Going Beyond Test Scores: The Gender Gap in Italian Children’s Mathematical Capability

REFERENCES

• Addabbo, Tindara, Maria Laura Di Tommaso, and Anna Maccagnan. 2014. “Gender Differences in Italian Children’s Capabilities.” Feminist Economics 20(2): 90–121. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2013.844846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allport, Gordon W. 1935. “Attitudes.” In A Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by Carl A. Murchinson, 798–844. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anelli, Massimo and Giovanni Peri. 2015. “Gender Gap in Italy: The Role of College-Majors.” In Unexplored Dimensions of Discriminations, edited by Tito Boeri, Elenora Patacchini, and Giovanni Peri, 79–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aragonés-González, Maria, Ana Rosser-Limiñana, and Diana Gil-González. 2020. “Coeducation and Gender Equality in Education Systems: A Scoping Review.” Children and Youth Services Review 111: 104837. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard, Charles and Marianne Johnson. 2005. “Gender, Expectations and Grades in Introductory Microeconomics at a US University.” Feminist Economics 11(1): 95–122. doi: 10.1080/1354570042000332560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, Francine D. and Lawrence M. Kahn. 2000. “Gender Differences in Pay.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(4): 75–99. doi: 10.1257/jep.14.4.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy, Rachel, Sarah Cattan, Claire Crawford, and Siobhan Dytham. 2018. “How Can We Increase Girls’ Uptake of Mathematics and Physics A-Level?” The Institute for Fiscal Studies. https://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/publications/comms/R149.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb-Clark, Deborah, Sonja C. Kassenboehmer, and Stefanie Schurer. 2014. “Healthy Habits: The Connection Between Diet, Exercise, and Locus of Control.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 98: 1–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb-Clark, Deborah and Stefanie Schurer. 2013. “The Stability of the Big-Five Personality Traits.” Economics Letters 115(1): 11–15. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contini, Dalit, Maria Laura Di Tommaso, and Silvia Mendolia. 2017. “The Gender Gap in Mathematics Achievement: Evidence from Italian Data.” Economics of Education Review 58(C): 32–42. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Cornwell, Christopher, David B. Mustard, and Jessica Van Parys. 2013. “Noncognitive Skills and the Gender Disparities in Test Scores and Teacher Assessments Evidence from Primary School.” Journal Human Resources 48(1): 236–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunha, Flavio, James J. Heckman, and Susanne M. Schennach. 2010. “Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation.” Econometrica 78(3): 883–931. doi: 10.3982/ECTA6551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daskalogianni, Katrina and Adrian Simpson. 2000. “Towards a Definition of Attitude: The Relationship Between the Affective and the Cognitive in Pre-University Students.” In Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, edited by Tadao Nakahara and Masataka Koyama, Vol. 3, 217–24. Hiroshima: PME.
   Google Scholar
• Di Martino, Pietro and Rosetta Zan. 2010. “‘Me and Mathematics’: Towards a Definition of Attitude Grounded on Students’ Narratives.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 13(1): 27–48. doi: 10.1007/s10857-009-9134-z
   Google Scholar
• Di Martino, Pietro, and Rosetta Zan. 2011. “Attitude Towards Mathematics: A Bridge Between Beliefs and Emotions.” Mathematics Education 43: 471–82.
   Google Scholar
• Di Tommaso, Maria Laura, Martin Raiser, and Melvyn Weeks. 2007. “Home Grown or Imported? Initial Conditions, External Anchors, and the Determinants of Institutional Reform in the Transition Economies.” Economic Journal 117(520): 858–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02053.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, Jeffrey R. and Richard P. Bagozzi. 2000. “On the Nature and Direction of Relationships Between Constructs and Measures.” Psychological Methods 5(2): 155–74. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.5.2.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenkopf, Gerald, Zohal Hessami, Urs Fischbacher, and Heinrich W. Ursprung. 2015. “Academic Performance and Single-Sex Schooling: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Switzerland.” Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 115: 123–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Else-Quest, Nicole M., Janet S. Hyde, and Marcia C. Linn. 2010. “Cross-National Patterns of Gender Differences in Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 136(1): 103–27. doi: 10.1037/a0018053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2006. Women in Science and Technology – The Business Perspective. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publication of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. Enhancing Excellence, Gender Equality and Efficiency in Research and Innovation. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publication of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2015. “Science is a Girls’ Thing, Newsletter.” November. http://science-girl-thing.eu/newsletters/november-2015.html.
   Google Scholar
• European Institute for Gender Equality. 2017a. “Economic Benefits of Gender Equality in the EU. How Gender Equality in STEM Education Leads to Economic Growth.” https://eige.europa.eu/gender-mainstreaming/policy-areas/economic-and-financial-affairs/economic-benefits-gender-equality/stem.
   Google Scholar
• European Institute for Gender Equality. 2017b. “How Closing the Gender Labour Market Activity and Pay Gap Leads to Economic Growth.” https://eige.europa.eu/gender-mainstreaming/policy-areas/economic-and-financial-affairs/economic-benefits-gender-equality/activity-pay.
   Google Scholar
• Fessler, Pirmin and Alyssa Schneebaum. 2012. “Gender and Educational Attainment in Austria.” Feminist Economics 18(1): 162–88. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2012.657661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryer, Roland G. and Steven D. Levitt. 2010. “An Empirical Analysis of the Gender Gap in Mathematics.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2(2): 210–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganley, Colleen M. and Sarah Theule Lubienski. 2016. “Mathematics Confidence, Interest, and Performance: Examining Gender Patterns and Reciprocal Relations.” Learning and Individual Differences 47: 182–93. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutman, Leslie M. and Ingrid Schoon. 2013. Non-Cognitive Skills: Evidence and Intervention. London: Education Endowment Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Haladyna, Tom, Joan Shaughnessy, and J. Michael Shaughnessy. 1983. “A Causal Analysis of Attitude Toward Mathematics.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 14(1): 19–29. doi: 10.2307/748794
   Google Scholar
• Hart, Laurie. 1989. “Describing the Affective Domain: Saying What We Mean.” In Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving, edited by Douglas Mc Leod and Verna M. Adams, 37–45. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, James J. 2008. “Schools, Skills, and Synapses.” Economic Inquiry 46(3): 289–324. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00163.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, James J. and Tim Kautz. 2012. “Hard Evidence on Soft Skills.” Labour Economics 19(4): 451–64. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2012.05.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui, Neha. 2017. “Bargaining Power and Indicators of Well-Being Among Brothel-Based Sex Workers in India.” Feminist Economics 23(3): 49–76. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2017.1315440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, Cheryl Burke, Scott B. Mackenzie, and Philip M. Podsakoff. 2003. “A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research.” Journal of Consumer Research 30(2): 199–218. doi:10.1086/376806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, Karl G. and Arthur S. Goldberger. 1975. “Estimation of a Model with Multiple Indicators and Multiple Causes of a Single Latent Variable.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 70(351): 631–9. doi:10.2307/2285946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jovanić, Maria. 2017. “GIRL POWER – Policies That Help Integrate Women into the Workforce Benefit Everyone.” IMF Finance & Development. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2017/03/pdf/picture.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Justman, Moshe and Susan J. Méndez. 2018. “Gendered Choices of STEM Subjects for Matriculation Are Not Driven by Prior Differences in Mathematical Achievement.” Economics of Education Review 64: 282–97. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolenikov, Stanislav and Gustavo Angeles. 2009. “Socioeconomic Status Measurement with Discrete Proxy Variables: Is Principal Component Analysis a Reliable Answer?” Review of Income and Wealth 1: 128–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4991.2008.00309.x
   Google Scholar
• Krishnakumar, Jaya and Florian Chávez-Juárez. 2016. “Estimating Capabilities with Structural Equation Models: How Well Are We Doing in a ‘Real’ World?” Social Indicators Research 129(2): 717–37. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-1148-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, Judy. 2013. Attitude in Mathematics: A Thematic Literature Review. British Columbia: Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Leder, Gilah C. 1985. “Measurement of Attitude to Mathematics.” For the Learning of Mathematics 34(5): 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Lubienski, Sarah, Joseph Robinson, Corinna Crane, and Colleen Ganley. 2013. “Girls’ and Boys’ Mathematics Achievement, Affect, and Experiences: Findings from ECLS-K.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 44(4): 634–45. doi: 10.5951/jresematheduc.44.4.0634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, Douglas. 1992. “Research on Affect in Mathematics Education: A Reconceptualization.” In Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, edited by Douglas Grows, 575–96. New York: McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mendolia, Silvia and Ian Walker. 2014. “The Effect of Non-Cognitive Traits on Health Behaviours in Adolescence.” Health Economics 23(9): 1146–58. doi: 10.1002/hec.3043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, Aniruddha, James Thomas Bang, and Arnab Biswas. 2015. “Gender Equality and Economic Growth: Is It Equality of Opportunity or Equality of Outcomes?” Feminist Economics 21(1): 110–35. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2014.930163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullis, Ina V. S., Michael O. Martin, Pierre Foy, and Martin Hooper. 2016. “TIMSS 2015 International Results in Mathematics.” Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, Ina V.S., Michael O. Martin, Pierre Foy, John F. Olson, Corinna Preuschoff, Ebru Erberber, Alka Arora, and Joseph Galia. 2008. TIMSS 2007 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, Linda K. and Bengt O. Muthén. 1998–2010. Mplus User’s Guide. 6th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Science. 2007. Beyond Bias and Barriers. Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, Daniel. 1969. “The Role of Attitudes in Learning Mathematics.” Arithmetic Teacher 16(8): 631–41. doi: 10.5951/AT.16.8.0631
   Google Scholar
• Nollenberger, Natalia, Nuria Rodriguez-Planas, and Almudena Sevilla. 2016. “The Math Gender Gap: The Role of Culture.” American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 106(5): 257–61. doi: 10.1257/aer.p20161121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, Martha. 2003. “Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice.” Feminist Economics 9(2&3): 33–59. doi: 10.1080/1354570022000077926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015. The ABC of Gender Equality in Education: Aptitude, Behaviour, Confidence. PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2016. PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. Empowering Women in the Digital Age. Where Do We Stand? https://www.oecd.org/social/empowering-women-in-the-digital-age-brochure.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2019. PISA 2018 Results (Volume II): Where All Students Can Succeed. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b5fd1b8f-en.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Planas, Natulia, and Nuria Nollenberger. 2018. “Let the Girls Learn! It Is not Only About Math … It’s About Gender Social Norms.” Economics of Education Review 62: 230–53. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffell, Moyra, John Mason, and Barbara Allen. 1998. “Studying Attitude to Mathematics.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 35(1): 1–18. doi: 10.1023/A:1003019020131
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya K. 1985. Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya K.. 2009. The Idea of Justice. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Sent, Esther-Mirjam and Irene van Staveren. 2019. “A Feminist Review of Behavioural Economic Research on Gender Differences.” Feminist Economics 25(2): 1–35. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2018.1532595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikora, Joanna and Artur Pokropek. 2012. “Gender Segregation of Adolescent Science Career Plans in 50 Countries.” Science Education 96(2): 234–64. doi: 10.1002/sce.20479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skagerlung, Kenny, Therese Lind, Camilla Stromback, Gustav Tinghog, and Danuiel Västfjäll. 2018. “Financial Literacy and the Role of Numeracy – How Individuals’ Attitude and Affinity with Numbers Influence Financial Literacy.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 74: 18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2018.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoet, Gijsbert, Drew H. Bailey, Alex M. Moore, and David C. Geary. 2016. “Countries with Higher Levels of Gender Equality Show Larger National Sex Differences in Mathematics Anxiety and Relatively Lower Parental Mathematics Valuation for Girls.” PLoS One 11(4): e0153857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Phan, Phuc and Martin O’Brien. 2019. “Multidimensional Wellbeing Inequality in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Vietnam.” Social Indicators Research 145: 157–83. doi: 10.1007/s11205-019-02104-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, Wendy and Alice H. Eagly. 2012. “Biosocial Construction of Sex Differences and Similarities in Behavior.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 46: 55–123. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-394281-4.00002-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellner, Miriam. 1970. “Self-esteem, Reception, and Influenceability.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 15(1): 87–93. doi:10.1037/h0029201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar