Scenarios of quality assurance of stakeholder relationships in Finnish higher education institutions

References

• Alves, H., Mainardes, E.M. & Raposo, M., 2010, ‘A relationship approach to higher education institution stakeholder management’, Tertiary Education and Management, 16(3), pp. 159–81.10.1080/13583883.2010.497314
   Google Scholar
• Amaral, A. & Magaelhaes, A., 2002, ‘The emergent role of external stakeholders in European higher education governance’, in Amaral, A., Jones, G. & Karseth, B. (Eds.) Governing Higher Education: National perspectives on institutional governance (Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic).10.1007/978-94-015-9946-7
   Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P. & Jongbloed, B. W., 2010, ‘Who matters to universities?’ A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social valorisation’, Higher Education, 59(5), pp. 567–88.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J., 2004, ‘What to do when stakeholders matter?’, Public Management Review, 6(1), pp. 21–53.10.1080/14719030410001675722
   Google Scholar
• Burrows, J., 1999, ‘Going beyond labels: a framework for profiling institutional stakeholders’, Contemporary Education, 70(4), pp. 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B., 1998, Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational pathways of transformation (Oxford, Pergamon).
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, M., 1995, ‘A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance’, Academy of Management Review, 20(1), pp. 92–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decree on Higher Education Evaluation Council (794/2009). Available at FINLEX database http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2009/20090794 (accessed 15 June 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Education Evaluation Centre (FINEEC), 2015, Audit manual for the quality systems of higher education institutions 2015–2018, Finnish Education Evaluation Centre Publications 2015:2. Available at http://karvi.fi/app/uploads/2015/02/KARVI_0215.pdf (accessed 7 June 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council (FINHEEC), 2012, Audit Manual for the Quality Systems of Higher Education Institutions 2011–2017, Publications of the Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council 15:2012 (Tampere, Tammerprint Oy). Available at http://karvi.fi/app/uploads/2014/09/KKA_1512.pdf (accessed 15 June 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R.E., 1984, Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach (Boston, MA, Pitman).
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R.E. & McVea, J., 2001, ‘A stakeholder approach to strategic management’, in Hitt, M., Freeman, R. & Harrison, J. (Eds.) The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management (Oxford, Blackwell).
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R., Harrison, J., Wicks, A., Parmar, B. & de Colle, S., 2010, Stakeholder Theory: The state of the art (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).10.1017/CBO9780511815768
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L. & Green, D., 1993, ‘Defining quality’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), pp. 9–34.10.1080/0260293930180102
   Google Scholar
• Huisman, J. & de Boer, H., 2012, ‘Where do we go from here? The future of English higher education’, Higher Education Quarterly, 66(4), pp. 341–62.10.1111/hequ.2012.66.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Iacovidou, M., Gibbs, P. & Zopiatis, A., 2009, ‘An exploratory use of the stakeholder approach to defining and measuring quality: the Case of a Cypriot higher education institution’, Quality in Higher Education, 15(2), pp. 147–65.10.1080/13538320902995774
   Google Scholar
• Jongbloed, B., Enders, J. & Salerno, C., 2008, ‘Higher education and its communities: interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda’, Higher Education, 56(3), pp. 303–24.10.1007/s10734-008-9128-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuusi, O., 1999, Expertise in the Future Use of Generic Technologies: Epistemic and methodological considerations concerning Delphi studies (Helsinki, Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration).
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, I., 2000, ‘University research policy in Norway – walking the tightrope between internal and external interests’, European Journal of Education, 35(4), pp. 385–402.10.1111/ejed.2000.35.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Linstone, H. & Turoff, M. (Eds.), 2002, The Delphi Method: Techniques and applications. Available at http://is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook/index.html (accessed 1 July 2015)
   Google Scholar
• de Lourdes Machado, M., Ferreira, J.B., Santiago, R. & Taylor, J.S., 2008, ‘Reframing the non-university sector in Europe: convergence or diversity?’ in Taylor, J., Ferreira, J.B., de Lourdes Machado, M. & Santiago, R. (Eds.), Non-university Higher Education in Europe (Dordrecht, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Maassen, P., 2000, ‘Editorial’, European Journal of Education, 35(4), pp. 377–83.10.1111/ejed.2000.35.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Maassen, P., 2002, ‘Organisational strategies and governance structures in Dutch universities’, in Amaral, A., Jones, G. & Karseth, B. (Eds.) Governing Higher Education: National perspectives on institutional governance (Dordrecht, Kluwer).
   Google Scholar
• Mainardes, E., Alves, H. & Raposo, M., 2010, ‘An exploratory research on the stakeholders of a university’, Journal of Management and Strategy, 1(1), pp. 76–88.
   Google Scholar
• Mainardes, E., Alves, H. & Raposo, M., 2012, ‘A model for stakeholder classification and stakeholder relationships’, Management Decision, 50(10), pp. 1861–79.10.1108/00251741211279648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R., Agle, B. & Wood, D., 1997, ‘Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts’, Academy of Management Review, 22(4), pp. 853–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musial, K., 2010, ‘Redefining external stakeholders in Nordic higher education’, Tertiary Education and Management, 16(1), pp. 45–60.10.1080/13583881003629822
   Google Scholar
• Näsi, J., 1995, ‘What is stakeholder thinking? A snapshot of a social theory of the firm’, in Näsi, J. (Ed.) Understanding Stakeholder Thinking (Gummerus, Jyväskylä).
   Google Scholar
• Polytechnics Act 932/2014, Available at FINLEX database: https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/2014/20140932?search%5Btype%5D=pika&search%5Bpika%5D=Ammattikorkeakoululaki (accessed 15 June 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, S., Schultz, F. & Hekman, D., 2006, ‘Stakeholder theory and managerial decision-making: constraints and implications of balancing stakeholder interests’, Journal of Business Ethics, 64(3), pp. 285–301.10.1007/s10551-005-5493-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, M. & Texeira, P., 2014, ‘Policy reforms Trojan horses, and imaginary friends: the role of external stakeholders in internal quality assurance systems’, Higher Education Policy, 27, pp. 219–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srikanthan, G. & Dalrymple, J., 2003, ‘Developing alternative perspectives for quality in higher education’, International Journal of Educational Management, 17(3), pp. 126–36.
   Google Scholar
• Talvinen, K., 2012, Enhancing Quality. Audits in Finnish higher education institutions 2005–2012. Publications of the Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council 11:2012 (Helsinki, Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council).
   Google Scholar
• Universities Act, 558/2009, Available at FINLEX database http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/2009/20090558?search%5Btype%5D=pika&search%5Bpika%5D=yliopistolaki (accessed 15 June 2015).
   Google Scholar
• van Vught, F., 2008, ‘Mission diversity and reputation in higher education’, Higher Education Policy, 21, pp. 151–74.10.1057/hep.2008.5
   Google Scholar
• Westerheijden, D., 2014, ‘Involvement of stakeholders in internal quality assurance across Europe. East-west contrasts in a seven-country study’, Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 4(1), pp. 1–13.
   Google Scholar