The crowding out of social values: on the reasons why social values so consistently lose out to other values in heritage management

References

• Ailhaud, F., and N. Barbe. 2017. “Un hôtel-Dieu en ses existences ou la grande prose de l’hôtel-Dieu de Dole [A hospital in its existences.” Situ Revue des patrimoines 32.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, J. 2008. “The Limits to Traditional Public Administration, or Rescuing Public Value from Misrepresentation.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 67 (3): 357–366. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2008.00593.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, J., and J. O’flynn. 2009. “Making Sense of Public Value: Concepts, Critiques and Emergent Meanings.” International Journal of Public Administration 32 (3–4): 171–191. doi:10.1080/01900690902732731.
   Google Scholar
• Amsing, E., P. Wagenaar, J. Rodenberg, and H. Renes. 2023. “Crafting Castella: Why Interactive Governance Led to Success in Reconstructing a Castellum in Utrecht, but Not in Leiden.” In Calling on the Community. Understanding Participation in the Heritage Sector: An Interactive Governance Perspective, edited by J. Rodenberg, P. Wagenaar, and G.-J. Burgers, 93–115. London and New York: Berghahn. doi:10.1515/9781800738393-007.
   Google Scholar
• Autralia ICOMOS. 2013. The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance. Burwood: Australia ICOMOS.
   Google Scholar
• Avrami, E., S. Macdonald, and R. Mason. 2019. Values in Heritage Management: Emerging Approaches and Research Directions, eds. D. Myers. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Avrami, E., and D. Mason. 2019. “Mapping the Issue of Values.” In Values in Heritage Management: Emerging Approaches and Research Directions, edited by E. Avrami, S. Macdonald, R. Mason, and D. Myers, 9–33. Los Angales: Getty Conservation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Benington, J., and M. H. Moore. 2011. “Public Value in Complex and Changing Times.” In Public Value Theory & Practice, edited by J. Benington and M. H. Moore, 1–30. Basingstoke: PalgraveMacMillan. doi:10.1007/978-0-230-36431-8_1.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, C., G. Dickinson, and B. L. Ott. 2010. “Introduction: Rhetoric/Memory/Place.” In Places of Public Memory: The Rhetoric of Museums and Memorials, edited by G. Dickinson, C. Blair, and B. L. Ott, 1–54. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boholm, M. 2017. “The Semantic Field of Risk.” Safety Science 92: 205 216. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2016.10.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and E. Chiapello. 2005. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and L. Thévenot. 1991. De la Justification: Les Économies de la Grandeur [On justification: economies of worth]. Paris: Les Editions Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and L. Thévenot. 1999. “The Sociology of Critical Capacity.” European Journal of Social Theory 2 (3): 359–377. doi:10.1177/136843199002003010.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and L. Thévenot. 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi:10.1515/9781400827145.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., B. C. Crosby, and L. Bloomberg. 2014. “Public Value Governance: Moving Beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management.” Public Administration Review 74 (4): 445–456. doi:10.1111/puar.12238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, I. 2010. A Dictionary of Critical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, C. 2020. “The UNESCO Imprimatur: Creating Global (In)significance.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 26 (9): 845–856. doi:10.1080/13527258.2020.1746923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelman, Ch. 1977. L’empire rhétorique: rhérotique et argumentation [Rhetorics and argumentation]. Paris: J. Vrin.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, K., and R. Lennox. 2019. “Public value and cultural heritage.” In Public Value: Deepening, Enriching, and Broadening the Theory and Practice, edited by A. Lindgreen, N. Koenig-Lewis, M. Kitchener, J. D. Brewer, M. H. Moore, and T. Meynhardt, 287–298. London/New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315163437-19.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 2005. Convention on the Value of Heritage for Society [Faro Convention]. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Courtney, R. A. 2018. “Network Governance in the Heritage Ecology.” Journal of Management & Governance 22 (3): 689–705. doi:10.1007/s10997-017-9399-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De La Broise, P. 2011. “La muséologie au défi d’une patrimonialisation post-industrielle [Museology facing the challenge of post-industrial heritagizations.” Hermes, La Revue 3 (61): 125–130.
   Google Scholar
• De la Torre, M., ed. 2002. Assessing the Values of Cultural Heritage. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• De la Torre, M. 2013. “Values and Heritage Conservation.” Heritage & Society 6 (2): 155–166. doi:10.1179/2159032X13Z.00000000011.
   Google Scholar
• Dolff-Bonekämper, G. 2009. “The Social and Spatial Frameworks of Heritage – What is New in the Faro Convention?” In Heritage and Beyond, edited by C. of Europe, 69–74. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Duval, M., B. Smith, S. Hœrlé, L. Bovet, N. Khumalo, and L. Bhengu. 2019. “Towards a Holistic Approach to Heritage Values: A Multidisciplinary and Cosmopolitan Approach.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 25 (12): 1279–1301. doi:10.1080/13527258.2019.1590449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Featherstone, M. 1991. Consumer Culture and Postmodernism. London: Pluto Press. doi:10.4135/9781446280546.n6.
   Google Scholar
• Finlayson, A. 2007. “From Beliefs to Arguments: Interpretive Methodology and Rhetorical Political Analysis.” The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 9 (4): 545–563. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856x.2007.00269.x.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., and J. Forester, eds. 1993. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822381815.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., and H. Gottweis. 2012. “The Argumentative Turn in Public Policy Revisited: Twenty Years Later.” Critical Policy Studies 7 (4): 425–433. doi:10.1080/19460171.2013.851164.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., D. Torgerson, A. Durnová, and M. Orsini, eds. 2015. Handbook of Critical Policy Studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi:10.4337/9781783472352.
   Google Scholar
• Fojut, N. 2019. “The Philosophical, Political and Pragmatic Roots of the Convention.” In Heritage and Beyond, edited by C. of Europe, 13–21. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fredheim, L. H., and M. Khalaf. 2016. “The Significance of Values: Heritage Value Typologies Re-Examined.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 22 (6): 466–481. doi:10.1080/13527258.2016.1171247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottweis, H. 2007. “Rhetoric in Policy Making: Between Logos, Ethos, and Pathos.” In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods, edited by F. Fischer and G. J. Miller, 237–250. Boca Raton: CRC/Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1201/9781420017007.ch17.
   Google Scholar
• Gottweiss, H. 2006. “Argumentative Policy Analysis.” In Handbook of Public Policy, edited by B. G. Peters and J. Pierre, 461–480. London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781848608054.n28.
   Google Scholar
• Gottweiss, H. 2012. “Political Rhetoric and Stem Cell Policy in the United States: Embodiments, Scenograhies and Emotions.” In The Argumentative Turn Revisited, edited by F. Fisher and H. Gottweis, 211–235. Durham and London: Duke University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv11smfm4.10.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C. 2008. “Arts Council England and Public Value: A Critical Review.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 14 (2): 209–214. doi:10.1080/10286630802106383.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 2000. “Whose Heritage?: Un-Settling ‘The Heritage’, Re-Imagining the Post-Nation.” Third Tekst 49: 3–13. doi:10.1080/09528829908576818.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. 2013. Heritage: Critical Approaches. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heinich, N. 2020a. “A Pragmatic Redefinition of Value (S): Toward a General Model of Valuation.” Theory, Culture & Society 37 (5): 75–94. doi:10.1177/0263276420915993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinich, N. 2020b. “Ten Proposals on Values.” Cultural Sociology 14 (3): 213–232. doi:10.1177/1749975520922173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewison, R. 1987. The Heritage Industry. Britain in a Climate of Decline. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson, C. 1978. Towards a Philosophy of Administration. 2nd print ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ireland, T., S. Brown, and J. Schofield. 2020. “Situating (In)significance.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 26 (9): 826–844. doi:10.1080/13527258.2020.1755882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagd, S. 2011. “Pragmatic Sociology and Competing Orders of Worth in Organizations.” European Journal of Social Theory 14 (3): 343–359. doi:10.1177/1368431011412349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaspers, S., and T. Steen. 2019. “Realizing Public Values: Enhancement or Obstruction? Exploring Value Tensions and Coping Strategies in the Co-Production of Social Care.” Public Management Review 21 (4): 606–627. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1508608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, C. 2017. “Recognising Connection: Social Significance and Heritage Practice.” Córima, Revista de Investigación en Gestión Cultural 2 (2): 1–24. doi:10.32870/cor.a2n2.6306.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. 2017. “Wrestling with the Social Value of Heritage: Problems, Dilemmas and Opportunities.” Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage 4 (1): 21–37. doi:10.1080/20518196.2016.1193996.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S., and S. Leech. 2015. Valuing the Historic Environment: A Critical Review of Existing Approaches to Social Value. London: AHRC.
   Google Scholar
• Kolen, J. C. A. 2008. “Een functionele geschiedenis [A functional history]”. In Op Historische Gronden. Erfgoed in een Context van Ruimtelijk Ontwerp, Planning en Democratie [On historical grounds.” In Heritage in the Context of Spatial Design, Planning and Democracy], edited by M. Eerden, E. Luiten, A. van der Zande, J. C. A. Kolen, and R. During, 83–104. Utrecht/Rotterdam: Projectbureau Belvedere/de Maasstad.
   Google Scholar
• Korostelina, K. 2019. “Understanding Values of Cultural Heritage within the Framework of Social Identity Conflicts.” In Values in Heritage Management: Emerging Approaches and Research Directions, edited by E. Avrami, S. Macdonald, R. Mason, and D. Myers, 83–96. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. Vol. 8. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lafrenz Samuels, K., and T. Rico, eds. 2015. Heritage Keywords: Rhetoric and Redescription in Cultural Heritage. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. J., K. Oakley, and R. Naylor. 2011. “The Public Gets What the Public wants’? The Uses and Abuses of ‘Public value’ in Contemporary British Cultural Policy.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 17 (3): 289–300. doi:10.1080/10286632.2010.528834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennox, R. 1997. Heritage and Politics in the Public Value Era. An Analysis of the Historic Environment Sector, the Public, and the State in England since 1997. PhD thesis, University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R. 2002. “Assessing Values in Conservation Planning: Methodological Issues and Choices.” In Assessing the Values of Cultural Heritage, edited by M. De la Torre, 5–30. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R., and E. Avrami. 2002. “Heritage Values and Challenges of Conservation Planning.” In Management Planning for Archaeological Sites: An International Workshop Organized by the Getty Conservation, edited by J. Teutonico and G. Palumbo, 13–26. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A., and J. De Jong. 2020. “Managing Value Conflicts in Public Innovation: Ostrich, Chameleon, and Dolphin Strategies.” International Journal of Public Administration 43 (11): 977–988. doi:10.1080/01900692.2019.1664568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. H. 2013. Recognizing Public Value. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674067820.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, K., R. Naylor, and D. Lee. 2006. Giving Them What They Want: The Construction of the Public in ‘Public Value’. London: BOP Consulting.
   Google Scholar
• O’Flynn, J. 2021. “Where to for Public Value? Taking Stock and Moving on.” International Journal of Public Administration 44 (10): 867–877. doi:10.1080/01900692.2021.1884696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, R. B. 1954. Realms of Value : A Critique of Human Civilization. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674430419.
   Google Scholar
• Prebble, M. 2018. “Is “We” Singular? The Nature of Public Value.” The American Review of Public Administration 48 (2): 103–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rescher, N. 1982. Introduction to Value Theory. Washington: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Rodenberg, J. 2015. “De bestuurlijke omgang met verleden, heden en toekomst: of hoe de Noordoostpolder geen Werelderfgoed werd [Govermental dealings with past, present and future: or how the Noordoostpolder did not become a World heritage site].” In Polders peilen [Gauging polders], edited by R. van Diepen, W. van der Most, and H. Pruntel, 130–153. Lelystad: Stichting Uitgeverij De Twaalfde Provincie.
   Google Scholar
• Rodenberg, J., and R. Hulst. 2012. “Governance of Heritage. Discourses and Power in Heritage Policy Networks.”, paper presented at the Inaugural Conference of the Association of Critical Heritage Studies, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Zweden, June 5-8.
   Google Scholar
• Rodenberg, J., and F. P. Wagenaar. 2016. “Essentializing ‘Black Pete’: Competing Narratives Surrounding the Sinterklaas Tradition in the Netherlands.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 22 (9): 716–728. doi:10.1080/13527258.2016.1193039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodenberg, J., and F. P. Wagenaar, eds. 2018. Cultural Contestation: Heritage, Identity and the Role of Government. Cham: Palgrave McMillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91914-0.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, M. H., edited by. 2009. In: “Culture and Belonging in Devided Societies”. Contestation and Symbolic Landscapes. Philadelphia, PA:University of Pennsylvania Press. 10.9783/9780812203509.
   Google Scholar
• Rutgers, M. R. 2015. “As Good as It Gets? On the Meaning of Public Value in the Study of Policy and Management.” The American Review of Public Administration 45 (1): 29–45. doi:10.1177/0275074014525833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutgers, M. R. 2019. “The Rationalities of Public Values: Conflicting Values and Conflicting Rationalities.” In Public Value: Deepening, Enriching, and Broadening the Theory and Practice, edited by A. Lindgreen, N. Koenig-Lewis, M. Kitchener, J. D. Brewer, M. H. Moore, and T. Meynhardt, 40–52. London/New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315163437-3.
   Google Scholar
• Rutgers, M. R., and P. Overeem. 2014. “Public Values in Public Administration Recognizing Public Value.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 24 (3): 806–812. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreurs, P. 2005. “Symposium—The Value (S) of Public Administration: Dedicated to Amande Nina Wianne.” Administrative Theory & Praxis 27 (2): 301–310. doi:10.1080/10841806.2005.11029491.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. 2006. Uses of Heritage. London and New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203602263.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. 2020. Emotional Heritage: Visitor Engagement at Museums and Heritage Sites. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315713274.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L., and G. Campbell. 2015. “The Elephant in the Room: Heritage, Affect and Emotion.” In A Companion to Heritage Studies, edited by W. Logan, M. N. Craith, and U. Kockel, 443–460. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118486634.ch30.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L., and E. Waterton. 2012. “Constrained by Commonsense : The Authorized Heritage Discourse in Contemporary Debates.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Archaeology, edited by R. Skeates, C. McDavid, and J. Carman, 153–171. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199237821.013.0009.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L., M. Wetherell, and G. Campbell, eds. 2018. Emotion, Affective Practices, and the Past in the Present. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781351250962.
   Google Scholar
• Steenhuisen, B. 2009. Competing public values: Coping strategies in heavily regulated utility industries. PhD thesis, TU Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. 2006. “Value Conflict and Policy Change.” The Review of Policy Research 23 (1): 183–195. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00192.x.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. 1988. Policy Paradox. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Little.
   Google Scholar
• Strouken, I. 2010. Dit zijn wij: de belangrijkste honderd tradities van Nederland [This is who we are: the hundred most important traditions in The Netherlands]. Beilen: Pharos Uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Thacher, D. 2001. “Conflicting Values in Community Policing.” Law & Society Review 35 (4): 765–798. doi:10.2307/3185416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thacher, D., and M. Rein. 2004. “Managing Value Conflict in Public Policy.” Governance 17 (4): 457–486. doi:10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00254.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thérond, D. 2009. “Benefits and Innovations of the Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society.” In Heritage and Beyond, edited by C. of Europe, 9–11. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tolia-Kelly, D. P., E. Wateron, and S. Watson. 2017. Heritage, Affect and Emotion. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315586656.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Berg, H. 2004. “Discoursanalyse En de ‘Linguistic turn’ in de Sociale Wetenschappen [Discourse Analysis and the Linguistic Turn in the Social Sciences].” KWALON 9 (2): 29–40. doi:10.5117/2004.009.003.007.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. 2014. Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. London/New York: M.E. Sharpe. doi:10.4324/9781315702476.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, F. P., and J. Rodenberg. 2018. “Acting in a National Play: Governmental Roles During the Zwarte Piet Contestation.” In Cultural Contestation: Heritage, Identity and the Role of Government, edited by J. Rodenberg and P. Wagenaar, 283–314. Cham: Palgrave McMillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91914-0_14.
   Google Scholar
• Waterton, E. 2010. Politics, Policy and the Discourses of Heritage in Great Brittain. Basingstoke: PalgraveMacmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230292383.
   Google Scholar
• Waterton, E., and L. Smith. 2010. ““The Recognition and Misrecognition of Community Heritage.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 16 (1–2): 4–15. doi:10.1080/13527250903441671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterton, E., L. Smith, and G. Campbell. 2006. “The Utility of Discourse Analysis to Heritage Studies: The Burra Charter and Social Inclusion.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 12 (4): 339–355. doi:10.1080/13527250600727000.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Z., and S. Hou. 2015. “Heritage and Discourse.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Heritage Research, edited by E. Waterton and S. Watson, 37–51. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137293565_3.
   Google Scholar