806
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Teacher agency in collaborative lesson planning: stabilising or transforming professional practice?

ORCID Icon
Pages 555-567 | Received 06 Oct 2020, Accepted 24 Mar 2022, Published online: 12 Apr 2022

References

  • Babichenko, M., Segal, A., & Asterhan, C. S. C. (2021). Associations between problem framing and teacher agency in school-based workgroup discussions of problems of practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103417
  • Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2014). InterViews. SAGE Publications.
  • Camphuijsen, M. K., Møller, J., & Skedsmo, G. (2020). Test-based accountability in the Norwegian context: Exploring drivers, expectations and strategies. Journal of Education Policy, 36(5), 624–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1739337
  • Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
  • Cong-Lem, N. (2021). Teacher agency: A systematic review of international literature. Issues in Educational Research, 31(3), 718–738.
  • Damşa, C. I., Froehlich, D. E., & Gegenfurtner, A. (2017). Reflections on empirical and methodological accounts of agency at work. In: Goller, M., Paloniemi, S. (eds) Agency at Work. Professional and Practice-based Learning, 20, 445–461. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0_22
  • Edwards, A. (2015). Recognising and realising teachers professional agency. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(6), 779–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044333
  • Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
  • Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001
  • Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556620
  • Goller, M., & Harteis, C. (2017). Human agency at work: Towards a clarification and operationalisation of the concept. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic Professional and Practice-based Learning, 20, 85–103. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0_5
  • Hargreaves, Andy. (1991). Contrived collegiality: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration. In Blase, J. (Ed.),The Politics of Life in Schools: Power, Conflict, and Cooperation, (pp. 80–94). New York: Corwin Press
  • Hargreaves, Andy. (2015). Autonomy and transparency: Two good ideas gone bad. In Jelmer Evers & Rene Kneyber (Eds.), Flip the system: Changing education from the ground up (pp. 120–133). Routledge.
  • Hermansen, H. (2017). Knowledge relations and epistemic infrastructures as mediators of teachers’ collective autonomy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 65, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.003
  • Hopwood, N. (2017). Agency, learning and knowledge work: Epistemic dilemmas in professional practices. In: Goller, M., Paloniemi, S. (eds) Agency at Work. Professional and Practice-based Learning, 20, 121–140. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0_7
  • Horn, I. S., & Little, J. W. (2010). Attending to problems of practice: Routines and resources for professional learning in teachers’ workplace interactions. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345158
  • Insulander, E., Brehmer, D., & Ryve, A. (2019). Teacher agency in professional development programmes – A case study of professional development material and collegial discussion. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 23, 100330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100330
  • Jerolmack, C., & Khan, S. (2017). The analytic lenses of ethnography. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 3, 237802311773525. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117735256
  • Kelchtermans, G. (2006). Teacher collaboration and collegiality as workplace conditions. A review. Zeitschrift Für Pädagogik, 52(2), 220–237. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:4454
  • Kelchtermans, G. (2015). Learning from ‘good examples of practice. Teachers and Teaching, 21(4), 361–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.969103
  • Kirsten, N., & Wermke, W. (2017). Governing teachers by professional development: State programmes for continuing professional development in Sweden since 1991. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(3), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1151082
  • Larssen, D. L. S., Cajkler, W., Mosvold, R., Bjuland, R., Helgevold, N., Fauskanger, J., Wood, P., Baldry, F., Jakobsen, A., Bugge, H. E., Næsheim-Bjørkvik, G., & Norton, J. (2018). A literature review of lesson study in initial teacher education. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 7(1), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-06-2017-0030
  • Lefstein, A., Louie, N., Segal, A., & Becher, A. (2019). Taking stock of research on teacher collaborative discourse: Theory and method in a nascent field. Teaching and Teacher Education, 88, 102954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102954
  • Lindvall, J., & Ryve, A. (2019). Coherence and the positioning of teachers in professional development programs. A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 27, 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.03.005
  • Mausethagen, S. (2021). Negotiating professionalism. In: Eckhardt Larsen, Jesper, Schulte, Barbara, W. Thue, Fredrik (Eds.), Schoolteachers and the Nordic Model (pp. 190–202). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003082514-15
  • Mausethagen, S., & Smeby, J.-C. (2016). Contemporary education policy and teacher professionalism. In M. Dent, I. L. Bourgeault, & J.-L. Denis (Eds.), The Routledge companion to the professions and professionalism (pp. 329–343). Routledge.
  • Noordegraaf, M. (2007). From “Pure” to “Hybrid” professionalism. Administration & Society, 39(6), 761–785. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707304434
  • Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S. (2005). Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), 793–815. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth070
  • Philpott, C., & Oates, C. (2017). Teacher agency and professional learning communities; what can learning rounds in Scotland teach us? Professional Development in Education, 43(3), 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1180316
  • Priestley, M.ark, Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: What is it and why does it matter? In: Evers, Jelmer, Kneyber, Rene (Eds.), Flip the System: Changing Education from the Ground Up (pp. 134–148). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315678573.
  • Servage, L. (2009). Who is the “Professional”in a professional learning community? An exploration of teacher professionalism in collaborative professional development settings. Canadian Journal of Education, 32(1), 149–171.
  • Shavard, G. (2021). From school improvement to student cases: Teacher collaborative work as a context for professional development. Professional Development in Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1879216
  • Spillane, J. P. (2012). Data in practice: Conceptualizing the data-based decision-making phenomena. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 113–141. https://doi.org/10.1086/663283
  • Toom, Auli. (2019). Shaping teacher identities and agency for the profession: contextual factors and surrounding communities. Teachers and teaching: Theory and practice, 25(8), 915–917. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1703619
  • Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., Packer, T., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.001
  • Weddle, H. (2021). Approaches to studying teacher collaboration for instructional improvement: A review of literature. Educational Research Review, 35, 100415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100415
  • Wermke, W., & Prøitz, Tine S. (2021). Integration, fragmentation, and complexity. In Eckhardt Larsen, Jesper, Schulte, Barbara Schulte, Fredrik W. Thue, W. Thue, Fredrik (Eds.), Schoolteachers and the Nordic Model (pp. 216–228). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003082514-17

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.