Using ‘big ideas’ to enhance teaching and student learning

References

• Alvarado, C., Canada, F., Garritzc, A., & Melladob, V. (2015). Canonical pedagogical content knowledge by CoRes for teaching acid–base chemistry at high school. Chemistry education research and practice, 16, 603–618.10.1039/C4RP00125G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2008). National science curriculum: Framing paper. Canberra: National Curriculum Board.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2012). Shape of the Australian science curriculum. Retrieved August 22, 2012, from http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/Australian_Curriculum_-_Science.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baird, J., & Mitchell, I. (1986). Improving the quality of teaching and learning: An Australian case study – The PEEL project. Melbourne: Monash University Printery.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, A., Loughran, J., & Van Driel, J. (2008). Revisiting the roots of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1271–1279.10.1080/09500690801998885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Some features of children’s ideas and their implications for teaching. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children’s ideas in science (pp. 193–201). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fensham, P. J. (1984). Nyholm lecture. Conceptions, misconceptions, and alternative frameworks in chemical education. Chemical Society Reviews, 13, 199–217.10.1039/cs9841300199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunstone, R., & Mitchell, I. (1998). Metacognition and conceptual change. In J. Mintzes, J. R. Wandersee, & J. Novak (Ed.), Teaching science for understanding (pp. 133–163). San Diego, CA, Academic Press
   Google Scholar
• Hasweh, M. (2005). Teacher pedagogical constructions: A reconfiguration of pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers and Teaching, 11, 273–292.10.1080/13450600500105502
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, E., Kysh, J., Ramage, K., & Resek, D. (2007). Seeking big ideas in algebra: The evolution of a task. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 325–332.10.1007/s10857-007-9055-7
   Google Scholar
• Hume, A., & Berry, A. (2011). Constructing CoRes – A strategy for building PCK in pre-service science teacher education. Research in Science Education, 41, 341–355.10.1007/s11165-010-9168-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacs, M., Corrigan, D., & Mitchell, I. (2008). Science curriculum resources: The interface between policy, research and practice. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australasian Science Education Research Association conference, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, I., & Mitchell, J. (2011a). Taking metacognition a step further: Teachers sharing pedagogical purposes. In A. Lauriala, R. Rajala, H. Ruokamo, & O. Ylitapio-Mäntylä (Eds.), Navigating in Educational Contexts (pp. 117–136).10.1007/978-94-6091-522-2
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, I., & Mitchell, J. (2011b). Change as journey. Paper presented at the International Society for the Study of Teaching and Teacher Education, Braga, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (2012). Five big ideas. Mathematics Teaching, 227, 49–50.
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (2000). What’s the big idea? Toward a pedagogy of idea power. IBM Systems Journal, 39, 720–729.10.1147/sj.393.0720
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. (1992). Smart schools: From training memories to educating minds. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchhart, R. (1999). Generative topics: Building a curriculum around big ideas. Teaching Children Mathematics, 5, 462.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–23.10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieman, D., Bleckly, J., & Neal, D. (2012). Working with big ideas in number and the Australian curriculum: Mathematics In B. Atweh, D. Siemen, R. Jorgenson, & M. Goos (Eds.), Engaging the Australian national curriculum: Mathematics – Perspectives from the field (pp. 19–45). Online Publication: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., & Girod, M. (2003). John Dewey & psychologizing the subject-matter: Big ideas, ambitious teaching, and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 295–307.10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00016-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education and other essays. Old Tappan, NJ: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteley, M. (2012). Big ideas: A close look at the Australian history curriculum. Agora, 47, 41–45.
   Google Scholar
• Woolnough, J. (2008). Developing preservice teachers’ science PCK using content representations. Paper presented at the paper prepared for ASERA2008, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar