Towards institutional ‘quality education’ policies in higher education: a schema for their implementation

References

• Ackoff, R.L., 1989, ‘From data to wisdom’, Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 15, pp. 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R., 1992, Improving Higher Education (Buckingham Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R., 2000, ‘University knowledge in an age of supercomplexity’, Higher Education, 40(4), pp. 409–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, R., 2004, ‘The purposes of higher education and the changing face of academia’, London Review of Education, 2(1), pp. 61–73.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R., 2005, Reshaping the University: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching (Maidenhead, Open University Press/McGraw-Hill Education).
   Google Scholar
• Bates, A.W. 2015. Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning (Vancouver, Tony Bates Associates). Available at http://dergipark.gov.tr/glokalde/issue/7240/95340 (accessed 4 October 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, H. & Sharpe, R. (Eds.), 2013, Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: Designing for 21st century learning, second edition (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, J.H., 2011, ‘The data-information-knowledge-wisdom hierarchy and its antithesis’, Nasko, 2(1), pp. 68–75.
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S. & Boyd, P., 2007, Developing Effective Assessment in Higher Education (Maidenhead, OU Press/McGraw Hill).
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. & Falchikov, N., 2007, Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the longer term (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L. & Cocking, R.R., 2000, How People Learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Washington DC, National Academies Press).
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, J., Edmunds, R., Houston, M., Jary, D., Lebeau, Y., Osborne, M. & Richardson, J., 2010, Improving What is Learned at University (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Chickering, A.W. & Ehrmann, S.C., 1996, ‘Implementing the seven principles: technology as lever’, AAHE Bulletin, 49(2), pp. 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Chickering, A.W. & Gamson, Z.F., 1987, ‘Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education’, AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), pp. 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Crane, L. & Bontis, N., 2014, ‘Trouble with tacit: developing a new perspective and approach’, Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(6), pp. 1127–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., 1996, Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention (New York, HarperCollins).
   Google Scholar
• Department for Business Innovation and Skills, 2011, Students at the Heart of the System (London, The Stationery Office). Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/31384/11-944-higher-education-students-at-heart-of-system.pdf (accessed 4 October 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Department for Business Innovation and Skills, 2016, Success as a Knowledge Economy: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice (London, The Stationery Office). Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/523396/bis-16-265-success-as-a-knowledge-economy.pdf (accessed 4 October 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Dror, I., 2007, The Three C’s of Learning: Control, challenge and commitment (Sheffield, Learning Light). Available at http://www.immagic.com/eLibrary/ARCHIVES/GENERAL/BLOGS/F070319S.pdf (accessed 4 October 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H. & Wenderoth, M.P., 2014, ‘Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), pp. 8410–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, H., Ketteridge, S. & Marshall, S. (Eds.), 2009, A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing academic practice (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H., 2011, ‘Five minds for the future: an overview’, Journal of Educational Sciences & Psychology, (1)2, pp. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• General Medical Council (GMC), 2015, Promoting Excellence: Standards for medical education and training (London, GMC).
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. & Simpson, C., 2004, ‘Conditions under which assessment supports student learning’, Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), pp. 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J.A.C. & Yates, G., 2014, Visible Learning and the Science of How we Learn (London and New York, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M. & Jenkins, A., 2009, Developing Undergraduate Research and Inquiry (York, Higher Education Academy).
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M., Pawson, E. & Solem, M., 2013, Active Learning and Student Engagement: International perspectives and practices in geography in higher education (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, J., Reeves, T.C. & Oliver, R., 2010, A Guide to Authentic E-Learning (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J., Walkington, H. & France, D., 2016, ‘Graduate attributes: implications for higher education practice and policy: introduction’, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(2), pp. 155–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, D. & Hood, C., 2017, ‘University teacher preparation programmes as a quality enhancement mechanism: evaluating impact beyond individual teachers’ practice’, Quality in Higher Education, 23(1), pp. 65–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JISC [previously Joint Information Systems Committee], 2016, Evaluating and Designing Learning Spaces. Available at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/evaluating-and-designing-learning-spaces (accessed 4 October 2019).
   Google Scholar
• JISC [previously Joint Information Systems Committee], 2018, Digital Experience Insights Survey 2018: Findings from students in UK further and higher education. Available at http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6967/1/Digital_experience_insights_survey_2018.pdf (accessed 4 October 2019).
   Google Scholar
• JISC [previously Joint Information Systems Committee], n.d., The Design Studio. Available at http://jiscdesignstudio.pbworks.com/w/page/12458422/Welcome%20to%20the%20Design%20Studio (accessed 4 October 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P.N., 2006, How We Reason (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kneale, P., ‘Teaching and learning for employability’, in Fry, H., Ketteridge, S. & Marshall, S. (Eds.), 2009, A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing academic practice, pp. 99–112 (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Knight, P. & Yorke, M., 2002, ‘Employability through the curriculum’, Tertiary Education and Management, 8(4), pp. 261–76.
   Google Scholar
• Kreber, C., Anderson, C., Entwistle, N. & McArthur, J. (Eds.), 2014, Advances and Innovations in University Assessment and Feedback (Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G.D., 2003, ‘What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE: benchmarks for effective educational practices’, Change, 35(2), pp. 24–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G.D., Cruce, T.M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J. & Gonyea, R.M., 2008, ‘Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence’, Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), pp. 540–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuh, G.D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J.H. & Whitt, E.J., 2011, Student Success in College: Creating conditions that matter (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass).
   Google Scholar
• Land, R., Meyer, J.H.F. & Smith, J.W.T., 2008, ‘Threshold concepts within the disciplines’, in Peters, M.A. & Freeman-Moir, J. (Eds.), 2008, Educational Futures: Rethinking theory and practice (Rotterdam, Sense Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Laurillard, D., 2012, Teaching as a Design Science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology (Abingdon/New York, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J., 2013, ‘Refreshing information literacy: learning from recent British information literacy models’, Communications in Information Literacy, 7(2), pp. 114ff.
   Google Scholar
• McHaney, R., 2011, The New Digital Shoreline (Sterling, VA., Stylus).
   Google Scholar
• Mentkowski, M. & Associates, 2000, Learning that Lasts: Integrating learning, development and performance in college and beyond (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass).
   Google Scholar
• National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), 2019, Home Page. Available at nsse.indiana.edu/index.cfm (accessed 20 October 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Pace, C.R., 1949, ‘What kind of citizens do college graduates become?’, Journal of General Education, 3(3), pp. 197–202.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M., O’Donovan, B., Rust, C. & Carroll, J. 2008, ‘Assessment standards: a manifesto for change’, Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching, 2(3) pp. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA), 2006, Code of Practice for the Assurance of Academic Quality and Standards in Higher Education. Available at http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/9713/2/COP_AOS.pdf (accessed 4 October 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA), 2010, Quality Assurance Agency, Honours Degree Benchmark Statements, (Gloucester, QAA). Available at http://www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/benchmark/honours/(accessed 4 October 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Rust, C., 2007, ‘Towards a scholarship of assessment’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), pp. 229–37.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D.R., 2009a, ‘Grade integrity and the representation of academic achievement’, Studies in Higher Education, 34(7), pp. 807–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D.R. 2009b, Moderation, Grading and Calibration, (Queensland, Griffith University). Available at www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/211940/GPA-Symposium2009-Edited-Keynote-Address-FINAL.pdf (accessed 4 October 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D.R., 2010, ‘Fidelity as a precondition for integrity in grading academic achievement’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(6), pp. 727–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D.R., 2017, ‘Academic achievement standards and quality assurance’, Quality in Higher Education, 23(2), pp. 81–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Säljö, R., 1979, ‘Learning about learning’, Higher Education, 8(4), pp. 443–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, G., 2005, ‘Flying not flapping: a strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions’, ALT-J (now Research in Learning Technology), 13(3), pp. 201–18.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S.J., 2017, ‘Great teaching is like an onion’, Journal of Food Science Education, 16(2), pp. 38–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, D.F., 2003, ‘Facilitating holistic curriculum development’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(4), pp. 423–34.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe, R., Beetham, H. & De Freitas, S. (Eds.), 2010, Rethinking Learning for a Digital Age: How learners are shaping their own experiences (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Tang, J. & Harrison, C., 2010, ‘Investigating university tutor perceptions of assessment feedback: three types of tutor beliefs’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(1), pp. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Washer, P., 2007, ‘Revisiting key skills: a practical framework for higher education’, Quality in Higher Education, 13(1), pp. 57–67.
   Google Scholar
• Whalley, W.B., 2008, ‘Geography21(gY)→3C+c→6C? (Towards Bologna and Lisbon; perhaps with some help from the Elephant’s Child)’, in Donert, K. & Wall, G. (Eds.) Future Prospects in Geography, pp. 9–17 (Liverpool Liverpool Hope University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Whalley, W.B., 2009, ‘Using learning outcomes in module design to enhance student participation and active learning’, in Terry, E.B., Jefferies, A.L. & Bracq, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Blended Learning Conference 2009, ‘Engaging Students in the Curriculum’, pp. 364–75 (Hatfield,University of Hertfordshire Press).
   Google Scholar
• Willison, J., 2012, ‘When academics integrate research skill development in the curriculum’, Higher Education Research & Development, 31(6), pp. 905–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorke, M., 2003, ‘Formative assessement in higher education: moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice’, Higher Education, 45(4), pp. 477–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar