Exploring organisational learning in universities’ responses to a quality assurance reform: experiences from Ontario, Canada

References

• Altbach, P.G., Reisberg, L. & Rumbley, L.E., 2010, Trends in Global Postsecondary Education: Tracking an academic revolution (Rotterdam, Sense).
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., 1985, Strategy, Change and Defensive Routines (Boston, MA, Pitmann).
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, J. & Shah, T., 2000, Managing Quality in Higher Education: An International Perspective on Institutional Assessment and Change (Buckingham, Open University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Brookes, M. & Becket, N., 2007, ‘Quality management in higher education: a review of international issues and practice’, International Journal of Quality Standards, 1(1), pp. 85–121.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S., 2012, ‘Managing change in universities: a Sisyphean task?’, Quality in Higher Education, 18(1), pp. 139–46.10.1080/13538322.2012.663547
   Google Scholar
• Coates, H., 2010, ‘Defining and monitoring academic standards in higher education’, Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(1), pp. 1–17.10.1787/hemp-v22-1-en
   Google Scholar
• Collinson, V. & Cook, T.F., 2007, Organizational Learning: Improving learning, teaching, and learning in school systems (Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, M., 2013, ‘Measuring excellence: details of how Maclean’s ranks 49 universities each year’, Maclean’s, 30 October. Available at http://www.macleans.ca/education/unirankings/measuring-excellence-2-2/ (accessed 12 January 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Finger, M. & Brand, S.B., 1999, ‘The concept of the “learning organization” applied to the transformation of the public sector’, in Esterby-Smith, M., Arauji, L. & Burgoyne, J. (Eds.) Organisational Learning and the Learning Organization (London, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Herbeson, E.F., 1994, ‘The Ontario Council on Graduate Studies appraisals process: a case study.’ PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Jeliazkova, M. & Westerheijden, D.F., 2002, ‘Systemic adaptation to a changing environment: towards a next generation of quality assurance models’, Higher Education, 44(3–4), pp. 433–48.10.1023/A:1019834105675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, D.W., 2015, ‘Self-regulation with rules: Lessons learned from a new quality assurance process for Ontario’, Quality Assurance in Education, 23(3), pp. 216–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Normann, R., 1985, ‘Developing capabilities for organizational learning’, in Pennings, J.M. & associates (Eds.) Organizational Strategy and Change: New views on formulating and implementing strategic decisions (San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass).
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Council on Graduate Studies (OCGS), 2007, OCGS By-laws and Procedures Governing Appraisals (Toronto, Council of Ontario Universities).
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Universities Council on Quality Assurance (OUCQA), 2014, Quality Assurance Framework and Guide (Toronto, OUCQA).
   Google Scholar
• Park, J.H., 2008, ‘Validation of Senge’s learning organization model with teachers of vocational high schools at the Seoul Megalopolis’, Asia Pacific Education Review, 9(3), pp. 270–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senge, P., 1990, The Fifth Discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization (New York, NY, Doubleday).
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P., 1994, ‘Moving forward: thinking strategically about building learning organization’, in Senge, P.M., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R.B. & Smith, B.J. (Eds.) The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization (London, Nicholas Brealey).
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P., 2006, The Fifth Discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization (New York, NY, Doubleday).
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J. & Kleiner, A., 2012, Schools That Learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education (New York, NY, Crown Business).
   Google Scholar
• Skolnik, M.L., 1989, ‘How academic program review can foster intellectual conformity and stifle diversity of thought and method’, The Journal of Higher Education, 60(6), pp. 619–43.10.1080/00221546.1989.11775075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam, M., 1999, ‘Managing change involves changing management: implications for transforming higher education’, Quality in Higher Education, 5(3), pp. 227–32.10.1080/1353832990050304
   Google Scholar