Advanced search
Publication Cover
Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents Volume 27, 2017 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
71
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Patenting Perspective

The challenges of joint performance to method patents

Feng-Chi ChenInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, Taiwan;Department of Biological Science and Technology, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan;School of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung, TaiwanCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
Pages 393-399 | Received 13 Oct 2016, Accepted 28 Feb 2017, Published online: 13 Mar 2017

References

  • Haanes EJ, Canaves JM. Stealing fire: a retrospective survey of biotech patent claims in the wake of Mayo v. Prometheus. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30:758–760.
  • Chen FC. Divided infringement in the limelight of the patent battle field. Trends Biotechnol. 2016;34:771–773.
  • 35 USC §271(a).
  • 35 USC §271(b).
  • The Supreme court of the United States. Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 2111 (2014).
  • The supreme court of the United States. Aro Mfg. Co. v. Convertible top replacement co. 365 US 336; 1961.
  • The court of appeals for the federal circuit. BMC Resources, Inc. v. Paymentech, LP., 498 F. 3d 1373 (2007).
  • The court of appeals for the federal circuit. Muniauction, Inc. v. Thomson, Corp., 532 F. 3d 1318 (2008).
  • The court of appeals for the federal circuit mckesson technologies v. Epic Systems, Corp., No. 2010-1291 (Fed. Cir., 2011).
  • The court of appeals for the federal circuit akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc. No. 2009-1372, WL 4760450 (Fed. Cir., Aug. 13, 2015) ( en banc).
  • The court of appeals for the federal circuit. Perkinelmer, Inc. v. Intema, Ltd. No. 2011-1577 (Fed. Cir., 2012).
  • The supreme court of the United States. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., No. 10-1150 US (2012).
  • The court of appeals for the federal circuit SiRF technology, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, 601 F. 3d 1319 (2010).
  • Sachs RE. Divided infringement and the doctor-patient relationship. IP theory. Bloomington, Idiana: Indiana University Maurer School of Law. Forthcoming.
  • Guidelines for examination, 2015. European Patent Office.
  • Sampat BN, Ziedonis AA. Patent citations and the economic value of patents. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Ressearch. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2005. p. 277–298.
  • Smith D. A citation-based patent evaluation framework to reveal hidden value and enable strategic business decisions. Technol Innovation Manag Rev. 2014;4:4–13.
  • Allison JR, Lemley MA, Moore KA, et al. Valueable patents. Geo L J. 2004;92:435–494.
  • The Lewin Group (2008) Laboratory medicine: a national status report: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
  • Supreme Court of the United States Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International et al. 573 U.S.(2014).
  • Eisenberg RS. Diagnostics need not apply. J Sci Technol Law. 21.2 2015. Available from: https://www.bu.edu/jostl/archives/vol-21-2-summer-2015/
  • Sachs R. Innovation law and policy: preserving the future of personalized medicine. California: UC Davis Law Review. Epub ahead of print; 2016.
  • United States District Court SDI. Eli lilly and company v. Teva parenteral medicines, Inc. et al. 126 F. Supp. 3d 671 (2015).
  • United States District Court EDP. Cardionet, LLC. et al. v. mednet healthcare technologies, Inc. et al. 146 F. Supp. 3d. 671 (2015).
  • United states district court EDNY travel sentry, Inc. v. Tropp, F.Supp.3d (2016) WL36400645.
  • Love BJ, Ambwani S. Inter partes review: an early look at the numbers. Univ Chicago Law Rev. 2014;81:93–107.
  • Liddicoat J, Whitton T, Nicol D. Are the gene-patent storm clouds dissipating? A global snapshot. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33:347–352.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.