3,270
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Reputation laundering and museum collections: patterns, priorities, provenance, and hidden crime

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 145-164 | Received 21 Jul 2023, Accepted 14 Nov 2023, Published online: 20 Nov 2023

References

  • Allen, L. 2013a. ““Come Then Ye Classic Thieves of Each Degree”: The Social Context of the Persepolis Diaspora in the Early Nineteenth Century.” Iran 51 (1): 207–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/05786967.2013.11834730.
  • Allen, L. 2013b. “‘From Silence: A Persepolis Relief in the Victoria and Albert Museum’.” V&A Online Journal 5. http://www.vam.ac.uk/content/journals/research-journal/issue-no.-5-2013/from-silence-a-persepolis-relief-in-the-victoria-and-albert-museum/.
  • Becker, H. S. 1982. Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Berger, M. n.d. “Introduction.” Journal for Art Market Studies 7.
  • Brodie, N., M. M. Kersel, S. Mackenzie, I. Sabrine, E. Smith, and D. Yates. 2022. “Why There is Still an Illicit Trade in Cultural Objects and What We Can Do About It.” Journal of Field Archaeology 47 (2): 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2021.1996979.
  • Brodie, N., and D. Yates. 2022. “Money Laundering and Antiquities‬.” Transfer: Journal for Provenance Research and the History of Collection 1 (1): 97–109. https://doi.org/10.48640/tf.2022.1.91516.
  • The Brooklyn Museum. 1969. Additions to the Museum Collections. The Brooklyn Museum Annual 11 (1): 77–93. Brooklyn Museum.
  • Coggins, C. C. 1969. “Illicit Traffic of Pre-Columbian Antiquities.” Art Journal 29 (1): 94–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043249.1969.10794675.
  • Davidson, K., G. Shawn, and H. Damien. 2021. “Exploring Taste Formation and Performance in the Illicit Trade of Human Remains on Instagram.” In Crime and Art: Sociological and Criminological Perspectives of Crimes in the Art World, edited by N. Oosterman and D. Yates, 29–44. Cham: Springer.
  • Elias, D. 1984. “FBI Arrests Pre-Columbian Art Dealer on Fraud Charges.” Age, June 5.
  • Fuhrmeister, C., and M. Hopp. January 2019. “Rethinking Provenance Research.” Getty Research Journal 11:213–231. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/702755.
  • Gattinara, F. C. 2006. “The Marion True Trial: Information from the Courtroom; Sergeant of Carabinieri Cross-Examined.” The Art Newspaper, June 1. https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2006/06/01/the-marion-true-trial-information-from-the-courtroom-sergeant-of-carabinieri-cross-examined.
  • Graham, S., and D. Huffer. 2020. “Reproducibility, Replicability, and Revisiting the Insta-Dead and the Human Remains Trade.” Internet Archaeology 55 (1). https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.55.11.
  • Graham, S., D. Huffer, and J. Blackadar. 2020. “Towards a Digital Sensorial Archaeology as an Experiment in Distant Viewing of the Trade in Human Remains on Instagram.” Heritage 3 (2): 208–227. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage3020013.
  • Graham, S., D. Huffer, and J. Simons. 2022. “When TikTok Discovered the Human Remains Trade: A Case Study.” Open Archaeology 8 (1): 196–219. De Gruyter Open Access. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2022-0235.
  • Graham, S., A. Lane, D. Huffer, and A. Angourakis. 2020. “Towards a Method for Discerning Sources of Supply within the Human Remains Trade via Patterns of Visual Dissimilarity and Computer Vision.” Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology 3 (1): https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.59.
  • Graham, S., D. Yates, and A. El-Roby. 2023. “Investigating Antiquities Trafficking with Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (GPT)-3 Enabled Knowledge Graphs: A Case Study.” Open Research Europe 3 (June): 100. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.16003.1.
  • Graham, S., D. Yates, A. El-Roby, C. Brousseau, J. Ellens, and C. McDermott. 2023. “Relationship Prediction in a Knowledge Graph Embedding Model of the Illicit Antiquities Trade.” Advances in Archaeological Practice 11 (2): 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2023.1.
  • Grant, D. 2005. “Merrin Gallery is Charged with Inflating Costs and Commissions.” ARTnews.Com, March 15. https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/merrin-gallery-is-charged-with-inflating-costs-and-commissions-2041/.
  • Huffer, D., and S. Graham. 2017. “The Insta-Dead: The Rhetoric of the Human Remains Trade on Instagram.” Internet Archaeology 45 (July). https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.45.5.
  • Huffer, D., and S. Graham. 2018. “Fleshing Out the Bones: Studying the Human Remains Trade with Tensorflow and Inception.” Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology 1 (1): 55–63. Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.8.
  • Huffer, D., and S. Graham. 2023. These Were People Once: The Online Trade in Human Remains and Why It Matters. New York: Berghan.
  • Huffer, D., A. Guerreiro, and S. Graham. 2021. “Osteological Assessment of a Seized Shipment of Modified Human Crania: Implications for Dayak Cultural Heritage Preservation and the Global Human Remains Trade.” Journal of Borneo-Kalimantan 7 (1): 67–93.
  • Huffer, D., C. Wood, and S. Graham. 2019 March. “What the Machine Saw: Some Questions on the Ethics of Computer Vision and Machine Learning to Investigate Human Remains Trafficking.” Internet Archaeology. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.52.5.
  • Kaufmann, J. E. 2008. “Case Against Samuel Merrin Dismissed.” The Art Newspaper, February.
  • Kelker, N., and K. Olsen Bruhns. 2009. Faking Ancient Mesoamerica. Walnut: Creek: Left Coast Press.
  • Knox, S. 1972. “Museum Returns Mayan Monument.” The New York Times, June 6. https://www.nytimes.com/1972/06/06/archives/museum-returns-mayan-monument-stones-in-brooklyn-since-64-accepted.html.
  • Lincoln, M. 2015. “Confabulation in the Humanities.” Matthew Lincoln, PhD Cultural Heritage Data & Info Architecture (blog), March 15. Accessed November 4, 2022 https://matthewlincoln.net/2015/03/21/confabulation-in-the-humanities.html.
  • Lincoln, M. 2017. “Continuity and Disruption in European Networks of Print Production.” Artl@s Bulletin 6 (3): 1550–1750.
  • Lufkin, M. 2005. “Respected Pre-Colombian Art Dealers Indicted Over Fraud.” The Art Newspaper, April 1. https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2005/04/01/respected-pre-colombian-art-dealers-indicted-over-fraud.
  • Mackenzie, S., N. Brodie, D. Yates, and Tsirogiannis, C. 2019. Trafficking Culture: New Directions in Researching the Global Market in Illicit Antiquities. London: Routledge.
  • Mackenzie, S., and D. Yates. 2016a. “What is Grey About the “Grey Market” in Antiquities.” In The Architecture of Illegal Markets: Towards an Economic Sociology of Illegality in the Economy, edited by M. Dewey and J. Beckert, 70–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Mackenzie, S., and D. Yates. 2016b. “Collectors on Illicit Collecting: Higher Loyalties and Other Techniques of Neutralization in the Unlawful Collecting of Rare and Precious Orchids and Antiquities.” Theoretical Criminology 20 (3): 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480615607625.
  • Mashberg, T. 2015. “Antiquities Dealer Leonardo Patterson Faces New Criminal Charges.” The New York Times, December 8, sec. Arts. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/09/arts/design/antiquities-dealer-leonardo-patterson-faces-new-criminal-charges.html.
  • National Gallery of Australia. 1979. Australian National Gallery Review 1978/79. Canberra.
  • Palombo, C., and D. Yates. 2023. “Digital Transit Ports for the Illicit Trade in Antiquities: The Case of the “Afghan Genizah”.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 38 (1): 257–276. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqac032.
  • Ramsay, S. 2011. Reading Machines: Toward an Algorithmic Criticism. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
  • Reed, V. S. 2023. “American Museums and Colonial-Era Provenance: A Proposal.” International Journal of Cultural Property 30 (1): 1–21. May. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739123000036.
  • Sample, M. 2012. “Notes Towards a Deformed Humanities.” Sample Reality (Blog). http://www.samplereality.com/2012/05/02/notes-towards-a-deformed-humanities/.
  • Samuels, L., and J. McGann. 1999. “Deformance and Interpretation.” New Literary History 30 (1): 25–56. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.1999.0010.
  • United Press International. 1984. National News in Brief. May 21.
  • Watson, P., and C. Todeschini. 2007. The Medici Conspiracy: The Illicit Journey of Looted Antiquities from Italy’s Tomb Raiders to the World's Greatest Museums. New York: Public Affairs.
  • Williams, P., and E. U. Savona, eds. 1996. The United Nations and Transnational Organized Crime. London ; Portland, OR: F. Cass.
  • Yates, D. 2014. “Church Theft, Insecurity, and Community Justice: The Reality of Source-End Regulation of the Market for Illicit Bolivian Cultural Objects.” European Journal on Criminal Policy Research 20 (4): 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-014-9232-z.
  • Yates, D. 2015. “Museums, Collectors, and Value Manipulation: Tax Fraud Through Donation of Antiquities.” Journal of Financial Crime 23 (1): 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2014-0051.
  • Yates, D., and D. Bērziņa. 2023 June. “Affective Atmosphere in an Art Fair Jewel Heist.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-023-09549-7.
  • Yates, D., D. Bērziņa, and A. Wright. 2022. “Protecting a Broken Window: Vandalism and Security at Rural Rock Art Sites.” The Professional Geographer 74 (2): 384–390. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2021.1957690.
  • Yates, D., and N. Brodie. 2023. “The Illicit Trade in Antiquities is Not the World’s Third-Largest Illicit Trade: A Critical Evaluation of a Factoid.” Antiquity, June: 1–13. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2023.90.