From Skopein to Scraping: Probability, Agency, and the Politics of Public Opinion Research

Bibliography

• Blumer, Herbert. “Public Opinion and Public Opinion Polling.” American Sociological Review 13, no. 5 (1948): 542–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. “Public Opinion Does Not Exist.” In Communication and Class Struggle, volume 1, edited by Armand Mattelart and Seth Siegelaub, 124–130. New York: International General, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, Isabelle, Emmanuel Didier, and Julien Prévieux. Statactivisme: Comment Lutter Avec Des Nombres [Statactivism: How to fight with numbers]. Zones, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, Isabelle, Emmanuel Didier, and Tommaso Vitale. “Statactivism: Forms of Action between Disclosure and Affirmation.” The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies 2, no. 7 (2014): 198–220.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, Archibald M. “Straw Polls in 1936.” Public Opinion Quarterly 1, no. 1 (1937): 24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Cukier, Kenneth and Viktor Mayer-Schoenberger. “The Rise of Big Data: How It’s Changing the Way We Think about the World.” Foreign Aff. 92, no. 3 (2013): 28–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disch, Lisa. “Democratic Representation and the Constituency Paradox.” Perspectives on Politics 10, no. 3 (2012): 599–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd, Stuart C. “Toward World Surveying.” Public Opinion Quarterly 10, no. 4 (1946): 470–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Gallup, George. “The Role of the Public Opinion Poll.” In The Press and Society: A Book of Readings, edited by George L. Bird and Frederic E. Merwin, 20–23. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Gallup, George, and Saul F. Rae. The Pulse of Democracy: The Public-Opinion Poll and How It Works. 2. Repr. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Pr, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah, Matthew G. “Sampling and the Politics of Representation in US Census 2000.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 19, no. 5 (2001): 515–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbst, Susan. "(Un)Numbered Voices?" In Political Polling in the Digital Age: The Challenge of Measuring and Understanding Public Opinion, edited by Robert K. Goidel, 85–98. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Univ. Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Igo, Sarah E. The Averaged American: Surveys, Citizens, and the Making of a Mass Public. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto. Emancipation(s). London: Verso, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Mislove, Alan. “Pulse of the Nation: US Mood throughout the Day Inferred from Twitter.” 2010. http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/amislove/twittermood/.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Joe, Michael W Link, Jennifer Hunter Childs, Casey Langer Tesfaye, Elisabeth Dean, Michael Stern, Josh Pasek, Jon Cohen, Mario Callegaro, and Paul Harwood. “Social Media in Public Opinion Research: Executive Summary of the Aapor Task Force on Emerging Technologies in Public Opinion Research.” Public Opinion Quarterly 78, no. 4 (2014): 788–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pack, Mark. Polling Unpacked: The History, Uses and Abuses of Political Opinion Polls. London: Reaktion Books, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, Hanna. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, Jacques. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Translated by Julie Rose. Minneapolis, Minn.: Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, Jacques. The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. Translated by Gabriel Rockhill. London: Continuum, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, Jacques, Davide Panagia, and Rachel Bowlby. “Ten Theses on Politics.” Theory & Event 5, no. 3 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Roper, Elmo and Woodward Julian, L. “Democracy’s Auxiliary Ballot Box.” New York Herald Tribune, April 4, 1948.
   Google Scholar
• Rouvroy, Antoinette. “The End(s) of Critique: Data Behaviourism versus Due Process.” In Privacy, Due Process and the Computational Turn: The Philosophy of Law Meets the Philosophy of Technology, edited by Mireille Hildebrandt and Katja de Vries, 143–167. London: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Seemann, Michael. Die Macht der Plattformen: Politik in Zeiten der Internetgiganten [The Power of Platforms: Politics in the Age of Internet Giants]. Sonderausgabe für die Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. Schriftenreihe/Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, Band 10785. Bonn: bpb, Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Sherwood, Harriet. “Census to Ask about Sexual Orientation for the First Time.” The Guardian, October 18, 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/oct/18/census-to-ask-about-sexual-orientation-for-the-first-time.
   Google Scholar
• Ulbricht, Lena. “Scraping the Demos. Digitalization, Web Scraping and the Democratic Project.” Democratization 27, no. 3 (2020): 426–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, Sidney. “The Citizen as Respondent: Sample Surveys and American Democracy Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1995.” American Political Science Review 90, no. 1 (1996): 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar