Challenges of implementing quality in European higher education: an expert perspective

References

• Altbach, P.G, 2014, ‘The complexity of higher education: a career in academics and activism’, in Maldonado, A., Bassett, R.M. & Altbach, P.G. (Eds.), 2014, The Forefront of International Higher Education (Dordrecht, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Alzafari, K., 2017, ‘Mapping the literature structure of ‘quality in higher education’ using co-word analysis’, Quality in Higher Education, 23(3), pp. 264–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzafari, K. & Perner, S., 2018, ‘Research of quality in higher education: evolving or devolving?’ INTEND-2018 Proceedings, pp. 7668–76.
   Google Scholar
• Amaral, A. & Magalhães, A., 2002, ‘The emergent role of external stakeholders in European higher education governance’, in Amaral, A., Jones, G.A. & Karseth, B. (Eds.), 2002, Governing Higher Education: National perspectives on institutional governance (Dordrecht, London, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Asiyai, R. I, 2013, ‘Challenges of quality in higher education in Nigeria in the 21st century’, Research India Publications, 3(3), pp. 159–72.
   Google Scholar
• Balbachevsky, E., 2015, ‘The role of internal and external stakeholders in Brazilian higher education’, in Schwartzman, S., Pinheiro, R. & Pillay, P. (Eds.), 2015, Higher Education in the BRICS Countries: Investigating the pact between higher education and society (Dordrecht, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Barriball, L. & While A., 1994, ‘Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(2), pp. 328–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becket, N. & Brookes M., 2008, ‘Quality management practice in higher education—what quality are we actually enhancing?’ Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism, 7(1), pp. 40–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendermacher, G.W.G., Oude Egbrink, M.G.A., Wolfhagen, I.H.A.P. & Dolmans, D.H.J.M., 2017, ‘Unravelling quality culture in higher education: a realist review’, Higher Education, 73(1), pp. 39–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilen, C., 2010, ‘Total quality management in higher education institutions: challenges and future directions’, International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 5(4), pp. 473–92.
   Google Scholar
• Blasé, K.A, Van Dyke, M., Fixsen, D.L & Bailey, F.W., 2012, ‘Implementation science: key concepts, themes and evidence for practitioners in educational psychology’, in Kelly, B. & Perkins, D.F. (Eds.), 2012, Handbook of Implementation Science for Psychology in Education (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bogner, A., Littig B. & Menz, W., 2009, ‘Introduction: expert interviews—an introduction to a new methodological debate’, in Bogner A, Littig, B. & Menz, W. (Eds.), 2009, Interviewing Experts (London, Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Brookes, M. & Becket, N., 2007, ‘Quality management in higher education: a review of international issues and practice’, International Journal for Quality and Standards, 1(1), pp. 85–121.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., 2012, Social Research Methods (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J.W., Morgan, M. & Oxtoby, M.J., 1996, ‘Intercoder agreement in analysis of responses to open-ended interview questions: examples from tuberculosis research’, Field Methods, 8(3), pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, S., Rosa M.J. & Stensaker, B., 2016, ‘Why is quality in higher education not achieved?: the view of academics’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), pp. 950–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaston, I., 1994, ‘Are British universities in a position to consider implementing total quality management?’ Higher Education Quarterly, 48(2), pp. 118–34.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W., 2014, Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Los Angeles, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Dhillon, J. K., 2001, ‘Challenges and strategies for improving the quality of information in a university setting: a case study’, Total Quality Management, 12(2), pp. 167–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick, G. & Tarí, J., 2013, A Review of Quality Management Research in Higher Education Institutions. Kent Business School Working Paper Series, 274 (Canterbury, University of Kent). Available at https://kar.kent.ac.uk/37512/1/KBS%20WP%20274%20%20Q-HEI%20Kent%20WP.pdf (accessed 1 January 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Eggins, H. (Ed.), 2014, Drivers and Barriers to Achieving Quality in Higher Education (Rotterdam, Sense).
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., 2007, Analyzing Qualitative Data (London, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Green, D.M., 1994, What is Quality in Higher Education? (Buckingham, Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L. & Green, D., 1993, ‘Defining quality’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), pp. 9–34.
   Google Scholar
• Heifetz, R.A., Grashow A. & Linsky, M., 2009, The Practice of Adaptive Leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world (Boston, Harvard Business Press).
   Google Scholar
• Horine, J.E & Hailey, W.A., 1995, ‘Challenges to successful quality management implementation in higher education institutions’, Innovative Higher Education, 20(1), pp. 7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F. & Shannon, S.E., 2005, ‘Three approaches to qualitative content analysis’, Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), pp. 1277–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanji, G.K, Malek, A. & Tambi, B.A., 1999, ‘Total quality management in UK higher education institutions’, Total Quality Management, 10(1), pp.129–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kecetep, İ. & Özkan, İ., 2014, ‘Quality assurance in the European Higher Education Area’, Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 141, pp. 660–64.
   Google Scholar
• Koch J. V., 2003, ‘TQM: why is its impact in higher education so small?’ The TQM Magazine, 15(5), pp. 325–33.
   Google Scholar
• Krause K.-L., 2012, ‘Addressing the wicked problem of quality in higher education: theoretical approaches and implications’, Higher Education Research & Development, 31(3), pp. 285–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land, R. & Rattray, J., 2014, ‘Policy drivers and barriers to implementation’, in Eggins, H. (Ed.), 2014, Drivers and Barriers to Achieving Quality in Higher Education, pp. 13–25 (Rotterdam, Sense Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Lavrakas, P.J., 2008, Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods (Los Angeles, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Leisyte, L., Westerheijden, D.F, Epping, E., Faber, M. & Weert, E., 2013, ‘Stakeholders and quality assurance in higher education’, paper presented at the 26th Annual CHER Conference 9 September 2013, Lausanne, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Liukineviciene, L. & Bilbokaite, R., 2011, ‘Major problems obstructing implementation of higher education quality management systems in higher schools’, Social Research, 2(23), pp. 80–89.
   Google Scholar
• Lomas, L., 2004, ‘Embedding quality: the challenges for higher education’, Quality Assurance in Education, 12(4), pp. 157–65.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C. & Rossman G.B., 2011, Designing Qualitative Research (London, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Matei, L. & Iwinska, J., 2016, Quality Assurance in Higher Education A Practical Handbook (Budapest, Central European University Press and Yehuda Elkana Center for Higher Education).
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P., 2007, ‘On generalization in qualitatively oriented research’, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 8(3), Article 26. Available at http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/291/641 (accessed 5 March 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Meirovich, G. & Romar, E.J., 2006, ‘The difficulty in implementing TQM in higher education instruction’, Quality Assurance in Education, 14(4), pp. 324–37.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S.B., 1998, Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass).
   Google Scholar
• Meuser, M. & Nagel, U., 1991, ExpertInneninterviews – vielfach erprobt, wenig bedacht: ein Beitrag zur qualitativen Methodendiskussion [Expert interviews - Multi-proven, little considered: a contribution to the qualitative method discussion], in Garz, D. & Kraimer, K. (Eds.), 1991, Qualitativ-empirische Sozialforschung: Konzepte, Methoden, Analysen (Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• Michelene, C.T.H., 1997, ‘Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: a practical guide’, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), pp. 271–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motwani, J. & Kumar, A., 1997, ‘The need for implementing total quality management in education’, International Journal of Educational Management, 11(3), pp. 131–35.
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K.A., 2016, The Content Analysis Guidebook (London, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Nohl, A.-M., 2012, Interview und dokumentarische Methode: Anleitungen für die Forschungspraxis [Interview and Documentary Method: Guidance for research practice] (Wiesbaden, Imprint VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften).
   Google Scholar
• Owlia, M.S. & Aspinwall, E.M., 1997, ‘TQM in higher education—a review’, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 14(5), pp. 527–43.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M.Q., 1999, ‘Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis’, Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2), pp.1189–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, R., 2015, ‘The role of internal and external stakeholders’, in Schwartzman, S., Pinheiro, R. & Pillay, P. (Eds.), 2015, Higher Education in the BRICS Countries: Investigating the pact between higher education and society (Dordrecht, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Quintanilla, M.A., 1999, ‘The quality challenge for universities: a view from Spain’, Tertiary Education and Management, 5(4), pp. 331–46.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa M., Cláudia C. & Amaral, A., 2012, ‘Implementing quality management systems in higher education institutions’, in Almuedo-Paz, A., Torres-Olivera, A., Núñez-García, D. & Reyes-Alcázar, V. (Eds.), 2012, The ACSA Accreditation Model: Self-assessment as a quality improvement tool (London, INTECH, Open Access Publisher).
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, T., 2015, ‘Quality assurance in higher education: a review of literature’, Higher Learning Research Communications, 5(4). Available at https://www.hlrcjournal.com/index.php/HLRC/article/view/257/223 (accessed 3 January 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Saillard, E. K., 2011, ‘Systematic versus interpretive analysis with two CAQDAS packages: NVivo and MAXQDA’, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 12(1), Article 34. Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1518/3133 (accessed 3 January 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Salleh, N.M, Zakuan, N., Ariff, M.S.M, Bahari A.Z., Chin, T.A, Sulaiman, Z., Yatim, M.S., Awang, S.R. & Saman M.Z.M., 2018, ‘Critical success factors of total quality management implementation in higher education institution: UTM case study’, Conference Proceedings, 6th international conference on manufacturing, optimization, industrial and material engineering, Bandung, Indonesia 24–25 March 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Sallis, E., 2002, Total Quality Management in Education, third edition (London, Stylus).
   Google Scholar
• Schindler, L., Puls-Elvidge, S., Welzant, H. & Crawford, L., 2015, ‘Definitions of quality in higher education: a synthesis of the literature’, Higher Learning Research Communications, 5(3), pp. 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, D.T., 1993, Total Quality Management in Higher Education: Clearing the hurdles a survey on strategies for implementing quality management in higher education (Methuen, MA, Goal/QPC).
   Google Scholar
• Shah, M., Lewis, I. & Fitzgerald, R., 2011, ‘The renewal of quality assurance in Australian higher education: the challenge of balancing academic rigour, equity and quality outcomes’, Quality in Higher Education, 17(3), pp. 265–78.
   Google Scholar
• Sirvanci, M.B., 2004, ‘Critical issues for TQM implementation in higher education’, The TQM Magazine, 16(6), pp. 382–86.
   Google Scholar
• Tarí, J.J. & Dick, G., 2016, ‘Trends in quality management research in higher education institutions’, Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 26(3), pp. 273–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesch, R., 1990, Qualitative Research: Analysis types and software tools (London, Falmer).
   Google Scholar
• Thurmond V.A., 2001, ‘The point of triangulation’, Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), pp. 253–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trivellas, P., Ipsilantis, P., Papadopoulos, I. & Kantas, D., 2012, ‘Challenges for quality management in higher education - investigating institutional leadership, culture and performance’, pp. 103–29 (London, INTECH, Open Access Publisher). Available at https://www.intechopen.com/books/quality-assurance-and-management/challenges-for-quality-management-in-higher-education-investigating-leadership-culture-and-performan (accessed 2 October 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Ulewicz, R., 2017, ‘The role of stakeholders in quality assurance in higher education’, Human Resources Management & Ergonomics, 11(1), pp. 93–107.
   Google Scholar
• Vidovic, L., 2003, ‘Methodological framing for policy trajectory’, in O’Donoghue, T. & Punch, K. (Eds.), 2003, Qualitative Educational Research in Action: Doing and reflecting (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Vincenzi, A. de Garau, A. & Guaglianone, A., 2018, ‘Has the quality of teaching and learning processes improved as a result of the implementation of quality assurance coordinated by the state?’ Quality in Higher Education, 24(1), pp. 55–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K., 2009, Case Study Research: Design and methods (Los Angeles, Sage).
   Google Scholar