscelli, P. N. (2024). Moving forward to a world free of nuclear weapons (?): How regional issues shape global non-proliferation and disarmament politics. Peace Review, 36(2), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2024.2347425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnum, M., & Lo, J. (2020). Is the NPT unraveling? Evidence from text analysis of review conference statements. Journal of Peace Research, 57(6), 740–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343320960523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, J., Gibbons, R. D., & Herzog, S. (2020). Japanese public opinion, political persuasion, and the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 3(2), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2020.1834961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearce, D. H., & Bondanella, S. (2007). Intergovernmental organizations, socialization, and member-state interest convergence. International Organization, 61(4), 703–733. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818307070245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belcher, E. (2020). Transforming our nuclear future with ridiculous ideas. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 76(6), 325–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2020.1846420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, K. (2020). Text as data: An overview. In L. Curini, & R. Franzese (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of research methods in political science and international relations (pp. 461–497). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526486387.n29
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, K., Watanabe, K., Wang, H., Nulty, P., Obeng, A., Müller, S., & Matsuo, A. (2018). quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(30), 774. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00774
   Google Scholar
• Bollfrass, A. K., & Herzog, S. (2022). The war in Ukraine and global nuclear order. Survival, 64(4), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2022.2103255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, M., & Minor, E. (2016). The discursive turn arrives in turtle bay: The international campaign to abolish nuclear weapons’ operationalization of critical IR theories. Global Policy, 7(3), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrie, J. (2014). Humanitarian reframing of nuclear weapons and the logic of a ban. International Affairs, 90(3), 625–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brands, H. (2007). Non-proliferation and the dynamics of the middle cold war: The superpowers, the MLF, and the NPT. Cold War History, 7(3), 389–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682740701474857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brixey-Williams, S. (2017). The ban treaty: A big nuclear-weapon-free zone? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. https://thebulletin.org/2017/06/the-ban-treaty-a-big-nuclear-weapon-free-zone/.
   Google Scholar
• Checkel, J. T. (2005). International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework. International Organization, 59(4), 801–826. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkel, J. T. (2016). Regional identities and communities. In T. A. Börzel, & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism (pp. 559–578). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199682300.013.25
   Google Scholar
• Chelotti, N., Dasandi, N., & Jankin Mikhaylov, S. (2022). Do intergovernmental organizations have a socialization effect on member state preferences? Evidence from the UN general debate. International Studies Quarterly, 66(1), sqab069. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqab069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, A. J., & Vaynman, J. (2015). Collusion and the nuclear nonproliferation regime. The Journal of Politics, 77(4), 983–997. https://doi.org/10.1086/682080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Considine, L. (2019). Contests of legitimacy and value: The treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons and the logic of prohibition. International Affairs, 95(5), 1075–1092. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhanapala, J., & Duarte, S. (2015). Is there a future for the NPT? Arms Control Today, 45(6), 8–10.
   Google Scholar
• Docherty, B. (2018). A ‘light for all humanity’: The treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons and the progress of humanitarian disarmament. Global Change, Peace & Security, 30(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2018.1472075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Don't Bank on the Bomb. (2023). Why divest? A focus on governments. https://www.dontbankonthebomb.com/take-action-for-divestment/governments/.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, T. (2017). A moral argument for the mass defection of non-nuclear-weapon states from the nuclear nonproliferation treaty regime. Global Governance, 23(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02301002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte, S. (2024). The contribution of Latin America and the Caribbean to multilateral nuclear nonproliferation and disarmament. Peace Review, 36(2), 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2024.2331724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egel, N., & Obermeier, N. (2022). A friend like me: The effect of international organization membership on state preferences. The Journal of Politics, 85(1), 340–344. https://doi.org/10.1086/722348
   Google Scholar
• Egel, N., & Ward, S. (2022). Hierarchy, revisionism, and subordinate actors: The TPNW and the subversion of the nuclear order. European Journal of International Relations, 28(4), 751–776. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661221112611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeland, K. (2019). Arms, influence and the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. Survival, 61(3), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2019.1614786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeland, K. (2021). Nuclear weapons and adversarial politics: Bursting the abolitionist “consensus”. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 4(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2021.1922801
   Google Scholar
• Egerod, B. C. K., & Klemmensen, R. (2020). Scaling political positions from text: Assumptions, methods and pitfalls. In L. Curini, & R. Franzese (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of research methods in political science and international relations (pp. 498–521). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526486387.n30
   Google Scholar
• Fihn, B. (2017). The logic of banning nuclear weapons. Survival, 59(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2017.1282671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhrmann, M., & Lupu, Y. (2016). Do arms control treaties work? Assessing the effectiveness of the nuclear nonproliferation treaty. International Studies Quarterly, 60(3), 530–539. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqw013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futter, A., & Samuel, O. (forthcoming). Accommodating nutopia: The nuclear ban treaty and the developmental interests of Global South countries. Review of International Studies, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210523000396
   Google Scholar
• Gavras, K., Mader, M., & Schoen, H. (2022). Convergence of European security and defense preferences? A quantitative text analysis of strategy papers, 1994–2018. European Union Politics, 23(4), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165221103026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheciu, A. (2005). Security institutions as agents of socialization? NATO and the ‘New Europe’. International Organization, 59(4), 973–1012. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, R. D. (2018). The humanitarian turn in nuclear disarmament and the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. The Nonproliferation Review, 25(1-2), 11–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2018.1486960
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, R. D., & Herzog, S. (2022). The first TPNW meeting and the future of the nuclear ban treaty. Arms Control Today, 52(7), 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, R. D., & Herzog, S. (2023). Nuclear disarmament and Russia’s War on Ukraine: The ascendance and uncertain future of the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. In R. D. Gibbons, S. Herzog, W. Wan, & D. Horschig (Eds.), The altered nuclear order in the wake of the Russia-Ukraine war (pp. 1–36). American Academy of Arts & Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, R., & Jinks, D. (2013). Socializing states: Promoting human rights through international law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199300990.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Greenhill, B. (2010). The company you keep: International socialization and the diffusion of human rights norms. International Studies Quarterly, 54(1), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00580.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassid, N. (2024). The challenges and avenues for banning nuclear weapons in the Middle East. Peace Review, 36(2), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2024.2328544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, G. (2014). Being nuclear: Africans and the global uranium trade. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, M. (2024). The European Union and the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons: Let’s agree that we disagree. Peace Review, 36(2), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2024.2328547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, S., Baron, J., & Gibbons, R. D. (2021). Antinormative messaging, group cues, and the nuclear ban treaty. The Journal of Politics, 84(1), 591–596. https://doi.org/10.1086/714924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C., & Wong, R. (2012). Many actors, one path? The meaning of Europeanization in the context of foreign policy. In R. Wong, & C. Hill (Eds.), National and European foreign policy: Towards Europeanization (pp. 210–231). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Horovitz, L. (2015). Beyond pessimism: Why the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons will not collapse. Journal of Strategic Studies, 38(1-2), 126–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2014.917971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. J., & Kupchan, C. A. (1990). Socialization and hegemonic power. International Organization, 44(3), 283–315. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830003530X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, A. I. (2001). Treating international institutions as social environments. International Studies Quarterly, 45(4), 487–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, A. I. (2003). Socialization in international institutions. In G. J. Ikenberry, & M. Mastanduno (Eds.), International relations theory and the Asia-Pacific (pp. 107–152). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kacowicz, A. M. (1998). Zones of peace in the Third World: South America and West Africa in comparative perspective. State University of New York Press. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.36-5948
   Google Scholar
• Kassenova, T. (2022). Atomic Steppe: How Kazakhstan gave up the bomb. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503629936
   Google Scholar
• Kmentt, A. (2021). The treaty prohibiting nuclear weapons: How it was achieved and why it matters. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003080879
   Google Scholar
• Knopf, J. W. (2022). Not by NPT alone: The future of the global nuclear order. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(1), 186–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1983243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwong, J. (2022). How disagreements over Russia’s nuclear threats could derail the NPT Review Conference. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. https://thebulletin.org/2022/07/how-disagreements-over-russias-nuclear-threats-could-derail-the-npt-review-conference/#post-heading.
   Google Scholar
• Lacovsky, E. (2021). Nuclear weapons free zones: A comparative perspective. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003119661
   Google Scholar
• Laver, M., Benoit, K., & Garry, J. (2003). Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 311–331. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, P. M. (2009). A new approach to nuclear disarmament: Learning from International Humanitarian Law Success (ICNND Paper No. 13). International Commission on Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament.
   Google Scholar
• Maitre, E. (2022). Implementing prohibition: An overview of the meeting of states parties to the TPNW and possible ways forward. Recherches & Documents n°08/2022 https://www.frstrategie.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/recherches-et-.
   Google Scholar
• Mathy, E. (2023). Why do states commit to the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons? The Nonproliferation Review, 29(1-3), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2023.2175994
   Google Scholar
• Meier, O., & Vieluf, M. (2021). From division to constructive engagement: Europe and the TPNW. Arms Control Today, 51(10), 6.
   Google Scholar
• Mian, Z. (2009). Beyond the security debate: The moral and legal dimensions of abolition. In G. Perkovich, & J. M. Acton (Eds.), Abolishing nuclear weapons: A debate (pp. 295–305). Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Mir, M. A., & Nazir, T. (2024). South Asian perspectives on the nuclear weapons ban: Challenges and prospects for disarmament. Peace Review, 36(2), 256–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2024.2328541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montal, F., Potz-Nielsen, C., & Sumner, J. L. (2020). What states want: Estimating ideal points from international investment treaty content. Journal of Peace Research, 57(6), 679–691. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343320959130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mpofu-Walsh, S. (2020). Obedient rebellion: Nuclear-weapon-free zones and global nuclear order, 1967–2017 [Unpublished PhD dissertation]. Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Mpofu-Walsh, S. (2022). Obedient rebellion: Conceiving the African nuclear weapon-free zone. International Affairs, 98(1), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, H., & Wunderlich, C. (2020). Nuclear disarmament without the nuclear-weapon states: The nuclear weapon ban treaty. Daedalus, 149(2), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NATO. (2010). Active engagement, modern defence. NATO 2010 Strategic Concept. https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_publications/20120214_strategic-concept-2010-eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian People's Aid. (2024). Nuclear weapons ban monitor. https://banmonitor.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Nuclear Threat Initiative. (2023a). Pelindaba treaty. https://www.nti.org/education-center/treaties-and-regimes/african-nuclear-weapon-free-zone-anwfz-treaty-pelindaba-treaty/.
   Google Scholar
• Nuclear Threat Initiative. (2023b). Bangkok treaty. https://www.nti.org/education-center/treaties-and-regimes/southeast-asian-nuclear-weapon-free-zone-seanwfz-treaty-bangkok-treaty/.
   Google Scholar
• Nzo, A. (1995). The statement by the foreign minister of the Republic of South Africa, Mr Alfred Nzo. The 1995 review and extension conference of the parties to the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. Department of International Relations and Cooperation Archives (Pretoria).
   Google Scholar
• Onderco, M. (2017). Why nuclear weapon ban treaty is unlikely to fulfil its promise. Global Affairs, 3(4-5), 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2017.1409082
   Google Scholar
• Onderco, M. (2020). Nuclear ban treaty: Sand or grease for the NPT? In T. Sauer, J. Kustermans, & B. Segaert (Eds.), Non-nuclear peace: The ban treaty and beyond (pp. 131–148). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26688-2_7
   Google Scholar
• Onderco, M. (2021). Networked nonproliferation: Making the NPT permanent. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9781503628922.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Onderco, M., & Farrés Jiménez, A. (2021). A comparison of national reviews of the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. EUNPDC Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Papers No.76. https://sipri.org/sites/default/files/2021-06/eunpdc_no_76.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Onderco, M., Smetana, M., van der Meer, S., & Etienne, T. W. (2021). When do the Dutch want to join the nuclear ban treaty? Findings of a public opinion survey in the Netherlands. The Nonproliferation Review, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2021.1978156
   Google Scholar
• Pilat, J. F. (2020). A World Without the NPT Redux. UNIDIR.
   Google Scholar
• Popp, R. (2017). The long road to the NPT: From superpower collusion to global compromise. In R. Popp, L. Horovitz, & A. Wenger (Eds.), Negotiating the nuclear non-proliferation treaty: Origins of the nuclear order (pp. 9–36). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, W. C. (2017). Disarmament diplomacy and the nuclear ban treaty. Survival, 59(4), 75–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2017.1349786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretorius, J., & Sauer, T. (2021). Ditch the NPT. Survival, 63(4), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2021.1956197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reaching Critical Will. (2023). Nuclear ban daily, Vol. 4, No. 2 (28 November 2023). Civil society perspectives on the Second Meeting of States Parties to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons 27 November–1 December 2023. https://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/nuclear-weapon-ban/2msp/reports/nbd4.2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T. (2024). External threats and state support for arms control. Journal of Peace Research, 61(2), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433221123359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, N. (2014). Waiting for Kant: Devaluing and delegitimizing nuclear weapons. International Affairs, 90(3), 601–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, N. (2019). A hegemonic nuclear order: Understanding the Ban Treaty and the power politics of nuclear weapons. Contemporary Security Policy, 40(4), 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2019.1571852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, N., & Egeland, K. (2018). The diplomacy of resistance: Power, hegemony and nuclear disarmament. Global Change, Peace & Security, 30(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2018.1467393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, N., & Kmentt, A. (2021). Universalising the TPNW: Challenges and opportunities. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 4(1), 70–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2021.1935673
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, J. L., & Mendenhall, E. (2022). Nuclear weapon-free zones and the issue of maritime transit in Latin America. International Affairs, 98(3), 819–836. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiac055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rublee, M. R., & Wunderlich, C. (2022). The vitality of the NPT after 50. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2037969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruzicka, J. (2019). The next great hope: The humanitarian approach to nuclear weapons. Journal of International Political Theory, 15(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088218785922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagan, S. D. (2011). The causes of nuclear weapons proliferation. Annual Review of Political Science, 14(1), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052209-131042
   Google Scholar
• Sarmiento, P., & Jegho, L. (2023). ASEAN stepping up push for treaty on nuclear weapon-free zone. China Daily Hong Kong. https://www.chinadailyhk.com/hk/article/327613.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, T. (2024). The impact of the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons: The crucial role of the European NATO allies. Peace Review, 36(2), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2024.2337881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slapin, J. B., & Proksch, S.-O. (2008). A scaling model for estimating time-series party positions from texts. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 705–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00338.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smetana, M., & O'Mahoney, J. (2022). NPT as an antifragile system: How contestation improves the nonproliferation regime. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(1), 24–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1978761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone Treaty. (1985). https://www.forumsec.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/South-Pacific-Nuclear-Zone-Treaty-Raratonga-Treaty-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stärk, F., & Kühn, U. (2022). Nuclear injustice: How Russia’s invasion of Ukraine shows the staggering human cost of deterrence. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. https://thebulletin.org/2022/10/nuclear-injustice-how-russias-invasion-of-ukraine-shows-the-staggering-human-cost-of-deterrence/.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanović, A, Šulejić, Kostić. (2024). Southeast European Countries and a Nuclear Weapons Ban. Peace Review, 36(2), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2024.2340093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs. (2018). Report of the Working Group to analyse the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. https://www.eda.admin.ch/dam/eda/en/documents/aussenpolitik/sicherheitspolitik/2018-bericht-arbeitsgruppe-uno-TPNW_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UK Government. (2018). P5 Joint statement on the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/p5-joint-statement-on-the-treaty-on-the-non-proliferation-of-nuclear-weapons.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2017). Treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. United Nations Treaty Series vol. 3379. https://treaties.un.org/doc/Treaties/2017/07/20170707%2003-42%20PM/Ch_XXVI_9.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vignoli, V. (2023). Text as data. In P. A. Mello, & F. Ostermann (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of foreign policy methods (pp. 536–550). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003139850-40
   Google Scholar
• Vilmer, J.-B. J. (2022). The forever-emerging norm of banning nuclear weapons. Journal of Strategic Studies, 45(3), 478–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2020.1770732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voeten, E. (2020). United-nations-general-assembly-votes-and-ideal-points. GitHub. https://github.com/evoeten/United-Nations-General-Assembly-Votes-and-Ideal-Points/blob/master/Output/IdealpointestimatesNuclear_Apr2020.csv.
   Google Scholar
• Von Stein, J. (2005). Do treaties constrain or screen? Selection bias and treaty compliance. American Political Science Review, 99(4), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, H. (2018). A nuclear babel: Narratives around the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. The Nonproliferation Review, 25(1-2), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2018.1477453
   Google Scholar
• Wittmann, C. (2024). Nuclear disarmament in Latin America: Unveiling the impact of humanitarian perspectives and advocacy campaigns on the TPNW. Peace Review, 36(2), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2024.2337873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, R., & Hill, C. (Eds.). (2012). National and European foreign policy: Towards Europeanization. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203816035
   Google Scholar