Teacher activist organizations and the development of professional agency

References

• Achinstein, B., & Ogawa, R. T. (2006). (In)Fidelity: What the resistance of new teachers reveals about professional principles and prescriptive educational policies. Harvard Educational Review, 76, 30–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Federation of Teacher. (2014). Stand with Philadelphia petition. Retrieved from http://action.aft.org/c/44/p/dia/action3/common/public/?action_KEY=6810
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. (2010). Embedded, emboldened, and (net)working for change: Support-seeking and teacher agency in urban, high-needs schools. Harvard Educational Review, 80, 541–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, K. T., & Edwards, B. (2004). Advocacy organizations in the U.S. political process. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 479–506.10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18, 215–228.10.1080/0268093022000043065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, B. (2012). Do I care about the union? Teacher Action Group – Philadelphia. Retrieved from http://tagphilly.org/?page_id=407
   Google Scholar
• Day, C. (2002). School reform and transitions in teacher professionalism and identity. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 677–692.10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00065-X
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., & Sachs, J. (2004). Professionalism, performativity and empowerment: Discourses in the politics, policies and purposes of continuing professional development. In C. Day & J. Sachs (Eds.), International handbook of the continuing professional development of teachers (pp. 3–32). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2009). The research act: A theoretical orientation to sociological methods. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers. ( Original work published in 1970).
   Google Scholar
• Dovemark, M. (2010). Teachers’ collective actions, alliances and resistance within neo-liberal ideas of education: The example of the individual programme. European Educational Research Journal, 9, 232–244.10.2304/eerj
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. (2005). Relational agency: Learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 168–182.10.1016/j.ijer.2006.06.010
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962–1023.10.1086/ajs.1998.103.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faces of the Layoffs. (2013). About the project. Retrieved from http://facesofthelayoffs.org/about-the-project/
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 94–118.10.2307/3556620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flipping the Script. (n.d.). Teacher action group – Philadelphia. Retrieved from http://tagphilly.org/?page_id=357
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching, 6, 151–182.10.1080/713698714
   Google Scholar
• Hilferty, F. (2008). Theorising teacher professionalism as an enacted discourse of power. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29, 161–173.10.1080/01425690701837521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitlin, S., & Elder, G. (2007). Time, self, and the curiously abstract concept of agency. Sociological Theory, 25, 170–191.10.1111/soth.2007.25.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. C. (2006). Nonprofit organizations and political advocacy. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed., pp. 307–332). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Labaree, D. F. (2000). On the nature of teaching and teacher education: Difficult practices that look easy. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 228–233.10.1177/0022487100051003011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linardopoulos, H. (2012). Flawed rhetoric and discord in education reform. Teacher Action Group – Philadelphia. Retrieved from http://tagphilly.org/?page_id=410
   Google Scholar
• Lipman, P. (2009). Paradoxes of teaching in neo-liberal times: Education ‘reform’ in Chicago. In S. Gewirtz, P. Mahony, I. Hextall, & A. Cribb (Eds.), Changing teacher professionalism. International trends, challenges, and ways forward (pp. 67–80). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lipponen, L., & Kumpulainen, K. (2011). Acting as accountable authors: Creating interactional spaces for agency work in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 812–819.10.1016/j.tate.2011.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., & Scott, W. R. (2005). Organizations and movements. In G. F. Davis, D. McAdam, W. R. Scott, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Social movements and organization theory (pp. 4–40). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791000
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, J. (2013). How paradigms create politics: The transformation of American educational policy, 1980–2001. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 285–324.10.3102/0002831212471417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1978). The structure of educational organizations. In M. W. Meyer (Ed.), Environments and organizations (pp. 78–109). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pulcinella, B. (2012). What I learned about successful organizing from the Chicago teachers strike leaders. Teacher Action Group – Philadelphia. Retrieved from http://thenotebook.org/blog/125386/what-i-learned-about-successful
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2012). Do comprehensive school teachers perceive themselves as active professional agents in school reforms? Journal of Educational Change, 13, 95–116.10.1007/s10833-011-9171-0
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2015). Teachers’ professional agency and learning – From adaption to active modification in the teacher community. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice. doi:10.1080/13540602.2014.995483
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, S. (2012). Constructing teacher agency in response to the constraints of education policy: Adoption and adaptation. Curriculum Journal, 23, 231–245.10.1080/09585176.2012.678702
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, W. H., Jr. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29.10.1086/ajs.1992.98.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teacher Action Group. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from http://tagphilly.org/
   Google Scholar
• Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1997). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitty, G. (2008). Changing modes of teacher professionalism: Traditional, managerial, collaborative and democratic. In B. Cunningham (Ed.), Exploring professionalism (pp. 28–49). London: Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar