Floating sentiments: silence and memory in the encounter between the celebration of Tooro Nagashi and the intangible cultural heritage policy in Brazil

References

• Amescua, C. 2013. “Anthropology of Intangible Cultural Heritage and Migration: An Uncharted Field.” In Anthropological Perspectives on Intangible Cultural Heritage, edited by L. Arizpe and C. Amescua, no pages. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ang, I. 2011. “Unsettling the National: Heritage and Diaspora.” In Heritage, Memory & Identity, edited by Y. R. Isar and H. K. Anheier, 82–94. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. 2013. “Cosmopolitanism from Below: Some Ethical Lessons from the Slums of Mumbai.” In The Future as Cultural Fact, edited by A. Appadurai, 197–215. London, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Brasil. 1937. “Constituição dos Estados Unidos do Brasil.”
   Google Scholar
• Brasil. 1938. “Decreto n° 383, de 18 de abril de 1938.”
   Google Scholar
• Brasil. 1939. “Decreto n° 1545, de 25 de agosto de 1939.”
   Google Scholar
• Brasil. 1942a. “Decreto-lei n° 10358, de 31 de Agosto de 1942.”
   Google Scholar
• Brasil. 1942b. “Decreto-lei n°4166, de 11 de março de 1942.”
   Google Scholar
• Brasil. 1988. “Constituição do Brasil.”
   Google Scholar
• Chuva, M. 2009. Os arquitetos da memória. Sociogênese das práticas de preservação do patrimônio cultural no Brasil (anos 1930-1940). Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ.
   Google Scholar
• Dellios, A., and E. Henrich. 2020. “Migratory Pasts and Heritage Making Presents: Theory and Practice.” In Migrant, Multicultural and Diasporic Heritage : Beyond and Between Borders, edited by A. Dellios and E. Henrich, 1–17. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gunew, S. 2013. Haunted Nations: The Colonial Dimensions of Multiculturalisms. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Handa, T. 1987. O imigrante japonês – história de sua vida no Brasil. São Paulo: TA Queiroz e Centro de Estudos Nipo-Brasileiros.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, M. 2014. “Presidential Address 2014: Connective Histories in Vulnerable Times.” PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 129 (3): 330–348. doi:10.1632/pmla.2014.129.3.330.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, M. 2019. “Connective Arts of Postmemory.” Analecta política 9 (16): 171–176. doi:10.18566/apolit.v9n16.a09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPHAN. 2008. Inventário Nacional da Celebração do Tooro Nagashi. São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• IPHAN. 2009. Inventário do Vale do Ribeira. São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Jelin, E. 2002. Los trabajos de la memória. Madri: Siglo XXI de España Editores.
   Google Scholar
• Kurazawa, F. 2004. “A Cosmopolitanism from Below: Alternative Globalization and the Creation of a Solidarity Without Bounds.” European Journal of Sociology 45 (2): 233–255. doi:10.1017/S0003975604001444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesser, J. 1999. Negotiating National Identity: Immigrants, Minorities, and the Struggle for Ethnicity in Brazil. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lesser, J. 2013. Immigration, Ethnicity, and National Identity in Brazil, 1808 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, S. X. 2019. The Making of Japanese Settler Colonialism: Malthusianism and Trans-Pacific Migration, 1868–1961. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Midorikawa, J. 1928. As colônias japonezas na zona do Ribeira de Iguape. São Paulo: Seção de Obras do Estado de São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Nanta, A. 2012. “The Japanese Colonial Historiography in Korea (1905-1945).” In History at Stake in East Asia, edited by R. Caroli and P. F. Souury, 83–105. Venezia: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina.
   Google Scholar
• Pollak, M. 1986. “La gestion de l’indicible.” Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 62 (1): 30–53. doi:10.3406/arss.1986.2315.
   Google Scholar
• Pollak, M. 1993. “Mémoire, oubli, silence.” In Une identité blessée: Études de sociologie et d’histoire, edited by M. Pollak, 13–39. Paris: Éditions Métailié.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, A. 2015. “Of Routes and Roots: Paths for Understanding Diasporic Heritage.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Heritage Research, edited by E. Waterton and S. Watson, 382–396. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. 2000. La mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha, C. 2006. Zen in Brazil: The Quest for Cosmopolitan Modernity. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press.
   Google Scholar
• São Paulo. 1937. “Lei n° 1912, de 19 de Janeiro de 1937.”
   Google Scholar
• Souyri, P. F. 2014. Japon colonial, 1880-1930. Les voix de la dissension. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
   Google Scholar
• Toji, S. 2021. “Consentimento, anuência, comunidades e detentores: a questão da participação social no campo do patrimônio cultural e o diálogo entre a Convenção para a Salvaguarda do Patrimônio Imaterial e a política de patrimônio imaterial do Brasil.” Cadernos de Sociomuseologia 62 (8): 77–86. doi:10.36572/csm.2021.vol.62.06.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. 2005. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uzzell, D., and R. Ballantyne. 1998. “Heritage That Hurts: Interpretation in a Postmodern World.” In Contemporary Issues in Heritage and Environmental Interpretation: Problems and Prospects, edited by D. Uzzell and R. Ballantyne, 152–171. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar