Has the Feminist Economics Intellectual Project Lost its Way? An Analysis of the Journal’s Evolution

References

• Agarwal, Bina. 1997. “‘Bargaining’ and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household.” Feminist Economics 3(1): 1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Aidis, Ruta, Friederike Welter, David Smallbone, and Nina Isakova. 2007. “Female Entrepreneurship in Transition Economies: The Case of Lithuania and Ukraine.” Feminist Economics 13(2): 157–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist, Josh, Pierre Azoulay, Glenn Ellison, Ryan Hill, and Susan Feng Lu. 2020. “Inside Job or Deep Impact? Extramural Citations and the Influence of Economic Scholarship.” Journal of Economic Literature 58(1): 3–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apodaca, Clair. 2009. “Overcoming Obstacles in Quantitative Feminist Research.” Politics & Gender 5(3): 419–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahn, Kate. 2022. “In Conversation with Cecilia Conrad.” Washington Center for Equitable Growth. https://equitablegrowth.org/in-conversation-with-cecilia-conrad/.
   Google Scholar
• Bahramitash, Roksana and Jennifer C. Olmsted. 2014. “Choice and Constraint in Paid Work: Women from Low-Income Households in Tehran.” Feminist Economics 20(4): 260–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bárcena-Martín, Elena and Ana I. Moro-Egido. 2013. “Gender and Poverty Risk in Europe.” Feminist Economics 19(2): 69–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechtold, Brigitte H. 1999. “The Practice of Econometrics: A Feminist Critique.” Review of Radical Political Economics 31(3): 40–52.
   Google Scholar
• Berik, Günseli, Yana van der Meulen Rodgers, and Stephanie Seguino. 2009. “Feminist Economics of Inequality, Development, and Growth.” Feminist Economics 15(3): 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettio, Francesca and Janneke Plantenga. 2004. “Comparing Care Regimes in Europe.” Feminist Economics 10(1): 85–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braunstein, Elissa. 2014. “Patriarchy Versus Islam: Gender and Religion in Economic Growth.” Feminist Economics 20(4): 58–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, Rose M., Cecilia A. Conrad, and Mary C. King. 2002. “The Complexities and Potential of Theorizing Gender, Caste, Race, and Class.” Feminist Economics 8(2): 3–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Card, David, Stefano DellaVigna, Patricia Funk, and Nagore Iriberri. 2020. “Are Referees and Editors in Economics Gender Neutral?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 135(1): 269–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Sumi, Kimberlé W. Crenshaw, and Leslie McCall. 2013. “Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 38(4): 785–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colander, David, Richard Holt, and Barkley Rosser Jr. 2004. “The Changing Face of Mainstream Economics.” Review of Political Economy 16(4): 485–99.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Anitdiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forum 1(8): 139–67.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Kathy. 2008. “Intersectionality as Buzzword: A Sociology of Science Perspective on What Makes a Feminist Theory Successful.” Feminist Theory 9(1): 67–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England, Paula. 1993. “The Separative Self, Androcentric Bias in Neoclassical Assumption.” In Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics, edited by Marianne A. Ferber and Julie A. Nelson, 37–53. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar Andrae, Bernardita. 2017. “Women in Business in Late Nineteenth-Century Chile: Class, Marital Status, and Economic Autonomy.” Feminist Economics 23(2): 33–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinel, Camila Orozco and Rebeca Gomez Betancourt. 2022. “A History of the Institutionalization of Feminist Economics through its Tensions and Founders.” History of Political Economy 54(S1): 159–92.
   Google Scholar
• Figart, Deborah M. 1997. “Gender as More than a Dummy Variable: Feminist Approaches to Discrimination.” Review of Social Economy 55(1): 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folbre, Nancy. 2006. “Measuring Care: Gender, Empowerment, and the Care Economy.” Journal of Human Development 7(2): 183–99.
   Google Scholar
• Friedemann-Sánchez, Greta. 2012. “Caregiving Patterns in Rural Andean Colombia.” Feminist Economics 18(3): 55–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaziani, Amin and Matt Brim. 2019. “Queer Methods.” In Imagining Queer Methods, edited by Amin Ghaziani and Matt Brim, 3–27. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guyan, Kevin. 2022. Queer Data: Using Gender, Sex and Sexuality Data for Action. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hamermesh, Daniel S. 2013. “Six Decades of Top Economics Publishing: Who and How?” Journal of Economic Literature 51(1): 162–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, Joyce P. 2021. “Feminist Use of Quantitative Methods.” In The Routledge Handbook of Feminist Economics, edited by Ebru Kongar and Günseli Berik, 129–37. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jayaratne, Toby Epstein and Abigail J. Stewart. 2015. “Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in the Social Sciences: Current Feminist Issues and Practical Strategies.” In Just Methods: An Interdisciplinary Feminist Reader, edited by Alison M. Jaggar, 44–57. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kalabikhina, Irina E., and Sofia M. Rebrey. 2022. “Economics of Gender: A Bibliometric Analysis.” Russian Journal of Economics 8(3): 295–314.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, Elizabeth. 1997. “The Intra-Household Economics of Voice and Exit.” Feminist Economics 3(3): 25–46.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O. 1998. “Beyond Dichotomy: Conversations Between International Relations and Feminist Theory.” International Studies Quarterly 42(1): 193–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Marlene. 1997. “Poor Women Survey Poor Women: Feminist Perspectives in Survey Research.” Feminist Economics 3(2): 99–117.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Marlene. 2022. “Gender in Economics Fifty Years Ago and Today: Feminist Economists Speak.” Review of Radical Political Economics 55(1): 8–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klasen, Stephan and Dana Schüler. 2011. “Reforming the Gender-Related Development Index and the Gender Empowerment Measure: Implementing Some Specific Proposals.” Feminist Economics 17(1): 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Frederic. 2008. “A Comment on “The Citation Impact of Feminist Economics”.” Feminist Economics 14(1): 137–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lex, Alexander, Nils Gehlenborg, Hendrik Strobelt, Romain Vuillemot, and Hanspeter Pfister. 2014. “UpSet: Visualization of Intersecting Sets.” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20(12): 1983–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Martha. 2005. “The Empirical Challenges of Feminist Economics: The Example of Economic Restructuring.” In Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspective on Economics, edited by Edith Kuiper, Jolande Sap, Notburga Ott, Susan Feiner, and Zafiris Tzannatos, 127–43. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, Patrick L., Samuel L. Myers Jr, and Margaret Simms. 2022. “Racial Isolation and Marginalization of Economic Research on Race and Crime.” Journal of Economic Literature 60(2): 494–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, Leslie. 2005. “The Complexity of Intersectionality.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30(3): 1771–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Jane E. and Yana van der Meulen Rodgers. 2008. “Economic Importance and Statistical Significance: Guidelines for Communicating Empirical Research.” Feminist Economics 14(2): 117–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, Julie A. 1995. “Feminism and Economics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(2): 131–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, Julie A. 2016. “Not-So-Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Risk Taking.” Feminist Economics 22(2): 114–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, Martha. 2003. “Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice.” Feminist Economics 9(2–3): 33–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearse, Rebecca, James N. Hitchcock, and Helen Keane. 2019. “Gender, Inter/Disciplinarity and Marginality in the Social Sciences and Humanities: A Comparison of Six Disciplines.” Women's Studies International Forum 72: 109–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearse, Rebecca and Helen Keane. 2023. “How Feminist Knowledge is Made in and Beyond Disciplines.” Gender and Education 35(1): 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, Marilyn. 1999. “Parasitic-Industries Analysis and Arguments for a Living Wage for Women in the Early Twentieth-Century United States.” Feminist Economics 5(1): 61–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, Marilyn. 2004. “Social Provisioning as a Starting Point for Feminist Economics.” Feminist Economics 10(3): 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pujol, Michèle. 1997. “Explorations - Introduction: Broadening Economic Data and Methods.” Feminist Economics 3(2): 119–20.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, Katherine N. 2002. “Social Capital, Microfinance, and the Politics of Development.” Feminist Economics 8(1): 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, Mike. 2007. “Academic Knowledge and Expert Authority in American Economics.” Sociological Perspectives 50(1): 101–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redmount, Esther. 2005. “Toward a Feminist Econometrics.” In Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economics, edited by Edith Kuiper, Jolande Sap, Notburga Ott, Susan Feiner, and Zafiris Tzannatos, 168–72. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, Ingrid. 2003. “Sen's Capability Approach and Gender Inequality: Selecting Relevant Capabilities.” Feminist Economics 9(2–3): 61–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya. 2004. “Capabilities, Lists, and Public Reason: Continuing the Conversation.” Feminist Economics 10(3): 77–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprague, Joey. 2016. Feminist Methodologies for Critical Researchers: Bridging Differences. Walnut Creek, CA: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Strassmann, Diana. 1995. “Creating a Forum for Feminist Economic Inquiry.” Feminist Economics 1(1): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Strassmann, Diana. 1997. “Editorial: Exploring the Methodological Boundaries of Economics.” Feminist Economics 3(2): vii–viii.
   Google Scholar
• Strassmann, Diana. 2004. “Editorial: Feminist Economics – It Flourishes.” Feminist Economics 10(3): 1–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tejani, Sheba. 2019. “What’s Feminist about Feminist Economics?” Journal of Economic Methodology 26(2): 99–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2019. “Statistical Annex of World Economic Situation and Prospects, 2019.” United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN/DESA), the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/WESP2019_BOOK-ANNEX-en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Westmarland, Nicole. 2001. “The Quantitative/Qualitative Debate and Feminist Research: A Subjective View of Objectivity.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2(1).
   Google Scholar
• Woolley, Frances. 2005. “The Citation Impact of Feminist Economics.” Feminist Economics 11(3): 85–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar