International Peacebuilding as a Case of Structural Injustice

References

• Autesserre, Séverine. “Hobbes and the Congo: Frames, Local Violence, and International Intervention.” International Organization 63, no. 2 (2009): 249–80. doi: 10.1017/S0020818309090080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autesserre, Séverine. The Trouble with the Congo: Local Violence and the Failure of International Peacebuilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Autesserre, Séverine. “Going Micro: Emerging and Future Peacekeeping Research.” International Peacekeeping 21, no. 4 (2014): 492–500. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2014.950884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autesserre, Séverine. Peaceland: Conflict Resolution and the Everyday Politics of International Intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Barder, Alexander D. Empire Within: International Hierarchy and Its Imperial Laboratories of Governance. London: Routledge, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bargués-Pedreny, Pol. “Connolly and the Never-Ending Critiques of Liberal Peace: From the Privilege of Difference to Vorarephilia.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 30, no. 2–3 (2017): 216–34. doi: 10.1080/09557571.2017.1313195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, Michael N. “Hierarchy and Paternalism.” In Hierarchies in World Politics, ed. Ayşe Zarakol, 66–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, Michael N. “Introduction: International Paternalism: Framing the Debate.” In Paternalism Beyond Borders, ed. Michael N. Barnett, 1–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, Michael, and Martha Finnemore. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Björkdahl, Annika, and Kristine Höglund. “Precarious Peacebuilding: Friction in Global–Local Encounters.” Peacebuilding 1, no. 3 (2013): 289–99. doi: 10.1080/21647259.2013.813170
   Google Scholar
• Björkdahl, Annika, Kristine Höglund, Gearoid Millar, Jaïr Van Der Lijn, and Willemijn Verkoren. Peacebuilding and Friction: Global and Local Encounters in Post Conflict-Societies. London: Routledge, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Bliesemann de Guevara, Berit, ed. Statebuilding and State-Formation: The Political Sociology of Intervention. London: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Boege, Volker, and Patricia Rinck. “The Local/International Interface in Peacebuilding: Experiences from Bougainville and Sierra Leone.” International Peacekeeping 26, no. 2 (2019): 216–39. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2018.1561185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bräuchler, Birgit. “The Cultural Turn in Peace Research: Prospects and Challenges.” Peacebuilding 6, no. 1 (2018): 17–33. doi: 10.1080/21647259.2017.1368158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braüchler, Birgit, and Philipp Naucke. “Peacebuilding and Conceptualisations of the Local.” Social Anthropology 25, no. 4 (2017): 422–36. doi: 10.1111/1469-8676.12454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brigg, Morgan. “Culture: Challenges and Possibilities.” In Palgrave Advances in Peacebuilding: Critical Developments and Approaches, ed. Oliver Richmond, 329–46. Berlin: Springer, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Brigg, Morgan. “Relational Sensibility in Peacebuilding: Emancipation, Tyranny, or Transformation?” In Relational Sensibility and the ‘Turn to the Local’: Prospects for the Future of Peacebuilding, ed. Wren Chadwick, Tobias Debiel, and Frank Gadinger, 12–18. Duisburg: Käte Hamburger Kolleg/Centre or Global Cooperation Research, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Wendy. Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in the Age of Identity and Empire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Susanna, David Chandler, and Meera Sabaratnam. A Liberal Peace? The Problems and Practices of Peacebuilding. London: Zed Books, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, Wren, Tobias Debiel, and Frank Gadinger. Relational Sensibility and the” Turn to the Local": Prospects for the Future of Peacebuilding. Duisburg: Käte Hamburger Kolleg, Centre for Global Cooperation Research, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, David. “Critiquing Liberal Cosmopolitanism? The Limits of the Biopolitical Approach.” International Political Sociology 3, no. 1 (2009): 53–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2008.00063.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, David. “The Uncritical Critique of Liberal Peace.” Review of International Studies 36, no. 1 (2010): 137–55. doi: 10.1017/S0260210510000823
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, David. “Relational Sensibilities: The End of the Road for ‘Liberal Peace’.” In Relational Sensibility and the ‘Turn to the Local’: Prospects for the Future of Peacebuilding, ed. Wren Chadwick, Tobias Debiel, and Frank Gadinger, 16–26. Duisburg: Centre or Global Cooperation Research, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, David. Peacebuilding: The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1997-2017. Basingtoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, Frederick, and Ann Laura Stoler. Tensions of Empire: Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Coulthard, Glen Sean. Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, Philip. “Still the Spectre at the Feast: Comparisons between Peacekeeping and Imperialism in Peacekeeping Studies Today.” International Peacekeeping 19, no. 4 (2012): 426–42. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2012.709751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donais, Timothy. “Empowerment or Imposition? Dilemmas of Local Ownership in Post-Conflict Peacebuilding Processes.” Peace & Change 34, no. 1 (2009): 3–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0130.2009.00531.x
   Google Scholar
• Duffey, Tamara. “Cultural Issues in Contemporary Peacekeeping.” International Peacekeeping 7, no. 1 (2000): 142–68. doi: 10.1080/13533310008413823
   Google Scholar
• Duffield, Mark. Development, Security and Unending War: Governing the World of Peoples. Cambridge: Polity, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Duffield, Mark. “Risk-Management and the Fortified Aid Compound: Everyday Life in Post-Interventionary Society.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 4, no. 4 (2010): 453–74. doi: 10.1080/17502971003700993
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, Arturo. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Fetherston, Anne Betts, and Carolyn Nordstrom. “Overcoming Habitus in Conflict Management: UN Peacekeeping and War Zone Ethnography.” Peace & Change 20, no. 1 (1995): 94–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0130.1995.tb00625.x
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. “Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation.” In Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, edited by Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth, 7–109. London: Verso, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Goetze, Catherine. The Distinction of Peace: A Social Analysis of Peacebuilding. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Goetze, Catherine, and Berit Bliesemann de Guevera. “The ‘Statebuilding Habitus': UN Staff and the Cultural Dimension of Liberal Intervention in Kosovo.” In Statebuilding and State-Formation: The Political Sociology of Intervention, ed. Berit Bliesemann de Guevara, 198–213. London: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Goetze, Catherine, and Berit Bliesemann de Guevera. “Cosmopolitanism and the Culture of Peacebuilding.” Review of International Studies 40, no. 4 (2014): 771–802. doi: 10.1017/S026021051300051X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes, Maìra Siman. “Analysing Interventionism Beyond Conventional Foreign Policy Rationales: The Engagement of Brazil in the United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH).” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 29, no. 3 (2016): 852–69. doi: 10.1080/09557571.2016.1230587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameiri, Shahar, and Lee Jones. “Beyond Hybridity to the Politics of Scale: International Intervention and Local Politics.” Development and Change 48, no. 1 (2017): 54–77. doi: 10.1111/dech.12287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harig, Christoph. “Synergy Effects between MINUSTAH and Public Security in Brazil.” Brasiliana-Journal for Brazilian Studies 3, no. 2 (2015): 142–68. doi: 10.25160/v3.i2/d6
   Google Scholar
• Hirblinger, Andreas T., and Claudia Simons. “The Good, the Bad, and the Powerful: Representations of the ‘Local’ in Peacebuilding.” Security Dialogue 46, no. 5 (2015): 422–39. doi: 10.1177/0967010615580055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iniguez de Heredia, Marta. Everyday Resistance, Peacebuilding and State-Making: Insights from ‘Africa's World War’. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Lee. “(Post-)Colonial State-Building and State Failure in East Timor: Bringing Social Conflict Back In.” Conflict, Security & Development 10, no. 4 (2010): 547–75. doi: 10.1080/14678802.2010.500544
   Google Scholar
• Koddenbrock, Kai. “Strategic Essentialism and the Possibilities of Critique in Peacebuilding.” In Relational Sensibility and the ‘Turn to the Local’: Prospects for the Future of Peacebuilding, ed. Wren Chadwick, Tobias Debiel, and Frank Gadinger, 27–35. Duisburg: Centre for Global Cooperation Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kühn, Florian P. “Universal Patterns of Intervention: Practice, no ‘-isms’.” Conflict, Security & Development 19, no. 3 (2019): 257–62. doi: 10.1080/14678802.2019.1608020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidén, Kristoffer, Roger Mac Ginty, and Oliver P. Richmond. “Introduction: Beyond Northern Epistemologies of Peace: Peacebuilding Reconstructed?” International Peacekeeping 16, no. 5 (2009): 587–98. doi: 10.1080/13533310903303230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lottholz, Philipp. “Critiquing Anthropological Imagination in Peace and Conflict Studies: From Empiricist Positivism to a Dialogical Approach in Ethnographic Peace Research.” International Peacekeeping 25, no. 5 (2018): 695–720. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2017.1350576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger. International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance: Hybrid Forms of Peace. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger, and Oliver P. Richmond. “The Local Turn in Peace Building: A Critical Agenda for Peace.” Third World Quarterly 34, no. 5 (2013): 763–83. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.800750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger, and Oliver P. Richmond. “The Fallacy of Constructing Hybrid Political Orders: A Reappraisal of the Hybrid Turn in Peacebuilding.” International Peacekeeping 23, no. 2 (2016): 219–39. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2015.1099440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, Peter. Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. New York, NY: Verso, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Mantena, Karuna. Alibis of Empire: Henry Maine and the Ends of Liberal Imperialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Markell, Patchen. “Recognition and Redistribution.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory, ed. John S. Dryzek, Bonnie Honig, and Anne Phillips, 450–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu, Xavier. “Critical Peacebuilding and the Dilemma of Difference: The stigma of the ‘Local’ and the Quest for Equality.” Third World Quarterly 40, no. 1 (2018): 36–52. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2018.1538732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, Alfred W. Policing America's Empire: The United States, the Philippines, and the Rise of the Surveillance State. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, Alfred W., and Francisco A. Scarano. The Colonial Crucible: Empire in the Making of the Modern American State. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, Gearoid. “Engaging Ethnographic Peace Research: Exploring an Approach.” International Peacekeeping 25, no. 5 (2018): 597–609. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2018.1521700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, Gearoid. “Ethnographic Peace Research: The Underappreciated Benefits of Long-Term Fieldwork.” International Peacekeeping 25, no. 5 (2018): 653–76. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2017.1421860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Audra. “Quality/Control: International Peace Interventions and ‘the Everyday’.” Review of International Studies 37, no. 4 (2011): 1623–45. doi: 10.1017/S0260210511000180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Markus-Michael. “Entangled Pacifications: Peacekeeping, Counterinsurgency and Policing in Port-au-Prince and Rio de Janeiro.” In The Global Making of Policing, ed. Jana Hönke and Markus-Michael Müller, 97–115. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nadarajah, Suthaharan, and David Rampton. “The Limits of Hybridity and the Crisis of Liberal Peace.” Review of International Studies 41, no. 1 (2015): 49–72. doi: 10.1017/S0260210514000060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netzloff, Mark. England's Internal Colonies: Class, Capital, and the Literature of Early Modern English Colonialism. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Paffenholz, Thania. “Unpacking the Local Turn in Peacebuilding: A Critical Assessment Towards an Agenda for Future Research.” Third World Quarterly 36, no. 5 (2015): 857–74. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1029908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquot, Thierry, ed. Ghettos De Riches: Tour Du Monde Des Enclaves Résidentielles Sécurisées. Paris: Perrin, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Pouligny, Béatrice. Peace Operations Seen from Below: UN Missions and Local People. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, Vincent. International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Randazzo, Elisa. “The Paradoxes of the Everyday: Scrutinising the Local Turn in Peace Building.” Third World Quarterly 37, no. 8 (2016): 1351–70. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1120154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard G., Wilkinson, and Kate Pickett. The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better. London: Allen Lane, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. “UN Peacebuilding Operations and the Dilemma of the Peacebuilding Consensus.” International Peacekeeping 11, no. 1 (2004): 83–101. doi: 10.1080/1353331042000228403
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. “Becoming Liberal, Unbecoming Liberalism: Liberal-Local Hybridity Via the Everyday as a Response to the Paradoxes of Liberal Peacebuilding.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 3, no. 3 (2009): 324–44. doi: 10.1080/17502970903086719
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. “A Post-Liberal Peace: Eirenism and the Everyday.” Review of International Studies 35, no. 3 (2009): 557–80. doi: 10.1017/S0260210509008651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. “Resistance and the Post-liberal Peace.” Millennium - Journal of International Studies 38, no. 3 (2010): 665–92. doi: 10.1177/0305829810365017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. A Post-Liberal Peace. London: Routledge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P., and Jason Franks. Liberal Peace Transitions: Between Statebuilding and Peacebuilding. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, Robert A. Peacekeeping under Fire: Culture and Intervention. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Sabaratnam, Meera. “Avatars of Eurocentrism in the Critique of the Liberal Peace.” Security Dialogue 44, no. 3 (2013): 259–78. doi: 10.1177/0967010613485870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabaratnam, Meera. Decolonising Intervention: International Statebuilding in Mozambique. London: Rowman & Littlefield International, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Schuberth, Moritz. “Brazilian Peacekeeping? Counterinsurgency and Police Reform in Port-au-Prince and Rio de Janeiro.” International Peacekeeping 26, no. 4 (2019): 487–510. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2019.1623675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sending, Ole Jacob. Why Peacebuilders Are “Blind” and “Arrogant” and What to Do About It. Oslo: NUPI, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sending, Ole Jacob. Why Peacebuilders Fail to Secure Ownership and Be Sensitive to Context. Vol. 755. Oslo: NUPI, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sotomayor, Arturo C. The Myth of the Democratic Peacekeeper: Civil-Military Relations and the United Nations. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Stoler, Ann Laura. Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Tomforde, Maren. “Introduction: The Distinctive Role of Culture in Peacekeeping.” International Peacekeeping 17, no. 4 (2010): 450–56. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2010.516650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Iris Marion. Responsibility for Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Zanotti, Laura. “Imagining Democracy, Building Unsustainable Institutions: The UN Peacekeeping Operation in Haiti.” Security Dialogue 39, no. 5 (2008): 539–61. doi: 10.1177/0967010608096151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarakol, Ayşe. “Theorising Hierarchies: An Introduction.” In Hierarchies in World Politics, ed. Ayşe Zarakol, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ziai, Aram. Exploring Post-Development: Theory and Practice, Problems and Perspectives. London: Routledge, 2007.
   Google Scholar