Prepared for higher education? Staff and student perceptions of academic literacy dimensions across disciplines

References

• Aamodt, P. O., Hovdhaugen, E. & Opheim, V., 2006, Evaluering av Kvalitetsreformen: Delrapport 6: Den nye studiehverdagen [Evaluation of the Quality Reform], NIFU-Report (Oslo, NIFU).
   Google Scholar
• Acker, S.R. & Halasek, K., 2008, ‘Preparing high school students for college-level writing: using ePortfolio to support a successful transition’, Journal of General Education, 57, pp. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C., 1988, Shaping Written Knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science (Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin Press).
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T. & Trowler, P., 1989, Academic Tribes and Territories (Buckingham, Society for Research into Higher Education Open University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Berkenkotter, C. & Huckin, T.N., 1995, Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/culture/power (Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum).
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, L., 2011, ‘Secondary analysis of qualitative data’, in Silverman, D. (Ed.), 2011, Qualitative Research, third edition, pp. 395–411 (Los Angeles, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, A.R.J., Clark, J. & Hall, I., 2012, ‘Building bridges: understanding student transition to university’, Quality in Higher Education, 18(1), pp. 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, H., Barron, P. & D’Annunzio-Green, N., 2013, ‘Direct entrants in transition: becoming independent learners’, Studies in Higher Education, 38(4), pp. 623–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington, C.A., Roderick, M., Allensworth, E., Nagaoka, J., Keyes, T.S., Johnson, D.W. & Beechum, N.O., 2012, Teaching Adolescents to Become Learners. The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance (Chicago, University of Chicago, Urban Education Instiutute).
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., 2010, Dimensions of Quality (York, Higher Education Academy).
   Google Scholar
• Goldfinch, J. & Hughes, M., 2007, ‘Skills, learning styles and success of first-year undergraduates’, Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(3), pp. 259–73.
   Google Scholar
• Gourlay, L., 2009, ‘Threshold practices: becoming a student through academic literacies’. London Review of Education, 7(2), pp. 181–92.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, M.J. & Booth, A., 2009, ‘A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies’, Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26, pp. 91–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, L. & Drew, S. with Smith, M., 2006, The First-Year Experience: A review of literature (Sheffield, Higher Education Academy).
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L. & Green, D., 1993. ‘Defining quality’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), pp. 9–34.
   Google Scholar
• Hatteberg, S.J. & Steffy, K., 2013, ‘Increasing reading compliance of undergraduates: an evaluation of compliance methods’, Teaching Sociology, 41(4), pp. 346–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertzberg, F., 2006, ‘Skrivekompetanse på tvers av fag [Writing competencies across subjects]’, in Elstad, E. & Turmo, A. (Eds.), 2006, Læringsstrategier. Søkelys på lærernes praksis, pp. 111–26 (Oslo, Universitetsforlaget).
   Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, D.A. & Harl, A., 2008, ‘Studying the “Reading Transition” from high school to college: what are our students reading and why?’, College English, 70, pp. 599–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsmoen, K.M. & Greek, M., 2017, ‘Lecturers’ text competencies and guidance towards academic literacy’, Educational Action Research, 25(3), pp. 354–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea, M.R. & Street, B.V., 1998, ‘Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach’, Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), pp. 157–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lødding, B. & Aamodt, P.O., 2015, Studieforberedt etter studieforberedende? Overgangen mellom studieforberedende utdanningsprogram og høyere utdanning belyst gjennom gruppesamtaler med lærere, studenter og elever [Prepard for higher education after upper secondary school], Rapport 2015:28 (Oslo, NIFU).
   Google Scholar
• Määttä, K. & Uusiautti, S., 2012, ‘How to enhance the smoothness of university students’ study paths’, International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 1(1), pp. 47–60.
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, K.N., 2014, ‘Read long and prosper: five do’s and don’ts for preparing students for college’, The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 87(2), pp. 83–87.
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, G. & Penner, A.J., 2013, ‘Literacy and learning’, College Quarterly, 16(4), p. n4.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, P.A. & Oppenheimer, D.M., 2014, ‘The pen is mightier than the keyboard: advantages of longhand over laptop note taking’, Psychological Science, 25(6), pp. 1159–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulhern, G. & Wylie, J., 2006, ‘Mathematical prerequisites for learning statistics in psychology: assessing core skills of numeracy and mathematical reasoning among undergraduates’, Psychology Learning & Teaching, 5(2), pp. 119–32.
   Google Scholar
• Nallaya, S., 2018, ‘An exploration of how first year students are inducted into their discipline’s academic discourse’, International Journal of Educational Research, 87, pp. 57–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palinscar, A.S. & Brown, A.L., 1984, ‘Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities’, Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), pp. 117–75.
   Google Scholar
• Pecorari, D., Shaw, P., Irvine, A., Malmström, H. & Mežek, Š., 2012, ‘Reading in tertiary education: undergraduate student practices and attitudes’, Quality in Higher Education, 18(2), pp. 235–56.
   Google Scholar
• Penn-Edwards, D.S., 2011, ‘Engaging with higher education academic support: a first year student teacher transition model’, European Journal of Education, 46(4), pp. 566–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapley, T., 2016, ‘Some pragmatics of qualitative data analysis’, in Silverman, D. (Ed.), 2016, Qualitative Research, pp. 331–45 (Los Angeles, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Reed, D.K., Rimel, H. & Hallett, A., 2016, ‘Note-taking interventions for college students: a synthesis and meta-analysis of the literature’, Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(3), pp. 307–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, A., 2006, ‘Leseopplæring og lesestrategier [Reading instruction and reading strategies]’, in Elstad, E. & Turmo, A. (Eds.), 2006, Læringsstrategier. Søkelys på lærernes praksis, pp. 67–92 (Oslo, Universitetsforlaget).
   Google Scholar
• Serrano, D.R., Dea-Ayuela, M.A., Gonzalez-Burgos, E., Serrano-Gil, A. & Lalatsa, A, 2019, ‘Technology-enhanced learning in higher education: how to enhance student engagement through blended learning’, European Journal of Education, 54(2), pp. 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, C., Shanahan, T. & Misischia, C., 2011, ‘Analysis of expert readers in three disciplines: history, mathematics, and chemistry’, Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), pp. 393–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T. & Shanahan, C., 2008, ‘Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: rethinking content-area literacy’, Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), pp. 40–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T. & Shanahan, C., 2012, ‘What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter?’ Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), pp. 7–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., Van Hoof, B. & Pursel, B., 2013, ‘An assessment of reading compliance decisions among undergraduate students’, Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(4), pp. 103–25.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. & Naylor, R., 2005, ‘Schooling effects on subsequent university performance’, Economics of Education Review, 24(5), pp. 549–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, S.E., Wilson, T.J. & Dole, J.A., 2014, ‘Ready or not recognizing and preparing college-ready students’, Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(4), pp. 299–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strømme, T.B. & Hansen, M.N., 2017, ‘Closure in the elite professions: the field of law and medicine in an egalitarian context’, Journal of Education and Work, 30(2), pp. 168–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Meer, J., 2012, ‘Students’ note-taking challenges in the twenty-first century: considerations for teachers and academic staff developers’, Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1), pp. 13–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kemenade, E., Pupius, M. & Hardjono, T.W., 2008, ‘More value to defining quality’, Quality in Higher Education, 14(2), pp. 175–85.
   Google Scholar
• Wingate, U., 2007, ‘A framework for transition: supporting ‘learning to learn’ in higher education’, Higher Education Quarterly, 61(3), pp. 391–405.
   Google Scholar
• Wingate, U., Andon, N. & Cogo, A., 2011, ‘Embedding academic writing instruction into subject teaching: a case study’, Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(1), pp. 69–81.
   Google Scholar