Teacher evaluation in Portugal: persisting challenges and perceived effects

References

• Araújo, P. C. (2011). Avaliação do Desempenho Docente na Perspetiva Dos Professores Avaliadores [Teacher Evaluation in the light of the Teacher Evaluators] ( Unpublished Master degree dissertation). Braga: University of Minho.
   Google Scholar
• Asseal, J., & Pavez, J. (2008). La construccion e implementacion del sistema de evaluacion del desempeño docente chileno: Principales tensiones y desafíos [The construction and implementation of the teacher evaluation system in Chile: Main tensions and dilemmas]. Revista Iberoamaricana de Evaluacion Educativa, 1, 41–55.
   Google Scholar
• Avalos, B. (2004). Teacher regulatory forces and accountability policies in Chile: From public servants to accountable professionals. Research Papers in Education, 19, 67–85.10.1080/0267152032000179981
   Google Scholar
• Avalos, B. (2010). O sistema chileno de avaliação do desempenho docente. In M. A. Flores (Ed.), A avaliação de professores numa perspectiva internacional: Sentidos e implicações (pp. 45–64). Porto: Areal Editores.
   Google Scholar
• Avalos, B. (2018). Teacher evaluation in Chile: Highlights and complexities in thirteen years of experience. Teachers and Teaching Theory and Practice, 24(3), 297–311. doi:10.1080/13540602.2017.1388228
   Google Scholar
• Avalos, B., & Assael, J. (2006). Moving from resistance to agreement: The case of the Chilean teacher performance evaluation. International Journal of Educational Research, 45, 254–266.10.1016/j.ijer.2007.02.004
   Google Scholar
• Barzanò, G., & Grimaldi, E. (2013). Discourses of merit: The hot potato of teacher evaluation in Italy. Journal of Education Policy, 28, 767–791.10.1080/02680939.2013.774439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandon, J., Hollweck, T., Donlevy, K., & Whalen, C. (2018). Teacher supervision and evaluation challenges: Canadian perspectives on overall instructional leadership. Teachers and Teaching Theory and Practice, 24(3), 263–280. doi:10.1080/13540602.2018.1425678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, A., Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Taking context seriously: Towards explaining policy enactments in the secondary school. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of Education, 32, 585–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, A., Maguire, M., & Ball, S. (2011). Policy enactments in the UK secondary school: Examining policy, practice and school positioning. Journal of Education Policy, 25, 547–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. W., & Derrington, M. L. (2018). High-stakes teacher evaluation policy: U.S. principals’ perspectives and variations in practice. Teachers and Teaching Theory and Practice, 24(3), 246–262. doi:10.1080/13540602.2017.1421164
   Google Scholar
• Chow, A. P. Y., Wong, E. K. P., Yeung, A. S., & Mo, K. W. (2002). Teachers’ perceptions of appraiser/appraise relationships. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16, 85–101.10.1023/A:1020096127713
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, J., & Dawson ,G. (2018). Enfranchising the profession through evaluation: A story from Australia. Teachers and Teaching Theory and Practice, 24(3), 312–327. doi:10.1080/13540602.2017.1421162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A. E., & Pease, S. R. (1983). Teacher evaluation in the organizational context: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 53, 285–328.10.3102/00346543053003285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, C., & Sachs, J. (2004). Professionalism, performativity and empowerment: Discourses in the politics, policies and purposes of continuing professional development. In C. Day & J. Sachs (Eds.), International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers (pp. 3–32). Maindenhead: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., Flores, M. A., & Viana, I. (2007). Effects of national policies on teachers’ sense of professionalism: Findings from an empirical study in Portugal and in England. European Journal of Teacher Education, 30, 249–266.10.1080/02619760701486092
   Google Scholar
• Decree-Law 15/2007.
   Google Scholar
• Decree-Law 2/2008.
   Google Scholar
• Decree-Law 26/2012.
   Google Scholar
• Derrington, M. L. (2014). Teacher evaluation initial policy implementation: Superintendent and principal perceptions. Planning and Changing, 45, 120–137.
   Google Scholar
• Derrington, M. L., & Campbell, J. W. (2013). The changing conditions of instructional leadership: Principals’ perceptions of teacher evaluation accountability mandates. In B. G. Barnett, A. S. Shoho, & A. J. Bowers (Eds.), School and district leadership in an era of accountability (pp. 231–251). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Derrington, M. L., & Campbell, J. W. (2015). Implementing new teacher evaluation systems: Principals’ concerns and supervisor support. Journal of Educational Change, 16, 305–326.10.1007/s10833-015-9244-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, M. A. (2009). Da avaliação de professores: Reflexões sobre o caso português [On teacher evaluation: Reflections from the Portuguese case]. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluation Educativa, 2, 239–246.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, M. A. (2010a). A avaliação de Professores numa Perspectiva Internacional: Sentidos e Implicações [Teacher evaluation from an international perspective: Meanings and implications]. Porto: Areal Editores.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, M. A. (2010b). Teacher performance appraisal in Portugal: The (im)possibilities of a contested model. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 15, 41–60.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, M. A. (2012). The implementation of a new policy on teacher appraisal in Portugal: How do teachers experience it at school? Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 24, 351–368.10.1007/s11092-012-9153-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, M. A. (2014). Profissionalismo e Liderança dos Professores [Teacher professionalism and leadership]. Santo Tirso: De Facto Editores.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, M. A., & Derrington, M. L. (2017). School principals’ views of teacher evaluation policy: Lessons learned from two empirical studies. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(4), 416–431.10.1080/13603124.2015.1094144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Hadji, C. (2010). A avaliação de professores em França. Da inspeção ao acompanhamento pedagógico? In M. A. Flores (Ed.), A avaliação de professores numa perspectiva internacional: Sentidos e implicações (pp. 111–140). Porto: Areal Editores.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., Heck, R. H., & Murphy, J. (2014). Teacher evaluation and school improvement: An analysis of the evidence. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26, 5–28.10.1007/s11092-013-9179-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsuno, M. (2010). Teacher evaluation in Japanese schools: An examination from a micro-political or relational viewpoint. Journal of Education Policy, 25, 293–307.10.1080/02680931003700431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapo, M. J., & Flores, M. A. (2016). Formação e(m) avaliação do desempenho docente: Contributos para o desenvolvimento profissional. In M. A. Flores, M. L. Carvalho, & C. Silva (Eds.), Formação e aprendizagem profissional de professores: Contextos e experiências (pp. 189–203). Santo Tirso: De Facto Editores.
   Google Scholar
• Lavinge, A. L., & Chamberlain, R. W. (2017). Teacher evaluation in Illinois: School leaders’ perceptions and practices. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability., 29, 179–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., & Zhao, D. (2013). Teacher evaluation in China; latest trends and future directions. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 25, 321–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., Xu, S., & Stronge, J. (2016). Chinese middle school teachers’ preferences regarding performance evaluation measures. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28, 161–177.10.1007/s11092-016-9237-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, L. N. K. (2012). Issues in teacher professionalism and performativity:Introduction. In C. Day (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of teacher and school development (pp. 13–18). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, F., Taut, S., & Schaaf, K. (2016). Classroom observation for evaluating and improving teaching: An international perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 49, 15–29.10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midddlewood, D. & Cardno, C. (Eds.). (2001). Managing teacher appraisal and performance. A comparative approach. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). Teachers for the 21st century: Using evaluation to improve teaching. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Oolbekkink-Marchand, H. W., Hadar, L. L., Smith, K., & Helleve, I. (2017). Teachers’ perceived professional space and their agency. Teaching and Teacher Education, 62, 37–46.10.1016/j.tate.2016.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovando, M. N., & Ramirez, A. (2007). Principals’ instructional leadership within a teacher performance appraisal system: Enhancing students’ academic success. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20, 85–110.10.1007/s11092-007-9048-1
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, P., & Comeaux, M. A. (1990). Evaluating the systems: Teachers’ perspectives on teacher evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 3–24.10.3102/01623737012001003
   Google Scholar
• Retallick, J., & Fink, D. (2002). Framing leadership: Contributions and impediments to educational change. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 5, 91–104.10.1080/13603120110112864
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. (2016). Teacher professionalism: Why are we still talking about it? Teachers and Teaching Theory and practice, 22(4), 413–425.10.1080/13540602.2015.1082732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago, P., Roseveare, D., van Amelsvoort, G., Manzi, J., & Matthews, P. (2009). Teacher evaluation in Portugal. OECD Report.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, K. (2012). Lessons from Korea. Educational Leadership, 7, 75–78.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, I. M. L. P., & Conboy, J. E. (2004). Representações dos professores sobre a avaliação do desempenho docente: O que avaliar? Como avaliar? Revista Portuguesa de Educação, XXIV, 119–150.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72, 387–431.10.3102/00346543072003387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stronge, J. H. (2006). Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.10.4135/9781412990202
   Google Scholar
• Stronge, J. H. (2010). O que funciona, de facto, na Avaliação de Professores: Breves Considerações [What works in teacher evaluation? An introduction]. In M. A. Flores (Ed.), A Avaliação de Professores numa Perspectiva Internacional: Sentidos e Implicações [Teacher evaluation from an international perspective: Meanings and implications] (pp. 22–44). Porto: Areal Editores.
   Google Scholar
• Su, Y., Feng, L., & Hsu, C.-H. (2017). Accountability or authenticity? The alignment of professional development and teacher evaluation. Teachers and Teaching Theory and Practice, 23(6), 717–728.10.1080/13540602.2016.1255189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. S., & Robinson, V. M. J. (1997). The problem of policy implementation: The case of performance appraisal. School Leadership and Management, 17, 333–345.10.1080/13632439769890
   Google Scholar
• Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2009). Teachers’ perception of the new teacher evaluation policy: A validity study of the policy characteristics scale. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 924–930.10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2010). The influence of school leadership on teachers’ perception of teacher evaluation policy. Educational Studies, 36, 521–536.10.1080/03055691003729054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2011). Stimulating professional learning through teacher evaluation: An impossible task for the school leader? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 891–899.10.1016/j.tate.2011.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2017). The role of feedback from the school leader during teacher evaluation for teacher and school improvement. Teaching and Teaching Theory and Practice, 23(1), 6–24.10.1080/13540602.2016.1203770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2018). Teacher evaluation policy as perceived by school principals: The case of Flanders (Belgium). Teachers and Teaching Theory and Practice, 24(3), 209–222. doi:10.1080/13540602.2017.1397508
   Google Scholar
• Vaillant, D. (2008). Algunos marcos referenciales en el evaluación del desempeño docente [Framework for teacher evaluation]. Revista Iberoamaricana de Evaluacion Educativa, 1, 7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Berg, R., Vandenberghe, R., & Sleegers, P. (1999). Management of innovations from a cultural-individual perspective. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10, 321–351.10.1076/sesi.10.3.321.3500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt, R., Smyth, L. F., & Vandenberghe, R. (2001). Implementing educational policy at the school level. Organization, dynamics and concerns. Journal of Educational Administration, 39, 8–23.10.1108/09578230110366883
   Google Scholar
• Vekeman, E., Devos, G., & Tuytens, M. (2015). The influence of teachers’ expectations on principals’ implementation of a new teacher evaluation policy in Flemish secondary education. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 27, 129–151.10.1007/s11092-014-9203-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, J. S., & Haymore Sandholtz, J. (2009). Constrained professionalism: Dilemmas of teaching in the face of test based accountability. Teachers College Record, 111(4), 1065–1114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar