Unfolding Patterns of Unpaid Household Work in Latin America

References

• Aguirre, Rosario. 2007. “Los cuidados familiares como problema público y objeto de políticas” [Family care as a public problem and policy issue]. In Familias y políticas públicas en América Latina: Una historia de desencuentros [Families and public policies in Latin America: A story of disagreements], edited by Irma Arriagada, 1987–98. Santiago, Chile: United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Aguirre, Rosario and Karina Batthyány. 2005. “El cuidado infantil en Montevideo. Análisis de resultados de la encuesta sobre uso del tiempo: Desigualdades sociales y de género” [Childcare in Montevideo. Analysis of time use surveys results: Gender and inequalities]. Montevideo, Uruguay: UNICEF.
   Google Scholar
• Aguirre, Rosario and Fernanda Ferrari. 2014. “ Las encuestas sobre el uso del tiempo y el trabajo no remunerado en América Latina y el Caribe. Caminos recorridos y desafíos hacia el futuro” [Time use and unpaid work surveys in Latin America and the Caribbean. Paths traveled and future challenges]. Santiago, Chile: United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Antonopoulos, Rania. 2009. “The Unpaid Care Work–Paid Work Connection.” Working Paper 86, Policy Integration and Statistics Department, International Labour Office.
   Google Scholar
• Antonopoulos, Rania and Indira Hirway, eds. 2010. Unpaid Work and the Economy: Gender, Time Use and Poverty in Developing Countries. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Anxo, Dominique, Lennart Flood, Letizia Mencarini, Ariane Pailhé, Anne Solaz, and Maria Letizia Tanturri. 2007. “Time Allocation between Work and Family over the Life-Cycle: A Comparative Gender Analysis of Italy, France, Sweden and the United States.” Discussion Paper 3193, IZA Institute of Labor Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Arriagada, Irma, ed. 2007. Familias y políticas públicas en América Latina: Una historia de desencuentros. Santiago, Chile: United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Barba Solano, Carlos. 2004. Régimen de bienestar y reforma social en México [Welfare regime and social reform in Mexico]. Santiago, Chile: United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, Thomas K. and Mathias Sinning. 2010. “Blinder–Oaxaca Decomposition for Tobit Models.” Applied Economics 42(12): 1569–75. doi: 10.1080/00036840701721612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batthyány, Karina. 2004. Cuidado infantil y trabajo ¿Un desafío exclusivamente femenino? [Childcare and work: An exclusively female challenge?]. Montevideo, Uruguay: International Labor Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, Janeen. 2005. “To Marry or Not to Marry: Marital Status and the Household Division of Labor.” Journal of Family Issues 26(3): 300–21. doi: 10.1177/0192513X04270473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, Suzanne M., Melissa A. Milkie, Liana C. Sayer, and John P. Robinson. 2000. “Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household Labor.” Social Forces 79(1): 191–228. doi: 10.2307/2675569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittman, Michael. 2004a. “Parenthood without Penalty: Time-Use and Public Policy in Australia and Finland.” In Family Time: The Social Organization of Care, edited by Nancy Folbre and Michael Bittman, 224–7. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bittman, Michael. 2004b. “Parenting and Employment What Time-Use Surveys Show.” In Family Time: The Social Organization of Care, edited by Nancy Folbre and Michael Bittman, 152–70. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blinder, Alan S. 1973. “Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural Estimates.” Journal of Human Resources 8(4): 436–55. doi: 10.2307/144855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brines, July. 1994. “Economic Dependency, Gender, and the Division of Labor at Home.” American Journal of Sociology 100(3): 652–88. doi: 10.1086/230577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budlender, Debbie. 2004. Why Should We Care About Unpaid Care Work? Harare, Zimbabwe: UNIFEM.
   Google Scholar
• Budlender, Debbie. 2007. “A Critical Review of Selected Time Use Surveys.” Gender and Development Programme Paper 2, UNRISD.
   Google Scholar
• Budlender, Debbie. 2008. “The Statistical Evidence on Care and Non-Care Work across Six Countries.” Gender and Development Programme Paper 4, UNRISD.
   Google Scholar
• Budlender, Debbie. 2010. Time Use Studies and Unpaid Care Work. New York: Routledge/UNRISD.
   Google Scholar
• Burchardt, Tania. 2008. Time and Income Poverty. Case Report 57, London School of Economics and Political Science, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion.
   Google Scholar
• Calderón Magaña, Coral. 2013. Redistributing Care: The Policy Challenge. Santiago, Chile: United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Canelas, Carla and Silvia Salazar. 2014. “Gender and Ethnic Inequalities in LAC Countries.“ IZA Journal of Labor and Development 3(18): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Colinas, Lourdes. 2008. Economía productiva y reproductiva en México: Un llamado a la conciliación [The productive and reproductive economy in Mexico: A call for conciliation]. Mexico City: United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, Mary and Katherine Rake. 2003. Gender and the Welfare State: Care, Work and Welfare in Europe and the U.S.A. London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• DANE. 2010. Encuesta Nacional de Uso del Tiempo (ENUT). Bogotá, Colombia: DANE.
   Google Scholar
• de Meester, Edith S., Clara H. Mulder, and Joos C. Droogleever Fortuijn. 2007. “Time Spent in Paid Work by Women and Men in Urban and Less Urban Contexts in the Netherlands.” Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie 98(5): 585–602. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00427.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). 2007. “El Aporte de Las Mujeres a La Igualdad En América Latina Y El Caribe” [Women’s political participation and gender parity in decision-making at all levels in the Caribbean]. X Conferencia Regional Sobre La Mujer: América Latina Y El Caribe, Quito, Ecuador, August 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). 2010a. “¿Qué Estado para qué igualdad?” [What kind of state? What kind of equality?]. Undécima Conferencia sobre la Mujer de América Latina y el Caribe, Brasília, Brazil, July 13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). 2010b. Social Panorama of Latin America 2009. Santiago, Chile: United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). 2010c. La hora de la igualdad. Brechas por cerrar, caminos por abrir [Time for equality: Closing gaps, opening trails]. Santiago, Chile: United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). 2013. Social Panorama of Latin America 2013. Santiago, Chile: United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). 2014. Social Panorama of Latin America 2014. Santiago, Chile: United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Esquivel, Valeria. 2009. “Time Use in the City of Buenos Aires Measuring, Analysing and Valuing Unpaid Care Work.” PhD diss., Institute for the Study of the Americas (ISA), School of Advanced Studies, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Esquivel, Valeria, Debbie Budlender, Nancy Folbre, and Indira Hirway. 2008. “Explorations: Time-Use Surveys in the South.” Feminist Economics 14(3): 107–52. doi: 10.1080/13545700802075135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filgueira, Fernando. 2001. “Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Construyendo Ciudadanía en América Latina.” In Ciudadanía en tránsito: Perfiles para el debate [Citizenship in transit: Profiles for debate], edited by Gerardo Caetano and Laura Gioscia, 141–63. Montevideo, Uruguay: Ediciones de la Banda Oriental.
   Google Scholar
• Filgueira, Fernando. 2005. “Welfare and Democracy in Latin America: The Development, Crises and Aftermath of Universal, Dual and Exclusionary Social States.” Draft Document for the UNRISD Project on Social Policy and Democratization.
   Google Scholar
• Floro, María and Marjorie Miles. 2003. “Time Use, Work and Overlapping Activities: Evidence from Australia.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 27(6): 881–904. doi: 10.1093/cje/27.6.881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folbre, Nancy and Julie A. Nelson. 2000. “For Love or Money – Or Both?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(4): 123–40. doi: 10.1257/jep.14.4.123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, Gigi and Charlene M. Kalenkoski. 2013. “Tobit or OLS? An Empirical Evaluation Under Different Diary Window Lengths.” Applied Economics 45(20): 2994–3010. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2012.690852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gammage, Sarah. 2010. “Time Pressed and Time Poor: Unpaid Household Work in Guatemala.” Feminist Economics 16(3): 79–112. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2010.498571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershuny, Jonathan. 2000. Changing Times: Work and Leisure in Postindustrial Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gershuny, Jonathan and John P. Robinson. 1988. “Historical Changes in the Household Division of Labor.” Demography 25(4): 537–52. doi: 10.2307/2061320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gornick, Janet C. and Marcia K. Meyers. 2003. Families That Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Government of the City of Buenos Aires. 2007. “Encuesta anual de hogares 2005: Us del tiempo” [Annual Household Survey 2005: Time-use module]. Informe de Resultados 328, Buenos Aires.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 1989. The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. New York: Avon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hook, Jennifer L. 2006. “Care in Context: Men’s Unpaid Work in 20 Countries, 1965–2003.” American Sociological Review 71(4): 639–60. doi: 10.1177/000312240607100406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). 2007. Uso del tiempo y trabajo no remunerado en el Uruguay. Módulo de la Encuesta Continua de Hogares [Time use and unpaid work in Uruguay. A module of the continuous household survey]. Montevideo, Uruguay: INE.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INDEC). 2013. Encuesta sobre trabajo no remunerado y uso del tiempo [Unpaid work and time-use survey]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: INDEC.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). 2009. Encuesta nacional sobre uso del tiempo 2009 (ENUT) [National time-use survey 2009]. Mexico City: INEGI.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadísticañ e Informática (INEI). 2010. Encuesta nacional de uso del tiempo 2010 [National time-use survey 2010]. Lima, Peru: INEI.
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Organization (ILO). 2009. Trabajo y Familia: Hacia nuevas formas de conciliación con corresponsabilidad social [Work and family: Toward new forms of reconciliation with social co-responsibility]. Lima, Peru: United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Organization (ILO). 2013. 19th International Conference of Labour Statisticians. Report of the Conference. Geneva: International Labour Office.
   Google Scholar
• Iversen, Torben and Frances Rosenbluth. 2006. “The Political Economy of Gender: Explaining Cross-National Variation in the Gender Division of Labor and the Gender Voting Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 50(1): 1–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00166.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalenkoski, Charlene M., David C. Ribar, and Leslie S. Stratton. 2005. “Parental Child Care in Single-Parent, Cohabiting and Married-Couple Families: Time-Diary Evidence from the United Kingdom.” American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 95(2): 194–8. doi: 10.1257/000282805774670176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalenkoski, Charlene M., David C. Ribar, and Leslie S. Stratton. 2006. “The Effect of Family Structure on Parents’ Child Care Time in the United States and the United Kingdom.” IZA Discussion Paper 2441, Institute of Labor Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Kalenkoski, Charlene M., David C. Ribar, and Leslie S. Stratton. 2007. “The Effect of Family Structure on Parents’ Child Care Time in the United States and the United Kingdom.” Review of Economics of the Household 5(4): 353–84. doi: 10.1007/s11150-007-9017-y
   Google Scholar
• Kalenkoski, Charlene M., David C. Ribar, and Leslie S. Stratton. 2009. “The Influence of Wages on Parents’ Allocations of Time to Child Care and Market Work in the United Kingdom.” Journal of Population Economics 22(2): 399–419. doi: 10.1007/s00148-008-0192-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmel, Jean and Rachel Connelly. 2007. “Mothers’ Time Choices: Caregiving, Leisure, Home Production, and Paid Work.” Journal of Human Resources 42(3): 643–81. doi: 10.3368/jhr.XLII.3.643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krantz-Kent, Rachel. 2009. “Measuring Time Spent in Unpaid Household Work: Results from the American Time Use Survey.” Monthly Labor Review 132(7): 46–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leira, Arnlaug. 1992. Welfare States and Working Mothers: The Scandinavian Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Jane. 1992. “Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes.” Journal of European Social Policy 2(3): 159–73. doi: 10.1177/095892879200200301
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Jane. 2003. “Economic Citizenship: A Comment.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society 10(2): 176–85. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxg009
   Google Scholar
• Martínez Franzoni, Juliana. 2008. Domesticar la Incertidumbre en América Latina. Mercado laboral, política social y familias [Taming uncertainty in Latin America. Labor market, social policy and families]. San José, Costa Rica: Editorial University of Costa Rica.
   Google Scholar
• McCloughan, Patrick., William H. Batt, Mark Costine, and Derek Scully. 2011. Second European Quality of Life Survey: Participation in Volunteering and Unpaid Work. Dublin, Ireland: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Merz, Joachim and Tim Rathjen. 2014. “Time and Income Poverty: An Interdependent Multidimensional Poverty Approach With German Time Use Diary Data.” Review of Income and Wealth 60(3): 450–79. doi: 10.1111/roiw.12117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milosavljevic, Vivian. 2009. “Las Encuestas de Uso Del Tiempo En América Latina” [Time Use Surveys in Latin America]. Paper presented at the VII Reunión Internacional de Expertas y Expertos en Encuestas sobre Uso del Tiempo, Mexico City, August 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Desarrollo Social (MIDES). 2014. Cuidados como Sistema: Propuesta para un modelo solidario y corresponsable de cuidados en Uruguay [Care as System: Proposal for a solidary and co-responsible care model in Uruguay]. Montevideo, Uruguay: United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Miranda, Veerle. 2011. “Cooking, Caring and Volunteering: Unpaid Work Around the World.” OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 116. http://www.oecd.org/berlin/47258230.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Neilson, Jeffrey and Maria Stanfors. 2014. “It’s About Time! Gender, Parenthood, and Household Divisions of Labor Under Different Welfare Regimes.” Journal of Family Issues 35(8): 1066–88. doi: 10.1177/0192513X14522240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oaxaca, Ronald L. 1973. “Male–Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets.” International Economic Review 14(3): 693–709. doi: 10.2307/2525981
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2011. “LMF2.5: Time Use for Work, Care and Other Day-to-Day Activities.” OECD Family Database. http://www.oecd.org/social/family/43199641.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2015. “Colombia.” Social Institutions and Gender Index, OECD Family Database. http://www.genderindex.org/sites/default/files/datasheets/CO.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pedrero, Mercedes. 2005. “Trabajo domestico no remunerado en México: Una estimación de su valor económico a través de la Encuesta Nacional Sobre Uso del Tiempo 2002” [Unpaid domestic work in Mexico: An estimation of its economic value using National Time Use Survey 2002]. Instituto Nacional de las Mujeres.
   Google Scholar
• Pribble, Jennifer. 2006. “Women and Welfare: The Politics of Coping with New Social Risks in Chile and Uruguay.“ Latin American Research Review 41(2): 84–111. doi: 10.1353/lar.2006.0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, Margaret G. 1934. Economics of Household Production. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sainsbury, Diane, ed. 1994. Gendering Welfare States. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sainsbury, Diane 1999. Gender and Welfare State Regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salvador, Soledad. 2007. “Comercio, género y equidad en América Latina: Generando conocimiento para la Acción Política. Estudio comparativo de la ‘economía del cuidado’ en Argentina, Brasil, Chile, Colombia, México y Uruguay” [Trade, gender and equity in Latin America: Generating knowledge for political action. Comparative study of the “care economy” in Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Uruguay]. Red Internacional de Género y Comercio, Capítulo Latinoamericano.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, Liana C. 2005. “Gender, Time and Inequality: Trends in Women’s and Men’s Paid Work, Unpaid Work and Free Time.” Social Forces 84(1): 285–303. doi: 10.1353/sof.2005.0126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton, Beth Anne. 1992. Women, Men, and Time: Gender Differences in Paid Work, Housework, and Leisure. New York: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, Beth Anne and Daphne John. 1993. “Does Marital Status Make a Difference? Housework Among Married and Cohabiting Men and Women.” Journal of Family Issues 14(3): 401–20. doi: 10.1177/019251393014003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, Jay. 2009. “Tobit or Not Tobit.” Working Paper 432, US Bureau of Labor Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Treas, Judith and Sonja Drobnic, eds. 2010. Dividing the Domestic: Men, Women, and Household Work in Cross-National Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valencia Lomelí, Enrique, David Foust Rodríguez, and Darcy Tetreault Weber. 2013. Sistemas de protección social en América Latina y el Caribe: México [Social protection systems in Latin America and the Caribbean: Mexico]. Santiago, Chile: United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Vickery, Clair. 1977. “The Time-Poor: A New Look at Poverty.” Journal of Human Resources 12(1): 27–48. doi: 10.2307/145597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villamizar García-Herreros, María Eugenia. 2011. Uso del tiempo de mujeres y hombres en Colombia: Midiendo la inequidad [Use of time for women and men in Colombia: Measuring inequity]. Santiago, Chile: United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Ross. 1999. “Wage Effects on the Volume of Unpaid Work in Nuclear Australian Households.” Australian Economic Papers 38: 91–105. doi: 10.1111/1467-8454.00044
   Google Scholar
• Wood, Cynthia A. 1997. “The First World/Third Party Criterion: A Feminist Critique of Production Boundaries in Economics.” Feminist Economics 3(3): 47–68. doi: 10.1080/135457097338654
   Google Scholar
• World Value Survey. 2015. “World Value Survey 1981–2014.” Longitudinal Aggregate v.20150418, World Values Survey Association, JDSystems Data Archive, Madrid, Spain. www.worldvaluessurvey.org.
   Google Scholar