Between orthodoxy and heterodoxy: the troubled relationships between heritage studies and heritage law

References

• Arrhenius, Thordis. 2012. The Fragile Monument: On Conservation and Modernity. London: Artifice Books.
   Google Scholar
• Audi, Alan. 2007. “A Semiotics of Cultural Property Argument.” International Journal of Cultural Property 14: 131–167.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Gary, and Laurajane Smith. 2011. “Manifesto of the Association of Critical Heritage Studies.” http://criticalheritagestudies.org.preview.binero.se/site-admin/site-content/about-achs.
   Google Scholar
• Carman, John, and Marie-Louise Stig Sørensen. 2009. “Heritage Studies: An Outline.” In Heritage Studies: Methods and Approaches, edited by Marie-Louise Stig Sørensen and John Carman, 11–28. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chechi, Alessandro. 2012. “The Role of Domestic Courts in Resolving Restitution Cases: Unveiling Judicial Strategies for Culture-sensitive Settlements.” In Resolving Disputes in Cultural Property, edited by Marc-André Renold, Alessandro Chechi and Anne Laurebandle, 147–173. Zurich: Schultess.
   Google Scholar
• Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (World Heritage Convention). Adopted by the UNESCO General Conference on 16 November 1972. Entry into Force: 17 December 1975. Number of States Parties as of January 2014: 190.
   Google Scholar
• Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Adopted by the UNESCO General Conference on 17 October 2003. Entry into Force: 20 April 2006. Number of States Parties as of January 2014: 158.
   Google Scholar
• Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Export, Import and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property. Adopted by the UNESCO General Conference on 14 November 1970. Entry into Force: 24 April 1972. Number of States Parties as of January 2014: 125.
   Google Scholar
• Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage. Adopted by the UNESCO General Conference on 2 November 2001. Entry into Force: 2 January 2009. Number of States Parties as of January 2014: 45.
   Google Scholar
• Francioni, Francesco, ed. 2008. The 1972 World Heritage Convention: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Melanie, ed. 2011a. Towards World Heritage: International Origins of the Preservation Movement 1870–1930. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Melanie. 2011b. “Introduction.” In Towards World Heritage: International Origins of the Preservation Movement 1870–1930, edited by Melanie Hall, 1–19. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, Sarah. 1999. “Value, Obligation and Cultural Heritage.” Arizona State Law Journal 31: 291–354.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, Rodney. 2010. “The Politics of Heritage.” In Understanding the Politics of Heritage, edited by Rodney Harrison, 154–196. Manchester, NH: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, Rodney. 2013. Heritage: Critical Approaches. London: Routledge.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199602001.013.021
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, Rodney, and Audrey Likman. 2010. “Critical Approaches to Heritage.” In Understanding the Politics of Heritage, edited by Rodney Harrison, 48–80. Manchester, NH: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, David C. 2001. “Heritage Pasts and Heritage Presents: Temporality, Meaning and the Scope of Heritage Studies.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 7 (4): 319–338.10.1080/13581650120105534
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Peter. 1994. “The Heritage Discipline.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 1 (1): 3–5.10.1080/13527259408722125
   Google Scholar
• International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (The Venice Charter 1964). Adopted at the II International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments, Venice, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Duncan. 1976. “Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication.” Harvard Law Review 89: 1685–1778.10.2307/1340104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Duncan. 1991. “A Semiotics of Legal Argument.” Syracuse Law Review 42: 75–116.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, David. 2006. Of War and Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koskenniemi, Martti. 2006. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511493713
   Google Scholar
• Kuruk, Paul. 2004. “Cultural Heritage, Traditional Knowledge and Indigenous Rights: An Analysis of the Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage.” Macquarie Journal of International and Comparative Environmental Law 1 (1): 111–134.
   Google Scholar
• Labadi, Sophia. 2010. “World Heritage, Authenticity and Post-authenticity.” In Heritage and Globalisation, edited by Sophia Labadi and Colin Long, 66–84. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leiboff, Marett. 2001. “Clashing Things.” Griffith Law Review 10 (2): 294–316.
   Google Scholar
• Little, Barbara J. 2009. “Public Archaeology in the United States in the Early Twenty-first Century.” In Heritage Studies: Methods and Approaches, edited by Marie-Louise Stig Sørensen and John Carman, 29–51. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lixinski, Lucas. 2011. “Selecting Heritage: The Interplay of Art, Politics and Identity.” European Journal of International Law 22 (1): 81–100.10.1093/ejil/chr001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lixinski, Lucas. 2013a. Intangible Cultural Heritage in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679508.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Lixinski, Lucas. 2013b. “International Cultural Heritage Regimes, International Law and the Politics of Expertise.” International Journal of Cultural Property 21 (1): 407–429.
   Google Scholar
• Lixinski, Lixinski, Fernando Lusa Bordin, and Maitê de Souza Schmitz. 2011. “Identity Beyond Borders: International Cultural Heritage Law and the Temple of Preah Vihear Dispute.” ILSA Quarterly 20 (1): 30–37.
   Google Scholar
• Merryman, John Henry. 2005. “Cultural Property Internationalism.” International Journal of Cultural Property 12 (1): 11–39.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, Roderick F. 2001. Wilderness and the American Mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, Patrick J. 2013. “‘Commercial Exploitation’: Its Prohibition in the UNESCO Convention on Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage 2001 and Other Instruments.” Art, Antiquity & Law 18 (2): 129–148.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, Thérèse. 2011. “The Restitution of Holocaust Looted Art and Transitional Justice: The Perfect Storm or the Raft of the Medusa?” European Journal of International Law 22 (1): 49–80.10.1093/ejil/chr004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orford, Anne, ed. 2006. International Law and its Others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prott, Lyndel V. 2009. “UNESCO International Framework for the Protection of the Cultural Heritage.” In Cultural Heritage Issues: The Legacy of Conquest, Colonization and Commerce, edited by James A. R. Nafziger and Ann M. Nicgorski, 257–285. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Prott, Lyndel V., and Patrick J. O’Keefe. 1984. Law and the Cultural Heritage, Vol. 1 – Discovery & Excavation. Abingdon: Professional Books.
   Google Scholar
• Prott, Lyndel V., and Patrick J. O’Keefe. 1989. Law and the Cultural Heritage, Vol. 3 – Movement. London: Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Recommendation on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Export, Import and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property. Adopted by the UNESCO General Conference on 19 November 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Recommendation on the Safeguarding of Traditional Culture and Folklore. Adopted by the UNESCO General Conference on 15 November 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Shyllon, Folarin. 1996. “Cultural Heritage Legislation and Management in Nigeria.” International Journal of Cultural Property 5 (2): 235–268.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Laurajane. 2006. Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Laurajane. 2012. “Editorial.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 18 (6): 533–540.10.1080/13527258.2012.720794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderland, Hilary A. 2009. “The History of Heritage: A Method in Analyzing Legislative Historiography.” In Heritage Studies: Methods and Approaches, edited by Marie-Louise Stigsørensen and John Carman, 55–84. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Swenson, Astrid. 2011. “The Law’s Delay? Preservation Legislation in France, Germany and England, 1970–194.” In Towards World Heritage: International Origins of the Preservation Movement 1870–1930, edited by Melanie Hall, 139–154. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Ulph, Janet, and Ian Smith. 2012. The Illicit Trade in Art and Antiquities: International Recovery and Criminal and Civil Liability. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Vrdoljak, Ana Filipa. 2006. International Law, Museums and the Return of Cultural Objects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar