References
- A Tool-kit for Online Writing Groups, undated, website. Available at http://www.phd-writing.com/tool-kit.html (accessed 10 March 2015).
- Aitchison, C., 2010, ‘Learning together to publish: writing group pedagogies for doctoral publishing’, in Aitchison, C., Kamler, B. & Lee, A. (Eds.) Publishing Pedagogies for the Doctorate and Beyond, pp. 83–100 (London, Routledge).
- Aitchison, C. & Lee, A., 2006, ‘Research writing: problems and pedagogies’, Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), pp. 265–278.10.1080/13562510600680574
- Akkerman, S., Petter, C. & de Laat, M., 2008, ‘Organising communities-of-practice: facilitating emergence’, Journal of Workplace Learning, 20(6), pp. 383–399.10.1108/13665620810892067
- Albion, P. & Erwee, R., 2011, ‘Preparing for doctoral supervision at a distance: lessons from experience’, paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, 7–11 March 2011.
- Carr, S., 2000, ‘As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students’, Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(23), pp. A39–A41.
- Carter, S. & Laurs, D., 2014, Developing Generic Support for Doctoral Students: Practice and pedagogy (Oxford, Routledge).
- Corbin, J. & Strauss, A.L., 2014, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, second edition (London, Sage).
- Elbow, P., 1973, Writing Without Teachers (New York, NY, Oxford University Press).
- Ferguson, T., 2009, ‘The ‘write’ skills and more: a thesis writing group for doctoral students’, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), pp. 285–297.10.1080/03098260902734968
- Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L., 2009, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research (Piscataway, NJ, Transaction Publishers).
- Golde, C.M., 2005, ‘The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: lessons from four departments’, Journal of Higher Education, 76(6), pp. 669–700.10.1353/jhe.2005.0039
- Haas, S., 2014, ‘Pick-n-mix: a typology of writers’ groups in use’, in Aitchison, C. & Guerin, C. (Eds.) Writing Groups for Doctoral Education and Beyond: Innovations in practice and theory, pp. 30–47 (Oxford, Routledge).
- Heinrich, K.T., Rogers, A., Haley, R. & Taylor, A., 1997, ‘Mid–life women doctoral students rediscover “voice” in a community of scholarly caring’, Journal of Professional Nursing, 13(6), pp. 352–364.10.1016/S8755-7223(97)80081-6
- Ho, M.C. & Savignon, S.J., 2007, ‘Face-to-face and computer–mediated peer review in EFL writing’, CALICO Journal, 24(2), pp. 269–290.
- Hrastinski, S., 2008, ‘Asynchronous and synchronous e–learning’, Educause Quarterly, 31(4), pp. 51–55.
- Huang, C.-K., Chen, Y.-H., Olmanson, J., Sung, W.H. & Kim, Y.S., 2010, ‘On initiating maintaining and growing an affinity based student led research and design group’, paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Toronto, Canada, 29 June 2010. Available at http://www.editlib.org/p/35183 (accessed 12 September 2013).
- Ings, W., 2014, ‘The studio model: developing community writing in creative, practice–led PhD design theses’, in Aitchison, C. & Guerin, C. (Eds.) Writing Groups for Doctoral Education and Beyond: Innovations in practice and theory, pp. 190–203 (Oxford, Routledge).
- Jones, M., 2013, ‘Issues in doctoral studies—forty years of journal discussion: where have we been and where are we going?’, International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 8, pp. 83–104.
- Kozar, O. & Lum, J., 2013a, ‘Factors likely to impact the effectiveness of research writing groups for off–campus doctoral students’, Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 7(2), pp. 132–149.
- Kozar, O. & Lum, J., 2013b, ‘Factors to consider when designing writing groups for off–campus doctoral candidates’, in Carter, H., Gosper, M. & Hedberg J. (Eds.) Electric Dreams. Proceedings ascilite 2013 Sydney, pp. 498–502 (Sydney, Macquarie University).
- Lindner, J.R., Dooley, K.E. & Murphy, T.H., 2001, ‘Differences in competencies between doctoral students on-campus and at a distance’, American Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), pp. 25–40.10.1080/08923640109527082
- Maher, D., Seaton, L., McMullen, C., Fitzgerald, T., Otsuji, E. & Lee, A., 2008, ‘‘Becoming and being writers’: the experiences of doctoral students in writing groups’, Studies in Continuing Education, 30(3), pp. 263–275.10.1080/01580370802439870
- McBrien, J.L., Cheng, R. & Jones, P., 2009, ‘Virtual spaces: employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning’, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3), pp. 1–17.
- Mercer, T., Kythreotis, A., Lambert, C. & Hughes, G., 2011, ‘Student–led research training within the PhD: “PhD experience” conferences’, International Journal for Researcher Development, 2(2), pp. 152–166.10.1108/17597511111212736
- Pearson, M., Cumming, J., Evans, T., Macauley, P. & Ryland, K., 2011, ‘How shall we know them? Capturing the diversity of difference in Australian doctoral candidates and their experiences’, Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), pp. 527–542.10.1080/03075079.2011.594591
- Tarmizi, H., de Vreede, G. & Zigurs, I., 2006, ‘Identifying challenges for facilitation in communities of practice’, paper presented at the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, 4–7 January 2006, pp. 26–36.
- University of British Columbia (UBC), 2014, Demographics—Age. Available at https://www.grad.ubc.ca/about–us/graduate–education–analysis–research/demographics–age, viewed 23 December 2014 (accessed 23 December 2014).
- Wenger, E., 1998, ‘Communities of practice: learning as a social system’, Systems Thinker, 9(5), 1–8.
- Wenger, E. & Snyder, W., 2000, ‘Communities of practice: the organizational frontier’, Harvard Business Review, 78(1), pp. 139–146.