Primary school teachers’ perspectives on the quality of inclusive education

References

• Ainscow, M., Dyson, A., & Weiner, S. (2013). From exclusion to inclusion: Ways of responding in schools to students with special educational needs. CfBT Education Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. J. K., Klassen, R. M., & Georgiou, G. K. (2007). Inclusion in Australia: What teachers say they need and what school psychologists can offer. School Psychology International, 28(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034307078086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV Model of teachers’ professional competence. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.) Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers. Mathematics teacher education (Vol. 8, pp. 25–48). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_2
   Google Scholar
• Bešić, E., Paleczek, L., Krammer, M., & Gasteiger-Klicpera, B. (2017). Inclusive practices at the teacher and class level: The experts’ view. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(3), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1240339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhm, A. (2012). Theoretisches Codieren: Textanalyse in der Grounded Theory [Theoretical coding: Text analysis in the grounded theory]. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), Qualitative Forschung. Ein Handbuch (pp. 475–485). Rowohlt.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2016). The Index for Inclusion: A guide to school development led by inclusive values. Index for Inclusion Network.
   Google Scholar
• Buehl, M. M., & Beck, J. S. (2015). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and teachers’ practices. In H. Fives & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (pp. 66–84). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burkhardt, F., Fuchs, D., von Knebel, U., & Roßmann, M. (2019). Gelingensbedingungen inklusiven Unterrichts aus der Sicht von Lehrkräften [Felicity conditions of inclusive education from the perspective of teachers]. Forschung Sprache, 7(3), 107–119.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (1996). The search for meanings – Grounded theory. In J. A. Smith, R. Harré, & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 27–49). SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
   Google Scholar
• Davis, P., & Florian, L. (2004). Teaching strategies and approaches for pupils with special educational needs: A scoping study (Research Report RR516). DfES.
   Google Scholar
• Downing, J. E., & Peckham-Hardin, K. D. (2007). Inclusive education: What makes it a good education for students with moderate to severe disabilities? Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.32.1.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education. (2003). Inclusive education and effective classroom practices. European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education.
   Google Scholar
• European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education. (2012). Profile of inclusive teachers. European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, D. L. (2008). International trends in inclusive education: The continuing challenge to teach each one and everyone. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 23(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250801946236
   Google Scholar
• Feyerer, E. (2013). LehrerInnenbildung im Umbruch. Aktuelle Entwicklungen in Österreich [Teacher education in transition. Current developments in Austria]. In G. Feuser & T. Maschke (Eds.), Lehrerbildung auf dem Prüfstand. Welche Qualifikationen braucht die inklusive Schule? (pp. 181–212). Psychosozial-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, S. Graham, J. M. Royer, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook. Vol. 2. Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (pp. 471–499). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13274-019
   Google Scholar
• Florian, L., & Camedda, D. (2020). Enhancing teacher education for inclusion. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(1), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1707579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florian, L., & Linklater, H. (2010). Preparing teachers for inclusive education: Using inclusive pedagogy to enhance teaching and learning for all. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2010.526588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidlund, U., & Boström, L. (2017). What is inclusive didactics? Teachers’ understanding of inclusive didactics for students with EBD in Swedish mainstream schools. International Education Studies, 10(5), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n5p87
   Google Scholar
• Göransson, K., & Nilholm, C. (2014). Conceptual diversities and empirical shortcomings – a critical analysis of research on inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(3), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.933545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosche, M. (2015). Was ist Inklusion? Ein Diskussions- und Positionsartikel zur Definition von Inklusion aus Sicht der empirischen Bildungsforschung [What is inclusion? A discussion and position article on the definition of inclusion from the perspective of empirical educational research]. In P. Kuhl, P. Stanat, B. Lütje-Klose, C. Gresch, H. A. Pant, & M. Prenzel (Eds.), Inklusion von Schülerinnen und Schülern mit sonderpädagogischem Förderbedarf in Schulleistungserhebungen (pp. 17–39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06604-8_1
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haug, P. (2017). Understanding inclusive education: Ideals and reality. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 19(3), 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2016.1224778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellmich, F., Löper, M. F., & Görel, G. (2019). The role of primary school teachers’ attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs for everyday practices in inclusive classrooms – A study on the verification of the ‘Theory of Planned Behaviour’. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 19, 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmke, A. (2012). Unterrichtsqualität und Lehrerprofessionalität. Diagnose, Evaluation und Verbesserung des Unterrichts [Teaching quality and teacher professionalism. Diagnosis, evaluation and improvement of teaching] (4th ed.). Klett/Kallmeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Klemm, K. (2015). Inklusion in Deutschland. Daten und Fakten [Inclusion in Germany. Data and facts]. Bertelsmann Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Klemm, K. (2022). Inklusion in Deutschlands Schulen: Eine bildungsstatistische Momentaufnahme 2020/21 [Inclusion in Germany: A snapshot of educational statistics 2020/21]. Bertelsmann Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Koster, M., Nakken, H., Pijl, S. J., & van Houten, E. (2009). Being part of the peer group: A literature study focusing on the social dimension of inclusion in education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110701284680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullmann, H., Lütje-Klose, B., & Textor, A. (2014). Eine Allgemeine Didaktik für inklusive Lerngruppen – fünf Leitprinzipien als Grundlage eines Bielefelder Ansatzes der inklusiven Didaktik [General didactics for inclusive learning groups – five guiding principles as the basis of a Bielefeldian approach to inclusive didactics]. In B. Amrhein & M. Dziak-Mahler (Eds.), Fachdidaktik inklusiv – Auf der Suche nach didaktischen Leitlinien für den Umgang mit Vielfalt in der Schule (pp. 89–107). Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Kuyini, A. B., & Desai, I. (2007). Principals’ and teachers’ attitudes and knowledge of inclusive education as predictors of effective teaching practices in Ghana. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 7(2), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2007.00086.x
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence-Brown, D. (2020). Differentiated instruction and inclusive schooling. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1223
   Google Scholar
• Lindner, K.-T., & Schwab, S. (2020). Differentiation and individualisation in inclusive education: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1813450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, H. R., & Horn, E. (2021). Definition, context, quality: Current issues in research examining high-quality inclusive education. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 40(4), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121419846342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lütje-Klose, B. (2011). Müssen Lehrkräfte ihr didaktisches Handeln verändern? Inklusive Didaktik als Herausforderung für den Unterricht [Do teachers have to change their didactic actions? Inclusive didactics as a challenge for teaching]. Lernende Schule, 14(55), 13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Lütje-Klose, B., & Urban, M. (2014). Professionelle Kooperation als wesentliche Bedingung inklusiver Schul- und Unterrichtsentwicklung. Teil 1: Grundlagen und Modelle inklusiver Kooperation [Professional cooperation as an essential condition for inclusive school and teaching development. Part 1: Basics and models of inclusive cooperation]. Vierteljahresschrift für Heilpädagogik und ihre Nachbargebiete, 83, 112–123. https://doi.org/10.2378/vhn2014.art09d
   Google Scholar
• MacFarlane, K., & Woolfson, L. M. (2013). Teacher attitudes and behavior toward the inclusion of children with social, emotional and behavioral difficulties in mainstream schools: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeskey, J., & Waldron, N. L. (2002). Inclusion and school change: Teacher perceptions regarding curricular and instructional adaptations. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 25(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640202500106
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, H. (2011). Was ist guter Unterricht? [What is good teaching?]. Cornelsen Scriptor.
   Google Scholar
• Norwich, B., & Lewis, A. (2007). How specialized is teaching children with disabilities and difficulties? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270601161667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, J. J. W., Edelstein, B., & Blanck, J. M. (2016). Awareness-raising, legitimation or backlash? Effects of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on education systems in Germany. Globalisation, Societies & Education, 14(2), 227–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2014.982076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A., Guay, F., & Valois, P. (2013). Teaching to address diverse learning needs: Development and validation of a Differentiated Instruction Scale. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(11), 1186–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2012.743604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savolainen, H., Engelbrecht, P., Nel, M., & Malinen, O.-P. (2012). Understanding teachers’ attitudes and self-efficacy in inclusive education: Implications for pre-service and in-service teacher education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 27(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2011.613603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 454–499. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307310317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senden, B., Nilsen, T., & Blömeke, S. (2021). Instructional quality: A review of conceptualizations, measurement approaches, and research findings. In M. Blikstad-Balas, K. Klette, & M. Tengberg (Eds.), Ways of analyzing teaching quality. Potentials and pitfalls (pp. 140–172). Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, U., & Jacobs, D. K. (2016). Predicting in-service educators’ intentions to teach in inclusive classrooms in India and Australia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simón, C., Muñoz-Martínez, Y., & Porter, G. L. (2021). Classroom instruction and practices that reach all learners. Cambridge Journal of Education, 51(5), 607–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.1891205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs. (2011). Inklusive Bildung von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Behinderungen in Schulen [Inclusive education of children and adolescents with disabilities in schools]. https://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2011/2011_10_20-Inklusive-Bildung.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Strogilos, V. (2018). The value of differentiated instruction in the inclusion of students with special needs/disabilities in mainstream schools. SHS Web of Conferences, 42. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184200003
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2000). Differentiation of instruction in the elementary grades. ERIC Digest. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED443572
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2018). Concept note for the 2020 global education monitoring report on inclusion. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265329
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2006). United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convention_accessible_pdf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Werning, R. (2017). Aktuelle Trends inklusiver Schulentwicklung in Deutschland. Grundlagen, Rahmenbedingungen und Entwicklungsperspektiven [Current trends in the development of inclusive schools in Germany. Basics, framework conditions and development perspectives]. In B. Lütje-Klose, S. Miller, S. Schwab, & B. Streese (Eds.), Inklusion: Profile für die Schul- und Unterrichtsentwicklung in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. Theoretische Grundlagen – Empirische Befunde – Praxisbeispiele (pp. 17–30). Waxmann.
   Google Scholar