Modern castles and country houses: the use of history in ‘gated communities’ in The Netherlands

References

• Aalbers, M. 2005. “Gated Communities. Opvattingen en misvattingen [Gated Communities. Conceptions and misconceptions].” Geografie: vaktijdschrift voor geografen 14 (7): 36–39.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, Y. 2006. “The Scope and Definitions of Heritage: From Tangible to Intangible.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 12 (3): 292–300.
   Google Scholar
• Algra, W. 2005. “Afgesloten woonwijken zijn ook hier in opmars [Enclosed Residential Areas are also on the Rise in the Netherlands].” Trouw, July 7, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. 2008. “Commentary: Gentrification, Segregation and the Vocabulary of Affluent Residential Choice.” Urban Studies 45 (12): 2626–2636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagaeen, S., and O. Uduku. 2010. Gated Communities: Social Sustainability in Contemporary and Historical Gated Developments. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J. 1983. Simulations. New York, NY: Semiotext[e].
   Google Scholar
• Blakely, E. J., and M. G. Snyder. 1999. Fortress America Gated Communities in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Boeijenga, J. and J. Mensink. 2008. Vinex Atlas. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bramley, G., and S. Power. 2009. “Urban form and Social Sustainability: The Role of Density and Housing Type.” Environment and Planning B 36 (1): 30–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, D., and O. Creighton. 2006. “Contested Identities: The Dissonant Heritage of European Town Walls and Walled Towns.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 12 (3): 234–254.
   Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E. 2010. “Cracks in the Myth: Challenges to Land Policy in the Netherlands.” Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 101 (3): 349–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den Hartog, H., ed. 2010. Shanghai New Towns. Searching for Community and Identity in a Sprawling Metropolis. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Donkers, H. 2005. “De opmars van privaat beheerde woonwijken in Nederland [The Rise of Privately Managed Residential Areas in the Netherlands].” Geografie: vaktijdschrift voor geografen 14 (8): 26–29.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, J., and N. Duncan. 2004. Landscapes of Privilege. The Politics of the Aesthetic in an American Suburb. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ennen, E. 2004. Wonen in gecreëerd erfgoed. Belevingen en bindingen in Brandevoort [Living in Built Heritage. Experiences and Connections in Brandevoort]. Utrecht: DGW Nethur.
   Google Scholar
• Falconer Al-Hindi, K. 2001. “The New Urbanism: Where and For Whom? Investigation of an Emergent Paradigm.” Urban Geography 22 (3): 202–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furuseth, O. J. 1997. “Neotraditional Planning: A New Strategy for Building Neighbourhoods?” Land Use Policy 14 (3): 201–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genis, S. 2007. “Producing Elite Localities: The Rise of Gated Communities in Istanbul.” Urban Studies 44 (4): 771–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordijn, H., W. Derksen, and J. Groen. 2003. De ongekende ruimte verkend [The Unknown Space Explored]. Rotterdam: NAi Uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J., and L. Mittelsteadt. 2004. “Types of Gated Communities.” Environment and Planning B 31 (6): 913–930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., and W. Zonneveld. 2000. “Spatial Planning in the Network Society. Rethinking the Principles of Planning in the Netherlands.” European Planning Studies 8 (3): 337–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamers, D., K. Nabielek, S. Schluchter, and M. van Middelkoop. 2007. Afgeschermde woondomeinen in Nederland [Enclosed Residential Areas in the Netherlands]. Rotterdam: NAi Uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Heijmans, T. 2010. Vinexmannen [Vinexmen]. Amsterdam: Volkskrant.
   Google Scholar
• Helmond, Gemeente. 2005. Een terugblik naar het verleden, 30 jaar wonen in beeld [A Look at the Past, 30 years Living in the Picture]. Helmond: Gemeente Helmond.
   Google Scholar
• Helmond, Gemeente. 2007. Statistisch Jaarboek [Statistical Yearbook]. Helmond: Gemeente Helmond.
   Google Scholar
• Hulsman, B. 2010. “Zo geborgen en toch zo bang. Hoe ‘gated community’s’ en shopping malls de Britten ongelukkig hebben gemaakt [How ‘gated communities’ and shopping malls have made the British unhappy].” NRC Handelsblad, January 22, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Ibelings, H. 2005. “Architectural Tour Guide to Unmodern Holland.” A10 New European architecture 1 (2): 58–60.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, J., E. Luiten, H. Renes, and J. Rouwendal. 2012. “Heritage Planning and Spatial Development in the Netherlands: Changing Policies and Perspectives.” International Journal of Heritage Studies iFirst article: 1–21. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13527258.2012.710852#.UoIT4nAz2M9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keulartz, J. 2007. “Sociale rechtvaardigheid en ruimtelijke diversiteit - Een Walzeriaanse visie op bereikbaarheid en toegankelijkheid [Social Justice and Spatial Diversity - A Walzerian Vision on Accessibility].” Filosofie en praktijk 28 (5): 38–48.
   Google Scholar
• Knox, P. L. 2001. Places and Regions in Global Context Human Geography. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lohof, S., and A. Reijndorp. 2006. Privé terrein: privaat beheerde woondomeinen in Nederland [Private Property: Privately Managed Residential Areas in Netherlands]. Rotterdam: NAi Uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Lörzing, H. 2006. “Reinventing Suburbia in the Netherlands.” Built Environment 32 (3): 298–310.
   Google Scholar
• Low, S. 2004. Behind the Gates. Life, Security, and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E. J. 1995. “Neotraditional Developments: The anatomy of a New Urban Form.” Urban Geography 16 (3): 210–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, S., and L. Karsten. 2012. “Living in Commodified History: Constructing Class Identities in Neotraditional Neighbourhoods.” Social and Cultural Geography 13 (5): 517–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, S., and A. Reijndorp. 2012. “Residential Hyperspaces: Building ‘Convincing Ambiences’ for the Middle Classes.” Urban Geography 33 (3): 442–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meurs, P. 2005. “De transformatie van de opdrachtsituatie. Herontwikkelen van stedelijke gebieden [The Transformation of the Commission. Redevelopment of Urban Areas].” In Een cultuur van ruimte maken # 3. Ontwerpen aan geschiedenis, edited by J. R. Rita Brons and G. Wallagh, 29–33. Rotterdam: Stimuleringsfonds voor Architectuur.
   Google Scholar
• Musterd, S., and W. Ostendorf. 2009. “Residential Segregation and Integration in the Netherlands.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 35 (9): 1515–1532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nio, I. 2003. “Het verlangen van collectiviteit. Over de ruimtelijke maakbaarheid van gemeenschapszin [The Desire for Collectivity. About The Extent to Which Community can be Created by Spatial Design].” Stedebouw en Ruimtelijke Ordening 84 (3): 40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Pleij, H. 1991. Het Nederlandse onbehagen [The Dutch Unease]. Amsterdam: Prometheus.
   Google Scholar
• Pow, C.-P., and L. Kong. 2007. “Marketing the Chinese Dream Home: Gated Communities and Representations of the Good Life in (Post-) Socialist Shanghai.” Urban Geography 28 (2): 129–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priemus, H. 2004. “Housing and New Urban Renewal: Current Policies in the Netherlands.” European Journal of Housing Policy 4 (2): 229–246.
   Google Scholar
• Raposo, R. 2006. “Gated Communities, Commodification and Aestheticization. The case of the Lisbon metropolitan area.” Geo Journal 66 (1): 43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, M. 2010. “The Politics of Elective Belonging.” Housing, Theory and Society 27 (3): 115–161.
   Google Scholar
• Soeters en van Eldonk architecten. 2000. Urban Vision Haverleij Den Bosch. Available from: http://www.soetersvaneldonk.nl/eng/p-haverleij.html [Accessed February 1 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Till, K. 1993. “Neotraditional Towns and Urban Villages: The Cultural Production of a Geography of ‘Otherness’.” Environment and Planning D 11 (3): 709–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNCHS (United Nations Centre for Human Settlement Habitat). 2001. Cities in a Globalizing World 2001: Global Report on Human Settlements. London: Earthscan Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Walks, R. A. 2006. “Aestheticization and the Cultural Contradictions of Neoliberal (Sub) Urbanism.” Cultural Geographies 13 (3): 466–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. 2004. “Toward a Contingent Urban Neoliberalism.” Urban Geography 25 (8): 771–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F. 2010. “Gated and Packaged Suburbia: Packaging and Branding Chinese Suburban Residential Development.” Cities 27 (5): 385–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukin, S. 2010. The Naked City. The Death and Life of Authentic Urban Places. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar