1,435
Views
69
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Feminism, Realism, and Universalism

Pages 25-59 | Published online: 02 Dec 2010

REFERENCES

  • Archer, Margaret, Roy Bhaskar, Andrew Collier, Tony Lawson, and Alan Norrie(eds.). 1998. Critical Realism: Essential Readings. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Assiter, Alison. 1996. Enlightened Women: Modernist Feminism in a Postmodern Age. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Badgett, M. V. Lee. 1995. "Gender, Sexuality, and Sexual Orientation: All in the Feminist Family?" Feminist Economics 1(1):121-39.
  • Berik, Gunseli. 1997. The Need for Grossing the Method Boundaries in Economics Research." Feminist Economics 3(2):121-6.
  • Bordo, Susan. 1993. "Feminism, Post Modernism and Gender Scepticism," in Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. The Regents of the University of California. Reprinted in Anne G Herrmann and Abigail Stewart(eds.). 1994. Theorizing Feminism: Parallel Trends in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Boulder, GO: Westview Press(page references to the latter).
  • Collins, Patricia Hill. 1991. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. London and New York: Routledge.
  • England, Paula. 1993. The Separative Self: Androcentric Bias in Neoclassical Assumptions, "in Marianne A. Ferber and Julie A. Nelson(eds.) Beyond Economic Man:Feminist Theory and Economics, pp. 37-53. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Esim, Simel. 1997. "Can Feminist Methodology Reduce Power Hierarchies in Research Settings?" Feminist Economics 3(2):137-40.
  • Ferber, Marianne A. and Julie A. Nelson(eds.). 1993. Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Flax, Jane. 1990. "Postmodernism and Gender Relations in Feminist Theory," in Linda J. Nicholson(ed.) Feminism/Postmodernism, pp. 39-62. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Folbre, Nancy. 1993. "How Does She Know? Feminist Theories of Gender Bias in Economics." History of Political Economy 25(4):167-84.
  • Flicker, Miranda. 1994. "Knowledge as Construct: Theorizing the Role of Gender in Knowledge," in Kathleen Lennon and Margaret Whitford(eds.) Knowing the Difference: Feminist Perspectives in Methodology. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Garfinkel, Alan. 1981. Farms of Explanation, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Grapard, UlIa. 1995. "Robinson Crusoe: The Quintessential Economic Man?" Feminist Economics 1(1):33-52.
  • Grimshaw, Jean. 1986. Feminist Philosophers: Women's Perspectives on Philosophical Traditions. Brighton, U.K: Wheatsheaf Books.
  • Haraway, Donna. 1985. "A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s." Socialist Review 15(2): 65-108. Reprinted in Donna Haraway. 1991.
  • Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, pp. 149-81, 243-8. New York: Routledge and Chapman & Hall. Also reprinted in Anne Herrmann and Abigail Stewart(eds.) 1994. Theorizing Feminism: Parallel Trends in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • -----. 1988. "Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective." Feminist Studies 14(575-99. Reprinted in Evelyn Fox Keller and Helen E. Longino(eds.) Feminism and Science. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press(page references to the latter).
  • Handing, Sandra. 1993. "Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is 'Strong Objectivity'?" in Linda Alcoff and Elizabeth Potter(eds.) Feminist Epistemologies. London and New York: Routledge. Reprinted in Evelyn Fox Keller and Helen E. Longino(eds.) Feminism and Science. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press(page references to the latter).
  • -----. 1995. "Can Feminist Thought Make Economics More Objective?" Feminist Economics 1(1): 7-32.
  • Hartsock, Nancy C. M. 1983. The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism," in Sandra Hading and Merrill B. Hintikka(eds.) Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Reidel. Reprinted in(for example)
  • Linda Nicholson(ed.) The Second Wave: A Reader in Feminist Theory, pp. 216-40. London and New \fork: Routledge(page references to the latter version).
  • Hutchings, Kimberly. 1994. The Personal is International: Feminist Epistemology and the Case of International Relations," in Kathleen Lennon and Margaret Whitford(eds.) Knowing the Difference: Feminist Perspectives in Methodology. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Jacobsen, Joyce P. and Andrew A. Newman. 1997. "What Data Do Economists Use? The Case of Labor Economics and Industrial Relations." Feminist Economics 3(2):127-30.
  • Lawson, Tony. 1997a. Economics and Reality. London and New York: Routledge.
  • -----. 1997b. "Situated Rationality." Journal of Economic Methodology 4(1):101-25.
  • Lazreg, Marnia. 1994. "Women's Experience and Feminist Epistemology: A Critical Neo-Rationalist Approach," in Kathleen Lennon and Margaret Whitford(eds.) Knowing the Difference: Feminist Perspectives in Methodology. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Lewis, David. 1986. "Causal Explanation," in Philosophical Papers, Vol. D, pp. 214-40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lipton, Peter. 1991. Inference to the Best Explanation. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Longino, Helen. 1987. "Can There Be A Feminist Science?" Hypatia 2(3)(Fall). Reprinted in Ann Carry and Marilyn Perasall(eds.). 1996. Women, Knowledge and Reality. London and New York: Routledge.
  • -----. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Enquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • McCloskey, Deirdre. 1997. "You Shouldn't Want a Realism If You Have a Rhetoric," mimeo. Erasmus University of Rotterdam and the University of Iowa.
  • McDonald, Martha. 1995. The Empirical Challenges of Feminist Economics: The Example of Economic Restructuring," in Edith Kuiper andjolande Sap(eds.) Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economics, pp. 175-97. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Nelson, Julie. 1993. "Value-Free or Valueless? Notes on the Pursuit of Detachment in Economics." History of Political Economy 25(4): 121-43.
  • -----. 1996. Feminism, Objectivity & Economics. London and New York: Routledge.
  • New, Caroline. 1998. "Realism, Deconstruction and the Feminist Standpoint," mimeo. Bath Spa University College.
  • Nussbaum, Martha Q 1995. "Human Capabilities, Female Human Beings," in Martha C. Nussbaum and Jonathan Glover(eds.) Women, Culture, and Development: A Study of Human Capabilities. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Olmsted, Jennifer C. 1997. Telling Palestinian Women's Economic Stories."Femin istEconomics(3)2:141-51.
  • Ott, Notburga. 1995. "Fertility and Division of Work in the Family: a Game Theoretic Model of Household Decisions", in Edith Kuiper andjolonde Sap(eds.) Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economics, London and New York: Routledge.
  • Phipps, Shelley A. and Peter S. Burton 1995. "Social/Institutional Variables and Behavior within Households: An Empirical Test using the Luxembourg Income Study." Feminist Economics 1(1):151-74.
  • Pujol, Michèle. 1995. "Into the Margin," in Edith Kuiper andjolande Sap(eds.) Out of the Margin; Feminist Perspectives on Economics, pp. 17-35. London and New York: Routledge.
  • -----. 1997. "Broadening Economic Data and Methods." Feminist Economics 3(2):119-20.
  • Redmount, Esther. 1995. Towards a Feminist Econometrics," in Edith Kuiper and Jolande Sap(eds.) Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economics, pp. 216-22. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Salanti, Andrea and Ernesto Screpanti(eds.). 1997. Pluralism in Economics: New Perspectives in History and Methodology. Cheltenham, U.K: Edward Elgar.
  • Scheman, Naomi. 1993. Though This Be Method, Yet There is Madness in It: Paranoia and Liberal Epistemology," in Louise Antony and Charlotte Witt(eds.) A Mind of One's Own, Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Reprinted in Evelyn Fox Keller and Helen E. Longino(eds.) Feminism and Science, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Seiz, Janet. 1993. "Feminism and the History of Economic Thought." History of Politicol Economy 25(4):185-201.
  • -----. 1995. "Epistemology and the Tasks of Feminist Economics." Feminist Economics 1(3):110-18.
  • Smith, Dorothy. 1987. The Everyday World as Problematic. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
  • -----. 1990. The Conceptual Practices of Power. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
  • Soper, Kate. 1990. Troubled Pleasures: Writings on Politics, Gender and Hedonism. London and New York: Verso.
  • -----. 1991. "Postmodernism, Critical Theory and Critical Realism," in Roy Bhaskar(ed.) A Meeting of Minds. London: The Socialist Society.
  • Strassmann, Diana. 1993a. "Not a Free Market: The Rhetoric of Disciplinary Authority in Economics," in Marianne A. Ferber and Julie A. Nelson(eds.) BeyondEcanomicMan:Feminist Theory and Economics, pp. 54-68. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • -----. 1993b. The Stories of Economics and the Power of the Storyteller." History of Political Economy 25(4):147-65.
  • -----. 1994. "Feminist Thought and Economics; Or, What do the Visigoths Know?" American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 153-8.
  • -----. 1995. "Editorial: Creating a Forum for Feminist Economic Inquiry." Feminist Economics 1(1):1-5.
  • ----- and Livia Polanyi. 1995. The Economist as Storyteller What Texts Reveal," in Edith Kuiper and Jolande Sap(eds.) Out of lhe Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economics. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Tiles, Mary. 1987. "A Science of Mars or of Venus?" Philosophy 62. Reprinted in Evelyn Fox Keller and Helen E. Longino(eds.) Feminism and Science. Oxford and New York Oxford University Press.
  • Van Fraassen, Bas Q 1980. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Van Stavern, Irene. 1997. "Focus Groups: Contributing to a Gender-Aware Methodology." Feminist Economics 3(2):131-7.
  • Weintraub, E. Roy. 1989. "Methodology Doesn't Matter, But the History of Thought Might" Scandinavian Journal of Economics 91(2):477-93.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.