Cultural heritage and interculturality: a call to action

References

• ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics). 2022. Australia: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Population Summary. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia. https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/australia-aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-population-summary#cite-window2.
   Google Scholar
• Allam, L. 2022. “Labor Promises to ‘Move quickly’ on Indigenous Voice to Parliament Referendum if Elected.” The Guardian, Accessed May 19. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/may/19/labor-promises-to-move-quickly-on-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-referendum-if-elected.
   Google Scholar
• Aman, R. 2017. “Colonial Differences in Intercultural Education: On Interculturality in the Andes and the Decolonization of Intercultural Dialogue.” Comparative Education Review 61 (S1): S103–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/690459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arantes, A. A. 2014. “The Celebration of Cultural Diversity and the Politics of Difference in Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage.” Ethnologies 36 (1–2): 279–296. https://doi.org/10.7202/1037610ar.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, M. 2013. “Interculturalism and Multiculturalism: Concepts and Controversies.” In Interculturalism and Multiculturalism: Similarities and Differences, edited by M. Barrett, 15–41. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bigenho, M., and H. Stobart. 2018. “Grasping Cacophony in Bolivian Heritage Otherwise.” Anthropological Quarterly 91 (4): 1329–1363. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2018.0067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. A. [2004] 2020. “Heritage as Property.” In Property in Question: Value Transformation in the Global Economy, edited by C. Humphrey and K. Verdery, 49–68. Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003086451-4.
   Google Scholar
• Butterly, L., and L. Lixinski. 2020. “Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Reform in Australia and the Dilemmas of Power.” International Journal of Cultural Property 27 (1): 125–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739120000028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, G., and L. Smith. 2012. “Manifesto of the Association of Critical Heritage Studies.” In Association of Critical Heritage Studies. History. https://www.criticalheritagestudies.org/history.
   Google Scholar
• CNA (Committee on Northern Australia). 2021. A Way Forward: Final Report into the Destruction of Indigenous Heritage Sites at Juukan Gorge. Commonwealth of Australia. https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/committees/reportjnt/024757/toc_pdf/AWayForward.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. [1900] 2020. Australia’s Constitution. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia: Parliamentary Education Office and Australian Government Solicitor.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M., and G. Williams. 2015. Everything You Need to Know About the Referendum to Recognise Indigenous Australians. Sydney: NewSouth Books.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M., and G. Williams. 2021. Everything You Need to Know About the Uluru Statement from the Heart. Sydney: UNSW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dervin, F., and T. Huiyu. 2022. “Politics of Interculturality.” In Supercriticality and Intercultural Dialogue, edited by F. Dervin and H. Tan, 115–127. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7572-1_13.
   Google Scholar
• DesRoches, D. M. 2021. “Working–Class Heritage and the Marketization of Difference: The Limits of New Museology at Manhattan’s Tenement Museum.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 27 (10): 1051–1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2021.1928736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakin, M. C. 2017. Becoming Brazilians: Race and National Identity in Twentieth-Century Brazil. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, A., and F. Mansouri. 2020. “A Systematic Review of Studies on Interculturalism and Intercultural Dialogue.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 41 (4): 490–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2020.1782861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, K. 2010. The Elusive Promise of Indigenous Development: Rights, Culture, Strategy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, K., and L. Lixinski. 2021. “Quilombo Land Rights, Brazilian Constitutionalism, and Racial Capitalism.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 54 (4): 831–870.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 1989. Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse, and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Minneapolis, MN, United States: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 1995. “From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a ‘Post-Socialist’ Age.” New Left Review (212): 68–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyre, G. [1933] 2003. Casa-grande & senzala: Formação da família brasileira sob o regime da economia patriarcal [Casa-Grande & Senzala: Formation of the Brazilian Family Under the Patriarchal Economy Regime]. 48th ed. Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil: Global Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, C. R. 2002. “Does Multiculturalism Menace? Governance, Cultural Rights and the Politics of Identity in Guatemala.” Journal of Latin American Studies 34 (3): 485–524. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X02006521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 2004. “Whose Heritage? Un-Settling ‘The Heritage’, Re-Imagining the Post-Nation.” In The Politics of Heritage: The Legacies of Race, edited by J. Littler and R. Naidoo, 21–31. Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Janke, T. 2000. “Intellectual Property: Arts for Money’s Sake.” Alternative Law Journal 25 (4): 189–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X0002500411.
   Google Scholar
• Janke, T. 2021. True Tracks: Respecting Indigenous Knowledge and Culture. Sydney: NewSouth Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kauanui, J. K. 2016. “‘A Structure, Not an Event’: Settler Colonialism and Enduring Indigeneity.” Lateral 5 (1). https://doi.org/10.25158/L5.1.7.
   Google Scholar
• Langton, M. 2020. “The Destruction of the Juukan Gorge Caves: A Cultural Property Crime in Moral Terms.” The Saturday Paper, Accessed September 19-25.
   Google Scholar
• Leite, I. B. 2007. “The Trans-Historical, Juridical-Formal and Pos-Utopian Quilombo.” In Project Rethinking Histories of Resistance in México and Brazil, Organised by John Gledhill, edited by John, Gledhill. Manchester, United Kingdom: University of Manchester. http://jg.socialsciences.manchester.ac.uk/rethinkinghistories.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lévi-Strauss, C. 1983. Structural Anthropology. Vol. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lixinski, L. 2015. “Between Orthodoxy and Heterodoxy: The Troubled Relationships Between Heritage Studies and Heritage Law.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 21 (3): 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2014.922113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlade, H. 2021. “Western Australia After the Juukan Gorge Inquiry: Little Solace for Aboriginal People.” AusPubLaw, Accessed December 10. https://www.auspublaw.org/blog/2021/12/western-australia-after-the-juukan-gorge-inquiry-little-solace-for-aboriginal-people.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, A., and D. James. 2008. “Papunya Art.” Aboriginal History 32:213–217.
   Google Scholar
• Muckle, R. J. 2012. Indigenous Peoples of North America: A Concise Anthropological Overview. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nascimento, B. [1985] 2021. “The Concept of Quilombo and Black Cultural Resistance.” In Antipode, edited by C. Smith, A. Davis, and B. Gomes, 279. Vol. 53.
   Google Scholar
• Povinelli, E. A. 2002. The Cunning of Recognition: Indigenous Alterities and the Making of Australian Multiculturalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Presidency of the Republic. [1988] 2020. Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil. Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Rappaport, J. 2005. Intercultural Utopias: Public Intellectuals, Cultural Experimentation, and Ethnic Pluralism in Colombia. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, D. [1995] 2000. The Brazilian People: The Formation and Meaning of Brazil, Translated by Gustavo Lins Ribeiro. Gainesville, Florida, United States: University Press of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Ricca, M. 2014. “Intercultural Law, Interdisciplinary Outlines: Lawyering and Anthropological Expertise in Migration Cases Before the Courts.” E/C Rivista Telematica dell‟Associazione Italiana di Studi Semiotici 1–53.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, D. 2010. “The Ideological Foundations of Arguments About Native Title.” Australian Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361141003736125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. J. 2000. Black Marxism: The Making of the Black Radical Tradition. 2nd ed. Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. J. 2019. An Anthropology of Marxism. 2nd ed. Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salleh, A. 2004. “Aboriginal Archaeologists Take a Stand.” ABC Science Online, Accessed December 16. https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2004/12/16/1266812.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Schwabe, S. 2021. “A Heritage of Otherness: Memory Haunts and Urban Development on the ‘Other Side’ of Santiago de Chile.” Ethnos 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2021.1973057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, H., and D. F. Ruggles. 2007. “Cultural Heritage and Human Rights.” In Cultural Heritage and Human Rights, edited by H. Silverman and D. F. Ruggles, 3–29. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71313-7_1.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. 2022. “Heritage, the Power of the Past, and the Politics of (Mis)recognition.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 52 (4): 623–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivak, D. 2017. “Dialogue and Heritage in the Cultural Strategy of UNESCO.” Culture and Dialogue 5 (2): 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1163/24683949-12340035.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. [1987] 2006. In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics. Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ubertazzi, B. 2022. Intangible Cultural Heritage, Sustainable Development and Intellectual Property: International and European Perspectives. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08104-0.
   Google Scholar
• Uluru Statement from the Heart 2017. https://ulurustatement.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/UluruStatementfromtheHeartPLAINTEXT.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2005. Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, I. 2022. “The History of a Lie: The Mabo Case After 30 Years.” Podcast Episode. Countersign, Accessed May 31. https://countersignisapodcast.com/app/uploads/Countersign-S03E01-Irene-Watson.mp3.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, T. 2012. “Beyond Eurocentrism? Heritage Conservation and the Politics of Difference.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 20 (2): 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2012.736403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, P. 2006. “Settler Colonialism and the Elimination of the Native.” Journal of Genocide Research 8 (4): 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623520601056240.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, K. 2019. “Concepts of Identity and Difference.” In A Museum Studies Approach to Heritage, edited by S. Watson, A. J. Barnes, and K. Bunning, 429–440. Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315668505-34.
   Google Scholar
• Yongqi, L., Y. Ruixia, P. Wang, Y. Anlin, and C. Guolong. 2021. “A Quantitative Description of the Spatial–Temporal Distribution and Evolution Pattern of World Cultural Heritage.” Heritage Science 9 (80): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-021-00549-6.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. 1997. “Unruly Categories: A Critique of Nancy Fraser’s Dual Systems Theory.” New Left Review (222): 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeleza, P. T. 2010. “African Diasporas: Toward a Global History.” African Studies Review 53 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1353/arw.0.0274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zotzmann, K., and G. Hernández-Zamora. 2013. “Beyond the ‘Cultural Turn’: The Politics of Recognition versus the Politics of Redistribution in the Field of Intercultural Communication.” The Language Learning Journal 41 (3): 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.836351.
   Google Scholar