Feelings of error in reasoning—in search of a phenomenon

References

• Carbonnell, L., & Falkenstein, M. (2006). Does the error negativity reflect the degree of response conflict? Brain Research, 1095, 124–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles, M. E., Frost, R. O., Heimberg, R. G., & Rhéaume, J. (2003). Not just right experiences: Perfectionism, obsessive–compulsive features and general psychopathology. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 681–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles, M. E., Heimberg, R. G, Frost, R. O., & Steketee, G. (2005). Not just right experiences and obsessive–compulsive features: Experimental and self-monitoring perspectives. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 153–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W. (2012). Bias and conflict: A case for logical intuitions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 28–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W., & Bonnefon, J. F. (2013). The whys and whens of individual differences in individual thinking biases. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 172–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W., Cromheeke, S., & Osman, M. (2011). Biased but in doubt: Conflict and decision confidence. PLoS One, 6(1), e15954. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W., & Feremans, V. (2012). Development of heuristic bias detection in elementary school. Developmental Psychology, 49, 258–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W., & Glumicic, T. (2008). Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking. Cognition, 106, 1248–1299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W., Moyens, E., & Vansteenwegen, D. (2010). Feeling we’re biased: Autonomic arousal and reasoning conflict. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 208–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W., Rossi, S., & Houdé, O. (2013). Bats, balls, and substitution sensitivity: Cognitive misers are no happy fools. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 269–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognitive and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1, 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S., & McCloskey, M. (1981). Decisions about ignorance: Knowing that you don't know. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 311–325.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, A., Watkins, E., Mansell, W., & Shafran, R. (2004). Cognitive behavioural processes across psychological disorders. A transdiagnostic approach to research and treatment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Strauss, Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich , D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koriat, A. (2000). The feeling of knowing: Some metatheoretical implications for consciousness and control. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 149–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., & Levy-Sadot, R. (1999). Processes underlying metacognitive judgements: Information based and experience-based monitoring of one's own knowledge. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 483–502). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J. (2000). Feelings and judgements of knowing: Is there a special poetic state? Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 178–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1980). Norms of 300 general-information questions: Accuracy of recall, latency of recall, and feeling-of-knowledge ratings. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 338–368.
   Google Scholar
• Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1994). Inevitable illusions. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Prowse Turner, J. A., & Thompson, V. (2009). The role of training, alternative models, and logical necessity in determining confidence in syllogistic reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 15, 69–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reder, L., & Schunn, C. (1996). Metacognition does not imply awareness: Strategy choice is governed by implicit learning and memory. In L. Reder (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 45–77). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Shynkaruk, J. M., & Thompson, V. A. (2006). Confidence and accuracy in deductive reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 34, 619–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 672–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A. (2009). Dual process theories: A metacognitive perspective. In J. Evans & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 171–195). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A., Evans, J. St. B. T., & Campbell, J. I. C. (2013). Matching bias on the selection task: It's fast and it feels good. Thinking & Reasoning, 19, 431–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A., & Johnson, S. J. (2014). Conflict, metacognition, and analytic thinking. Thinking & Reasoning, 20, 215–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A., & Morsanyi, K. (2012). Analytic thinking: Do you feel like it? Mind & Society, 11, 93–105.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A., Prowse Turner, J. A., & Pennycook, G. (2011). Intuition, reason, and metacognition. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 107–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar