Investigation of the higher education students’ participation in quality assurance processes based on the theory of planned behaviour: a case of Turkey

References

• Ajzen, I., 1991, ‘The theory of planned behaviour’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), pp. 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., 2005, Attitudes, Personality and Behaviour, second edition (New York, Open University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Alaniska, H., Codina, E.A., Bohrer, J., Dearlove, R., Eriksson, S., Helle, E. & Wiberg, L.K., 2006, Student Involvement in the Processes of Quality Assurance Agencies, ENQA Workshop Reports 4. European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (EUA) (Helsinki, EUA).
   Google Scholar
• Al-Sheeb, B.A., Abdulwahed, M.S. & Hamouda, A.M., 2018, ‘Impact of first-year seminar on student engagement, awareness, and general attitudes toward higher education’, Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 10(1), pp. 15–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armat, M.R., Assarroudi, A., Rad, M., Sharifi, H. & Heydari, A., 2018, ‘Inductive and deductive: ambiguous labels in qualitative content analysis’, The Qualitative Report 2018, 23(1), pp. 219–21.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, P., 2013, ‘Student as co-producer in a marketised higher education system: a case study of students’ experience of participation in curriculum design’, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(3), pp. 250–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, M.K., 1998, ‘Predicting unethical behavior: a comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior’, Journal of Business Ethics, 17(16), pp. 1825–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S.M. & Song, J., 2012, ‘An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior’, Computers & Education, 59, pp. 1054–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., 1960, ‘A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales’, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, pp. 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C. & Felten, P., 2014, Engaging Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching: A guide for faculty (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass).
   Google Scholar
• Council of Higher Education, 2020, Higher Education Information Management System. Available at: https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/ (accessed 9 September 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Dearlove, R., 2006, ‘Student involvement in external quality assurance: results of a preliminary survey’, in Alaniska, H., Codina, E.A., Bohrer, J., Dearlove, R., Eriksson, S., Helle, E. & Wiberg, L.K. (Eds.), 2006, Student Involvement in the Processes of Quality Assurance Agencies, pp. 32–40 (Helsinki, European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education).
   Google Scholar
• Doganay, A. & Sari, M., 2006, ‘Evaluation of students’ perceptions about quality of life in their campus in terms of democratic life culture (Çukurova University case)’, The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 4(2), pp. 107–28.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2010, Higher Education in Armenia (Brussels, EACEA).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice, 2012, The European Higher Education Area in 2012: Bologna Process Implementation Report (Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice, 2015, The European Higher Education Area in 2015: Bologna Process Implementation Report (Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice, 2018, The European Higher Education Area in 2018: Bologna Process Implementation Report (Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union).
   Google Scholar
• European Student’s Union, 2018, Bologna with Students Eye 2018: The final countdown (Brussels. European Students Union). Available at: http://www.ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/2018_Paris/06/0/BWSE-2018_web_lowres_952060.pdf (accessed 4 September 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Frawley, T., Goh, E. & Law, R., 2019, ‘Quality assurance at hotel management tertiary institutions in Australia: an insight into factors behind domestic and international student satisfaction’, Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 31(1), pp. 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gover A. & Loukkola, T., 2018, Enhancing Quality: From policy to practice (Brussels, Belgium). Available at: https://eua.eu/resources/publications/322:enhancing-quality-from-policy-to-practice.html (accessed 1 October 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L., 1997, ‘Empowering Learners’, Link: The European Student Magazine of The National Unions of Students in Europe (ESIB, Austria), 2, pp. 5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L., 2004–21, ‘Standards’, Analytic Quality Glossary. Available at http://www.qualityresearchinternational.com/glossary/standards.htm (accessed 17 June 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Isaeva, R., Eisenschmidt, E., Vanari, K. & Kumpas-Lenk, K., 2020, ‘Students’ views on dialogue: improving student engagement in the quality assurance process’, Quality in Higher Education, 26(1), pp. 80–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, N.F., Reilly, M.D. & Carsrud, A.L., 2000, ‘Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions’, Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5–6), pp. 411–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J.R. & Koch, G.G., 1977, ‘The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data’, Biometrics, 33, pp. 159–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, B. & Williams, R., 2010, 'Students’ roles in maintaining quality and in enhancing learning: is there a tension?', Quality in Higher Education, 16(2), pp. 115–27.
   Google Scholar
• Lizzio, A. & Wilson, K., 2009, ‘Student participation in university governance: the role conceptions and sense of efficacy of student representatives on departmental committees’, Studies in Higher Education, 34(1), pp. 69–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, U. & Meyer, J.H.F., 2004, ‘Supporting student awareness: understanding student preconceptions of their subject matter within introductory courses’, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(4), pp. 459–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis, E., Black, C. & Healey, M., 2017, ‘Responding to the challenges of student-staff partnership: the reflections of participants at an international summer institute’, Teaching in Higher Education, 22(6), pp. 720–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieson, K., 1991, ‘Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behaviour’, Information Systems Research, 2(3), pp. 173–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch, A., 2009, ‘The student as co-producer: learning from public administration about the student-university relationship’, Studies in Higher Education, 34(2), pp. 171–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merabishvili, N., Tsereteli, M. & Bellon, E.M.E., 2017, ‘Should the students be engaged in the higher education quality assurance? (Perspectives of students and quality assurance department)’, The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 7, pp. 52–62.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. & Saldana, J., 2014, ‘Qualitative Data Analysis: A methods sourcebook’, third edition (Thousand Oaks, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Molesworth, M., Nixon, E. & Scullion, R., 2009, ‘Having, being and higher education: the marketisation of the university and the transformation of the student into consumer’, Teaching in Higher Education, 14, pp. 277–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie, J., Zheng, C., Zeng, P., Zhou, B., Lei, L. & Wang, P., 2020, ‘Using the theory of planned behaviour and the role of social image to understand mobile English learning check-in behaviour’, Computers & Education, 156, article 10394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palomares, F., 2011, ‘Consequences of the student participation in quality assurance’, Future of Higher Education Bologna Process Researchers’ Conference, Bucharest, Romania, 18 October 2011, European Students’ Union, pp. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, M.E., 2000, ‘Career decision-making self-efficacy, perceived stress, and an integrated model of student persistence: a structural model of finances, attitudes, behaviour, and career development’, Research in Higher Education, 41(5), pp. 537–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, I.M., Bocheco, O. & Habak, C., 2018, ‘A survey of student and instructor perceptions of personal mobile technology usage and policies for the classroom’, Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), pp. 617–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirokova, G., Osiyevskyy, O. & Bogatyreva, K., 2016, ‘Exploring the intention-behaviour link in student entrepreneurship: moderating effects of individual and environmental characteristics’, European Management Journal, 34(4), pp. 386–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim, J. & Wright, C.C., 2005, ‘The Kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements’, Physical Therapy, 85(3), pp. 258–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. & Todd, P.A., 1995, ‘Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models’, Information Systems Research, 6(2), pp. 144–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trowler, V., 2010, Student Engagement Literature Review (York, Higher Education Academy).
   Google Scholar
• Tück, C., 2006, Student Participation in Internal Quality Assurance. In Second conference on internal quality assurance (Bern,Swiss Center of Accreditation and Quality Assurance in Higher Education).
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Higher Education Quality Council (THEQC), 2020, THEQC’s Self-Evaluation Report. Available at: https://yokak.gov.tr/Uluslararasilasma/Uyelikler (accessed 4 September 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Wiberg, L.K., 2006, ‘The role of students in the external review of QA agencies: a comparative reflection with the external review of higher education institutions’, in Alaniska, H., Codina, E.A., Bohrer, J., Dearlove, R., Eriksson, S., Helle, E., Wiberg, L.K., (Eds.), 2006, Student Involvement in the Processes of Quality Assurance Agencies, pp. 8–11. (Helsinki, European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education).
   Google Scholar
• Woodall, T., Hiller, A. & Resnick, S., 2012, ‘Making sense of higher education: students as consumers and the value of the university experience’, Studies in Higher Education, 39(1), pp. 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar