Dynamic interactionism between research fraud and research culture: a commentary to Harvey’s analysis

References

• Aguinis, H., Cummings, C., Ramani, R.S. & Cummings, T.G., 2020, ‘”An A is an A”: the new bottom line for valuing academic research’, Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(1), pp. 135–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, P.S., Odom, A.R., Gray, H.M., Jones, J.B., Christensen, W.F., Hollingshead, T., Hadfield, J.G., Evans-Pickett, A., Frost, M., Wilson, C., Davidson, L.E. & Seeley, M.K., 2020, ‘A case study exploring associations between popular media attention of scientific research and scientific citations’, PloS One, 15(7), Article e0234912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artino, A.R., Jr, Driessen, E.W. & Maggio, L.A., 2019, ‘Ethical shades of gray: international frequency of scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education’, Academic Medicine, 94(1), pp. 76–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baccini, A., De Nicolao, G., Petrovich, E. & Bornmann, L., 2019, ‘Citation gaming induced by bibliometric evaluation: a country-level comparative analysis‘, PLoS One, 14(9), pp. e0221212.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, G.C., Rogelberg, S.G., Woznyj, H.M., Landis, R.S. & Rupp, D.E., 2016, ‘Evidence on questionable research practices: the good, the bad, and the ugly’, Journal of Business and Psychology, 31, pp. 323–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biagioli, M. & Lippman, A., 2020, Gaming the Metrics: Misconduct and manipulation in academic research (Massachusetts, MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Billaut, J.C., Bouyssou, D. & Vincke, P., 2010, ‘Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking? An MCDM view’, Scientometrics, 84(1), pp. 237–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouffard, K., 2020, ‘Scientist gets 10-year ban from federal research in Wayne State University misconduct case’, The Detroit News, 14 September. Available at: https://eu.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/detroit-city/2020/09/14/scientist-banned-10-years-federal-research-wayne-state-misconduct-case/5749048002/ (accessed 19 November 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Bouyssou, D. & Marchant, T., 2011, ‘Ranking scientists and departments in a consistent manner’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(9), pp. 1761–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravo, G., Farjam, M., Moreno, F.G., Birukou, A. & Squazzoni, F., 2018, ‘Hidden connections: network effects on editorial decisions in four computer science journals’, Journal of Informetrics, 12(1), pp. 101–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brembs, B., 2018, ‘Prestigious science journals struggle to reach even average reliability’, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, Article 37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brembs, B., Button, K. & Munafo, M., 2013, ‘Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank’, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodeur, A., Cook, N. & Heyes, A., 2020, ‘Methods matter: P-hacking and publication bias in causal analysis in economics’, American Economic Review, 110(11), pp. 3634–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, N., Delaney, H. & Spoelstra, S., 2017, ‘The gray zone: questionable research practices in the business school’, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(1), pp. 94–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, N. & Spoelstra, S., 2020, ‘Academics at play: why the “publication game” is more than a metaphor’, Management Learning, 51(4), pp. 414–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, D.W. & Lindner, S., 2014, ‘Degrees of integrity: the threat of corruption in higher education’, ’Studies in Higher Education, 41(2), pp. 247–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civera, A., Lehmann, E.E., Paleari, S. & Stockinger, S.A., 2020, ‘Higher education policy: why hope for quality when rewarding quantity?’, Research Policy, 49(8), Article 104083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colussi, T., 2018, ‘Social ties in academia: a friend is a treasure’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(1), pp. 45–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csiszar, A., 2020, ‘Gaming metrics before the game: citation and the bureaucratic virtuoso’, in Biagioli, M. & Lippman, A. (Eds.), 2020, Gaming the Metrics: Misconduct and manipulation in academic research, pp. 31–42, (Massachusetts, MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, M.R., Slevc, L.R. & Grand, J.A., 2019, ‘Making research evaluation more transparent: aligning research philosophy, institutional values, and reporting’, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), pp. 361–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dr. Ruoyun (Lucy) Zhao v. University of Technology Sydney, 2020, Fair Work Commission of Australia, p. 416. Available at https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/html/2020fwc416.htm (accessed 3 December 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M.A. & Roy, S., 2017, ‘Academic research in the 21st century: maintaining scientific integrity in a climate of perverse incentives and hypercompetition’, Environmental Engineering Science, 34(1), pp. 51–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European University Association., 2020, ‘#EUInvestInKnowledge – Call for urgent EU investment in research, innovation and education’. Available at https://eua.eu/downloads/assignments/common%20statement%20-%20funding%20campaign.pdf (accessed 19 November 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B.S., 2003, ‘Publishing as prostitution? Choosing between one’s own ideas and academic success’, Public Choice, 116(1–2), pp. 205–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, L., 2020, ‘Research fraud: a long-term problem exacerbated by the clamour for research grants’, Quality in Higher Education, 26(3), pp. 243–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginson, A.D. & Munafò, M.R., 2016, ‘Current incentives for scientists lead to underpowered studies with erroneous conclusions’, PLoS Biology, 14(11), e2000995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, J.P., 2014, ‘Research accomplishments that are too good to be true’, Intensive Care Medicine, 40(3), pp. 99–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, J.P. & Boyack, K.W., 2020, ‘Citation metrics for appraising scientists: misuse, gaming and proper use’, Medical Journal of Australia, 212(6), pp. 247–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, S., 1975, ‘On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B’, Academy of Management Journal, 18(4), pp. 769–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, R.M., 1978, ‘Nature, nurture, and dynamic interactionism’, Human Development, 21(1), pp. 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M., 1964, Understanding Media: The extensions of man (New York, McGraw Hill).
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A.N., Taylor, S.G. & Bedeian, A.G., 2011, ‘Publish or perish: academic life as management faculty live it’, Career Development International, 16(5), pp. 422–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orhan, M.A., 2020, ‘Pardon my French: On superfluous journal rankings, incentives, and impacts on industrial-organizational psychology publication practices in French business schools’, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 13(3), pp. 295–306.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., 2016, ‘Why the assholes are winning: money trumps all’, Journal of Management Studies, 53(4), pp. 663–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powdthavee, N., Riyanto, Y.E. & Knetsch, J.L., 2018, ‘Lower-rated publications do lower academics’ judgments of publication lists: evidence from a survey experiment of economists’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 66, pp. 33–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schekman, R., 2013, ‘How journals like Nature, Cell and Science are damaging science’, The Guardian, 9 December. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/09/how-journals-nature-science-cell-damage-science (accessed 13 November 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Seeber, M., Cattaneo, M., Meoli, M. & Malighetti, P., 2019, ‘Self-citations as strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions’, Research Policy, 48(2), pp. 478–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smaldino, P.E. & McElreath, R., 2016, ‘The natural selection of bad science’, Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), Article 160384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R., 2005, ‘Medical journals are an extension of the marketing arm of pharmaceutical companies’, PLoS Med, 2(5), e138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starbuck, W.H., 2005, ‘How much better are the most-prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication’, Organization Science, 16(2), pp. 180–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, C., Butler, L. & Kingsley, D., 2006, ‘The publishing imperative: the pervasive influence of publication metrics’, Learned Publishing, 19(4), pp. 277–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, W.G., 2004, ‘Academic freedom and tenure: between fiction and reality’, Journal of Higher Education, 75(2), pp. 161–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomkins, A., Zhang, M. & Heavlin, W.D., 2017, ‘Reviewer bias in single-versus double-blind peer review’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(48), pp. 12708–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourish, D., 2020, ‘The triumph of nonsense in management studies’, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 19(1), pp. 99–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourish, D. & Craig, R., 2020, ‘Research misconduct in business and management studies: causes, consequences, and possible remedies’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 29(2), pp. 174–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tregoning, J., 2018, ‘How will you judge me if not by impact factor?’, Nature, 558(7710), p. 345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dalen, H.P., 2020, How the publish-or-perish principle divides a science: the case of academic economists, CentER Discussion Paper; volume 2020-020. (Tilburg, CentER, Center for Economic Research).
   Google Scholar
• Van Noorden, R., 2020, ‘Highly cited researcher banned from journal board for citation abuse’, Nature, 578(7794), pp. 200–01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazire, S., 2020, ‘Peer-reviewed scientific journals don’t really do their job’, WIRED, 25 June. Available at: https://www.wired.com/story/peer-reviewed-scientific-journals-dont-really-do-their-job/ (accessed 13 November 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Vuletich, H.A., Andrade, F.C., Guevara Beltran, D. & Tissera, H., 2019, ‘Social and personality psychology PhDs on the academic job market: characteristics and outcomes: a technical report by the SPSP student committee’. Available at: http://spsp.org/sites/default/files/Social_and_Personality_Psychology_PhDs_on_the_Academic_Job_Market_Characteristics_and_Outcomes_Technical_Report.pdf (accessed 19 November 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Wellcome Trust., 2020, ‘What researchers think about the culture they work in’. Available at https://wellcome.org/sites/default/files/what-researchers-think-about-the-culture-they-work-in.pdf (accessed 18 November 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Wislar, J.S., Flanagin, A., Fontanarosa, P.B. & DeAngelis, C.D., 2011, ‘Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey’, British Medical Journal, 343(Oct25 1), pp. d6128–d6128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar