Risk Preferences and Gender Differences in Union Membership in Late Nineteenth-Century Swedish Manufacturing

References

• Primary sources
   Google Scholar
• Specialundersökningar Tobaksindustrien 1898 [Special investigations into the tobacco industry in 1898], Statistiska avdelningen, HIII b:1, Kommerskollegiets arkiv, The Swedish National Archives (Riksarkivet), Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Undersökning av tryckerier och därmed förenad hantering [Investigation of the printing industry], Avdelningen för arbetsstatistik, HII a, Kommerskollegiets arkiv, The Swedish National Archives (Riksarkivet), Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Secondary sources
   Google Scholar
• Ashenfelter, Orley and John H. Pencavel. 1969. “American Trade Union Growth: 1900–1960.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 83(3): 434–48. doi: 10.2307/1880530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, George S. and Peter Elias. 1985. “Trade Union Membership in Great Britain: An Individual-Level Analysis.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 23(1): 71–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8543.1985.tb00182.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, Monroe. 1954. “The Economics of Trade Union Organization and Administration.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 7(4): 575–92. doi: 10.1177/001979395400700405
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand, Marianne. 2011. “New Perspectives on Gender.” In Handbook of Labor Economics, Volume 4b, edited by Orley Ashenfelter and David Card, 1545–92. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bonin, Holger, Thomas Dohmen, Armin Falk, David Huffman, and Uwe Sunde. 2007. “Cross-Sectional Earnings Risk and Occupational Sorting: The Role of Risk Attitudes.” Labour Economics 14(6): 926–37. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2007.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, Alison L. 1985. “The Free Rider Problem and a Social Custom Model of Trade Union Membership.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 100(1): 253–61. doi: 10.2307/1885744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, Alison L.. 2009. “Gender and Competition.” Labour Economics 16(6): 599–606. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2009.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnette, Joyce. 2008. Gender, Work and Wages in Industrial Revolution Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burnette, Joyce and Maria Stanfors. 2012. “Was There a Family Gap in Late Nineteenth Century Manufacturing? Evidence from Sweden.” History of the Family 17(1): 31–50. doi: 10.1080/1081602X.2012.658147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrnes, James P., David C. Miller, and William D. Schafer. 1999. “Gender Differences in Risk Taking: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 125(3): 367–83. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clawson, Mary Ann. 1989. Constructing Brotherhood: Class, Gender and Fraternalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, Cynthia. 1981. “The Material of Male Power.” Feminist Review 9: 41–58. doi: 10.1057/fr.1981.19
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, Cynthia.. 1983. Brothers: Male Dominance and Technological Change. London: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, Patricia A. 1987. Once a Cigar Maker: Men, Women and Work Culture in American Cigar Factories, 1900–1919. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Croson, Rachel and Uri Gneezy. 2009. “Gender Differences in Preferences.” Journal of Economic Literature 47(2): 448–74. doi: 10.1257/jel.47.2.448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVault, Ileen A. 2004. United Apart: Gender and the Rise of Craft Unionism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dohmen, Thomas and Armin Falk. 2011. “Performance Pay and Multidimensional Sorting: Productivity, Preferences and Gender.” American Economic Review 101(2): 556–90. doi: 10.1257/aer.101.2.556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohmen, Thomas, Armin Falk, David Huffman, Uwe Sunde, Jürgen Schupp, and Gert G. Wagner. 2011. “Individual Risk Attitudes: Measurement, Determinants, and Behavioral Consequences.” Journal of the European Economic Association 9(3): 522–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckel, Catherine C. and Philip J. Grossman. 2008. “Differences in the Economic Decision of Men and Women: Experimental Evidence.” In Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, Vol. 1, edited by Charles R. Plott and Vernon L. Smith, 509–19. New York: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Emery, George and Herbert J. C. Emery. 1999. A Young Man’s Benefit: The Independent Order of Odd Fellows and Sickness Insurance in the United States and Canada, 1860–1929. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, Liselotte and Lars Fredrik Andersson. 2015. “Efficiency and Equity: Exploring Gender Exclusion and Underwriting Efficiency in Swedish Social Insurance 1901–1910.” Presented at the Women in Changing Labor Markets Conference, Lund, Sweden, March 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, Richard B. and James L. Medoff. 1984. What Do Unions Do? New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Gerald. 2008. Labor Unions in the United States. http://eh.net/encyclopedia/labor-unions-in-the-united-states/.
   Google Scholar
• Goerke, Laszlo and Markus Pannenberg. 2011. “Trade Union Membership and Dismissals.” Labour Economics 18(2): 810–21. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2011.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goerke, Laszlo and Markus Pannenberg. 2012. “Risk Aversion and Trade-Union Membership.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 114(2): 275–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9442.2012.01694.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin, Claudia. 1990. Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gosden, Peter H. J. H. 1961. The Friendly Societies in England 1815–1875. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grazier, Suzanne and Peter J. Sloane. 2008. “Accident Risk, Gender, Family Status and Occupational Choice in the U.K.” Labour Economics 15(5): 938–57. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2007.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinnane, Timothy W. and Jochen Streb. 2011. “Moral Hazard in a Mutual Health Insurance System: German Knappschaften, 1867–1914.” Journal of Economic History 71(1): 70–104. doi: 10.1017/S0022050711000039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, Heidi. 1976. “Capitalism, Patriarchy, and Job Segregation by Sex.” Signs 1(3): 137–69. doi: 10.1086/493283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, Barry T. and John T. Addison. 1986. The Economic Analysis of Unions: New Approaches and Evidence. Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, Gerry. 2005. Women and Work in Britain Since 1840. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler-Harris, Alice. 1975. “Where are the Organized Women Workers?” Feminist Studies 3(1–2): 92–110 . doi: 10.2307/3518958
   Google Scholar
• Kornhauser, Ruth. 1961. “Some Social Determinants and Consequences of Union Membership.” Labor History 2(1): 30–61. doi: 10.1080/00236566108583862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindbom, Tage. 1938. Den svenska fackföreningsrörelsens uppkomst och tidiga historia 1872–1900 [The Swedish trade union movement’s emergence and early history 1872–1900]. Stockholm: Tidens.
   Google Scholar
• Lindbom, Tage and Evert Kuhm. 1940. Tobaksarbetarnas förbund i Sverige 1889–1939 [The Tobacco Workers’ Union in Sweden 1889–1939]. Stockholm: Svenska tobaksindustriarbetareförbundet.
   Google Scholar
• Maddox, Steven and Barry Eichengreen. 1989. “The Impact of Unions in the 1890s: The Case of the New Hampshire Show Industry.” Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Working Paper 17–89. http://irle.berkeley.edu/workingpapers/17-89.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Milkman, Ruth. 1990. “Gender and Trade Unionism in Historical Perspective.” In Women, Politics, and Change, edited by Louise A. Tilly and Patricia Gurin, 87–107. New York: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mood, Carina. 2010. “Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do What We Think We Can Do, and What We Can Do About It.” European Sociological Review 26(1): 67–82. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcp006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, Thomas S. 1986. “Are Women ‘Hard to Organize’?” Work and Occupations 13(1): 97–111. doi: 10.1177/0730888486013001007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Sonya O. 1988. “Gender Antagonism and Class Conflict: Exclusionary Strategies of Male Trade Unionists in Nineteenth-Century Britain.” Social History 13(2): 191–208. doi: 10.1080/03071028808567710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnabel, Claus. 2003. “Determinants of Trade Union Membership.” In International Handbook of Trade Unions, edited by John T. Addison and Claus Schnabel, 13–43. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Stanfors, Maria, Tim Leunig, Björn Eriksson, and Tobias Karlsson. 2014. “Gender, Productivity and the Nature of Work and Pay: Evidence from the Late Nineteenth-Century Tobacco Industry.” Economic History Review 67(1): 48–65. doi: 10.1111/1468-0289.12017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman. 1981. “The Framing of Decision and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211(4481): 453–8. doi: 10.1126/science.7455683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, Sidney and Beatrice Webb. 1920. History of Trade Unionism. 2nd ed. London: Longman & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Wessel, Nils. 1937. Svenska typografförbundet 1887–1936 [The Swedish Typographers’ Union 1887–1936]. Stockholm: Svenska typografförbundet.
   Google Scholar
• Wikander, Ulla, Alice Kessler-Harris, and Jane Lewis. 1995. Protecting Women: Labor Legislation in Europe, the United States, and Australia, 1890–1920. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar