Quality management, performance measurement and indicators in higher education institutions: between burden, inspiration and innovation

References

• Barnett, R., 1992, Improving Higher Education: Total quality care (Buckingham, Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Barrie, S., Hughes, C., Crisp, G. & Bennison, A., 2014, Assessing and Assuring Australian Graduate Learning Outcomes: Principles and practices within and across disciplines (Sydney, Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching).
   Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P. & Jongbloed, B.W., 2010, ‘Who matters to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorisation’, Higher Education, 59(5), pp. 567–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G. & Halligan, J., 2008, Managing Performance: International comparisons (Abingdon, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Cave, M., Henkel, M., Kogan, M. & Hanney, S., 1997, The Use of Performance Indicators in Higher Education: The challenge of the quality movement, third edition (London, Jessica Kingsley).
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B.R., 1983, The Higher Education System: Academic organisation in cross-national perspectives (Berkeley, University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Daraio, C., Lenzerini, M., Leporelli, C., Naggar, P., Bonaccorsi, A. & Bartolucci, A., 2016, ‘The advantages of an ontology-based data management approach: openness, interoperability and data quality’, Scientometrics, 108(1), pp. 441–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer, H., Jongbloed, B., Benneworth, P., Cremonini, L., Kolster, R., Kottmann, A., Lemmens-Krug, K. & Vossensteyn, H., 2015, Performance-Based Funding and Performance Agreements in Fourteen Higher Education Systems (Enschede, Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies).
   Google Scholar
• Dicker, R., Garcia, M., Kelly, A. & Mulrooney, H., 2019, ‘What does ‘quality’ in higher education mean? Perceptions of staff, students and employers’, Studies in Higher Education, 44(8), pp. 1425–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dill, D.D., & Beerkens, M., 2013, ‘Designing the framework conditions for assuring academic standards: lessons learned about professional, market, and government regulation of academic quality’, Higher Education, 65(3), pp. 341–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA), 2015, Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education (Brussels, ENQA).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2015, Dropout and Completion in Higher Education in Europe (Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2020, A New ERA for Research and Innovation (Brussels, European Commission).
   Google Scholar
• Franzoni, C., Stephan, P. & Veugelers, R., 2021, ‘Funding risky research’, in Lerner, J. & Stern, S. (Eds.), 2021, Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, volume 1, forthcoming, (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Goff, L., Potter, M.K., Pierre, E., Carey, T., Gullage, A., Kustra, E., Lee, R., Lopes, V., Marchall, L., Martin, L., Raffoul, J., Siddiqui, A. & Van Gastel, G., 2015, Learning Outcomes Assessment: A practitioner’s handbook (Toronto, Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario).
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L. & Green, D., 1993, ‘Defining quality’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), pp. 9–34.
   Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, E., 2013, ‘World-class universities or world class systems?: rankings and higher education policy choices’, in Marope, M., Wells, P. & Hazelkorn, E. (Eds.), 2013, Rankings and Accountability in Higher Education: Uses and misuses, pp. 71–95 (Paris, UNESCO).
   Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, E., 2016, ‘Contemporary debates part 1: theorising civic engagement’, in Goddard, J., Hazelkorn, E., Kempton, L. & Vallance, P. (Eds.), 2016, The Civic University: The policy and leadership challenges, pp. 34–64 (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• International Network for Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education (INQAAHE), 2018, INQAAHE Guidelines of Good Practice (Barcelona, INQAAHE).
   Google Scholar
• Johnes, G., 1992, ‘Performance indicators in higher education: a survey of recent work’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 8(2), pp. 19–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnes, J. & Taylor, J., 1990, Performance Indicators in Higher Education: UK universities (Buckingham, Society for Research in Higher Education and Open University Press).
   Google Scholar
• King, D.A., 2004, ‘The scientific impact of nations—what different countries get for their research spending’, Nature, 430(July), pp. 311–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leiber, T., 2019, ‘A general theory of learning and teaching and a related comprehensive set of performance indicators for higher education institutions’, Quality in Higher Education, 25(1), pp. 76–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiber, T., 2022, ‘Justifying, contextualising and operationalising performance indicators of learning and teaching: the role of theories and practice of learning and teaching’, Quality in Higher Education, 28(1).
   Google Scholar
• Machado, D., 2021, ‘Quantitative indicators for high-risk/high-reward research’, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2021/07 (Paris, OECD Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Manatos, M.J., Sarrico, C.S., & Rosa, M.J., 2017, ‘The integration of quality management in higher education institutions: a systematic literature review’, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(1–2), pp. 159–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marginson, S., 2016, ‘High participation systems of higher education’, Journal of Higher Education, 87(2), pp. 243–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmolejo, F., 2016, What Matters Most for Tertiary Education: A framework paper. Systems Approach for Better Education Results (SABER) Working Paper Series, Number 11 (Washington, D.C., World Bank Group).
   Google Scholar
• May, R.M., 1997, ‘The scientific wealth of nations’, Science, 275(5301), pp. 793–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, 2015, The Value of Knowledge. Strategic Agenda for Higher Education and Research 2015–2025 (The Hague, Directorate of Higher Education and Student Grants, Ministry of Education, Culture and Science of the Netherlands).
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Research of Norway,2018, Long-term Plan for Research and Higher Education 2019–2028 (Langtidsplan for forskning og høyere utdanning 2019–2028) (Oslo, Ministry of Education and Research of Norway).
   Google Scholar
• Molas-Gallart, J. & Castro-Martínez, E., 2007, ‘Ambiguity and conflict in the development of ‘Third Mission’ indicators’, Research Evaluation, 16(4), pp. 321–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2015, ‘How is the global talent pool changing (2013, 2030)?’, Education Indicators in Focus, No. 31 (Paris, OECD Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2016, Skills Matter: Further results from the survey of adult skills, OECD Skills Studies. (Paris, OECD Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2017, Benchmarking Higher Education System Performance: Conceptual framework and data. Enhancing higher education system performance (Paris, OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2019a, Benchmarking Higher Education System Performance, Higher Education (Paris, OECD Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2019b, Education at a Glance 2019: OECD indicators (Paris, OECD Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2020a, Education at a Glance 2020: OECD indicators (Paris, OECD Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2020b, ‘Population with tertiary education (indicator)’, Education Attainment. Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/0b8f90e9-en (accessed on 6 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2020c, Resourcing Higher Education: Challenges, choices and consequences, higher education (Paris, OECD Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. & Bouckaert, G., 2017, Public Management Reform: A comparative analysis into the age of austerity, fourth edition (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Power, M., 1997, The Audit Society: Rituals of verification (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, J., 2013, Drop-Out and Completion in Higher Education in Europe among Students from Under-represented Groups (Brussels, European Union).
   Google Scholar
• Sarrico, C.S., 2010, ‘On performance in higher education: towards performance governance?’ Tertiary Education and Management, 16(2), pp. 145–58.
   Google Scholar
• Sarrico, C.S. & Godonoga, A., 2021, ‘Higher education systems rankings and benchmarking’, in Hazelkorn, E. & Mihut, G. (Eds.), 2021, Research Handbook on University Rankings (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Stensaker, B. & Gornitzka, Å., 2009, ‘The ingredients of trust in European higher education’, in Kehm, B.M., Huisman, J. & Stensaker, B. (Eds.), 2009, The European Higher Education Area: Perspectives on a moving target, pp. 125–39 (Rotterdam, Sense).
   Google Scholar
• Stensaker, B. & Harvey, L., 2011, ‘Accountability: understandings and challenges’, in Stensaker, B. & Harvey, L. (Eds.), 2011, Accountability in Higher Education: Global perspectives on trust and power, pp. 7–22, (New York, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, F., 2019, Comment to ‘Has the university building gold rush run its course?’ Architects’ Journal, 31 January 2019. Available at: https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/has-the-university-building-gold-rush-run-its-course (accessed 1 June 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Sustainable Quality Enhancement in Higher Education Learning and Teaching (SQELT -GL), 2020, SQELT Guideline: Performance data governance and management in higher education learning and teaching, Erasmus+ Strategic Partnership SQELT. Available at: https://www.evalag.de/fileadmin/dateien/pdf/forschung_international/sqelt/Intellectual_outputs/sqelt_guideline_pdgm_o11_201130_final_sec.pdf (accessed 1 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Sustainable Quality Enhancement in Higher Education Learning and Teaching (SQELT -PI), 2020, SQELT comprehensive performance indicator set’, Erasmus+ Strategic Partnership SQELT. Available at: https://www.evalag.de/fileadmin/dateien/pdf/forschung_international/sqelt/Intellectual_outputs/sqelt_perfindicset4_o9_201127_final_sec.pdf (accessed 1 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Talbot, C., 2011, Theories of Performance: Organizational and service improvement in the public domain (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Talloires Network, 2014, Call to Action: 2014 Talloires Network Leaders Conference (Cape Town, Talloires Network).
   Google Scholar
• Times Higher Education, 2021, Impact Rankings 2021. Available at: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/impactrankings (accessed 1 June 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Vitae, 2019, The Concordat to Support the Career Development of Researchers. Available at: https://www.vitae.ac.uk/policy/concordat (accessed 1 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• VSNU, NFU, KNAW, NWO, & ZonMw, 2019, Room for everyone’s talent. Position paper, November 2019, The Hague. Available at: https://www.nwo.nl/sites/nwo/files/media-files/2019-Recognition-Rewards-Position-Paper_EN.pdf (accessed 1 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, R., 2018, ‘What do we know—what should we know? Measuring and comparing achievements of learning in European higher education: initiating the new CALOHEE approach’, in Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Toepper, M., Pant, H., Lautenbach, C. & Kuhn, C. (Eds.), 2018, Assessment of Learning Outcomes in Higher Education. Methodology of educational measurement and assessment (Cham, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Veugelers, R. & Stephan, P., 2017, ‘Bias against novelty in science: a cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators’, Research Policy, 46(8), pp. 1416–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingarten, H.P. & Hicks, M., 2018, On Test: Skills. Summary of findings from HEQCO’s skills assessment pilot studies (Toronto, Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario).
   Google Scholar
• Weingarten, H.P., Hicks, M., Jonker, L., Smith, C. & Arnold, H., 2015, Canadian Postsecondary Performance: IMPACT 2015 (Toronto, Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario).
   Google Scholar