Choosing a research higher degree supervisor: a framework for nurses

References

• Armstrong, S.J., 2004, ‘The impact of supervisors’ cognitive styles on the quality of research supervision in management education’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(4), pp. 599–616.10.1348/0007099042376436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H. & Scales, B., 2008, Review of Australian Higher Education. Available at http://www.deewr.gov.au/HigherEducation/Review/Documents/PDF/Higher%20Education%20Review_one%20document_02.pdf (accessed 10 April 2010)
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, P., 1999, ‘The supervision of doctoral dissertations using a collaborative cohort model’, Counselor Education and Supervision, 39(1), pp. 46–52.10.1002/ceas.1999.39.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Churchill, H. & Sanders, T., 2007, Getting Your PhD: A practical insider’s guide (London, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Coates, H., Dobson, I., Edwards, D., Friedman, T., Goedegebuure, L. & Meek, L., 2009, ‘The attractiveness of the academic profession: a comparative analysis’, Research Briefing Changing Academic Profession, pp. 1–34, (Melbourne, LH Martin Institute), Printgraphics, Australia. Available at http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=higher_education (accessed 2 January 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Council of Australian Postgraduate Associations, 2010, CAPA Background Paper – Enrolment Trends 2001–2008: Health Disciplines. Available at http://www.capa.edu.au/briefingpaper/2010/background_paper_health_2008 (accessed 29 April 2010)
   Google Scholar
• Delamont, S., Atkinson, P. & Parry, O., 2000, The Doctoral Experience (London, Falmer).10.4324/9780203451403
   Google Scholar
• Deuchar, R., 2008, ‘Facilitator, director or critical friend?: contradiction and congruence in doctoral supervision styles’, Teaching in Higher Education, 13(4), pp. 489–500.10.1080/13562510802193905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowie, I., 2008, ‘Reflections on academic supervision’, Nursing Standard, 23(11), pp. 35–38.10.7748/ns2008.11.23.11.35.c6724
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finigan, V. & Lee, N., 2010, ‘The doctoral journey: supervision from the perspective of students and supervisors’, MIDIRS Midwifery Digest, 20(2), pp. 155–8.
   Google Scholar
• Gatfield, T., 2005, ‘An investigation into PhD supervisory management styles: development of a dynamic conceptual model and its managerial implications’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(3), pp. 311–25.10.1080/13600800500283585
   Google Scholar
• Gatfield, T. & Alpert, F., 2002, ‘The supervisory management styles model’, in Goody, A., Herrington, J. & Northcote, M. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2002 Annual International Conference of Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia, pp. 263–73 (Perth, Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia).
   Google Scholar
• Gill, P. & Burnard, P., 2008, ‘The student-supervisor relationship in the PhD/Doctoral process’, British Journal of Nursing, 17(10), pp. 668–71.10.12968/bjon.2008.17.10.29484
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gurr, G.M., 2001, ‘Negotiating the “Rackety Bridge” – a dynamic model for aligning supervisory style with research student development’, Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), pp. 81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Happell, B., 2008, ‘Negotiating the relationship in higher education by research studies—part 1—tips for supervisees’, International Journal of Psychiatric Nursing Research, 13(3), pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hodza, F., 2007, ‘Managing the student-supervisor relationship for successful postgraduate supervision: a sociological perspective’, South African Journal of Higher Education 21 (Special Edition no.8), pp. 1155–65.
   Google Scholar
• Hon Kam, B., 1997, ‘Style and quality in research supervision’, Higher Education, 34(1), pp. 81–103.10.1023/A:1002946922952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honey, P. & Mumford, A., 2000, The Learning Styles Helper’s Guide (Maidenhead, Peter Honey Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Isenberg, D.A. & Salmon, M., 2000, ‘How to supervise a thesis—best practice’, Rheumatology, 39, pp. 560–62.10.1093/rheumatology/39.5.560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ives, G. & Rowley, G., 2005, ‘Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: Ph.D. students progress and outcomes’, Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), pp. 535–55.10.1080/03075070500249161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack, B., 1999, ‘Staying the course: the supervisee’s personal experience of the supervision relationship’, Nurse Researcher, 6(4), pp. 19–27.10.7748/nr1999.07.6.4.19.c6093
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. & Cleary, M., 2011, ‘Practical advice to support mid-career doctoral students in nursing: some considerations for academic supervisors’, Contemporary Nurse, 38(1–2), pp. 171–79.10.5172/conu.2011.38.1-2.171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, D., Darbyshire, P., Luck, L. & Peters, K., 2009, ‘Intergenerational reflections on doctoral supervision in nursing’, Contemporary Nurse, 32(1–2), pp. 83–91.10.5172/conu.32.1-2.83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A., 1999, ‘Significant relationships: planning for effective research supervision’, Nurse Researcher, 6(4), pp. 5–18.10.7748/nr1999.07.6.4.5.c6092
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, M., Boud, D., Manathunga, C. & Cantwell, R., 2011, ‘Honouring the incomparable: honours in Australian universities’, Higher Education, 62(5), pp. 619–33.10.1007/s10734-011-9409-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, N.-J., 2009, ‘Professional doctorate supervision: exploring student and supervisor experiences’, Nurse Education Today, 29, pp. 641–48.10.1016/j.nedt.2009.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, N., 2010, ‘Making research supervision work for you’, Nurse Researcher, 17(2), pp. 44–51.10.7748/nr2010.01.17.2.44.c7461
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lekalakala-Mokgele, S., 2008, ‘Expectations of postgraduate nursing students: an inquiry’, Curationis, 31(3), pp. 44–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindén, J., Ohlin, M. & Brodin, E.M., 2013, ‘Mentorship, supervision and learning experience in PhD education’, Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), pp. 639–62.10.1080/03075079.2011.596526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manderson, D., 1996, ‘Asking better questions: approaching the process of thesis supervision’, Journal of Legal Education, 46(3), pp. 407–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marland, G. & Lyttle, C., 2003, ‘Research supervision’, Nursing Standard, 17(25), pp. 33–37.10.7748/ns2003.03.17.25.33.c3353
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCallin, A. & Nayar, S., 2012, ‘Postgraduate research supervision: a critical review of current practice’, Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1), pp. 63–74.10.1080/13562517.2011.590979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melkman, A. & Trotman, J., 2005, ‘Learning styles and training styles in a multi-cultural setting’, Training International Managers: Designing, deploying and delivering effective training for multi-cultural groups, pp. 17–22 (Aldershot, Gower).
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, P., Semenic, S. & Edwards, N., 2008, ‘Post-doctoral training in nursing: a consideration of opportunities and strategies’, Nursing Research, 21(1), pp. 36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, M. & Brew, A., 2002, ‘Research training and supervision development’, Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), pp. 135–50.10.1080/03075070220119986c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, M., Cumming, J., Evans, T., Maccauley, P. & Ryland, K., 2008a, ‘Exploring the extent and nature of the diversity of the doctoral population in Australia: A profile of the respondents to a 2005 national survey’, QPR 2008: Quality in Postgraduate Research Conference: Research education in the new global environment, Adelaide, 17–18 April.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, M., Evans, T. & Macauley, P., 2008b, ‘Growth and diversity in doctoral education: assessing the Australian experience’, Higher Education, 55(3), pp. 357–72.10.1007/s10734-007-9059-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, M., Cumming, J., Evans, T., Macauley, P. & Ryland, K., 2011, ‘How shall we know them? Capturing the diversity of difference in Australian doctoral candidates and their experiences’, Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), pp. 527–42.10.1080/03075079.2011.594591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, E.M. & Pugh, D.S., 2000, How to Get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors (Buckingham, Open University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Severinsson, E., 2010, ‘Discovering the value of research supervision’, Nursing & Health Sciences, 12(4), pp. 400–1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, D.R., Kirkman, S., Watson, R. & Stewart, S., 2005, ‘Improving research supervision in nursing’, Nurse Education Today, 25, pp. 283–90.10.1016/j.nedt.2005.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilks, S., 2006, ‘The process of supervisor selection’, in Denholm, C. & Evans, T. (Eds.) Doctorates Downunder: Keys to successful doctoral study in Australia and New Zealand (Camberwell, Victoria, Australia, ACER Press).
   Google Scholar