Learning-outcomes-based assessments at universities of applied sciences in the Netherlands: perceptions of business lecturers

References

• Agee, J., 2009, ‘Developing qualitative research questions: a reflective process’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 22, pp. 431–47.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. & Krathwohl, D., 2001, A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (New York, Longman).
   Google Scholar
• Armat, M.R., Assarroudi, A., Rad, M., Sharifi, H. & Heydari, A., 2018, ‘Inductive and deductive: ambiguous labels in qualitative content analysis’, The Qualitative Report, 23(1), pp. 219–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendermacher, G.W.G., Oude Egbrink, M.G.A., Wolfhagen, I.H.A.P. & Dolmans, D.H.J.M., 2017, ‘Unravelling quality culture in higher education: a realist review’, Higher Education, 73(1), pp. 39–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. 1996. ‘Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment.’ Higher Education, 32(3), pp. 347–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. & Tang, C., 2011, Teaching for Quality Learning at University (New York, McGraw Hill).
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, M.M.W., Johnson, A.W. & Finelli, C.J. 2018, ‘Developing an observation protocol to categorize formative assessment in engineering courses’, in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition 2018 (Washington, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE)).
   Google Scholar
• Bulmer, M.G., 1979, Principles of Statistics (New York, Dover Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Chari, S., Dashputra, A.V. & Gupta, M., 2018, ‘University examination: the examiners perspective’, Journal of Education Technology in Health Sciences, 5(3), pp.135–38.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. 2018, Research Methods in Education (New York, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• De Tegel, 2013, ‘Slechte scriptie, toch je bul’. Available at www.detegel.info/2013/slechte-scriptie-toch-je-bul/ (accessed 17 May 2021).
   Google Scholar
• European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA), 2005, Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (Helsinki, ENQA).
   Google Scholar
• European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA), 2015, Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (Brussels, EURASHE).
   Google Scholar
• Halbherr, T. & Schlienger, C., 2013, Guidelines on Grading Written Examinations (Zurich, ETH Zurich).
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L. & Williams, J., 2010, ‘Fifteen years of Quality in Higher Education’ (Part Two), Quality in Higher Education, 16(2), pp. 81–113.
   Google Scholar
• Hoger Beroepsonderwijs (HBO), 2012, Vreemde ogen dwingen Eindrapport Commissie externe validering examenkwaliteit hoger beroepsonderwijs (Den Haag, HBO-raad, vereniging van hogescholen).
   Google Scholar
• Holliday, A., 2016, Doing and Writing Qualitative Research (London, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Ilango Sivaraman, S. & Dinesh, K., 2015, ‘Blooms taxonomy- application in exam papers assessment’, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Engineering, 6(9), pp. 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, C., Goksøyr, A., Hjelle, K.L. & Linge, H., 2017, ‘Exams as learning arena: a criterion-based system for justified marking, student feedback, and enhanced constructive alignment’, in Mårtensson, K., Andersson, R., Roxå, T. & Tempte, L. (Eds.), 2017, Transforming Patterns Through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: The 2nd European Conference for The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, pp. 136–40 (Lund, Lund University).
   Google Scholar
• Joughin, G., 2010, ‘The hidden curriculum: a critical review of research into the influence of summative assessment of learning’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), pp. 335–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, B., 1988, How to Market Professional Services (New York, Nichols Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, B.L. & Thornburg, R., 2018, ‘Deduction, induction, and abduction’, in Flick, U. (Ed.), 2018, The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection, pp. 49–64 (Los Angeles, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Komotar, M.H., 2021, ‘Accreditation in European higher education from the comparative perspective: Slovenia and The Netherlands’, Quality in Higher Education, 27(2), pp. 149–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luque-Martínez, T. & Faraoni, N., 2019, ‘Meta-ranking to position world universities’, Studies in Higher Education, 45(4), pp. 819–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynam, S. & Cachia, M., 2018, ‘Students’ perceptions of the role of assessments at higher education’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), pp. 223–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateo, J., 2001, La Investigación Educative (Barcelona, Universidad de Barcelona).
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J.A., 2008, Designing a Qualitative Study. The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods, 2, pp. 214–53 (California, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S.B., 2009, Qualitative Research: A guide to design and implementation, (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass).
   Google Scholar
• Naidoo, R., 2018, ‘The competition fetish in higher education: shamans, mind snares and consequences’, European Educational Research Journal, 17(5), pp. 605–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H., 2015, ‘Qualitative and descriptive research: data type versus data analysis’, Language Teaching Research, 19(2), pp. 129–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (NOS), 2011, ‘Journalistenopleiding Zwolle onder vuur’, [Press release], 21 December 2011. Available at: Journalistenopleiding Zwolle onder vuur | NOS (accessed 17 May 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Newton, J., 2002, ‘Views from below: academics coping with quality’, Quality in Higher Education, 8(1), pp. 39–61.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, L., Floyd, S. & Norton, B., 2019, ‘Lecturers’ views of assessment design, marking and feedback in higher education: a case for professionalisation?’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), pp. 1209–21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuffic, 2018, The Education System in the Netherlands. Available at https://www.nuffic.nl/documents/459/education-system-the-netherlands.pdf (accessed 21 January 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Punch, K.F., 2009, Introduction to Research Methods in Education (London, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Race, P., 2020, The Lecturer's Toolkit: A practical guide to assessment, learning and teaching (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Rauf, A., Abdelwahab, H.R., Chen, D. & Birdsall, P., 2021, ‘University of applied sciences students’ engagement with scientific literature for final year projects: an exploratory study’, International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(9), pp. 287–307.
   Google Scholar
• Sato, B.K., Hill, C.F. & Lo, S.M., 2019, ‘Testing the test: are exams measuring understanding?’, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 47(3), pp. 296–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, K., 2017, ‘The distinction between academic standards and quality: implications for transnational higher education’, Quality in Higher Education, 23(2), pp. 138–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testa, S., Toscano, A. & Rosato, R., 2018, ‘Distractor efficiency in an item pool for statistics classroom exam: assessing its relation with items’ cognitive level classified according to Bloom’s taxonomy’, Frontiers in Psychology, 28 (August) online.
   Google Scholar
• University Alliance, 2021, University Alliance Members, Available at https://www.unialliance.ac.uk/home/member/ (accessed 8 February 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Vlachopoulos, D., 2016, ‘Assuring quality in e-learning course design: the roadmap’, The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(6), pp. 183–205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J., 2016, ‘Quality assurance and quality enhancement: is there a relationship?’, Quality in Higher Education, 22(2), pp. 97–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar