On Being in the Middle: Inter-religious Dialogue and Network Centrality

References

• Abu-Nimer, Mohammed. “Conflict Resolution, Culture, and Religion: Toward a Training Model of Interreligious Peacebuilding.” Journal of Peace Research 38 (2001): 685–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allport, Gordon W. The Nature of Prejudice. 1954. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, Albert. Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, Michael. Interreligious Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, Michael. Theology and the Dialogue of Religions. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Benet-Martinez, Verónica, Fiona Lee, and Janxin Leu “Biculturalism and Cognitive Complexity: Expertise in Cultural Representation.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 37 (2006): 386–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohm, David. On Dialogue. New York: Routledge, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, Steve P., Martin G. Everett, and Linton C. Freeman. Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, Ronald S. “Network Items and the General Social Survey.” Social Networks 6 (1984): 293–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, Ronald S., and Michael J. Minor, eds. Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction. London: Sage, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Charaniya, Nadira K., Jane West, and Walsh Nadira. “Interpreting the Experiences of Christians, Muslims, and Jews Engaged in Interreligious Dialogue: A Collaborative Research Study.” Religious Education 96 (2001): 351–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, Juliet M., and Anselm L. Strauss. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. London: Sage, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Cornille, Catherine. “Conditions for the Possibility of Interreligious Dialogue on God.” Eds. Werner G. Jeanrond, and Aasulv Lande. The Concept of God in Global Dialogue. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuis, Jacques. Toward a Christian Theology of Religious Pluralism. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, Jon. Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ennett, Susan T., and Karl E. Bauman. “The Contribution of Influence and Selection to Adolescent Peer Group Homogeneity: The Case of Adolescent Cigarette Smoking.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67 (1994): 653–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, Claude S. To Dwell among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. London: U of Chicago P, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Friedkin, Noah. A Structural Theory of Influence. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, Renee. What Works? Evaluating Interfaith Dialogue Programs. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, Kenneth J. An Invitation to Social Construction: Second Edition. London: Sage, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, Greg, Arwen Bunce, and Laura Johnson. “How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability.” Field Methods 18 (2006): 59–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollis, Martin. The Philosophy of Social Science: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Knoke, David, and Song Yang. Social Network Analysis. London: Sage, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Laumann, Edward O. Bonds of Pluralism: The Form and Substance of Urban Social Networks. London: Wiley, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Laumann, Edward O., Peter V. Marsdon, and David Prensky. “The Boundary Specification Problem in Network Analysis.” Eds. Ronald S. Burt, and Michael J. Minor. Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1983. 18–35.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas, Emmanuel. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne UP, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Lipner, Julius. “Truth-Claims and Inter-Religious Dialogue.” Religious Studies 12 (1976): 217–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macquarrie, John. “Commitment and Openness: Christianity’s Relation to Other Faiths.” Theology Digest 27.4 (1974): 347–55.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, Thomas F., and Linda R. Tropp. “A Meta-analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (2006): 751–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratch, Leslie, and Jordan Jacobowitz. “Integrative Capacity and the Evaluation of Leadership: A Multimethod Assessment Approach.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 34 (1998): 180–201.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul. Oneself as Another. Trans. Kathleen Blamey. Chicago, IL: Chicago UP, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Ruparell, Tinu. “The Dialogue Party: Hybridity and the Reluctant Other.” Ed. Vigo Mortensen. Theology and the Religions: A Dialogue. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, John P. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. 2nd ed. London: Sage, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Suedfeld, Peter, Dana C. Leighton, and Lucian G. Conway. “Integrative Complexity and Cognitive Management in International Confrontations: Research and Potential Applications.” Eds. M. Fitzduff, and Chris E. Stout. The Psychology of War, Conflict Resolution, and Peace. New York: Praeger, 2006. 211–37.
   Google Scholar
• Streib, Heinz, and Constantin Klein. “Religious Styles Predict Inter-Religious Prejudice: A Study of German Adolescents with the Religious Schema Scale.” International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 24 (2013): 151–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadmor, Carmit T., Adam D. Galinsky, and William W. Maddux. “Getting the Most out of Living Abroad: Biculturalism and Integrative Complexity as Key Drivers of Creative and Professional Success.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 103 (2012): 520–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente, Thomas W. Social Networks and Health: Models, Methods, and Applications. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hoven C., James. “Interreligious Group Work: Stimulating Dialogue in America.” Graduate Journal of Counselling 3 (2012): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, Stanley, and Katherine Faust. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, Barry. “Structural Analysis: From Method and Metaphor to Theory and Substance.” Eds. Barry Wellman, and Stephen D. Berkowitz. Social Structures: A Network Approach. 2nd ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI P, 1997. 19-61.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Ryan J. “Network Hubs and Opportunity for Complex Thinking among Young British Muslims.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 52 (2013): 573–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar