Keeping it real? Subcultural graffiti, street art, heritage and authenticity

References

• ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation). 2008. “Melbourne Graffiti Considered for Heritage Protection.” ABC. Accessed August 2. http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/06/23/2282978.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Alvelos, H. 2004. “The Desert of Imagination in the City of Signs: Cultural Implications of Sponsored Transgression and Branded Graffiti.” In Cultural Criminology Unleashed, edited by J. Ferrell, K. Hayward, W. Morrison, and M. Presdee, 181–191. London: Cavendish.
   Google Scholar
• Araoz, G. 2009. “Protecting Heritage Places under the New Heritage Paradigm and Defining its Tolerance for Change: A Leadership Challenge for ICOMOS.” Paper Presented at the Conservation Turn – Return to Conservation: Challenges and Chances in a Changing World, La Valletta, Malta, October 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Araoz, G. 2011. “Preserving Heritage Places under a New Paradigm.” Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development 1 (1): 55–60. doi:10.1108/20441261111129933.10.1108/20441261111129933
   Google Scholar
• Australia ICOMOS (International Council on Monuments and Sites). 1999. The Burra Charter: The Australian ICOMOS Charter for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Significance. Burwood: Australia ICOMOS.
   Google Scholar
• Avery, T. 2009. “Values Not Shared: The Street Art of Melbourne’s City Laneways.” In Valuing Historic Environments, edited by L. Gibson and J. Pendlebury, 139–156. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, J. A., and C. Taylor, eds. 2010. Ancient Graffiti in Context. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer K. 2012. “The View from Stokes Croft.” In Banksy: The Bristol Legacy, edited by P. Gough, 70–77. Bristol: Redcliffe.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, E. 2012. “Hanging Out Down the Council House: Street Art’s Outlaws and the Bristol Establishment.” In Banksy: The Bristol Legacy, edited by P. Gough, 78–85. Bristol: Redcliffe.
   Google Scholar
• Castleman, C. 1982. Getting Up: Subway Graffiti in New York. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chalfant, H., and M. Cooper. 1984. Subway Art. London: Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• COE (Council of Europe). 2005. Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society. Faro: COE.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, R. 2011. “Keszler & Banksy: Pest Control Stymies Keszler Gallery Sales.” artnet.com. Accessed January 5, 2014. http://www.artnet.com/magazineus/features/corbett/keszler-banksy-10-12-11.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Daniell, C. 2011. “Graffiti, Calliglyphs and Markers in the UK.” Archaeologies 7 (2): 454–476. doi:10.1007/s11759-011-9176-6.10.1007/s11759-011-9176-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davey E. 2009. “Vandal Cashes in on Law Loophole.” bbc.co.uk. Accessed August 10, 2013. news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8249419.stm.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, C. 2011. “‘Tox’ Graffiti Artist Convicted of Criminal Damage.” The Guardian, June 8.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsche Presse-Agentur. 2014. “Grüne Fordern Denkmalschutz Für Graffiti.” Berliner Zeitung June 3. http://www.berliner-zeitung.de/berlin/waldemarstrasse-gruene-fordern-denkmalschutz-fuer-graffiti,10809148,27333454.html.
   Google Scholar
• Dickens, L. 2008. “Placing Post-Graffiti: The Journey of the Peckham Rock.” Cultural Geographies 15 (4): 47–496. doi:10.1177/1474474008094317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, I. 2009. “Banksy's Graffiti: A Not-So-Simple Case of Criminal Damage?” The Journal of Criminal Law 73 (4): 345–361. doi:10.1350/jcla.2009.73.4.583.10.1350/jcla.2009.73.4.583
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 1985. The All New Australian Graffiti. Melbourne: Sun Books.
   Google Scholar
• English Heritage. 1999. Graffiti on Historic Buildings and Monuments: Methods of Removal and Prevention. Technical Advisory Note. London: English Heritage.
   Google Scholar
• Fender, L. 2009. “Entire Banksy Mural Removed by Croydon-Beddington Wall’s Owners.” yourlocalguardian.co.uk. Accessed August 10, 2013. www.yourlocalguardian.co.uk/news/local/suttonnews/4731235.Entire_Banksy_mural_removed_by_wall_s_owners/.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrell, J., and R. D. Weide. 2010. “Spot Theory.” City 14 (1): 48–62. doi:10.1080/13604810903525157.10.1080/13604810903525157
   Google Scholar
• Frederick, U. K. 2009. “Revolution is the New Black: Graffiti/Art and Mark-making Practices.” Archaeologies 5 (2): 210–237. doi:10.1007/s11759-009-9107-y.10.1007/s11759-009-9107-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbatt, A. 2009. “Residents Vote to Spare Banksy Mural.” guardian.co.uk. Accessed August 10, 2013. www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2009/oct/06/banksy-mural-graffiti-sutton-bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, M. 1993. “The Writing on Our Walls: Finding Solutions through Distinguishing Graffiti Art from Graffiti Vandalism.” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 26 (3): 633–707.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P., ed. 2012. Banksy: The Bristol Legacy. Bristol: Redcliffe.
   Google Scholar
• Graves-Brown, P., and J. Schofield. 2011. “The Filth and the Fury: 6 Denmark Street (London) and the Sex Pistols.” Antiquity 85 (330): 1385–1401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halsey, M., and B. Pederick. 2010. “The Game of Fame: Mural, Graffiti, Erasure.” City 14 (1): 82–98. doi:10.1080/13604810903525199.10.1080/13604810903525199
   Google Scholar
• Halsey, M., and A. Young. 2002. “The Meanings of Graffiti and Municipal Administration.” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 35 (2): 165–186. doi:10.1375/acri.35.2.165.10.1375/acri.35.2.165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. 2013. “Forgetting to Remember, Remembering to Forget: Late Modern Heritage Practices, Sustainability and the ‘Crisis’ of Accumulation of the past.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 19 (6): 579–595. doi:10.1080/13527258.2012.678371.10.1080/13527258.2012.678371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtorf, C. 2006. “Can Less be More? Heritage in the Age of Terrorism.” Public Archaeology 5 (2): 101–109.10.1179/pua.2006.5.2.101
   Google Scholar
• ICCROM (International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Conservation of Cultural Property). 2006. “Activity: Stop Graffiti.” ICCROM. Accessed August 2, 2012. http://www.iccrom.org/eng/05advocacy_en/05_02models_en/06posters02_en.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• ICOMOS (International Council on Monuments and Sites). 1964. International Charter for Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (the Venice Charter 1964). Rome: ICOMOS.
   Google Scholar
• Jokilehto, J. 1995. “Authenticity: A General Framework for the Concept.” In Nara Conference on Authenticity in Relation to the World Heritage Convention Proceedings, edited by K. E. Larsen, 17–34. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Jokilehto, J. 1998a. “The Context of the Venice Charter (1964).” Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 2: 229–233.10.1179/135050398793138762
   Google Scholar
• Jokilehto, J. 1998b. “International Trends in Historic Preservation: From Ancient Monuments to Living Cultures.” APT Bulletin 29 (3/4): 17–19.10.2307/1504606
   Google Scholar
• Keats, G. 2008. “The Motivations behind Graffiti.” Security Insider February/March : 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchheimer, M. 1981. Stations of the Elevated. Streetwise Films. 46 min. (Film).
   Google Scholar
• Lachmann, R. 1988. “Graffiti as Career and Ideology.” American Journal of Sociology 94 (2): 229–250.10.1086/ajs.1988.94.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ley, D., and R. Cybriwsky. 1974. “Urban Graffiti as Territorial Markers.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 64 (4): 491–505. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1974.tb00998.x.10.1111/j.1467-8306.1974.tb00998.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, D. 1995. “Changing Criteria of Authenticity.” In Nara Conference on Authenticity in Relation to the World Heritage Convention Proceedings, edited by K. E. Larsen, 121–135. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, N. 2001. The Graffiti Subculture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230511743
   Google Scholar
• MacDowall, L. 2006. “In Praise of 70 K: Cultural Heritage and Graffiti Style.” Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 20 (4): 471–484. doi:10.1080/10304310600987320.10.1080/10304310600987320
   Google Scholar
• Manco, T. 2004. Street Logos. London: Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• McAuliffe, C., and K. Iveson. 2011. “Art and Crime (and Other Things Besides … ): Conceptualising Graffiti in the City.” Geography Compass 5 (3): 128–143. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2011.00414.x.10.1111/geco.2011.5.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Mccormick, J., and N. Jarman. 2005. “Death of a Mural.” Journal of Material Culture 10 (1): 49–71. doi:10.1177/1359183505050094.10.1177/1359183505050094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcleod, K. 1999. “Authenticity within Hip-Hop and Other Cultures Threatened with Assimilation.” Journal of Communication 49 (4): 134–150. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02821.x.10.1111/jcom.1999.49.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill, S. O. C. 2011. “Graffiti at Heritage Places: Vandalism as Cultural Significance or Conservation Sacrilege?” Time and Mind 4 (1): 59–75. doi:10.2752/175169711X12893985693711.10.2752/175169711X12893985693711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill, S., and H. Hack. 2013. “Exploring Hidden Narratives: Conscript Graffiti at the Former Military Base of Kummersdorf.” Journal of Social Archaeology 13 (1): 101–121. doi:10.1177/1469605312455762.10.1177/1469605312455762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, S. 2011. “Banksy Classic Artwork Defaced in Bristol as Graffiti War Re-erupts.” guardian.co.uk. Accessed August 10, 2013. www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2011/oct/03/banksy-classic-defaced-bristol
   Google Scholar
• Mubi Brighenti, A. 2010. “At the Wall: Graffiti Writers, Urban Territoriality, and the Public Domain.” Space and Culture 13 (3): 315–332. doi:10.1177/1206331210365283.10.1177/1206331210365283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, J., and T. Neal, eds. 2010. Wild Signs: Graffiti in Archaeology and History. Oxford: Archaeopress.
   Google Scholar
• Orsini, M. 2012. The Writing’s on the Wall: Changing Attitudes towards Graffiti and Conservation [Unpublished MA Dissertation]. London: University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Schacter, R. 2008. “An Ethnography of Iconoclash: An Investigation into the Production, Consumption and Destruction of Street-art in London.” Journal of Material Culture 13: 35–61. doi:10.1177/1359183507086217.10.1177/1359183507086217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, J. 2012. “Preserving Art that was Never Meant to Last.” Deutsche Welle. Accessed August 10, 2013. www.dw.de/dw/article/0,15933463,00.html
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, J. 2010. “Theo Loves Doris: Wild-signs in Landscape and Heritage Context.” In Wild Signs: Graffiti in Archaeology and History, edited by J. Oliver and T. Neal, 71–79. Oxford: Archaeopress.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, P. 2005. The Rough Guide to Hip Hop. 2nd ed. London: Rough Guides.
   Google Scholar
• Skounti, A. 2009. “The Authentic Illusion: Humanity’s Intangible Cultural Heritage, the Moroccan Experience.” In Intangible Heritage, edited by L. Smith and N. Akagawa, 74–92. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. 2006. The Uses of Heritage. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Starn, R. 2002. “Authenticity and Historic Preservation: Towards an Authentic History.” History of the Human Sciences 15 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1177/0952695102015001070.10.1177/0952695102015001070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO (United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). 1972. Convention concerning the Protection the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, November 16, 1972. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO (United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). 1994. The Nara Document on Authenticity. Nara: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO (United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). 2003. Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, October 17, 2003. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO (United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). 2012. Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Wacławek, A. 2011. Graffiti and Street Art. London: Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J. 2011. “Should the Work of Banksy Be Listed?” Journal of Planning & Environment Law 4: 374–385.
   Google Scholar
• Webster J. 2012. “Protecting Banksy’s Legacy: A Lawyer’s View. In Banksy the Bristol Legacy, edited by P. Gough, 132–137. Bristol: Redcliffe.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, P. 1987. Graffiti and Vandalism on Public, Transport No. 6 Research Brief. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. 2008. Prison: Cultural Memory and Dark Tourism. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A. 2010. “Negotiated Consent or Zero Tolerance? Responding to Graffiti and Street Art in Melbourne.” City 14 (1–2): 99–114. doi:10.1080/13604810903525215.10.1080/13604810903525215
   Google Scholar