Current Role of Dacomitinib in Head and Neck Cancer

References

• Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(1):5–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose P, Brockton NT, Dort JC. Head and neck cancer: from anatomy to biology. Int J Cancer. 2013;133(9):2013–2023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strojan P, Corry J, Eisbruch A, et al. Recurrent and second primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: when and how to reirradiate. Head Neck. 2015;37(1):134–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi AK, Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, et al. Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(32):4294–4301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillison ML, Chaturvedi AK, Anderson WF, et al. Epidemiology of human papillomavirus-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(29):3235–3242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes DN, Van Waes C, Seiwert TY. Genetic landscape of human papillomavirus-associated head and neck cancer and comparison to tobacco-related tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(29):3227–3234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasco M, Crook T. The p53 network in head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 2003;39(3):222–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon MT, Harrington KJ. Human papillomavirus-negative pharyngeal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(29):3251–3261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mak MP, William WN. Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor for head and neck cancer chemoprevention. Oral Oncol. 2014;50(10):918–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin Grandis J, Melhem MF, Gooding WE, et al. Levels of TGF-alpha and EGFR protein in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and patient survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:824–832.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen RB. Current challenges and clinical investigations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)- and ErbB family-targeted agents in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Cancer Treat Rev. 2014;40(4):567–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler S, Siwak DR, Chai R, et al. Tumor epidermal growth factor receptor and EGFR PY1068 are independent prognostic indicators for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(8):2278–2289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi MD, Agulnik M. Targeted treatment of head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma: potential of lapatinib. Onco Targets Ther. 2014;7:245–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorsey K, Agulnik M. Promising new molecular targeted therapies in head and neck cancer. Drugs. 2013;73(4):315–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler SE, Egloff AM, Wang L, et al. Challenges in EGFRvIII detection in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0117781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinhofer I, Klinghammer K, Weichert W, et al. Expression of amphiregulin and EGFRvIII affect outcome of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck receiving cetuximab-docetaxel treatment. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(15):5197–5204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melchers LJ, Clausen MJAM, Mastik MF, et al. Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas do not express EGFRvIII. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;90(2):454–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau NG, Perez-Ordonez B, Zhang K, et al. The association between EGFR variant III, HPV, p16, c-MET, EGFR gene copy number and response to EGFR inhibitors in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Head Neck Oncol. 2011;3(1):11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forastiere AA, Leong T, Rowinsky E, et al. Phase III comparison of high-dose paclitaxel + cisplatin + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus low-dose paclitaxel + cisplatin in advanced head and neck cancer: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E1393. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(4):1088–1095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermorken JB, Mesia R, Rivera F, et al. Platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(11):1116–1127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, et al. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(6):567–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, et al. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: 5-year survival data from a phase 3 randomised trial, and relation between cetuximab-induced rash and survival. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(1):21–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermorken JB, Trigo J, Hitt R, et al. Open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab as a single agent in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who failed to respond to platinum-based therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(16):2171–2177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann M, Zouhair A, Azria D, et al. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in head and neck cancer: its role and treatment implications. Radiat Oncol. 2006;1:11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machiels J-P, Subramanian S, Ruzsa A, et al. Zalutumumab plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy: an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(4):333–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermorken JB, Stöhlmacher-Williams J, Davidenko I, et al. Cisplatin and fluorouracil with or without panitumumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SPECTRUM): an open-label phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(8):697–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramakrishnan MS, Eswaraiah A, Crombet T, et al. Nimotuzumab, a promising therapeutic monoclonal for treatment of tumors of epithelial origin. MAbs. 2009;1(1):41–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy BKM, Lokesh V, Vidyasagar MS, et al. Nimotuzumab provides survival benefit to patients with inoperable advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A randomized, open-label, phase IIb, 5-year study in Indian patients. Oral Oncol. 2014;50(5):498–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart JSW, Cohen EEW, Licitra L, et al. Phase III study of gefitinib compared with intravenous methotrexate for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(11):1864–1871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argiris A, Ghebremichael M, Gilbert J, et al. Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trial of docetaxel with or without gefitinib in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer: an eastern cooperative oncology group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(11):1405–1414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington K, Temam S, Mehanna H, et al. Postoperative adjuvant lapatinib and concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by maintenance lapatinib monotherapy in high-risk patients with resected squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(35):4202–4209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machiels J-PH, Haddad RI, Fayette J, et al. Afatinib versus methotrexate as second-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck progressing on or after platinum-based therapy (LUX-Head & Neck 1): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(5):583–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelman JA, Zejnullahu K, Gale CM, et al. PF00299804, an irreversible pan-ERBB inhibitor, is effective in lung cancer models with EGFR and ERBB2 mutations that are resistant to gefitinib. Cancer Res. 2007;67(24):11924–11932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam H-J, Ching KA, Kan J, et al. Evaluation of the antitumor effects and mechanisms of PF00299804, a pan-HER inhibitor, alone or in combination with chemotherapy or targeted agents in gastric cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012;11(2):439–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ather F, Hamidi H, Fejzo MS, et al. Dacomitinib, an irreversible Pan-ErbB inhibitor significantly abrogates growth in head and neck cancer models that exhibit low response to cetuximab. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caponigro F, Romano C, Milano A, et al. A phase I/II trial of gefitinib and radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Anticancer Drugs. 2008;19(7):739–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainsworth JD, Spigel DR, Burris HA, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy/gefitinib followed by concurrent chemotherapy/radiation therapy/gefitinib for patients with locally advanced squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer. 2009;115(10):2138–2146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregoire V, Hamoir M, Chen C, et al. Gefitinib plus cisplatin and radiotherapy in previously untreated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Radiother Oncol. 2011;100(1):62–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulieres D, Senzer NN, Vokes EE, et al. Multicenter phase II study of erlotinib, an oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(1):77–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siu LL, Soulieres D, Chen EX, et al. Phase I/II trial of erlotinib and cisplatin in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a Princess Margaret hospital phase II consortium and National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(16):2178–2183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen EEW, Davis DW, Karrison TG, et al. Erlotinib and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase I/II study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(3):247–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal EL, Chung TK, Carroll WR, et al. Assessment of erlotinib as adjuvant chemoprevention in high-risk head and neck cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(13):4263–4269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herchenhorn D, Dias FL, Viegas CMP, et al. Phase I/II study of erlotinib combined with cisplatin and radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;78(3):696–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainsworth JD, Spigel DR, Greco FA, et al. Combined modality treatment with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, bevacizumab, and erlotinib in patients with locally advanced squamous carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase II trial of the Sarah Cannon oncology research consortium. Cancer J. 2011;17(5):267–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao K, Kalapurakal S, Chalasani P, et al. A phase II study of intra-arterial cisplatin with concurrent radiation and erlotinib for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;72(3):545–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins RG, Parvathaneni U, Bauman JE, et al. Cisplatin and radiotherapy with or without erlotinib in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a randomized phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(11):1415–1421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saba NF, Hurwitz SJ, Kono SA, et al. Chemoprevention of head and neck cancer with celecoxib and erlotinib: results of a phase ib and pharmacokinetic study. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2014;7(3):283–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Souza JA, Davis DW, Zhang Y, et al. A phase II study of lapatinib in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(8):2336–2343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington K, Berrier A, Robinson M, et al. Randomised phase II study of oral lapatinib combined with chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: rationale for future randomised trials in human papilloma virus-negative disease. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(7):1609–1618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdul Razak AR, Soulières D, Laurie SA, et al. A phase II trial of dacomitinib, an oral pan-human EGF receptor (HER) inhibitor, as first-line treatment in recurrent and/or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(3):761–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HS, Kwon HJ, Jung I, et al. Phase II clinical and exploratory biomarker study of dacomitinib in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(3):544–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales AJ, Hook KE, Althaus IW, et al. Antitumor activity and pharmacokinetic properties of PF-00299804, a second-generation irreversible pan-erbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008;7(7):1880–1889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JP, Kim I, Ito E, et al. Pre-clinical characterization of Dacomitinib (PF-00299804), an irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor, combined with ionizing radiation for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e98557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brzezniak C, Carter CA, Giaccone G. Dacomitinib, a new therapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2013;14(2):247–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry DW, Bridges AJ, Denny WA, et al. Specific, irreversible inactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor and erbB2, by a new class of tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(20):12022–12027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sok JC, Coppelli FM, Thomas SM, et al. Mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRvIII) contributes to head and neck cancer growth and resistance to EGFR targeting. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(17):5064–5073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jänne PA, Boss DS, Camidge DR, et al. Phase I dose-escalation study of the pan-HER inhibitor, PF299804, in patients with advanced malignant solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(5):1131–1139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Garcia A, Masters JC, Mendes Da Costa L, et al Effect of food or proton pump inhibitor treatment on the bioavailability of dacomitinib in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;56(2):223–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi T, Boku N, Murakami H, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of dacomitinib (PF-00299804), an oral irreversible, small molecule inhibitor of human epidermal growth factor receptor-1, −2, and −4 tyrosine kinases, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Invest New Drugs. 2012;30(6):2352–2363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giri N, Masters JC, Plotka A, et al. Investigation of the impact of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of dacomitinib. Invest New Drugs. 2015;33(4):931–941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello CL, Smith E, Ruiz-Garcia A, et al. A phase I, open-label, mass balance study of [(14)C] dacomitinib (PF-00299804) in healthy male volunteers. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;72(2):379–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Garcia A, Giri N, LaBadie RR, et al. A phase I open-label study to investigate the potential drug-drug interaction between single-dose dacomitinib and steady-state paroxetine in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;54(5):555–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park K, Cho BC, Kim D-W, et al. Safety and efficacy of Dacomitinib in Korean patients with KRAS wild-type advanced non-small-cell lung cancer refractory to chemotherapy and Erlotinib or Gefitinib: A phase I/II trial. J Thorac Oncol. 2014;9(10):1523–1531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu JW, Chan K, Chen EX, et al. Pharmacokinetic assessment of dacomitinib (pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor) in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA SCCHN) following administration through a gastrostomy feeding tube (GT). Invest New Drugs. 2015;33(4):895–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello CL, LaBadie RR, Ni G, et al. The effect of dacomitinib (PF-00299804) on CYP2D6 activity in healthy volunteers who are extensive or intermediate metabolizers. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012;69(4):991–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brana I, She D, Chau NG, et al. Preoperative window-of-opportunity (WOO) study of dacomitinib (Dac) in patients (Pts) with resectable oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCC): generation of a gene expression signature (DGS) as a predictor of Dac activity. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(suppl) abstr6041.
   Google Scholar
• Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(3):205–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby AM, A’Hern RP, D’Ambrosio C, et al. Gefitinib (ZD1839, Iressa) as palliative treatment in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006;94(5):631–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramalingam SS, Blackhall F, Krzakowski M, et al. Randomized phase II study of dacomitinib (PF-00299804), an irreversible pan-human epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, versus erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(27):3337–3344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audet M, Allo G, Weng X, et al. Evaluation of potential predictive markers of efficacy of dacomitinib in patients (pts) with recurrent/metastatic SCCHN from a phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(suppl):abstr6041.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis PM, Shepherd FA, Millward M, et al. Dacomitinib compared with placebo in pretreated patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NCIC CTG BR.26): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):1379–1388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramalingam SS, Jänne PA, Mok T, et al. Dacomitinib versus erlotinib in patients with advanced-stage, previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (ARCHER 1009): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):1369–1378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang KK, Zhang Q, Rosenthal DI, et al. Randomized phase III trial of concurrent accelerated radiation plus cisplatin with or without cetuximab for stage III to IV head and neck carcinoma: RTOG 0522. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(27):2940–2950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesía R, Henke M, Fortin A, et al. Chemoradiotherapy with or without panitumumab in patients with unresected, locally advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CONCERT-1): a randomised, controlled, open-label phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;2045(14):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Magrini SM, Buglione M, Corvò R, et al. Cetuximab and radiotherapy versus Cisplatin and radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer: a randomized phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(5):427–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrelli F, Coinu A, Riboldi V, et al. Concomitant platinum-based chemotherapy or cetuximab with radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer : A systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. Oral Oncol. 2014;50(11):1041–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licitra L, Mesia R, Rivera F, et al. Evaluation of EGFR gene copy number as a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of cetuximab in combination with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: EXTREME study. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(5):1078–1087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermorken JB, Psyrri A, Mesía R, et al. Impact of tumor HPV status on outcome in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck receiving chemotherapy with or without cetuximab: retrospective analysis of the phase III EXTREME trial. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(4):801–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal DI, Harari PM, Giralt J, et al. Association of human papillomavirus and p16 status with outcomes in the IMCL-9815 phase III registration trial for patients with locoregionally advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radiotherapy with or without C. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1300–1308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar