The seven deadly sins of quality management: trade-offs and implications for further research

References

• Adcroft, A. & Willis, R., 2005, ‘The (un)intended outcome of public sector performance measurement’, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18(5), pp. 386–400.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M. & Sandberg, J., 2013, ‘Has management studies lost its way? Ideas for more imaginative and innovative research’, Journal of Management Studies, 50(1), pp. 128–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M. & Spicer, A., 2019, ‘Neo-institutional theory and organization studies: a mid-life crisis?’, Organization Studies, 40(2), pp. 199–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askling, B., 1997, ‘Quality monitoring as an institutional enterprise’, Quality in Higher Education, 3(1), pp. 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, M.A., Rom, M.C. & Taylor, M.M., 2004, ‘State competition in higher education: a race to the top, or a race to the bottom?’, Economics of Governance, 5(1), pp. 53–75.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, R. & Wilkinson, R., 1994, ‘The use and abuse of performance indicators in UK higher education’, Higher Education, 27(4), pp. 417–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, N., 2004, ‘Higher education funding’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20(2), pp. 264–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becket, N. & Brookes, M., 2006, ‘Evaluating QM in university departments’, Quality Assurance in Education, 14(2), pp. 123–42.
   Google Scholar
• Beerkens, M., 2015, ‘Quality assurance in the political context: in the midst of different expectations and conflicting goals’, Quality in Higher Education, 21(3), pp. 231–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billing, D., 1998. ‘Quality management and organisational structure in higher education’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 20(2), pp. 139–59.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, N. & Bates, A., 2016. ‘The standards paradox: how quality assurance regimes can subvert teaching and learning in higher education’, European Educational Research Journal, 15(2), pp. 155–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, J. & Shah, T., 2000, ‘Quality assessment and institutional change: experiences from 14 countries’, Higher Education, 40(3), pp. 331–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N., Rasche, A. & Seidl, D., 2012, ‘The dynamics of standardization: three perspectives on standards in organization studies’, Organization Studies, 33(5–6), pp. 613–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, E. & Green, M., 2015, Making Sense of Change Management: A complete guide to the models, tools and techniques of organizational change (Philadelphia, PA, Kogan Page).
   Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larsen, P., 2011, The Evaluation Society (Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larsen, P., 2014, ‘Constitutive effects of performance indicators: getting beyond unintended consequences’, Public Management Review, 16(7), pp. 969–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larsen, P., 2015, ‘The evaluation society: critique, contestability and scepticism’, Spazio Filosofico, 13, pp. 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• de Boer, H., Enders, J. & Schimank, U., 2007, ‘On the way towards new public management? The governance of university systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany’, in Jansen, D. (Ed.), 2007, New Forms of Governance in Research Organizations, pp. 137–52 (Dordrecht, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Deem, R. & Brehony, K.J., 2005, ‘Management as ideology: the case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education’, Oxford Review of Education, 31(2), pp. 217–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dill, D.D., 1995, ‘Through Deming’s eyes: a cross-national analysis of quality assurance policies in higher education’, Quality in Higher Education, 1(2), pp. 95–110.
   Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M., 1999, ‘The impact of bureaucratic structure on policy making’, Public Administration, 77(1), pp. 155–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elken, M. & Røsdal, T., 2017, ‘Professional higher education institutions as organizational actors’, Tertiary Education and Management, 23(4), pp. 376–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elken, M. & Stensaker, B., 2018, ‘Conceptualising ‘quality work’ in higher education’, Quality in Higher Education, 24(3), pp. 189–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elton, L., 1988, ‘Accountability in higher education: the danger of unintended consequences’, Higher Education, 17(4), pp. 377–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frølich, N., Huisman, J., Slipersæter, S., Stensaker, B. & Bótas, P.C.P., 2013, ‘A reinterpretation of institutional transformations in European higher education: strategising pluralistic organisations in multiplex environments’, Higher Education, 65(1), pp. 79–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funnell, W. & Wade, M., 2012, ‘Negotiating the credibility of performance auditing’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 23(6), pp. 434–50.
   Google Scholar
• Gornitzka, Å., Kyvik, S. & Larsen, I.M., 1998, ‘The bureaucratisation of universities’, Minerva, 36(1), pp. 21–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, L., & Williams, J., 2010, ‘Fifteen years of Quality in Higher Education (Part Two)’, Quality in Higher Education, 16(2), pp. 81–113.
   Google Scholar
• Hasse, R. & Krücken, G., 2013, ‘Competition and actorhood: a further expansion of the neo-institutional agenda’, Sociologia Internationalis, 51(2), pp. 181–205.
   Google Scholar
• Huisman, J. & Currie, J., 2004, ‘Accountability in higher education: bridge over troubled water?’, Higher Education, 48(4), pp. 529–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, J.P., 2005, ‘Why most published research findings are false’, PLoS Medicine, 2(8), p. e124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jann, W., 2016, ‘Accountability, performance and legitimacy in the welfare state: if accountability is the answer, what was the question?’, in Christensen, T. & Lægreid, P. (Eds.), 2016, The Routledge Handbook to Accountability and Welfare State Reforms in Europe, pp. 31–44 (New York, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, D. S., 2014, ‘Regulating higher education: quality assurance and neo-liberal managerialism in higher education—a critical introduction’, Policy and Society, 33(3), pp. 155–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelle, U., 2006, ‘Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in research practice: purposes and advantages’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(4), pp. 293–311.
   Google Scholar
• King, G. & Sen, M., 2013, ‘How social science research can improve teaching’, Political Science & Politics, 46(3), pp. 621–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouzmin, A., Löffler, E., Klages, H. & Korac-Kakabadse, N., 1999, ‘Benchmarking and performance measurement in public sectors: towards learning for agency effectiveness’, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 12(2), pp. 121–44.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, R., 2010, ‘Benchmarking, rankings und ratings’, in Simon, D., Knie, A. & Hornbostel, S. (Eds.), 2010, Handbuch Wissenschaftspolitik, pp. 322–33 (Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften).
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.W. & Rowan, B., 1977, ‘Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), pp. 340–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neave, G., 1988, ‘On the cultivation of quality, efficiency and enterprise: an overview of recent trends in higher education in Western Europe, 1986-1988ʹ, European Journal of Education, 23(1–2), pp. 7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Niskanen, W.A., 1968, ‘The peculiar economics of bureaucracy’, American Economic Review, 58(2), pp. 293–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, C., 1992, ‘The antecedents of deinstitutionalization’, Organization Studies, 13(4), pp. 563–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M., 1999, The Audit Society: Rituals of verification (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Power, M., 2003, ‘Evaluating the audit explosion’, Law & Policy, 25(3), pp. 185–202.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, F.O. & Christensen, T., 2013, ‘The formalization of the university: rules, roots, and routes’, Higher Education, 65(6), pp. 695–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reith, F. & Seyfried, M., 2019, ‘Balancing the moods: quality managers’ perceptions and actions against resistance’, Higher Education Policy, 32(1), pp. 71–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J., 2013, The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (Los Angeles, CA, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F.W., 1994, ‘Games real actors could play: positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(1), pp. 27–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimank, U., 2015, “New public management’ as de-professionalization – conceptual reflections with some applications to school teachers’, in Klenk, T. & Pavolini, E. (Eds.), 2015, Restructuring Welfare Governance: Marketization, managerialism and welfare state professionalism, pp. 183–99 (Northampton, Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Schneijderberg, C., 2017, ‘Higher education professionals: a growing profession’, in Shin, J.C. & Teixeira, P. (Eds.), 2017, Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions, pp. 1–6 (Dordrecht, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Seeber, M., Lepori, B., Montauti, M., Enders, J., de Boer, H., Weyer, E. & Frølich, N., 2015, ‘European universities as complete organizations? Understanding identity, hierarchy and rationality in public organizations’, Public Management Review, 17(10), pp. 1444–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfried, M., 2019, ‘Undisclosed desires: quality managers’ normative notions regarding the implementation of quality management’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(7), pp. 1106–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfried, M., Ansmann, M. & Pohlenz, P., 2019, ‘Institutional isomorphism, entrepreneurship and effectiveness: the adoption and implementation of quality management in teaching and learning in Germany’, Tertiary Education and Management, 25(2), pp. 115–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfried, M. & Pohlenz, P., 2018, ‘Assessing quality assurance in higher education: quality managers’ perceptions of effectiveness’, European Journal of Higher Education, 8(3), pp. 258–71.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C., 2003, Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, M. & Stone Sweet, A., 2002, ‘Theory and practice of delegation to non-majoritarian institutions’, West European Politics, 25(1), pp. 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Thiel, S. & Leeuw, F.L., 2002, ‘The performance paradox in the public sector’, Public Performance & Management Review, 25(3), pp. 267–81.
   Google Scholar
• Waterman, R.W. & Meier, K.J., 1998, ‘Principal–agent models: an expansion?’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), pp. 173–202.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. & Winckelmann, J. (Eds.), 2002, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie, fifth revised edition. (Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck).
   Google Scholar
• Whitchurch, C., 2008, ‘Shifting identities and blurring boundaries: the emergence of third space professionals in UK higher education’, Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4), pp. 377–96.
   Google Scholar
• Whitchurch, C. & Law, P., 2010, ‘Optimising the potential of third space professionals in higher education’, Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung, 5(4), pp. 9–22.
   Google Scholar