281
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Culturally responsive postsecondary performance measurement: amplifying student perceptions of success

&

References

  • Agarwal, N., Moya, E.M., Yasui, N.Y. & Seymour, C., 2015, ‘Participatory action research with college students with disabilities: photovoice for an inclusive campus’, Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28(2), pp. 243–50.
  • Andrews, J. & Eade, E., 2013, ‘Listening to students: customer journey mapping at Birmingham City University Library and Learning Resources’, New Review of Academic Librarianship, 2, pp. 161–77.
  • Bolman, L.G. & Deal, T.E. 2013, Reframing Organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership, fifth edition (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass).
  • Chalmers, D., 2008, ‘Teaching and learning quality indicators in Australian universities: outcomes of higher education’, Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education (IMHE). Outcomes of Higher Education: Quality, Relevance, and Impact, 8 September.
  • Crazy Bull, C., 2020, ‘Tribal colleges and universities: equity and justice reside in place-based, cultural education’, presented at the Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities Annual Conference, Seattle, United States of America, 18–20 November.
  • Creswell, J.W. & Creswell, J.D., 2018, Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, fifth edition (Washington, Sage).
  • DeLancey, D., 2020, ‘Indigenous evaluation in the Northwest Territories: opportunities and challenges’, Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 34(3), pp. 492–512.
  • Elliott, V., 2018, ‘Thinking about the coding process in qualitative data analysis’, The Qualitative Report, 23(11), pp. 2850–61.
  • Farnell, T., Benneworth, P., Cullum Ilic, B., Seeber, M. & Scukanec Schmidt, N., 2020, TEFCE Toolbox: An institutional self-reflection framework for community engagement in higher education (Zagreb Institute for the Development of Education). Available at: https://www.tefce.eu/toolbox (accessed 11 April 2022).
  • Fine, M., 2017, Just Research in Contentious Times: Widening the methodological imagination (New York, Teachers College Press).
  • Frierson, H.T., Hood, S. & Hughes, G., 2002, ‘Section IV: A guide to conducting culturally responsive evaluations’, in Frechtling, J. (Ed.), The 2002 User-friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation, pp. 63–76 (Alexandria, National Science Foundation).
  • Greene, A.C. & Sanchez, S., 2018, ‘Wicked problems, flying monkeys, and prec(ar)ious lives: a matter of time?’, in Fine, M. (Ed.), 2018, Just Research in Contentious Times: Widening the methodological imagination, pp. 49–70 (New York, Teachers College Press).
  • Hamshire, C., Forsythe, R., Bell, A., Benton, M., Kelly-Laubsher, R., Paxton, M. & Wolfgramm-Foliaki, E., 2017, ‘The potential for student narratives to enhance quality in higher education’, Quality in Higher Education, 23(1), pp. 50–64.
  • Helena College, n.d., Necessary narratives. Available at: https://www.necessarynarratives.org/ (accessed 12 April 2022).
  • Hoare, A. & Goad P., 2021, ‘NWCCU quality culture project: from invitation to inclusion’, The Beacon, 3(3), np. Available at https://nwccu.org/v3i3-nwccu-quality-culture-project-from-invitation-to-inclusion/ (accessed 12 April 2022).
  • Hoare, A. & Hu, J., 2017, ‘Employer perspectives on EAL employee writing problems’, Comparative and International Education, 46(1), pp. 1–19.
  • Hood, S., 2014, ‘How will we know it when we see it? A critical friend perspective of the GEDI program and its legacy in evaluation’, in Collins, P. & Hopson, R.K. (Eds.), 2014, Building a New Generation of Culturally Responsive Evaluators: Contributions of the American Evaluation Association’s graduate education diversity internship program, pp. 109–21 (Washington, Jossey Bass).
  • Kirkhart, K.E., 2010, ‘Eyes on the prize: multicultural validity and evaluation theory’, American Journal of Evaluation, 31(3), pp. 400–413.
  • LeBoeuf, R., 2020, ‘SNHU center using student data to improve teaching and learning’, Southern New Hampshire (SNHU) Newsroom. Available at: https://www.snhu.edu/about-us/newsroom/2020/01/center-for-teaching-and-learning (accessed 12 April 2022).
  • Martin, J., 2005, ‘Meta-theoretical controversies in studying organizational culture’, in Knudsen, C. & Tsoukas, H. (Eds.), 2005, The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Theory, pp. 1–29 (New York, Oxford University Press).
  • McCormack, T., Schnee, E. & Vanora, J., 2014, ‘Researching up: triangulating qualitative research to influence the public debate of “on-time” college graduation’, Teachers College Record, 116(4), pp. 1–35.
  • Mertens, D.M., 2020, Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods, fifth edition (Washington, Sage).
  • Meyerhoff, L., 2020, ‘Cornell University: ripple-effect mapping’, Equity Case Study, National Institute for Learning Outcomes and Assessment. Available at: https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Cornell-Equity-Case.pdf (accessed 12 April 2022).
  • NSSE, n.d., ‘How do institutions use their student comments?’, Indiana University, Available at: https://nsse.indiana.edu/nsse/administering-nsse/customizing-nsse/open-ended-prompts-and-students-comments-report.html (accessed 12 April 2022).
  • Patton, M.Q., 2018, Principles-focused Evaluation: The GUIDE (New York, The Guilford Press).
  • Shavelson, R., 2009, Measuring College Learning Responsibly: Accountability in a new era (Stanford, Stanford University Press).
  • Study Group on the Conditions of Excellence in American Higher Education, 1984, ‘Involvement in learning: realizing the potential of American higher education’, a report to the National Institute of Education, US Department of Education (Washington, US Government Printing Office).
  • Thomas, V.G. & Campbell, P.B., 2021, Evaluation in Today’s World: Respecting diversity, improving quality, and promoting usability, first edition (Washington, Sage).
  • Thompson Rivers University, 2021, Research Core Theme Workbook. Available at: https://www.tru.ca/about/tru-mission-statement/themes/research.html (accessed 12 April 2022).
  • Tinto, V., 1994, Leaving College: Rethinking the causes and curses of student attrition, second edition (Chicago, The University of Chicago Press).
  • Tinto, V., 2017, ‘Through the eyes of students’, Journal of College Student Retention: Research, theory & practice, 19(3), pp. 254–69.
  • van Note Chism, N. & Banta, T.W., 2007, ‘Enhancing institutional assessment efforts through qualitative methods’, New Directions for Institutional Research, 136, pp. 15–28.
  • Weatherton, M. & Schussler, E.E., 2021, ‘Success for all? A call to re-examine how student success is defined in higher education’, CBE-Life Sciences Education, 20(3), pp. 1–13.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.