Enfranchising the profession through evaluation: a story from Australia

References

• Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., & Sander, W. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public high schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25, 95–135.10.1086/508733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2013). Australian Teacher Performance & Development Framework. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/verve/_resources/Australian_Teacher_Performance_and_Development_Framework.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2016). Teacher toolkit – Self-assessment & reflection. Retrieved from www.toolkit.aitsl.edu.au/category/self-assessment-reflection
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, T. V., Hattie, J., Dinham, S., Scull, J., & Clinton, J. M. (2014). Proposing a comprehensive model for identifying teaching candidates. The Australian Educational Researcher, 41(4), 365–380. doi:10.1007/s13384-014-0146-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton, J. M. (2015, March 2). Embrace career long evaluation. Education Review, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, J. M., Anderson, M., Dawson, G., Dawson, A., Bolton, S., & Mason, R. (2016). Systems, frameworks and measures of teacher effectiveness. Melbourne: Centre for Program Evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, J. M., Cairns, K., Dabrowski, A., & Brcan, S. (2014). Making teaching and learning visible: A report to the education endowment foundation. University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, J. M., Cairns, K., McLaren, P., & Simpson, S. (2014, August). Evaluation of the Victorian Deaf Education Institute real-time captioning pilot program. Final Report. The University of Melbourne, Centre for Program Evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, J., Dinham, S., Savage, G., Aston, R., Dabrowski, A., Gullickson, A., ... Arbour, G. (2015, November). Evaluation of the Australian professional standards for teachers: Final report. Centre for Program Evaluation, The University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, J. M., Lewsey, J., & Arifin, D. (2016, September). Predictive capacity of cognitive and non-cognitive characteristics of preservice teachers on course performance. A paper presented at the European Educational Research Congress, Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–44.10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, S. I., Gooler, L. E., & Scriven, M. (2002). Strategies for managing evaluation anxiety: Toward a psychology of program evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 23(3), 261–273.10.1177/109821400202300303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, L., & Timperley, H. (2015). Evaluative thinking for successful educational innovation. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 122. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrxtk1jtdwf-en
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C., O’Malley, K., & Eveleigh, F. (2014). Australian teachers and the learning environment: An analysis of teacher response to TALIS 2013. Final Report. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/talis/2
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2015). What doesn't work in education: The politics of distraction. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. M. (2012). Teacher evaluation needs to support teacher growth. Pennsylvania Educational Leadership, 32(1), 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A. D., & Kane, T. J. (2013). The reliability of classroom observations by school personnel (Research Paper. MET Project). Seattle, WA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, B. (2010). What teachers want: Better teacher management. Retrieved from https://grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/033_report_what_teachers_want.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leigh, A. (2010, June). Estimating teacher effectiveness from two-year changes in students’ test scores. Economics of Education Review, 29(3), 480–488.10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, K. (2016). It’s time to rethink teacher supervision and evaluation. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(10), 727–735.
   Google Scholar
• Milstein, B., Chapel, T. J., Wetterhall, S. F., & Cotton, D. A. (2002). Building capacity for program evaluation at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. New Directions for Evaluation, 2002(93), 27–46.10.1002/(ISSN)1534-875X
   Google Scholar
• Nuttal, G. (2007). The hidden lives of learners. Wellington: NZCER Press.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). Key Findings from the Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS). Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/australia/TALIS-2013-country-note-Australia.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Skipp, A., & Tanner, E. (2015). The Visible Classroom: Evaluation report and executive summary. London: The Education Endowment Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Stronge, J. H. (2005). Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice. Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, P. D., & Stronge, J. H. (2005). Linking teacher evaluation and student learning. Arlington, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Zwozdiak-Myers, P. (2012). The teacher’s reflective practice handbook: Becoming an extended professional through capturing evidence-informed practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar