Invitations to Intervene and the Legitimacy of EU and NATO Civilian and Military Operations

Bibliography

• Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, and Vincent Pouliot. “Power in Practice: Negotiating the International Intervention in Libya.” European Journal of International Relations 20, no. 4 (2014): 889–911. doi: 10.1177/1354066113512702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agence France Presse. Albania: NATO Opens Debate on Sending Peacekeeper Force to Albania. Brussels: World News Connection, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Agence France Presse. Scheffer Says NATO ‘Ready’ to Send Troops to Iraq if Government Makes Request. Warsaw: World News Connection, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, Karen J., and Sophie Meunier. “The Politics of International Regime Complexity.” Perspectives on Politics 7, no. 1 (2009): 13–24. doi: 10.1017/S1537592709090033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badescu, Cristina G. “Authorizing Humanitarian Intervention: Hard Choices in Saving Strangers.” Canadian Journal of Political Science-Revue Canadienne De Science Politique 40, no. 1 (2007): 51–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balas, Alexandru, Andrew P. Owsiak, and Paul F. Diehl. “Demanding Peace: The Impact of Prevailing Conflict on the Shift from Peacekeeping to Peacebuilding.” Peace & Change 37, no. 2 (2012): 195–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0130.2011.00743.x
   Google Scholar
• Beck, Robert J. “The Grenada Invasion, International Law and the Scoon Invitation: A 30-year Retrospective.” The Round Table 102, no. 3 (2013): 281–90. doi: 10.1080/00358533.2013.794578
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, Alex J., and Paul D. Williams. “Who’s Keeping the Peace? Regionalization and Contemporary Peace Operations.” International Security 29, no. 4 (2005): 157–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, Martin, and Monika Heupel. “The Legitimacy of the UN Security Council: Evidence from Recent General Assembly Debates.” International Studies Quarterly 59, no. 2 (2015): 238–50. doi: 10.1111/isqu.12134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosig, Malte. “EU Peacekeeping in Africa: From Functional Niches to Interlocking Security.” International Peacekeeping 21, no. 1 (2014): 74–90. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2014.899124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesterman, Simon. “Legality Versus Legitimacy: Humanitarian Intervention, the Security Council, and the Rule of Law.” Security Dialogue 33, no. 3 (2002): 293–307. doi: 10.1177/0967010602033003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Ian. Legitimacy and International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Cottey, Andrew. “Beyond Humanitarian Intervention: The New Politics of Peacekeeping and Intervention.” Contemporary Politics 14, no. 4 (2008): 429–46. doi: 10.1080/13569770802519342
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. Council Joint Action 2007/667/CFSP: on the European Union Military Operation in the Republic of Chad and in the Central African Republic. Brussels: EUR-Lex, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Dandeker, Christopher, and James Gow. “The Future of Peace Support Operations: Strategic Peacekeeping and Success.” Armed Forces & Society 23, no. 3 (1997): 327–48. doi: 10.1177/0095327X9702300302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debeuf, Koert. The Untold Story of Libya’s Mahmud Gebril. Future Leadership Institute, 2013, http://fli.institute/2013/05/13/the-untold-story-of-libyas-mahmud-gebril-column/.
   Google Scholar
• Diehl, Paul F. International Peacekeeping. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, Hylke. “The Military Operation of the EU in Chad and the Central African Republic: Good Policy, Bad Politics.” International Peacekeeping 17, no. 3 (2010): 395–407. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2010.500150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, Hylke. Policy-Making in EU Security and Defense: An Institutional Perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, Daniel, and Paul F. Diehl, eds. Peace Operation Success: A Comparative Analysis. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Engberg, Katarina. “To Intervene or Not to Intervene? The EU and the Military Option in the Lebanon War of 2006.” Perspectives on European Politics and Society 11, no. 4 (2010): 408–28. doi: 10.1080/15705854.2010.524406
   Google Scholar
• Falk, Richard. “Introduction: Legality and Legitimacy. Necessities and Prolematics of Exceptionalism.” In Legality and Legitimacy in Global Affairs, ed. Richard Falk, Mark Juergensmeyer, and Vesselin Popovski, 3–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Gregory H. “Intervention by Invitation.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law, ed. Marc Weller, 816–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Gegout, Catherine. “The Quint: Acknowledging the Existence of a Big Four-US Directoire at the Heart of the European Union’s Foreign Policy Decision-Making Process.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 40, no. 2 (2002): 331–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gent, Stephen E. “Strange Bedfellows: The Strategic Dynamics of Major Power Military Interventions.” The Journal of Politics 69, no. 4 (2007): 1089–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00609.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. Case Studies and Theory Development in Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Gottwald, Marlene. TEPSA Brief: Options for EU Engagement in Post-conflict Libya, 1–6. Brussels: Trans European Policy Studies Association, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Annika S. Against all Odds – The Evolution of Planning for ESPD Operations: Civilian Crisis Management from EUPM Onwards, 1–63. Berlin: Zentrum für Internationale Friedenseinsätze, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, Heidi. “Rapid Response or Evasive Action? Regional Organization Responses to Peace Operation Demands.” European Security 18, no. 4 (2010): 383–415. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2010.496778
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, Heidi. Time to React: The Efficiency of International Organizations in Crisis Response. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hehir, Aidan. “NATO’s ‘Humanitarian Intervention’ in Kosovo: Legal Precedent or Aberration?.” Journal of Human Rights 8, no. 3 (2009): 245–64. doi: 10.1080/14754830903110319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinze, Eric A. “Humanitarian Intervention, the Responsibility to Protect, and Confused Legitimacy.” Human Rights and Human Welfare 11 (2011): 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrickson, Ryan C. “Public Diplomacy at NATO: An Assessment of Jaap de Hoop Scheffer’s Leadership of the Alliance.” Journal of Military and Strategic Studies 8, no. 2 (2005–2006): 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, Stéphanie C. “Why Institutional Overlap Matters: CSDP in the European Security Architecture.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 49, no. 1 (2011): 101–20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01782-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurd, Ian. “Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics.” International Organization 53, no. 2 (1999): 379–408. doi: 10.1162/002081899550913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurrell, Andrew. “Legitimacy and the Use of Force: Can the Circle Be Squared?” Review of International Studies 31 (2005): 15–32. doi: 10.1017/S0260210505006765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, Ian. “Managing Consent in Contemporary Peacekeeping Operations.” International Peacekeeping 18, no. 2 (2011): 168–82. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2011.546091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsrud, John, and Diana Felix da Costa. “Invitation Withdrawn: Humanitarian Action, United Nations Peacekeeping, and State Sovereignty in Chad.” Disasters 37 (2013): S171–87. doi: 10.1111/disa.12020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, Nicole. “Between Conflict Management and Role Conflict: The EU in the Libyan Crisis.” European Security 23, no. 3 (2014): 250–69. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2013.875532
   Google Scholar
• Kreps, Sarah E. “Multilateral Military Interventions: Theory and Practice.” Political Science Quarterly 123, no. 4 (2008–2009): 573–603. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-165X.2008.tb00635.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, Alan J. “The Moral Hazard of Humanitarian Intervention: Lessons from the Balkans.” International Studies Quarterly 52, no. 1 (2008): 49–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00491.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, Jack S. “Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 25, no. 1 (2008): 1–18. doi: 10.1080/07388940701860318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord Robertson. Remarks by Former NATO Secretary General Lord Robertson. Washington, DC: Council on Foreign Relations, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Luck, Edward C. “The United States, International Organizations, and the Quest for Legitimacy.” In Multilateralism & U.S. Foreign Policy: Ambivalent Engagement, ed. Stewart Patrick and Shepard Forman, 47–74. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, Sebastian, and Olaf Theiler. “Coping with Complexity: Informal Political Forums at NATO Headquarters.” In NATO’s Post-Cold War Politics: The Changing Provision of Security, ed. Sebastian Mayer, 140–58. New York: Palgrave, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mersiades, Michael. “Peacekeeping and Legitimacy: Lessons from Cambodia and Somalia.” International Peacekeeping 12, no. 2 (2005): 205–21. doi: 10.1080/13533310500066487
   Google Scholar
• Mondré, Aletta. Forum Shopping in International Disputes. London: Palgrave Macmillian, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• NATO Maritime Command. “Operation Allied Provider.” 2016, http://www.mc.nato.int/ops/Pages/Operation-Allied-provider.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Backgrounder: NATO’s Role in Civil Emergency Planning, 1–9. Brussels: NATO Public Diplomacy Division, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• North Atlantic Treaty Organization. “Press Conference by NATO Secretary General, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer.” June 24, 2004, http://www.nato.int/docu/speech/2004/s040624a.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, Roland. “Broadening the Study of Peace Operations.” International Studies Review 2, no. 3 (2000): 27–44. doi: 10.1111/1521-9488.00214
   Google Scholar
• Pattison, James. “Legitimacy and Humanitarian Intervention: Who Should Intervene?” The International Journal of Human Rights 12, no. 3 (2008): 395–413. doi: 10.1080/13642980802069658
   Google Scholar
• Piccolino, Giulia, and John Karlsrud. “Withering Consent, but Mutual Dependency: UN Peace Operations and African Assertiveness.” Conflict, Security & Development 11, no. 4 (2011): 447–71. doi: 10.1080/14678802.2011.614128
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, Jeffrey, and Emizet F. Kisangani. “Political, Economic, and Social Consequences of Foreign Military Intervention.” Political Research Quarterly 59, no. 3 (2006): 363–76. doi: 10.1177/106591290605900304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl, Benjamin. “To What Ends? Governmental Interests and European Union (Non-) Intervention in Chad and the Democratic Republic of Congo.” Cooperation and Conflict 49, no. 2 (2014): 191–211. doi: 10.1177/0010836713482875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pushkina, Darya. “A Recipe for Success? Ingredients of a Successful Peacekeeping Mission.” International Peacekeeping 13, no. 2 (2006): 133–49. doi: 10.1080/13533310500436508
   Google Scholar
• Regan, Patrick M. “Conditions of Successful Third-party Intervention in Intrastate Conflicts.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 40, no. 2 (1996): 336–59. doi: 10.1177/0022002796040002006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudoren, Jodi. “Palestinian Leader Seeks NATO Force in Future State.” The New York Times, February 3, 2014, A4.
   Google Scholar
• Rynning, Sten. NATO in Afghanistan: The Liberal Disconnect. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Sari, Aurel. “The Conclusion of International Agreements by the European Union in the Context of the ESDP.” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 57, no. 1 (2008): 53–86. doi: 10.1017/S0020589308000031
   Google Scholar
• Segell, Glen. “The First NATO Mission to Africa: Darfur.” Scientia Miliaria: South African Journal of Military Studies 36, no. 2 (2008): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, Richard W., and David E. Sanger. “Bush Doesn’t Expect NATO to Provide Troops to Iraq.” New York Times, June 11, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Tardy, Thierry. “EU-UN Cooperation in Peacekeeping: A Promising Relationship in a Constrained Environment.” In The European Union and the United Nations: Partners in Effective Multilateralism. Chaillot Paper No. 78, ed. Martin Ortega, 49–68. Paris: Institute for Security Studies, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Tejpar, Johan, and Kristina Zetterlund. EUCAP Nestor: Trying to Steer Out of the Doldrums. Swedish Defense Research Agency, 2013, http://hlo-daktari.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/EUCAP-NESTOR-Tejpar-and-Zetterlund-FOI-R-3721.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The Independent International Commission on Kosovo. The Kosovo Report, 1–372. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Whalan, Jeni. How Peace Operations Work: Power, Legitimacy, and Effectiveness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar